Difference between revisions of "Duration of the Egyptian Exile/2"
(Original Author: Yonatan Novetsky, Rabbi Hillel Novetsky) |
(Original Author: Yonatan Novetsky, Rabbi Hillel Novetsky) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
<category name="Full 430 Years">Full 430 Years | <category name="Full 430 Years">Full 430 Years | ||
<p>The Israelites lived in Egypt for a full 430 years.</p> | <p>The Israelites lived in Egypt for a full 430 years.</p> | ||
− | <mekorot><multilink><a href="Rashba367" data-aht="source">Rashba</a><a href="Rashba367" data-aht="source">New Responsa #367</a><a href="R. Shelomo b. Aderet" data-aht="parshan">About Rashba</a></multilink>,<fn>After first discussing the 210 year position found in Chazal, Rashba writes: "כל שכן לכשתלך אחר פשוטי הכתובים שהיתה עמידתם במצרים ת״ל שנה, כמו שכתוב ומושב בני ישראל אשר ישבו במצרים שלשים שנה וארבע מאות שנה". See also Scholion of Megillat Taanit regarding 25 Sivan and Bavli Sanhedrin 91a where Geviha b. Pesisa claims backpay for a full 430 years of slavery. In contrast, the parallel account in Bereshit Rabbah 61:7 speaks of 210 years. For more see <a href="Reparations and Despoiling Egypt" data-aht="page">Reparations and Despoiling Egypt</a>.</fn> <multilink><a href="Shadal6-20" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="Shadal6-20" data-aht="source">Shemot 6:20</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About Shadal</a></multilink> agreeing with I.B. Koppe,<fn>Shadal also cites Isaak Markus Jost as maintaining this position. However, there is a fundamental difference between them regarding how to understand Shemot 6 – see below.</fn> <multilink><a href="HoilBereshit15-16" data-aht="source">Hoil Moshe</a><a href="HoilBereshit15-16" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:16</a><a href="Hoil6-18" data-aht="source">Shemot 6:18</a><a href="HoilYehoshua7-1" data-aht="source">Yehoshua 7:1</a><a href="R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi (Hoil Moshe)" data-aht="parshan">About Hoil Moshe</a></multilink>.<fn>Two similar options are mentioned by the <multilink><a href="RambamTeiman3" data-aht="source">Rambam</a><a href="RambamTeiman3" data-aht="source">Iggeret Teiman Ch. 3</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Maimon (Rambam)" data-aht="parshan">About Rambam</a></multilink>, in the context of his discussion of the impossibility of predicting when the ultimate redemption will happen. Rambam notes that while the Israelites were in Egypt there were also conflicting predictions as to when the Exodus was supposed to occur and as to how to interpret the prophecy of Bereshit 15:13. According to the Rambam's reconstruction, two of the theories proposed at that time were that the 400 years should be counted either from the descent to Egypt or from the start of the slavery (which the Rambam places at 70 years after the descent). Since for the Rambam these possibilities were contemplated only while the Israelites were still in Egypt (and were proven false when the Exodus took place 400 years after the birth of Yitzchak), they could not have accounted for the later verses in Shemot 12:40-41 which mention the figure of 430 years.</fn></mekorot> | + | <mekorot><multilink><a href="Rashba367" data-aht="source">Rashba</a><a href="Rashba367" data-aht="source">New Responsa #367</a><a href="R. Shelomo b. Aderet" data-aht="parshan">About Rashba</a></multilink>,<fn>After first discussing the 210 year position found in Chazal, Rashba writes: "כל שכן לכשתלך אחר פשוטי הכתובים שהיתה עמידתם במצרים ת״ל שנה, כמו שכתוב ומושב בני ישראל אשר ישבו במצרים שלשים שנה וארבע מאות שנה". See also Scholion of Megillat Taanit regarding 25 Sivan and Bavli Sanhedrin 91a where Geviha b. Pesisa claims backpay for a full 430 years of slavery. In contrast, the parallel account in Bereshit Rabbah 61:7 speaks of 210 years. For more see <a href="Reparations and Despoiling Egypt" data-aht="page">Reparations and Despoiling Egypt</a>.</fn> <multilink><a href="Shadal6-20" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="Shadal6-20" data-aht="source">Shemot 6:20</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About Shadal</a></multilink> agreeing with I.B. Koppe,<fn>Shadal also cites Isaak Markus Jost as maintaining this position. However, there is a fundamental difference between them regarding how to understand Shemot 6 – see below.</fn> <multilink><a href="HoilBereshit15-16" data-aht="source">Hoil Moshe</a><a href="HoilBereshit15-16" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:16</a><a href="Hoil6-18" data-aht="source">Shemot 6:18</a><a href="HoilYehoshua7-1" data-aht="source">Yehoshua 7:1</a><a href="R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi (Hoil Moshe)" data-aht="parshan">About Hoil Moshe</a></multilink>.<fn>Two similar options are mentioned by the <multilink><a href="RambamTeiman3" data-aht="source">Rambam</a><a href="RambamTeiman3" data-aht="source">Iggeret Teiman Ch. 3</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Maimon (Rambam, Maimonides)" data-aht="parshan">About Rambam</a></multilink>, in the context of his discussion of the impossibility of predicting when the ultimate redemption will happen. Rambam notes that while the Israelites were in Egypt there were also conflicting predictions as to when the Exodus was supposed to occur and as to how to interpret the prophecy of Bereshit 15:13. According to the Rambam's reconstruction, two of the theories proposed at that time were that the 400 years should be counted either from the descent to Egypt or from the start of the slavery (which the Rambam places at 70 years after the descent). Since for the Rambam these possibilities were contemplated only while the Israelites were still in Egypt (and were proven false when the Exodus took place 400 years after the birth of Yitzchak), they could not have accounted for the later verses in Shemot 12:40-41 which mention the figure of 430 years.</fn></mekorot> |
<p class="summary">Shadal and the Hoil Moshe maintain that the Israelites were in Egypt for a full 430 years. To do so, they must posit that Moshe's genealogy in Shemot 6 omits several generations and includes only the more prominent personalities.</p> | <p class="summary">Shadal and the Hoil Moshe maintain that the Israelites were in Egypt for a full 430 years. To do so, they must posit that Moshe's genealogy in Shemot 6 omits several generations and includes only the more prominent personalities.</p> | ||
