David's Deathbed Instructions to Shelomo/2

David's Deathbed Instructions to Shelomo

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Changing Circumstances

David asked Shelomo to deal with his opponents even though he himself had not done so because he realized that with the change of monarch, there was to be an accompanying change in the strength of the kingdom.  This approach subdivides regarding the direction of this change and whether it views David or Shelomo as the stronger king:

From Weakness to Strength

As much of David's reign was marked by turmoil and attempted rebellions, he never found himself in the position of strength needed to assassinate his opponents.  Shelomo, in contrast, was a powerful monarch who could easily eliminate enemies.

Why didn't David kill Yoav and Shimi? Throughout his reign, David found himself dealing with one crisis after another, leaving him no opportunity to eliminate his enemies:

• Civil war – Yoav killed Avner right when David was attempting to unite Israel under his leadership after the civil war with Ishboshet, making David hesitant to retaliate. As he says: "‎‏וְאָנֹכִי הַיּוֹם רַךְ וּמָשׁוּחַ מֶלֶךְ".‎¹
• Internationals wars – The middle of David's reign was marked by both defensive and offensive wars, and thus also not an opportune time in which to eliminate his chief general.
• Sin and punishment – After David's sin with Batsheva, and Yoav's role in the cover-up, it became increasingly difficult to kill him. The family troubles that plagued David in the aftermath of the sin likely further contributed to his reluctance.
• Rebellions – The end of David's reign was filled with attempted coups. As such, after Avshalom's rebellion, when Shimi hinted that if David forgave him for his curse he would ensure that the tribes of Yosef re-pledge their allegiance him, David did not feel like he had any other choice but to agree not to kill him. Similarly, after Sheva. b. Bichri's coup, David was again in no position to eliminate Yoav.²

"וְלֹא תוֹרֵד שֵׂיבָתוֹ בְּשָׁלֹם שְׁאֹל" / "וְהוֹרַדְתָּ אֶת שֵׂיבָתוֹ בְּדָם שְׁאוֹל" – This position does not differentiate between these two formulations, assuming that both refer to killing. Had David been capable, he would have eliminated both Yoav and Shimi and thus, he requests from Shelomo to do what he could not.

"אַתָּה יָדַעְתָּ אֵת אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה לִי יוֹאָב" – This approach might suggest that David emphasizes "אֵת אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה לִי " because he wanted Shelomo to view Yoav's assassinations as personal affronts to David, so as to further encourage him to avenge his honor.  Alternatively, David really was referring to a personal crime of Yoav, his killing of Avshalom (see RadakMelakhim I 2:5-9About R. David Kimchi).

"וְעָשִׂיתָ כְּחׇכְמָתֶךָ" – It is not clear why David suggests that Shelomo's killing of Yoav and Shimi be done "with wisdom," as if deceit was necessary and the killings would not otherwise be perceived as justified:

• Regarding Shimi, David knew that due to his oath, Shelomo would not be able to simply kill Shimi for his cursing of David since that would constitute a reneging on the oath.  Thus, David told Shelomo to act with wile and convict him of a different capital crime. Similarly, once David had ignored Yoav's crimes for so long it would not be possible to suddenly punish him for them, so David advised his son to use his cunning to accomplish his goal. 
• Alternatively, it is possible that David recognized that even if Shelmo's kingdom was stable and powerful, these opponents were nonetheless formidable threats and woul require Shelomo's wisdom and guile  to overpower.

"שְׁלֹמֹה בְנִי נַעַר וָרָךְ" – One might question why David thought that Shelomo would be in a better position than he to assassinate enemies, considering that Shelomo's reign also began on the backdrop of an attempted rebellion. Moreover, David himself refers to him as "נַעַר וָרָךְ"! 

