Chronology of Bemidbar 1 – 10/2

Chronology of Bemidbar 1 – 10

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

In Chronological Order

Despite first impressions, Bemidbar 1-10 maintains a basic chronological order.  This approach subdivides regarding which chapters are not as they seem:

Chapters 7-9 Occurred Later

Though Bemidbar 7 and 9 make passing references to the first month, their main focus is on events which took place in the second month.  Thus, the entire unit of Bemidbar 1-10 recounts events of the second month, and there is no achronology.

Sources:AbarbanelBemidbar 7:1Bemidbar 9:1About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel

Chapters 1 – 4 – According to Abarbanel the censuses and appointment of the Levites described in Bemidbar 1-4 all occurred in the second month, as the simple reading of the verses would imply.

Bemidbar 7:1 – "וַיְהִי בְּיוֹם כַּלּוֹת מֹשֶׁה לְהָקִים אֶת הַמִּשְׁכָּן וַיִּמְשַׁח אֹתוֹ" – According to Abarbanel, the time marker, "וַיְהִי בְּיוֹם כַּלּוֹת מֹשֶׁה לְהָקִים אֶת הַמִּשְׁכָּן", only applies to the anointment of the vessels, not to the gifts of the princes described thereafter. He asserts that Moshe began anointing the vessels after erecting the Mishkan in the first month, but this was an extended process that lasted several weeks.

Dedication of the altar – As the princes brought their sacrifices only after the vessels were anointed, the dedication of the altar first took place in the second month. As such, with the exception of the first verse, all the events of Chapter 7 really occurred in the second month, after the censuses of Chapters 1-4.

Relationship between מילואים and חנוכת המזבח – According to Abarbanel the two events did not overlap at all, as one took place in Nisan and the other in Iyar.  The prince's sacrifices are known as "the dedication of the altar" not because the altar had not been used earlier, but because they were the fist to bring sacrifices upon it as individual Israelites.

"הֵם הָעֹמְדִים עַל הַפְּקֻדִים" – Abarbanel points to the description of the princes as "those who officiated in the counting" to support his position.  The verse can describe the princes in this manner only because the census took place before the dedication of the altar.

Gifts to Levites – The fact that the princes give the Levites wagons to aid them in their tasks  further suggests that the events of Chapter 7 took place only after the Levites were appointed and assigned specific roles.

"וַיַּקְרִיבוּ הַנְּשִׂאִים... בְּיוֹם הִמָּשַׁח אֹתוֹ" – This verse is difficult for Abarbanel as it suggests that the anointment took only one day and that the princes brought their sacrifices on that very day. Abarbanel asserts that the word "day" can refer not only to a specific day but also to an extended period of time.¹  Thus, the verse is sharing that after the period of anointment, the princes sacrificed.

Bemidbar 8 – Purification of the Levites – According to this position, this chapter is in its proper place and took place in Iyar, after the dedication of the altar.  Abarbanel distinguishes between the Levites' census and their appointment to replace the firstborns discussed in Chapter 3, and their actual preparation for service in Chapter 8.  The two events were distinct, but both happened in Iyar within a few days of each other.

Bemidbar 9 – Pesach – Abarbanel asserts that Chapter 9 opens with Pesach in the first month only as a prelude to the main topic of the chapter which is Pesach Sheni.²  Thus, this chapter, too, focuses on events of the second month, continuing where the previous ones left off.

What is Sefer Bemidbar about?

Chapters 1-4 Conclude an Earlier Process

Though the census in Bemidbar 1 mentions the second month, the first few chapters of Bemidbar are actually the summary of an extended process which began already in the first year, during the construction of the Tabernacle.  As such, the book of Bemidbar opens with a summation of events begun in the first year, and then continues in order.

Sources:An approach based on U. CassutoShemot 38:25About Prof. Umberto Cassuto³

Bemidbar 1 –The Census – Cassuto proposes that the censuses of Shemot 30 and Bemidbar 1 were both part of a single extended process.⁴  At the time of the construction of the Tabernacle, the people gave their half-shekels, names and other information, but it was only in the second month of the following year that the data was analyzed and all of the necessary calculations were made.⁵  As this part of the census provides important background for Sefer Bemidbar it is recorded here.