<point><b>430 years in Egypt</b> − This position reads the verses in Shemot 12:40-41 literally, and thus maintains that the Israelites really were in Egypt for a full 430 years.</point> | <point><b>430 years in Egypt</b> − This position reads the verses in Shemot 12:40-41 literally, and thus maintains that the Israelites really were in Egypt for a full 430 years.</point> | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>Reinterpreting two of its terms – R. Saadia adopts this method. Thus he suggests that "בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל" can refer also to the Israelites' ancestors such as Avraham,<fn>See similarly <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah63-3" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah63-3" data-aht="source">63:3</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>, and cf. Samaritan Pentateuch which reads "בני ישראל ואבותם" in the verse itself (Codex Alexandrinus of the LXX reads similarly, as noted already by Shadal).</fn> and that "בְּמִצְרָיִם" encompasses not only Egypt proper, but all lands which were under Egyptian dominion.<fn>Cf. the Samaritan Pentateuch on Shemot 12:40 which reads "בארץ כנען ובארץ מצרים" and the LXX which translates similarly (just in reverse order), and Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Bo 14 and numerous other rabbinic sources which attribute this emendation to the seventy elders who translated the Torah into Greek. For more on the textual versions, see <a href="Textual Variants – Shemot 12" data-aht="page">Shemot 12</a>.</fn> These broader definitions then allow him to explain that the 430 figure includes also the years from the time that the Patriarchs lived in Canaan and Haran (as those lands were then under Egyptian control).<fn>Ancient Near Eastern documents from the Biblical period do, in fact, describe the political and military dependence of Canaanite kings on Egyptian rulers.</fn></li> | <li>Reinterpreting two of its terms – R. Saadia adopts this method. Thus he suggests that "בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל" can refer also to the Israelites' ancestors such as Avraham,<fn>See similarly <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah63-3" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah63-3" data-aht="source">63:3</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>, and cf. Samaritan Pentateuch which reads "בני ישראל ואבותם" in the verse itself (Codex Alexandrinus of the LXX reads similarly, as noted already by Shadal).</fn> and that "בְּמִצְרָיִם" encompasses not only Egypt proper, but all lands which were under Egyptian dominion.<fn>Cf. the Samaritan Pentateuch on Shemot 12:40 which reads "בארץ כנען ובארץ מצרים" and the LXX which translates similarly (just in reverse order), and Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Bo 14 and numerous other rabbinic sources which attribute this emendation to the seventy elders who translated the Torah into Greek. For more on the textual versions, see <a href="Textual Variants – Shemot 12" data-aht="page">Shemot 12</a>.</fn> These broader definitions then allow him to explain that the 430 figure includes also the years from the time that the Patriarchs lived in Canaan and Haran (as those lands were then under Egyptian control).<fn>Ancient Near Eastern documents from the Biblical period do, in fact, describe the political and military dependence of Canaanite kings on Egyptian rulers.</fn></li> | ||
− | <li>Assuming that the verse is giving only the central facts and not the full details – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor thus explains that the verse mentions only the stay in Egypt because that was the main part of the exile.<fn>Cf. <multilink><a href="RambanSHM1" data-aht="source">Ramban in his Critique of the Rambam's Sefer HaMitzvot</a><a href="RambanSHM1" data-aht="source">Root 1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban)" data-aht="parshan">About Ramban</a></multilink>.</fn></li> | + | <li>Assuming that the verse is giving only the central facts and not the full details – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor thus explains that the verse mentions only the stay in Egypt because that was the main part of the exile.<fn>Cf. <multilink><a href="RambanSHM1" data-aht="source">Ramban in his Critique of the Rambam's Sefer HaMitzvot</a><a href="RambanSHM1" data-aht="source">Root 1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About Ramban</a></multilink>.</fn></li> |
− | <li>Separating the 430 figure from the rest of the verse – R. Avraham b. HaRambam suggests that the verse is merely saying that the Israelites were in Egypt until the end of the 430 year Patriarchal era which began with Avraham.<fn>In order to do this, R. Avraham b. HaRambam needs to assume that the words "עד סוף" are understood, and the verse reads as if it said "ומושב בני ישראל אשר ישבו במצרים <b>עד סוף</b> שלשים שנה וארבע מאות שנה". It thereby becomes parallel to the immediately following verse: "וַיְהִי <b>מִקֵּץ</b> שְׁלֹשִׁים שָׁנָה וְאַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת שָׁנָה וַיְהִי בְּעֶצֶם הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה יָצְאוּ כָּל צִבְאוֹת ה' מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם". Cf. <multilink><a href="RSBHGBereshit41-1" data-aht="source">R. Shemuel b. Chofni Gaon</a><a href="RSBHGBereshit41-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 41:1</a><a href="RSBHGBereshit46-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 46:8</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Chofni Gaon" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Chofni Gaon</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="IbnJanachRikmah28" data-aht="source">R. Yonah ibn Janach</a><a href="IbnJanachRikmah28" data-aht="source">Sefer HaRikmah Sha'ar 28</a><a href="R. Yonah ibn Janach" data-aht="parshan">About Ibn Janach</a></multilink> cited below as well as <multilink><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:40</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban)" data-aht="parshan">About Ramban</a></multilink>'s comparisons to Devarim 2:14 and Daniel 12:12.</fn></li> | + | <li>Separating the 430 figure from the rest of the verse – R. Avraham b. HaRambam suggests that the verse is merely saying that the Israelites were in Egypt until the end of the 430 year Patriarchal era which began with Avraham.<fn>In order to do this, R. Avraham b. HaRambam needs to assume that the words "עד סוף" are understood, and the verse reads as if it said "ומושב בני ישראל אשר ישבו במצרים <b>עד סוף</b> שלשים שנה וארבע מאות שנה". It thereby becomes parallel to the immediately following verse: "וַיְהִי <b>מִקֵּץ</b> שְׁלֹשִׁים שָׁנָה וְאַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת שָׁנָה וַיְהִי בְּעֶצֶם הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה יָצְאוּ כָּל צִבְאוֹת ה' מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם". Cf. <multilink><a href="RSBHGBereshit41-1" data-aht="source">R. Shemuel b. Chofni Gaon</a><a href="RSBHGBereshit41-1" data-aht="source">Bereshit 41:1</a><a href="RSBHGBereshit46-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 46:8</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Chofni Gaon" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Chofni Gaon</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="IbnJanachRikmah28" data-aht="source">R. Yonah ibn Janach</a><a href="IbnJanachRikmah28" data-aht="source">Sefer HaRikmah Sha'ar 28</a><a href="R. Yonah ibn Janach" data-aht="parshan">About Ibn Janach</a></multilink> cited below as well as <multilink><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:40</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About Ramban</a></multilink>'s comparisons to Devarim 2:14 and Daniel 12:12.</fn></li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</point> | </point> | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
<p class="summary">Demetrius and Josephus propose that the 430 year count begins when Avraham arrived in the land of Canaan at age 75, and they apparently view the 400 as merely a round number. The nation was thus in Egypt for a total of 215 years.</p> | <p class="summary">Demetrius and Josephus propose that the 430 year count begins when Avraham arrived in the land of Canaan at age 75, and they apparently view the 400 as merely a round number. The nation was thus in Egypt for a total of 215 years.</p> | ||