• It is possible that David was not expecting Shelomo to act immediately, but rather to wait until he was established on the throne.  David likely felt that he had ushered in an era of stability on the international front, so that within a few years Shelomo would be a powerful monarch capable of overcoming any internal enemies.
• David might have also recognized his son's extraordinary wisdom,³ and assumed that it would compensate for lack of experience or power.

When did the assassinations take place? Though many assume that the elimination of Yoav and Shimi took place right after Shelomo took the throne, it is possible that the events of the chapter took place over several years,⁴ by which point Shelomo had consolidated more power.  If so, the events of the chapter overlap with those of coming chapters and are simply written here to finish the story of the establishment of Shelomo's reign.  Thus, the chapter ends: וְהַמַּמְלָכָ֥ה נָכ֖וֹנָה בְּיַד־שְׁלֹמֹֽה.

Shelomo's fulfills the testament – When Shelomo eliminates Yoav and Shimi, he declares that he is doing so in retaliation for their crimes against David, supporting the idea that Shelomo was, in fact, acting on David's behalf, completing what his father could not do in his lifetime.

From Strength to Weakness

As David was a strong king, he had no need to kill his opponents and could keep them in check without bloodshed.  Shelomo, though, was a young boy who would need to rid himself of any threats to his kingdom.

"שְׁלֹמֹה בְנִי נַעַר וָרָךְ" – This position finds support in this description of Shelomo as a "young and tender boy". It might agree with Chazal that Shelomo was only twelve years old when taking the throne, not capable of holding opponents in check by his authority alone.

Change of Heart

During most of his reign, David intentionally maintained a policy of clemency towards his enemies, refusing to kill them. The stresses of the end of his life, however, hardened him, making him rethink this policy and instruct Shelomo to act differently.

Sources:Hoil MosheMelakhim I 2About R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi

Why didn't David kill Yoav and Shimi? David's lenient attitude was part of a larger policy of forgiving or being merciful to his enemies. For example, despite Shaul's continuous attempts on his life, David refused to allow his men to kill Shaul.  Though Avner had backed Ishboshet, David willingly made peace with him. Similarly, though Amasa served as Avshalom's general-in-chief, David not only forgave him, but even appointed him as his own general.  Thus, the fact that he did not originally desire the deaths of Yoav and Shimi was not out of character.

"וְאָנֹכִי הַיּוֹם רַךְ וּמָשׁוּחַ מֶלֶךְ" – Hoil Moshe claims that in these words David is not suggesting that he was too young or inexperienced to kill Yoav, since after all he was already 37.⁵  Rather, David was saying that he was too soft-hearted [רַךְ] to do so.

What changed? Hoil Moshe suggests that the stresses that David faced at the end of his life changed and hardened him. He does not specify which hardships affected David in this manner, but is likely referring to the continuous rebellions that plagued the kingdom in its final years.⁶

Why not deal with Yoav and Shimi himself? It is possible that David's change of heart came when he was already on his death-bed, and no longer capable of dealing with his opponents.

"שְׁלֹמֹה בְנִי נַעַר וָרָךְ" – Hoil Moshe assumes that Shelomo was relatively young, but no longer a teenager, and thus fully capable of punishing. Moreover, his authority did not come from age but rather from his position as king. David, thus, had no reason to think that Shelomo would not be up to the job.

Evaluating David's Command – The Hoil Moshe views David's change of heart and directive negatively, even suggesting that David's decision and its record in Tanakh is evidence that Tanakh does not hide the foibles of Biblical heroes from its readers. One might, however, suggest the exact opposite. Perhaps the new, harsh policy was the better one, and from the beginning David should not have had mercy on his opponents but rather punished them immediately.

No Change

David's instructions to Shelomo were not a request to exterminate his enemies, and did not reflect a reversal of the policies of his own reign. He was simply warning his son to be wary of potential political opponents.