Bemidbar 3 – Appointment of the Levites – According to this position, the appointment of the Levites and their census also took place during the first year.  Cassuto suggests that they were rewarded to take the place of the firstborns after their meritorious deeds when the nation sinned with the Golden Calf.  See Selection of the Priests and Levites for elaboration on this position.

Descendants of Aharon – According to Cassuto it is logical why Bemidbar 3:1 first recounts the lineage of Aharon "on the day that Hashem spoke to Moshe BaHar Sinai", mentioning all four sons, and then qualifies that Nadav and Avihu died. When the census began they had been alive, but after their deaths the text needed to update the list to match the reality of the second year.

Bemidbar 7 – Dedication of the Altar – According to this approach, the dedication of the Altar took place in the first month of the second year, after the Tabernacle was erected, as per the simple reading of Bemidbar 7:1.  Cassuto does not specify how it related to the eight days of the consecration of the Mishkan and whether the two ceremonies overlapped or one followed the other.

"הֵם הָעֹמְדִים עַל הַפְּקֻדִים" – According to Cassuto, the princes might have already played a role in the first part of the census which occurred prior to the dedication, and as such, can be described here as "הֵם הָעֹמְדִים עַל הַפְּקֻדִים".  Bemidbar 1:4-5, however, implies that the leaders were first chosen during the second stage of the census.  Cassuto might reply that this appointment is just a reaffirmation of the status already conferred in the first year.  Cf. the NetzivBemidbar 1:4Bemidbar 7:1About R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin who suggests that during the Tabernacle's construction the princes had originally held positions by choice of the people,⁶ and in Bemidbar 1 this choice gets Divine sanction.

Gifts to Levites – If the Levites had already been appointed in the first year, it is understandable how the princes gave them gifts related to their tasks.

Bemidbar 8 – Purification of the Levites – According to this approach, though the Levites are appointed in the first year, their purification ceremony needed to wait until after the Tabernacle was completed, and first took place in Nisan of the second year.

Bemidbar 9 – Pesach – According to Cassuto, Chapter 9 follows the events of Chapters 7-8, speaking of observing Pesach in the second half of the first month.

Not in Chronological Order

The events of Bemidbar 1-10 are not recorded in the order in which they occurred.  This approach subdivides regarding which events were moved and why.

Later Events Told Earlier

The early chapters of Sefer Bemidbar speak of events that occurred only later, because they are not part of the book's core.  They serve, instead, as either an introduction to Sefer Bemidbar or as appendix to the Books of Shemot and Vayikra.

Sources:R. Yosef Bekhor ShorBemidbar 9:1About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor, RambanBemidbar 3:1Bemidbar 3:14Bemidbar 5:2:6Bemidbar 7:1Bemidbar 9:1About R. Moshe b. Nachman

Bemidbar 1-6 – This position assumes that the opening date of Chapter 1 refers to the events of all six chapters and that both the censuses and accompanying laws in Bemidbar 5-6, occurred in the second month.

Bemidbar 7 and 9 – These chapters are achronological and the events that they describe occurred as dated, in the first month.

Why isn't the book written chronologically?

• Appendix – According to R"Y Bekhor Shor and Ramban, Bemidbar 9 really opens the book, while the first eight chapters only come to finish topics (להשלים את הענין) discussed in  the Books of Shemot and Vayikra.⁷ As such, there is no attempt to arrange these chapters chronologically and some of the events discussed there happened after events spoken of only later in Bemidbar.
• Introduction – Alternatively, the core of Bemidbar really begins with Chapter 7, "the day that Moshe finished erecting the Tabernacle" and proceeds chronologically from there. The census and set up of the camp in the second month are recorded earlier (in Chapters 1-4) only because they comprise a necessary introduction to the book.⁸ According to this, Chapters 5-6 might be viewed as a legal appendix to this unit,⁹ as in other places where a narrative section ends with a legal passage.