<point><b>215 years in Egypt</b> – According to this position, 215 of the 430 years transpired before the descent to Egypt,<fn>The breakdown of the 215 years spent in Canaan is: 25 years of Avraham (before Yitzchak was born) + 60 years of Yitzchak (before Yaakov was born) + 130 years of Yaakov (before he went down to Egypt).</fn> and the Israelites were in Egypt itself for exactly half of the 430 years.<fn>See below for the possible influence of the LXX on this even division. Cf. <multilink><a href="PirkeiDRE47" data-aht="source">Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a><a href="PirkeiDRE47" data-aht="source">47</a><a href="Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer" data-aht="parshan">About Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a></multilink> which first counts 400 years from the birth of Yitzchak. Then, after subtracting the 190 years from his birth until the descent to Egypt to obtain 210 years in Egypt, it adds the five earlier years of Menashe and Ephraim's lives to arrive at a total of 215 years. It is unclear whether Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer was influenced by the earlier 215 year tradition. See <a href="Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer" data-aht="parshan">About Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a> and see above for further analysis of his motivation.</fn></point> | <point><b>215 years in Egypt</b> – According to this position, 215 of the 430 years transpired before the descent to Egypt,<fn>The breakdown of the 215 years spent in Canaan is: 25 years of Avraham (before Yitzchak was born) + 60 years of Yitzchak (before Yaakov was born) + 130 years of Yaakov (before he went down to Egypt).</fn> and the Israelites were in Egypt itself for exactly half of the 430 years.<fn>See below for the possible influence of the LXX on this even division. Cf. <multilink><a href="PirkeiDRE47" data-aht="source">Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a><a href="PirkeiDRE47" data-aht="source">47</a><a href="Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer" data-aht="parshan">About Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a></multilink> which first counts 400 years from the birth of Yitzchak. Then, after subtracting the 190 years from his birth until the descent to Egypt to obtain 210 years in Egypt, it adds the five earlier years of Menashe and Ephraim's lives to arrive at a total of 215 years. It is unclear whether Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer was influenced by the earlier 215 year tradition. See <a href="Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer" data-aht="parshan">About Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a> and see above for further analysis of his motivation.</fn></point> | ||
− | <point><b>430 year period</b> – "וּמוֹשַׁב בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲשֶׁר יָשְׁבוּ בְּמִצְרָיִם שְׁלֹשִׁים שָׁנָה וְאַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת שָׁנָה" (Shemot 12:40) – Demetrius and Josephus utilized the text of the Septuagint which reads "in the land, Egypt, and in the land of Chanaan."<fn>It was thus natural for them to divide the 430 year period into two equal halves (cf. the Samaritan midrash Memar Marqah). Another possible option would have been to view the 430 years as framed by Avraham's brief exile to Egypt when he was 75 (or soon after he arrived in Canaan) and the later much lengthier exile to Egypt of his descendants. This is not what Demetrius and Josephus had in mind, as they make no mention of Avraham's descent to Egypt, but this is a possible reading of <multilink><a href="RambanSHM1" data-aht="source">Ramban in his Critique of the Rambam's Sefer HaMitzvot</a><a href="RambanSHM1" data-aht="source">Root 1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban)" data-aht="parshan">About Ramban</a></multilink> ("מעת גלות אברהם מארץ כנען בפעם הראשונה").</fn> The version of the LXX they were using may also have read "they and their fathers" like Codex Alexandrinus.<fn>Cf. the text of the Samaritan Pentateuch "ומושב בני ישראל ואבותם". Alternatively, they could have interpreted like R. Saadia above.</fn></point> | + | <point><b>430 year period</b> – "וּמוֹשַׁב בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲשֶׁר יָשְׁבוּ בְּמִצְרָיִם שְׁלֹשִׁים שָׁנָה וְאַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת שָׁנָה" (Shemot 12:40) – Demetrius and Josephus utilized the text of the Septuagint which reads "in the land, Egypt, and in the land of Chanaan."<fn>It was thus natural for them to divide the 430 year period into two equal halves (cf. the Samaritan midrash Memar Marqah). Another possible option would have been to view the 430 years as framed by Avraham's brief exile to Egypt when he was 75 (or soon after he arrived in Canaan) and the later much lengthier exile to Egypt of his descendants. This is not what Demetrius and Josephus had in mind, as they make no mention of Avraham's descent to Egypt, but this is a possible reading of <multilink><a href="RambanSHM1" data-aht="source">Ramban in his Critique of the Rambam's Sefer HaMitzvot</a><a href="RambanSHM1" data-aht="source">Root 1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About Ramban</a></multilink> ("מעת גלות אברהם מארץ כנען בפעם הראשונה").</fn> The version of the LXX they were using may also have read "they and their fathers" like Codex Alexandrinus.<fn>Cf. the text of the Samaritan Pentateuch "ומושב בני ישראל ואבותם". Alternatively, they could have interpreted like R. Saadia above.</fn></point> |
<point><b>400 year period</b> – "גֵר יִהְיֶה זַרְעֲךָ בְּאֶרֶץ לֹא לָהֶם וַעֲבָדוּם וְעִנּוּ אֹתָם אַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת שָׁנָה" (Bereshit 15:13) – According to this position, the 400 figure is an approximation<fn>The 400 years cannot be a precise number dating from the birth of Yitzchak, as according to this view, he was born only 25 years after the 430 count began.</fn> of the 405 years Avraham's descendants sojourned in Canaan and Egypt before the Exodus.<fn>See R. Saadia above and R. Yosef Kara below for two options in understanding the construction of the verse.</fn></point> | <point><b>400 year period</b> – "גֵר יִהְיֶה זַרְעֲךָ בְּאֶרֶץ לֹא לָהֶם וַעֲבָדוּם וְעִנּוּ אֹתָם אַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת שָׁנָה" (Bereshit 15:13) – According to this position, the 400 figure is an approximation<fn>The 400 years cannot be a precise number dating from the birth of Yitzchak, as according to this view, he was born only 25 years after the 430 count began.</fn> of the 405 years Avraham's descendants sojourned in Canaan and Egypt before the Exodus.<fn>See R. Saadia above and R. Yosef Kara below for two options in understanding the construction of the verse.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>430 in Shemot vs. 400 in Bereshit</b> – The 430 years include Avraham's own years in Canaan, while the 400 figure is a round number which approximates the 405 years from the birth of Yitzchak (as this verse specifies "זַרְעֲךָ").</point> | <point><b>430 in Shemot vs. 400 in Bereshit</b> – The 430 years include Avraham's own years in Canaan, while the 400 figure is a round number which approximates the 405 years from the birth of Yitzchak (as this verse specifies "זַרְעֲךָ").</point> | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>Reinterpreting "בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל" to refer also to the Israelites' ancestors such as Avraham<fn>See similarly the Samaritan Pentateuch, Codex Alexandrinus of the LXX, Bereshit Rabbah, and R. Saadia cited above.</fn> and "בְּמִצְרָיִם" to encompass not only Egypt proper, but all lands which were under Egyptian dominion<fn>Cf. the Samaritan Pentateuch, LXX, and R. Saadia noted above.</fn> – This appears to be the option adopted by the Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael and Mekhilta DeRashbi.</li> | <li>Reinterpreting "בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל" to refer also to the Israelites' ancestors such as Avraham<fn>See similarly the Samaritan Pentateuch, Codex Alexandrinus of the LXX, Bereshit Rabbah, and R. Saadia cited above.</fn> and "בְּמִצְרָיִם" to encompass not only Egypt proper, but all lands which were under Egyptian dominion<fn>Cf. the Samaritan Pentateuch, LXX, and R. Saadia noted above.</fn> – This appears to be the option adopted by the Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael and Mekhilta DeRashbi.</li> | ||
