Difference between revisions of "David's Deathbed Instructions to Shelomo/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 16: Line 16:
 
From Strength to Weakness
 
From Strength to Weakness
 
<p>As David was a strong king, he had no need to kill his opponents and could keep them in check without bloodshed.&#160; Shelomo, though, was a young boy who would need to rid himself of any threats to his kingdom.</p>
 
<p>As David was a strong king, he had no need to kill his opponents and could keep them in check without bloodshed.&#160; Shelomo, though, was a young boy who would need to rid himself of any threats to his kingdom.</p>
 +
<point><b>"שְׁלֹמֹה בְנִי נַעַר וָרָךְ"</b></point>
 
</opinion>
 
</opinion>
 
</category>
 
</category>

Version as of 04:26, 20 April 2018

David's Deathbed Instructions to Shelomo

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Changing Circumstances

David asked Shelomo to deal with his opponents even though he himself had not done so because he realized that the power of the kingdom was to change after Shelomo took office.  This approach subdivides regarding the direction of this change and whether it views David or Shelomo as the stronger king:

From Weakness to Strength

As much of David's reign was marked by turmoil and attempted rebellions, he never found himself in the position of strength needed to assassinate his opponents.

From Strength to Weakness

As David was a strong king, he had no need to kill his opponents and could keep them in check without bloodshed.  Shelomo, though, was a young boy who would need to rid himself of any threats to his kingdom.

"שְׁלֹמֹה בְנִי נַעַר וָרָךְ"

Change of Heart

During most of his reign, David maintained a policy of clemency towards his enemies, refusing to kill them. The stresses of the end of his life, however, hardened him, making him rethink this policy and instruct Shelomo to act differently.

No Change

David's instructions to Shelomo were not a request to exterminate his enemies, and did not reflect a reversal of the policies of his own reign.