Sources:AbarbanelMelakhim I 2About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel, MalbimMelakhim I 2:5-6Melakhim I 2:8-8About R. Meir Leibush Weiser

No double standards – Abarbanel brings two arguments to prove that David could not have been asking Shelomo to kill his old opponents for their crimes against him:

• Shelomo's inexperience – He points that since Shelomo was still an inexperienced king,⁷ in the same position that David himself had been when Yoav killed Avner, it does not make sense that David would have instructed him to do what he himself had been loathe to do under the same circumstances.
• Oath to Shimi still binding – He further points out that asking Shelomo to kill Shimi would be reneging on his oath.  The fact that the death would be by proxy would not absolve David of guilt.

"אֵת אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה לִי יוֹאָב" – David tells Shelomo to remember what Yoav "had done to him" not so that Shelomo would feel a need to avenge his father's honor, but purely to alert him to Yoav's past misdeeds and the need to tread carefully around him.

"...וַיָּשֶׂם דְּמֵי מִלְחָמָה בְּשָׁלֹם וַיִּתֵּן דְּמֵי מִלְחָמָה בַּחֲגֹרָתוֹ" – In these words, David warns Shelomo about what type of person Yoav really is:

• "וַיָּשֶׂם דְּמֵי מִלְחָמָה בְּשָׁלֹם" – Yoav is a trickster who pretends to be at peace, when his intention is really to kill. The phrase "וַיָּשֶׂם דְּמֵי מִלְחָמָה בְּשָׁלֹם" means that Yoav's spilling of blood was an action worthy of doing only in wartime, against an enemy, yet he did so against those with whom he was supposedly at peace.  David, thus, warns Shelomo to be careful in his interactions with Yoav, and to be fully cognizant of his potential for deceit .
• "וַיִּתֵּן דְּמֵי מִלְחָמָה בַּחֲגֹרָתוֹ" – David shares that Yoav had put the blood of Avner and Amsa on his belt and shoe for all to see to teach Shelomo that Yoav is someone who gloats over his evil deeds, as if they were worthy of emulation.

"וְהִנֵּה עִמְּךָ שִׁמְעִי בֶן גֵּרָא... וָאֶשָּׁבַע לוֹ בַי"י" – As above, David tells Shelomo about his oath to Shimi to ensure that he understood Shimi's true character and would thus be cautious when dealing with him.  When Shimi returned as "the first of the house of Yosef" after Avshalom's rebellion, he was ostensibly expressing his remorse for his earlier curse. In reality, though, he was blackmailing David, intimating that if David did not forgive him, he would ensure that Israel not resume their allegiance.

"וְלֹא תוֹרֵד שֵׂיבָתוֹ בְּשָׁלֹם שְׁאֹל" – Abarbanel reinterprets this phrase, claiming that it does not mean that Shelomo should kill Yoav but that the two should not sit in peace with each other. In other words, David tells Shelomo that he should exile Yoav, and thus eliminate any threat he might represent.

"אַל תְּנַקֵּהוּ.. וְהוֹרַדְתָּ אֶת שֵׂיבָתוֹ בְּדָם שְׁאוֹל" – These words are even more difficult for this approach as they imply that David was, in fact, requesting that Shelomo kill Shimi for his previous treason.  Abarbanel and Malbim, thus, explain that David is not speaking of the past, but only warning Shelomo that if Shimi acts similarly under Shelomo's reign, then "do not hold him guiltless..." but kill him if necessary.⁸

Shelomo's motives – When killing both Yoav and Shimi, Shelomo alludes to their crimes against David,⁹ suggesting that, contrary to the claims of this approach, he was indeed punishing them for those sins and not for their actions against him personally. 