− | <li>Reading the 430 year figure as describing the duration of the Patriarchal period, whose endpoint coincided with the Exodus – R. Shemuel b. Chofni Gaon,<fn>However, in his commentary on Bereshit 46:8 he appears to explain like the first possibility</fn> R. Yonah ibn Janach.<fn>Cf. R. Avraham b. HaRambam and the use of the word "מִקֵּץ" in Shemot 12:41 cited above, as well as <multilink><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:40</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban)" data-aht="parshan">About Ramban</a></multilink>'s comparisons to Devarim 2:14 and Daniel 12:12 cited below.</fn></li> | + | <li>Reading the 430 year figure as describing the duration of the Patriarchal period, whose endpoint coincided with the Exodus – R. Shemuel b. Chofni Gaon,<fn>However, in his commentary on Bereshit 46:8 he appears to explain like the first possibility</fn> R. Yonah ibn Janach.<fn>Cf. R. Avraham b. HaRambam and the use of the word "מִקֵּץ" in Shemot 12:41 cited above, as well as <multilink><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:40</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About Ramban</a></multilink>'s comparisons to Devarim 2:14 and Daniel 12:12 cited below.</fn></li> |
− | <li>Assuming that the verse is giving only the central facts and not the full details – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor thus explains that the verse mentions only the stay in Egypt because that was the main part of the exile.<fn>Cf. <multilink><a href="RambanSHM1" data-aht="source">Ramban in his Critique of the Rambam's Sefer HaMitzvot</a><a href="RambanSHM1" data-aht="source">Root 1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban)" data-aht="parshan">About Ramban</a></multilink>.</fn></li> | + | <li>Assuming that the verse is giving only the central facts and not the full details – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor thus explains that the verse mentions only the stay in Egypt because that was the main part of the exile.<fn>Cf. <multilink><a href="RambanSHM1" data-aht="source">Ramban in his Critique of the Rambam's Sefer HaMitzvot</a><a href="RambanSHM1" data-aht="source">Root 1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About Ramban</a></multilink>.</fn></li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</point> | </point> | ||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li>Achronology – As the events of Bereshit 12-14 and the first part of Bereshit 15 proceed sequentially from when Avraham was 75 years old, the story of the Covenant of the Pieces in Bereshit 15:7-21 cannot be in chronological order and is not a continuation of the first part of Bereshit 15.<fn>One difficulty with this theory is that the text gives no hint that it is going backwards in time. Additionally, the language of "וַיֹּאמֶר אֵלָיו" at the beginning of the Covenant of the Pieces appears to indicate that this story continues from where the preceding narrative left off. Were it an opening of a separate story, one would have expected the standard opening formula of ויאמר ה' אל אברהם to identify the participants in the conversation. Not all Rabbinic sources adopt the chronology of Seder Olam Rabbah – see Tanchuma Buber Chayyei Sarah 6 that he was 48, and see <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah46-2" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah46-2" data-aht="source">46:2</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink> that he was 85. See <a href="BER15$" data-aht="page">Covenant of the Pieces</a>, and for more on the general issue, see <a href="LIT$">Chronology</a>.</fn></li> | <li>Achronology – As the events of Bereshit 12-14 and the first part of Bereshit 15 proceed sequentially from when Avraham was 75 years old, the story of the Covenant of the Pieces in Bereshit 15:7-21 cannot be in chronological order and is not a continuation of the first part of Bereshit 15.<fn>One difficulty with this theory is that the text gives no hint that it is going backwards in time. Additionally, the language of "וַיֹּאמֶר אֵלָיו" at the beginning of the Covenant of the Pieces appears to indicate that this story continues from where the preceding narrative left off. Were it an opening of a separate story, one would have expected the standard opening formula of ויאמר ה' אל אברהם to identify the participants in the conversation. Not all Rabbinic sources adopt the chronology of Seder Olam Rabbah – see Tanchuma Buber Chayyei Sarah 6 that he was 48, and see <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah46-2" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah46-2" data-aht="source">46:2</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink> that he was 85. See <a href="BER15$" data-aht="page">Covenant of the Pieces</a>, and for more on the general issue, see <a href="LIT$">Chronology</a>.</fn></li> | ||
− | <li>Setting – Since according to Bereshit 12:4-5 Avraham arrived in Israel only after he was 75, one must posit either that the Covenant of the Pieces took place outside of Israel before Avraham came to Israel<fn>See Chizkuni Bereshit 15:7 that this possibility would appear to be contradicted by the words "הָאָרֶץ הַזֹּאת"‎ (15:7,18). However, R. Yaacov Medan in an article in מוסף השבת, מקור ראשון, פרשת לך לך תש"ע attempts to develop this option. According to him the words "הָאָרֶץ הַזֹּאת" and "הֵנָּה"‎ (15:16) refer to the land Avraham is viewing (Cf. Devarim 34:4).</fn> or that Avraham had made an earlier pilot trip to Israel before he was 70, left,<fn>See Ran in his commentary to Bereshit 12:5 that Avraham went back to pack up his "lift."</fn> and then returned at 75.<fn>Seder Olam Rabbah 1 takes this option. See also the opinions in Bavli Avodah Zarah 9a and Tosafot s.v. "וגמירי" (see also Tosafot Shabbat 10b s.v. "ושל") that Avraham was 52 when he came to Israel, and Tanchuma Buber Chayyei Sarah 6 that he was 48 at the time of the Covenant. <multilink><a href="RalbagMilotBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagMilotBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Milot Bereshit 15:13</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershon (Ralbag)" data-aht="parshan">About Ralbag</a></multilink> argues against Seder Olam Rabbah and rejects the possibility that Avraham would have left the land of Israel without adequate reason (cf. Ramban Bereshit 12:10). For further discussion, see <a href="BER12$" data-aht="page">Avraham's Aliyah</a> and <a href="BER15$" data-aht="page">Covenant of the Pieces</a>.