Internal order of achronological chapters

• According to Ramban, within the appendix, thematic order takes precedence over chronology.  The book opens with the censuses and set up of the camp around the Mishkan (perhaps because the book focuses on the nation's travels), and then discusses laws which relate to this.¹⁰ Only after all the legal material is covered does the Torah return to narrative to speak of the prince's offerings and the Levites' purification.
• According to the alternative opinion, it is only one set of chapters that is out of order, those dealing with the censuses and camp, and within these there is no achronology. 

Gifts to the Levites – Since this position posits that the dedication of the altar (Chapter 7) took place in the first month, but that the Levites' census and replacement of the firstborns (Chapter 3) took place in the second, it must explain how the princes knew to give the Levites wagons if they had not yet been assigned their tasks.  It could suggest one of two possibilities:

• Levites chosen earlier – The Levites were actually chosen beforehand, but they were only officially counted in the second month, as this was right before the nation's travels, when they were to begin their jobs as porters. See Selection of the Priests and Levites for a full discussion of when they might have first been chosen.
• Gifts given later – Alternatively, Bemidbar 7:5-7 is out of place.  Though the princes' gifts and sacrifices were brought to the Mishkan in the first month, the wagons and cattle were only given to the Levites after their appointment in the second month.¹¹  The verses are only recorded here to finish the story of the princes' offerings.

"הֵם הָעֹמְדִים עַל הַפְּקֻדִים" – According to this position this description is a parenthetical statement of the narrator, meant for the reader who already knows that the princes officiated in the counting even though they had not yet done so at the time of the story.

Purification of the Levites

• First month – According to the position that the core of Sefer Bemidbar begins in Chapter 7 and proceeds chronologically, the purification of the Levites took place in the first month.  This assumes that not only were the Levites chosen before the census¹² but that they were purified as well. Presumably this was done so that they would be prepared for their tasks as soon as they needed to travel.
• Second month – Ramban is ambiguous, but seems to imply in contrast, that the purification took place in the second month, soon after the Levites' official census and appointments.¹³

Chronology in Torah – Ramban normally posits that the Torah is written according to chronological order. Here, he only claims otherwise due to the explicit dates mentioned in the verses and suggests a thematic explanation for the exception.

What is Sefer Bemidbar about?

Earlier Events Told Later

Certain events are told out of order, after they really occurred, in order to present the nation in the best possible light.

Sources:RashiBemidbar 7:1Bemidbar 7:2Bemidbar 9:1About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki, SefornoBemidbar 9:1About R. Ovadyah Seforno

Bemidbar 1-4 – This position assumes that the events of these chapters occurred in the second month, as the simple reading of the verses would imply.

Bemidbar 5-6 – Seforno suggests that the laws of these chapters deal with keeping the camp holy and thus were given in the second month together with the laws regarding the set up of the camp.¹⁴

Chapters 7 and 9 – These chapters are achronological and occurred as dated, in the first month.

Purpose of achronology

• Avoid denigration – Rashi only addresses the achronological placement of Chapter 9. He suggests that Hashem did not want to open the book with the story of the nation's observance of the Pesach in the first month since it was shameful that this was the only Pesach they observed throughout their 40 years in the wilderness.  This, however, is difficult since the book could have begun with Chapter 7 (the description of the princes' sacrifices in the first month) which would have both maintained chronological order and also opened the book with a positive action.  Moreover, it is hard to say that speaking of the Pesach is denigrating, as in the first year the nation had not done anything wrong.
• Give praise – Seforno suggests that though the description of the nation's travels in Chapter 10 really flows straight from Chapters 1-6,¹⁵ Chapters 7-9 are inserted in the middle as an introduction to Chapter 10 to explain why the nation merited to enter the land immediately without war.¹⁶ The events described in these chapters (the dedication of the altar, purification of the Levites, Pesach sacrifice, and willingness to follow Hashem in the Wilderness) were all praiseworthy deeds which merited them entry into the land..