• Excuse for Benayahu – Abarbanel addresses the issue only by Yoav and suggests that Shelomo's words were addressed specifically to Benayahu who was uncomfortable killing Yoav by the altar.  Shelomo, thus, comforted him pointing out that Yoav was culpable on multiple fronts, not just for backing Adoniyahu, but also for having intentionally killed innocents regarding which the Torah itself states "וְכִי יָזִד אִישׁ עַל רֵעֵהוּ לְהׇרְגוֹ בְעׇרְמָה מֵעִם מִזְבְּחִי תִּקָּחֶנּוּ לָמוּת" (Shemot 24:14).
• Shelomo deviated from David's will – This position could also respond that despite David not requesting their deaths, Shelomo, on his own, felt a need to avenge his father's honor.  Thus, he went beyond his father's exhortations and when the opportunity arose, he made sure to kill his opponents¹⁰ and declare that he was punishing them not only for their disloyalty to him but also for their prior deeds.

¹ David had not yet had a chance to prove himself to the nation and to surround himself with enough loyal supporters to kill opponents without fear of repercussions.

² The same was true after Avshalom's rebellion. Though David was upset about Yoav's having killed Avshalom, he could not afford to punish Yoav for the act.

³ Even though Hashem only granted Shelomo his great wisdom afterwards, David's double reference to "acting in wisdom" (Melakhim II 2:6 and 9) suggests that even beforehand Shelomo was gifted.

⁴ By Shimi it is explicit that at least three years had passed before he violated Shelomo's command (Melakhim I 2:39).

⁵ From Shemuel II 5:4-5 we know that David was 30 when he began to reign and that he was king in Chevron for seven years before making the treaty with Avner.

⁶ It is not clear exactly when Avshalom rebelled since the verse which dates the event states only, "וַיְהִי מִקֵּץ אַרְבָּעִים שָׁנָה" without explaining from what the forty years are being counted.  Nonetheless it would seem to be towards the end of David's reign.  If so, in the last few years of David's life he had to deal with the attempted coups of Avshalom, Sheva b. Bichri and Adoniyahu.  The three events might have easily convinced someone that political opponents need to be eliminated. One might argue, however, that even at this late stage in his life, David was willing to forgive Amasa, so why did he suddenly feel differently about Shimi and Yoav?

⁷ Abarbanel does not maintain that Shelomo was particularly young, only that he was still new to the throne. He suggests that Shelomo's being "נַעַר וָרָךְ" is equivalent to David's being "רַךְ וּמָשׁוּחַ מֶלֶךְ".  Though both were adults when they began to reign, neither had yet reached a position of strength.

⁸ This, though is not explicit in the verse, and necessitates adding in several words to the verse, as is evident from Malbim's paraphrase: "ועתה אם יחטא לך אל תנקהו, כי איש חכם אתה וידעת את אשר תעשה לו לנסותו אם פי מלך ישמור כראוי ואם רעה תמצא בו והורדת את שיבתו בדם שאול".

⁹ See his speech to Benayahu when killing Yoav:  "וְהֵשִׁיב י"י אֶת דָּמוֹ עַל רֹאשׁוֹ אֲשֶׁר פָּגַע בִּשְׁנֵי אֲנָשִׁים צַדִּקִים וְטֹבִים מִמֶּנּוּ וַיַּהַרְגֵם בַּחֶרֶב וְאָבִי דָוִד לֹא יָדָע אֶת אַבְנֵר בֶּן נֵר שַׂר צְבָא יִשְׂרָאֵל וְאֶת עֲמָשָׂא בֶן יֶתֶר" (Melakhim I 2:32) and his words to Shimi himself upon killing him:  "אַתָּה יָדַעְתָּ אֵת כׇּל הָרָעָה אֲשֶׁר יָדַע לְבָבְךָ אֲשֶׁר עָשִׂיתָ לְדָוִד אָבִי וְהֵשִׁיב י"י אֶת רָעָתְךָ בְּרֹאשֶׁךָ" (Melakhim I 2:44)

¹⁰ See Chaim Gevaryahu, "ברית דוד ואבנר וגורלו של שר הצבא יואב" in ספר שמואל ייבין; מחקרים במקרא, ארכיאולוגיה, לשון ותולדות ישראל  (Jerusalem, 1970): 140-156, who makes this point.