</fn></li> | + | <li>Setting – Since according to Bereshit 12:4-5 Avraham arrived in Israel only after he was 75, one must posit either that the Covenant of the Pieces took place outside of Israel before Avraham came to Israel<fn>See Chizkuni Bereshit 15:7 that this possibility would appear to be contradicted by the words "הָאָרֶץ הַזֹּאת"‎ (15:7,18). However, R. Yaacov Medan in an article in מוסף השבת, מקור ראשון, פרשת לך לך תש"ע attempts to develop this option. According to him the words "הָאָרֶץ הַזֹּאת" and "הֵנָּה"‎ (15:16) refer to the land Avraham is viewing (Cf. Devarim 34:4).</fn> or that Avraham had made an earlier pilot trip to Israel before he was 70, left,<fn>See Ran in his commentary to Bereshit 12:5 that Avraham went back to pack up his "lift."</fn> and then returned at 75.<fn>Seder Olam Rabbah 1 takes this option. See also the opinions in Bavli Avodah Zarah 9a and Tosafot s.v. "וגמירי" (see also Tosafot Shabbat 10b s.v. "ושל") that Avraham was 52 when he came to Israel, and Tanchuma Buber Chayyei Sarah 6 that he was 48 at the time of the Covenant. <multilink><a href="RalbagMilotBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagMilotBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Milot Bereshit 15:13</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershon (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About Ralbag</a></multilink> argues against Seder Olam Rabbah and rejects the possibility that Avraham would have left the land of Israel without adequate reason (cf. Ramban Bereshit 12:10). For further discussion, see <a href="BER12$" data-aht="page">Avraham's Aliyah</a> and <a href="BER15$" data-aht="page">Covenant of the Pieces</a>.</fn></li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</point> | </point> | ||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
<subopinion name="Covenant at 80">Covenant at Age 80 | <subopinion name="Covenant at 80">Covenant at Age 80 | ||
<p>The Covenant of the Pieces (ברית בין הבתרים) occurred when Avraham was 80 years old.</p> | <p>The Covenant of the Pieces (ברית בין הבתרים) occurred when Avraham was 80 years old.</p> | ||
− | <mekorot><multilink><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:13</a><a href="RambanBereshit46-15" data-aht="source">Bereshit 46:15</a><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:40</a><a href="RambanSHM1" data-aht="source">Sefer HaMitzvot, Root 1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban)" data-aht="parshan">About Ramban</a></multilink>'s preferred option.<fn>After first describing Seder Olam Rabbah's position and discussing one possible way of reconciling the 430 and 400 figures, Ramban proceeds to offer three alternatives for the beginning of the 430 year count. He rejects the first of these (counting the 430 years from the birth of Yitzchak, cf. Jubilees below) and suggests the third (counting the 430 years from the Covenant which was made when Avraham was 87) primarily as a way of finding common ground with the Rabbinic figure of 210 years. We will focus here on his middle and preferred option (counting the 430 years from the Covenant which was made when Avraham was 80). [All of Ramban's possibilities start by defining the starting point for the 430, with the 400 being secondary.]</fn></mekorot> | + | <mekorot><multilink><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:13</a><a href="RambanBereshit46-15" data-aht="source">Bereshit 46:15</a><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:40</a><a href="RambanSHM1" data-aht="source">Sefer HaMitzvot, Root 1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About Ramban</a></multilink>'s preferred option.<fn>After first describing Seder Olam Rabbah's position and discussing one possible way of reconciling the 430 and 400 figures, Ramban proceeds to offer three alternatives for the beginning of the 430 year count. He rejects the first of these (counting the 430 years from the birth of Yitzchak, cf. Jubilees below) and suggests the third (counting the 430 years from the Covenant which was made when Avraham was 87) primarily as a way of finding common ground with the Rabbinic figure of 210 years. We will focus here on his middle and preferred option (counting the 430 years from the Covenant which was made when Avraham was 80). [All of Ramban's possibilities start by defining the starting point for the 430, with the 400 being secondary.]</fn></mekorot> |
<p class="summary">Ramban suggests that the 430 years began with the Covenant which occurred when Avraham was 80, midway between the ages mentioned in the surrounding chapters. This leaves 220 years for the actual sojourn in Egypt. To reconcile the discrepancy between 400 and 430, Ramban suggests that the original plan included 400 years of wandering but an additional 30 were added later due to the sins of the nation.</p> | <p class="summary">Ramban suggests that the 430 years began with the Covenant which occurred when Avraham was 80, midway between the ages mentioned in the surrounding chapters. This leaves 220 years for the actual sojourn in Egypt. To reconcile the discrepancy between 400 and 430, Ramban suggests that the original plan included 400 years of wandering but an additional 30 were added later due to the sins of the nation.</p> | ||
− | <point><b>220 years in Egypt</b> – The Torah does not give us Avraham's age at the time of the Covenant of Pieces, and thus Ramban estimates it at ~80, or midway between Avraham's recorded ages of 75 and 85-86 in the neighboring chapters.<fn>Ramban (in contrast to Seder Olam Rabbah) thus gains that the Avraham stories remain in chronological order – see <a href="LIT_">Chronology</a> and <a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban)" data-aht="parshan">Ramban</a> for more on Ramban's general chronological approach.</fn> According to this, 210 of the 430 years preceded the descent to Egypt,<fn>The additional 210 years consist of: ~20 years of Avraham (before Yitzchak was born) + 60 years of Yitzchak (before Yaakov was born) + 130 years of Yaakov (before he went down to Egypt).</fn> leaving 220 years for the stay in Egypt.<fn>Ramban also attempts to integrate the Rabbinic tradition of 210 years in Egypt with his own approach (see <a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban)" data-aht="parshan">Ramban</a> for other examples of this), by suggesting a variation according to which Avraham was 87 at the time of the Covenant of Pieces. This would reduce the number of years prior to the descent to 203, leaving 227 of the 430 years for the stay in Egypt. As Yaakov was still alive for the first 17 of these 227 years, Ramban proposes that the 210 year tradition could refer to the years the Israelites spent in Egypt after Yaakov's death. However, this approach would require one to posit an achronology (which Ramban wants to avoid), as Avraham is only 86 in the story which follows the Covenant.</fn></point> | + | <point><b>220 years in Egypt</b> – The Torah does not give us Avraham's age at the time of the Covenant of Pieces, and thus Ramban estimates it at ~80, or midway between Avraham's recorded ages of 75 and 85-86 in the neighboring chapters.<fn>Ramban (in contrast to Seder Olam Rabbah) thus gains that the Avraham stories remain in chronological order – see <a href="LIT_">Chronology</a> and <a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">Ramban</a> for more on Ramban's general chronological approach.</fn> According to this, 210 of the 430 years preceded the descent to Egypt,<fn>The additional 210 years consist of: ~20 years of Avraham (before Yitzchak was born) + 60 years of Yitzchak (before Yaakov was born) + 130 years of Yaakov (before he went down to Egypt).</fn> leaving 220 years for the stay in Egypt.<fn>Ramban also attempts to integrate the Rabbinic tradition of 210 years in Egypt with his own approach (see <a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">Ramban</a> for other examples of this), by suggesting a variation according to which Avraham was 87 at the time of the Covenant of Pieces. This would reduce the number of years prior to the descent to 203, leaving 227 of the 430 years for the stay in Egypt. As Yaakov was still alive for the first 17 of these 227 years, Ramban proposes that the 210 year tradition could refer to the years the Israelites spent in Egypt after Yaakov's death. However, this approach would require one to posit an achronology (which Ramban wants to avoid), as Avraham is only 86 in the story which follows the Covenant.</fn></point> |
