Difference between revisions of "Chronology of Bemidbar 1 – 10/2"
m |
m |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
<point><b>The Census</b> – Cassuto proposes that the censuses of <a href="Shemot30-11-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 30 </a>and Bemidbar 1 were both part of a single extended process.<fn>He uses this to explain how the final tallies (See <a href="Shemot38-25-28" data-aht="source">Shemot 38:26</a> and <a href="Bemidbar1-46" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 1:46</a>) were identical.  See <a href="Censuses in the Wilderness" data-aht="page">Censuses in the Wilderness</a> for elaboration.</fn>  At the time of the construction of the Tabernacle, the people gave their half-shekels, names and other information, but it was only in the second month of the following year that the data was analyzed and all of the necessary calculations were made.<fn>Cassuto points to documentation of other censuses in the Ancient Near East and to David's census described in Shemuel II 24:8 as evidence that such counts were a long drawn out process that could take many months.</fn>  As this part of the census provides important background for Sefer Bemidbar it is recorded here.</point> | <point><b>The Census</b> – Cassuto proposes that the censuses of <a href="Shemot30-11-16" data-aht="source">Shemot 30 </a>and Bemidbar 1 were both part of a single extended process.<fn>He uses this to explain how the final tallies (See <a href="Shemot38-25-28" data-aht="source">Shemot 38:26</a> and <a href="Bemidbar1-46" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 1:46</a>) were identical.  See <a href="Censuses in the Wilderness" data-aht="page">Censuses in the Wilderness</a> for elaboration.</fn>  At the time of the construction of the Tabernacle, the people gave their half-shekels, names and other information, but it was only in the second month of the following year that the data was analyzed and all of the necessary calculations were made.<fn>Cassuto points to documentation of other censuses in the Ancient Near East and to David's census described in Shemuel II 24:8 as evidence that such counts were a long drawn out process that could take many months.</fn>  As this part of the census provides important background for Sefer Bemidbar it is recorded here.</point> | ||
<point><b>Descendants of Aharon</b> – According to Cassuto it is logical why <a href="Bemidbar3-1-16" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 3:1 </a>first recounts the lineage of Aharon "on the day that Hashem spoke to Moshe BaHar Sinai", mentioning all four sons, and then qualifies that Nadav and Avihu died. When the census began they had been alive, but after their deaths the text needed to update the list to match the reality of the second year.</point> | <point><b>Descendants of Aharon</b> – According to Cassuto it is logical why <a href="Bemidbar3-1-16" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 3:1 </a>first recounts the lineage of Aharon "on the day that Hashem spoke to Moshe BaHar Sinai", mentioning all four sons, and then qualifies that Nadav and Avihu died. When the census began they had been alive, but after their deaths the text needed to update the list to match the reality of the second year.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Appointment of the Levites</b> – According to this position, the appointment of the Levites also took place during the first year. </point> | + | <point><b>Appointment of the Levites</b> – According to this position, the appointment of the Levites also took place during the first year.  They were rewarded to take the place of the firstborns after their meritorious deeds when the nation sinned with the Golden Calf.</point> |
<point><b>Bemidbar 7: Dedication of the Altar</b> – According to this approach, the dedication of the Altar took place in the first month of the second year after the Tabernacle was erected, as per the simple reading of Bemidbar 7:1.</point> | <point><b>Bemidbar 7: Dedication of the Altar</b> – According to this approach, the dedication of the Altar took place in the first month of the second year after the Tabernacle was erected, as per the simple reading of Bemidbar 7:1.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>"הֵם הָעֹמְדִים עַל הַפְּקֻדִים"</b> – Since the census</point> | + | <point><b>"הֵם הָעֹמְדִים עַל הַפְּקֻדִים"</b> – Since the census began prior to the dedication, it is not problematic to refer to the princes as "those who officiated in the counting".</point> |
− | <point><b>Gifts to Levites</b></point> | + | <point><b>Gifts to Levites</b> – If the Levites had already been appointed in the first year, it is understandable how the princes give them gifts related to their tasks.</point> |
+ | <point><b>Pesach</b> – According to Cassuto, there is no reason to suggest that Chapter 9 is out of order.  It follows the events of Chapter 7, continuing to speak of the events of the second half of the first month.</point> | ||
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
</category> | </category> |
Version as of 11:33, 31 May 2016
Chronology of Bemidbar 1 – 10
Exegetical Approaches
Chronological
The events of Chapters 1-10 are told chronologically.
Chapters 7-9 Later Than They Appear
Though Chapters 7 and 9 refer to events of the first month their main focus is events of the second month. As such, Bemidbar 1-10 all takes place in one month, in the order written.
Chapters 1-4 Earlier Than They Appear
Though the censuses of Chapters 1-4 are dated to the second month, they were really part of an extended process which began when the Tabernacle was being constructed. As such, the book of Bemidbar really opens with a summation of events begun in the first year, and then continues in order.
Not Chronological
The events of Bemidbar 1-10 are not written in the order in which they occurred.
Later Events Told Earlier
The main story-line of Sefer Bemidbar begins in Chapter 9, in the first month of the second year. The first seven chapters contain material dated later since they are thematically related to the Mishkan and simply form an appendix to the Books of Shemot and Vayikra.