Purification of the Levites

• First month – Seforno claims that this occurred in the first month.¹⁷  This preserves the internal chronology within the larger unit of Chapters 7-9, but must posit that the Levites were both chosen and purified before they were officially counted to replace the firstborns. ¹⁸
• Second month –Seforno could have alternatively suggested that the purification occurred in the second month after the census and the Levites' official appointment. This would assume that the internal order of the interloping unit of Chapters 7-9 is not based on chronology but the relative importance of each of the events discussed.¹⁹  It has the advantage of being able to date the purification to after (or alongside) the Levites' appointment in the second month.

"הֵם הָעֹמְדִים עַל הַפְּקֻדִים" – This position would say, as above, that this is a clarifying comment meant only for the reader who already knows the roles played by the princes in the census.

Gifts to the Levites – As above, this position could either suggest that the Levites were really chosen earlier and thus the princes knew to give them gifts, or that the gifts were really only given to the Levites in the second month but are mentioned earlier in connection to the rest of the princes' offerings discussed in the chapter.

Chronology in Torah – Seforno explains that sometimes the Torah will veer from the true order of events, as long as some other purpose is gained by doing so ("לְזֶה כַּאֲשֶׁר תְּכַוֵּן תַּכְלִית מַה זוּלָתִי הַזְּמַן בַּסֵּדֶר הַמְסֻפָּר"). As opposed to Ramban above, this position does not just pit thematic order against chronological order, but also takes into account moral or other messages that juxtaposition of certain events might convey.

What is Sefer Bemidbar about?

¹ As support he points to the usage of the word in Yechezkel 20:5 and  Yechezkel 38:18 where it seems to mean a time period rather than a literal day.

² For the reader to understand what prompted the new law, it was first necessary to speak of those who were impure during the initial holiday.

³ The approach presented here is a possible extension of Cassuto's understanding (in his commentary on Sefer Shemot) of the chronology of the census.  Cassuto did not write a commentary to Bemidbar and thus did not explicitly relate to the chronology issue in Sefer Bemidbar.

⁴ He uses this to explain how the final tallies (See Shemot 38:26 and Bemidbar 1:46) were identical.  See Censuses in the Wilderness for elaboration.

⁵ Cassuto points to documentation of other censuses in the Ancient Near East and to David's census described in Shemuel II 24:8 as evidence that such counts were a long drawn out process that could take many months.

⁶ He points to Shemot 35:27 which already speaks of the princes and the gifts they brought to the Mishkan.

⁷ These all relate in some way to the Mishkan.

⁸ A discussion of the set up of the camp is a natural prelude for a book dealing with the nation's wanderings.

⁹ As such it would not be necessary to find a connection between them and the preceding narrative.

¹⁰ Chapter five opens with laws related to the impure who must leave the camp.  Then, since the census involved family lineage, laws of the Sotah and potential illegitimate children follow. The Nazirite stands in contrast both to the impure and Sotah and is thus discussed next.

¹¹ This might be Ramban's own opinion; see his comments to Bemidbar 8:5.

¹² See above point.

¹³ Since all of Chapters 1-8 are an appendix according to Ramban, they are not trying to preserve any chornological order so it is not problematic that they begin in the second month, return to the first, only to revert back to the second.  Nonetheless, it would seem to be more logical to discuss the purification right after the Levite's appointments and only then to move into the laws of Chapters 5-6.

¹⁴ They discuss the sending away of the impure and purifying the camp from the potentially illegitimate child of a sotah. Cf. Ramban's similar explanation of the placement of these laws above.

¹⁵ The book opens in the first of the second month, while Chapter 10 continues with the twentieth of the month.

¹⁶ Seforno points out that were it not for the spies the nation was supposed to enter the land immediately and inherit it without need of military conquest.  This i consistent with his general approach that actions of the people, such as the Sin of the Spies or Golden Calf, cause changes from Hashem's original plan.

¹⁷ Rashi does not address the issue.

¹⁸ See Seforno who suggests this, even though he maintains chronology within the chapters.

¹⁹ This is in fact what Seforno himself suggests.