<point><b>430 year period</b> – "וּמוֹשַׁב בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲשֶׁר יָשְׁבוּ בְּמִצְרָיִם שְׁלֹשִׁים שָׁנָה וְאַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת שָׁנָה" (Shemot 12:40) – Ramban offers two possible understandings of this verse in two different works: | <point><b>430 year period</b> – "וּמוֹשַׁב בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲשֶׁר יָשְׁבוּ בְּמִצְרָיִם שְׁלֹשִׁים שָׁנָה וְאַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת שָׁנָה" (Shemot 12:40) – Ramban offers two possible understandings of this verse in two different works: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
<subopinion name="Covenant at 85">Covenant at Age 85 | <subopinion name="Covenant at 85">Covenant at Age 85 | ||
<p>The Covenant of the Pieces (ברית בין הבתרים) occurred when Avraham was 85 years old.</p> | <p>The Covenant of the Pieces (ברית בין הבתרים) occurred when Avraham was 85 years old.</p> | ||
− | <mekorot><multilink><a href="RalbagMilotBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagMilotBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Milot Bereshit 15:13</a><a href="RalbagSippurBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Sippur Bereshit 15:13</a><a href="Ralbag2-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 2:1</a><a href="Ralbag12-40" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:40</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershon (Ralbag)" data-aht="parshan">About Ralbag</a></multilink>.<fn>Ralbag discusses an alternative option that the 430 years are counted from the birth of Yitzchak and that 240 years were spent in Egypt (cf. Jubilees below). According to both of Ralbag's options for accounting for the 430, the 400 year decree began with the birth of Yaakov, but its duration was shortened (by either 30 or 45 years, resulting in either 240 or 225 years in Egypt). Ralbag also considers in passing the possibility that the full 400 years from Yaakov's birth were completed, according to which the Israelites would have spent 270 years in Egypt, however it is unclear how he would reconcile this with the 430 figure.</fn></mekorot> | + | <mekorot><multilink><a href="RalbagMilotBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagMilotBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Milot Bereshit 15:13</a><a href="RalbagSippurBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Sippur Bereshit 15:13</a><a href="Ralbag2-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 2:1</a><a href="Ralbag12-40" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:40</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershon (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About Ralbag</a></multilink>.<fn>Ralbag discusses an alternative option that the 430 years are counted from the birth of Yitzchak and that 240 years were spent in Egypt (cf. Jubilees below). According to both of Ralbag's options for accounting for the 430, the 400 year decree began with the birth of Yaakov, but its duration was shortened (by either 30 or 45 years, resulting in either 240 or 225 years in Egypt). Ralbag also considers in passing the possibility that the full 400 years from Yaakov's birth were completed, according to which the Israelites would have spent 270 years in Egypt, however it is unclear how he would reconcile this with the 430 figure.</fn></mekorot> |
<p class="summary">According to Ralbag, the 430 years began with the Covenant of the Pieces which took place when Avraham was 85 years old, the age recorded in the very next chapter. The 400 years begin from the birth of Yaakov. In order to reconcile this number with the 430 which began 75 years earlier, Ralbag must suggest that Hashem decided to shorten this original decree by 45 years, leaving 225 years for the Egyptian exile.</p> | <p class="summary">According to Ralbag, the 430 years began with the Covenant of the Pieces which took place when Avraham was 85 years old, the age recorded in the very next chapter. The 400 years begin from the birth of Yaakov. In order to reconcile this number with the 430 which began 75 years earlier, Ralbag must suggest that Hashem decided to shorten this original decree by 45 years, leaving 225 years for the Egyptian exile.</p> | ||
<point><b>225 years in Egypt</b> – Ralbag assumes that Avraham was 85 at the time of the Covenant of Pieces,<fn>This matches the opinion found in <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah46-2" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah46-2" data-aht="source">46:2</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>. Cf. Genesis Apocryphon (1Q20) XXII:27 which also places the events of Bereshit 15 ten years after Avraham left from Haran.</fn> as this is his age in the following chapter.<fn>Ralbag links Avraham's despair of fathering a child in the first part of Bereshit 15 with Sarah giving him Hagar in Bereshit 16. Ralbag rejects Seder Olam Rabbah's proposal that the story is achronological, and he argues that had Avraham come to the land of Israel before he was 75, he would not have left it to return to Haran (cf. Ramban Bereshit 12:10).</fn> According to this, 205 of the 430 years preceded the descent to Egypt,<fn>The additional 205 years consist of: ~15 years of Avraham (before Yitzchak was born) + 60 years of Yitzchak (before Yaakov was born) + 130 years of Yaakov (before he went down to Egypt).</fn> leaving 225 years for the stay in Egypt.</point> | <point><b>225 years in Egypt</b> – Ralbag assumes that Avraham was 85 at the time of the Covenant of Pieces,<fn>This matches the opinion found in <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah46-2" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah46-2" data-aht="source">46:2</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>. Cf. Genesis Apocryphon (1Q20) XXII:27 which also places the events of Bereshit 15 ten years after Avraham left from Haran.</fn> as this is his age in the following chapter.<fn>Ralbag links Avraham's despair of fathering a child in the first part of Bereshit 15 with Sarah giving him Hagar in Bereshit 16. Ralbag rejects Seder Olam Rabbah's proposal that the story is achronological, and he argues that had Avraham come to the land of Israel before he was 75, he would not have left it to return to Haran (cf. Ramban Bereshit 12:10).</fn> According to this, 205 of the 430 years preceded the descent to Egypt,<fn>The additional 205 years consist of: ~15 years of Avraham (before Yitzchak was born) + 60 years of Yitzchak (before Yaakov was born) + 130 years of Yaakov (before he went down to Egypt).</fn> leaving 225 years for the stay in Egypt.</point> | ||
Line 142: | Line 142: | ||
<multilink><a href="Jubilees16" data-aht="source">Jubilees</a><a href="Jubilees16" data-aht="source">16:13</a><a href="Jubilees48" data-aht="source">48:1</a><a href="Jubilees" data-aht="parshan">About Jubilees</a></multilink>,<fn>Jubilees does not explicitly mention the 430 years. However, it dates the birth of Yitzchak to year 1980 from Creation and the Exodus to the 2410/2411th year, with a differential of 430 years between the events. Jubilees 44 places the descent to Egypt in the year 2172, and thus there were 238-240 years in Egypt. It should be noted, though, that there are some textual transmission issues which impact these dates.</fn> | <multilink><a href="Jubilees16" data-aht="source">Jubilees</a><a href="Jubilees16" data-aht="source">16:13</a><a href="Jubilees48" data-aht="source">48:1</a><a href="Jubilees" data-aht="parshan">About Jubilees</a></multilink>,<fn>Jubilees does not explicitly mention the 430 years. However, it dates the birth of Yitzchak to year 1980 from Creation and the Exodus to the 2410/2411th year, with a differential of 430 years between the events. Jubilees 44 places the descent to Egypt in the year 2172, and thus there were 238-240 years in Egypt. It should be noted, though, that there are some textual transmission issues which impact these dates.</fn> | ||
<multilink><a href="RChananel" data-aht="source">R. Chananel</a><a href="RChananel" data-aht="source">In R. Bachya Shemot 12:40</a><a href="R. Chananel b. Chushiel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Chananel</a></multilink>,<fn>R. Chananel's position is unclear, as after first saying that the 430 years are counted from Yitzchak's birth (which would imply that 240 years were spent in Egypt), he proceeds to explain that they were in Egypt for only 210 years. Additionally, it is unclear how R. Chananel reconciles the 430 and 400 figures.</fn> | <multilink><a href="RChananel" data-aht="source">R. Chananel</a><a href="RChananel" data-aht="source">In R. Bachya Shemot 12:40</a><a href="R. Chananel b. Chushiel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Chananel</a></multilink>,<fn>R. Chananel's position is unclear, as after first saying that the 430 years are counted from Yitzchak's birth (which would imply that 240 years were spent in Egypt), he proceeds to explain that they were in Egypt for only 210 years. Additionally, it is unclear how R. Chananel reconciles the 430 and 400 figures.</fn> | ||
− | an option mentioned by both <multilink><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:40</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban)" data-aht="parshan">About Ramban</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RalbagMilotBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagMilotBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Milot Bereshit 15:13</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershon (Ralbag)" data-aht="parshan">About Ralbag</a></multilink>, | + | an option mentioned by both <multilink><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="Ramban12-40" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:40</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About Ramban</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RalbagMilotBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagMilotBereshit15-13" data-aht="source">Milot Bereshit 15:13</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershon (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About Ralbag</a></multilink>, |
<multilink><a href="AbarbanelBereshit15-12" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelBereshit15-12" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:12-15</a><a href="Abarbanel12-21" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:21-41</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink>, | <multilink><a href="AbarbanelBereshit15-12" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelBereshit15-12" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:12-15</a><a href="Abarbanel12-21" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:21-41</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink>, | ||
<multilink><a href="KeliYekar12-40" data-aht="source">Keli Yekar</a><a href="KeliYekar12-40" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:40</a><a href="R. Shelomo Ephraim Luntschitz (Keli Yekar)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Ephraim Luntschitz</a></multilink>. | <multilink><a href="KeliYekar12-40" data-aht="source">Keli Yekar</a><a href="KeliYekar12-40" data-aht="source">Shemot 12:40</a><a href="R. Shelomo Ephraim Luntschitz (Keli Yekar)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Ephraim Luntschitz</a></multilink>. |
Version as of 03:04, 1 January 2015
The Duration of the Egyptian Exile
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
Faced with the apparent contradictions between the explicit verses which speak of 400 or 430 years and the upper limit of 350 years derived from Moshe’s genealogy, different commentators chose to take some verses at face value while reinterpreting others. This yields a full spectrum of approaches regarding the total number of years the Israelites spent in Egypt.
Shadal and the Hoil Moshe maintain that the Children of Israel were in Egypt for the full 430 years. They propose that Moshe's genealogy omits several generations and includes only the more prominent personalities. Others view Moshe's genealogy as a full listing and therefore suggest that the nation was in Egypt for much less than 430 years. To do so, they reread the verses which speak of 430 or 400, suggesting that this time span does not begin with the descent to Egypt but with some other event such as Avraham's journey to Israel, the Covenant of the Pieces, or the birth of Yitzchak. Depending on which of these approaches is chosen, the Children of Israel might have been in Egypt anywhere between 210 and 240 years. There is also a compromise approach which suggests that though the original plan was for a full 400 year exile in Egypt, Hashem changed his mind and shortened the stay.1
Full 430 Years
The Israelites lived in Egypt for a full 430 years.
Shadal and the Hoil Moshe maintain that the Israelites were in Egypt for a full 430 years. To do so, they must posit that Moshe's genealogy in Shemot 6 omits several generations and includes only the more prominent personalities.
Change in Plans
The Israelites were supposed to be in Egypt for a full 400-430 years, but Hashem shortened their stay.
This approach resolves the discrepancy between four generations and 430/400 years by suggesting that there was a change in the Divine plan. Although Hashem originally decreed a longer exile in Egypt, He later shortened the stay to 210 years.
Never 430 Years
The Israelites were never supposed to be in Egypt for a full 400-430 years, and the verses which speak of a 400 or 430 year stay need to be reinterpreted as counting, not from the descent to Egypt, but rather from a different starting point.27 This option subdivides regarding the point from which the 430 years are counted:28
430 Years From Avraham's Aliyah
The 430 years are counted from the time when Avraham began his journey to the land of Israel. There are two variations of this possibility:
Departure at Age 70
The 430 year count begins when Avraham originally departed Ur Kasdim at the age of 70.29
This approach suggests that the 430 year count begins when Avraham departed Ur Kasdim at the age of 70 while the 400 years is counted from the birth of Yitzchak (the beginning of the sojourn of Avraham's "seed"). The exile in Egypt, then, lasted 210 years.
- Reinterpreting two of its terms – R. Saadia adopts this method. Thus he suggests that "בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל" can refer also to the Israelites' ancestors such as Avraham,34 and that "בְּמִצְרָיִם" encompasses not only Egypt proper, but all lands which were under Egyptian dominion.35 These broader definitions then allow him to explain that the 430 figure includes also the years from the time that the Patriarchs lived in Canaan and Haran (as those lands were then under Egyptian control).36
- Assuming that the verse is giving only the central facts and not the full details – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor thus explains that the verse mentions only the stay in Egypt because that was the main part of the exile.37
- Separating the 430 figure from the rest of the verse – R. Avraham b. HaRambam suggests that the verse is merely saying that the Israelites were in Egypt until the end of the 430 year Patriarchal era which began with Avraham.38
Arrival at Age 75
The 430 year count begins when Avraham arrived in the land of Canaan at age 75.45
Demetrius and Josephus propose that the 430 year count begins when Avraham arrived in the land of Canaan at age 75, and they apparently view the 400 as merely a round number. The nation was thus in Egypt for a total of 215 years.
430 Years From Covenant
The 430 years are counted from the Covenant of the Pieces (ברית בין הבתרים). This possibility further subdivides regarding when the Covenant took place:
Covenant at Age 70
The Covenant of the Pieces (ברית בין הבתרים) occurred when Avraham was 70 years old.56
This approach suggests that the 430 years began with the Covenant which happened when Avraham was 70 years old. It thus needs to rearrange the chronology of Sefer Bereshit and also assume either that the Covenant took place outside of Israel or that Avraham came to Israel only to leave and return again. The 400 years are counted from the birth of Yitzchak. This leaves 210 years for the sojourn in Egypt.
- Reinterpreting "בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל" to refer also to the Israelites' ancestors such as Avraham61 and "בְּמִצְרָיִם" to encompass not only Egypt proper, but all lands which were under Egyptian dominion62 – This appears to be the option adopted by the Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael and Mekhilta DeRashbi.
- Reading the 430 year figure as describing the duration of the Patriarchal period, whose endpoint coincided with the Exodus – R. Shemuel b. Chofni Gaon,63 R. Yonah ibn Janach.64
- Assuming that the verse is giving only the central facts and not the full details – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor thus explains that the verse mentions only the stay in Egypt because that was the main part of the exile.65
- Achronology – As the events of Bereshit 12-14 and the first part of Bereshit 15 proceed sequentially from when Avraham was 75 years old, the story of the Covenant of the Pieces in Bereshit 15:7-21 cannot be in chronological order and is not a continuation of the first part of Bereshit 15.69
- Setting – Since according to Bereshit 12:4-5 Avraham arrived in Israel only after he was 75, one must posit either that the Covenant of the Pieces took place outside of Israel before Avraham came to Israel70 or that Avraham had made an earlier pilot trip to Israel before he was 70, left,71 and then returned at 75.72
Covenant at Age 80
The Covenant of the Pieces (ברית בין הבתרים) occurred when Avraham was 80 years old.
Ramban suggests that the 430 years began with the Covenant which occurred when Avraham was 80, midway between the ages mentioned in the surrounding chapters. This leaves 220 years for the actual sojourn in Egypt. To reconcile the discrepancy between 400 and 430, Ramban suggests that the original plan included 400 years of wandering but an additional 30 were added later due to the sins of the nation.
- In his Commentary on the Torah, Ramban suggests that the verse is an elliptical construction and should be read as if the word "עַד" precedes the 430 years. Thus, he interprets the 430 as referring to the aforementioned period specified to Avraham at the Covenant of the Pieces,83 rather than to the time spent in Egypt.84
- In his Critique of the Rambam's Sefer HaMitzvot, Ramban posits that the verse is speaking generally about the majority of the 430 years, which was in fact spent in Egypt.85 Ramban also adds that the 430 year period began with Avraham's first exile from Canaan. Assuming that Ramban is referring to Avraham's descent to Egypt,86 the 430 years would then be bookended by two exiles to Egypt.
- Ramban explains that the verse is a מקרא מסורס and "אַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת שָׁנָה" is a dangling modifier which refers back to "גֵר יִהְיֶה זַרְעֲךָ בְּאֶרֶץ לֹא לָהֶם", rather than to the immediately preceding words of "וַעֲבָדוּם וְעִנּוּ אֹתָם".87
- Ramban maintains that the 400 years incorporate the years of Avraham himself from the time of the Covenant,88 in spite of the fact that the verse specifies "זַרְעֲךָ".89
- Ramban must argue that "בְּאֶרֶץ לֹא לָהֶם" includes Canaan.90
- The verses in Bereshit should be understood as saying that following the 400 years, there will be an additional period of thirty years until the Amorites are fully deserving of punishment and the Israelites will return to the land.
- The verse in Bereshit describes the original plan which called for only 400 years of wandering and oppression. Ultimately, however, their exile was prolonged by thirty years as a penalty for bad behavior,91 and thus Shemot speaks of 430 years.92
Covenant at Age 85
The Covenant of the Pieces (ברית בין הבתרים) occurred when Avraham was 85 years old.
According to Ralbag, the 430 years began with the Covenant of the Pieces which took place when Avraham was 85 years old, the age recorded in the very next chapter. The 400 years begin from the birth of Yaakov. In order to reconcile this number with the 430 which began 75 years earlier, Ralbag must suggest that Hashem decided to shorten this original decree by 45 years, leaving 225 years for the Egyptian exile.
- Ralbag says that "זַרְעֲךָ" refers to Yaakov and the 400 years are counted from his birth, as Yaakov spent much of his life wandering and was the first to dwell in Egypt on a permanent basis.101
- Ralbag suggests that this verse is also slightly elliptical, and is saying that the bondage will last until the end of the 400 year period which began with the birth of Yaakov.102
- Ralbag says that ultimately Hashem shortened the 400 year decree by 45 years.103 This allows him to reconcile it with the 430 count which began 75 years earlier.104
430 Years From Yitzchak's Birth
The 430 years are counted from the birth of Yitzchak, when Avraham was 100 years old.
This approach counts the 430 years from the birth of Yitzchak, according to which the actual stay in Egypt was 240 years. Abarbanel explains that the 400 years is either a round number or, like Ramban above, that 30 years were later added due to the nation's sins.