Difference between revisions of "Duration of the Egyptian Exile/2"
(Original Author: Yonatan Novetsky, Rabbi Hillel Novetsky) |
(Original Author: Yonatan Novetsky, Rabbi Hillel Novetsky) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<mekorot><multilink><a href="Rashba367" data-aht="source">Rashba</a><a href="Rashba367" data-aht="source">New Responsa #367</a><a href="R. Shelomo b. Aderet" data-aht="parshan">About Rashba</a></multilink>,<fn>After first discussing the 210 year position found in Chazal, Rashba writes: "כל שכן לכשתלך אחר פשוטי הכתובים שהיתה עמידתם במצרים ת״ל שנה, כמו שכתוב ומושב בני ישראל אשר ישבו במצרים שלשים שנה וארבע מאות שנה". See also Scholion of Megillat Taanit regarding 25 Sivan and Bavli Sanhedrin 91a where Geviha b. Pesisa claims backpay for a full 430 years of slavery. In contrast, the parallel account in Bereshit Rabbah 61:7 speaks of 210 years. For more see <a href="Reparations and Despoiling Egypt" data-aht="page">Reparations and Despoiling Egypt</a>.</fn> <multilink><a href="Shadal6-20" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="Shadal6-20" data-aht="source">Shemot 6:20</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About Shadal</a></multilink> agreeing with I.B. Koppe,<fn>Shadal also cites Isaak Markus Jost as maintaining this position. However, there is a fundamental difference between them regarding how to understand Shemot 6 – see below.</fn> <multilink><a href="HoilBereshit15-16" data-aht="source">Hoil Moshe</a><a href="HoilBereshit15-16" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:16</a><a href="Hoil6-18" data-aht="source">Shemot 6:18</a><a href="HoilYehoshua7-1" data-aht="source">Yehoshua 7:1</a><a href="R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi (Hoil Moshe)" data-aht="parshan">About Hoil Moshe</a></multilink>.<fn>Two similar options are mentioned by the <multilink><a href="RambamTeiman3" data-aht="source">Rambam</a><a href="RambamTeiman3" data-aht="source">Iggeret Teiman Ch. 3</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Maimon (Rambam, Maimonides)" data-aht="parshan">About Rambam</a></multilink>, in the context of his discussion of the impossibility of predicting when the ultimate redemption will happen. Rambam notes that while the Israelites were in Egypt there were also conflicting predictions as to when the Exodus was supposed to occur and as to how to interpret the prophecy of Bereshit 15:13. According to the Rambam's reconstruction, two of the theories proposed at that time were that the 400 years should be counted either from the descent to Egypt or from the start of the slavery (which the Rambam places at 70 years after the descent). Since for the Rambam these possibilities were contemplated only while the Israelites were still in Egypt (and were proven false when the Exodus took place 400 years after the birth of Yitzchak), they could not have accounted for the later verses in Shemot 12:40-41 which mention the figure of 430 years.</fn></mekorot> | <mekorot><multilink><a href="Rashba367" data-aht="source">Rashba</a><a href="Rashba367" data-aht="source">New Responsa #367</a><a href="R. Shelomo b. Aderet" data-aht="parshan">About Rashba</a></multilink>,<fn>After first discussing the 210 year position found in Chazal, Rashba writes: "כל שכן לכשתלך אחר פשוטי הכתובים שהיתה עמידתם במצרים ת״ל שנה, כמו שכתוב ומושב בני ישראל אשר ישבו במצרים שלשים שנה וארבע מאות שנה". See also Scholion of Megillat Taanit regarding 25 Sivan and Bavli Sanhedrin 91a where Geviha b. Pesisa claims backpay for a full 430 years of slavery. In contrast, the parallel account in Bereshit Rabbah 61:7 speaks of 210 years. For more see <a href="Reparations and Despoiling Egypt" data-aht="page">Reparations and Despoiling Egypt</a>.</fn> <multilink><a href="Shadal6-20" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="Shadal6-20" data-aht="source">Shemot 6:20</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About Shadal</a></multilink> agreeing with I.B. Koppe,<fn>Shadal also cites Isaak Markus Jost as maintaining this position. However, there is a fundamental difference between them regarding how to understand Shemot 6 – see below.</fn> <multilink><a href="HoilBereshit15-16" data-aht="source">Hoil Moshe</a><a href="HoilBereshit15-16" data-aht="source">Bereshit 15:16</a><a href="Hoil6-18" data-aht="source">Shemot 6:18</a><a href="HoilYehoshua7-1" data-aht="source">Yehoshua 7:1</a><a href="R. Moshe Yitzchak Ashkenazi (Hoil Moshe)" data-aht="parshan">About Hoil Moshe</a></multilink>.<fn>Two similar options are mentioned by the <multilink><a href="RambamTeiman3" data-aht="source">Rambam</a><a href="RambamTeiman3" data-aht="source">Iggeret Teiman Ch. 3</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Maimon (Rambam, Maimonides)" data-aht="parshan">About Rambam</a></multilink>, in the context of his discussion of the impossibility of predicting when the ultimate redemption will happen. Rambam notes that while the Israelites were in Egypt there were also conflicting predictions as to when the Exodus was supposed to occur and as to how to interpret the prophecy of Bereshit 15:13. According to the Rambam's reconstruction, two of the theories proposed at that time were that the 400 years should be counted either from the descent to Egypt or from the start of the slavery (which the Rambam places at 70 years after the descent). Since for the Rambam these possibilities were contemplated only while the Israelites were still in Egypt (and were proven false when the Exodus took place 400 years after the birth of Yitzchak), they could not have accounted for the later verses in Shemot 12:40-41 which mention the figure of 430 years.</fn></mekorot> | ||
<p class="summary">Shadal and the Hoil Moshe maintain that the Israelites were in Egypt for a full 430 years. To do so, they must posit that Moshe's genealogy in Shemot 6 omits several generations and includes only the more prominent personalities.</p> | <p class="summary">Shadal and the Hoil Moshe maintain that the Israelites were in Egypt for a full 430 years. To do so, they must posit that Moshe's genealogy in Shemot 6 omits several generations and includes only the more prominent personalities.</p> | ||
− | <point><b>430 years in Egypt</b> | + | <point><b>430 years in Egypt</b> – This position reads the verses in Shemot 12:40-41 literally, and thus maintains that the Israelites really were in Egypt for a full 430 years.</point> |
− | <point><b>Moshe's paternal lineage</b> | + | <point><b>Moshe's paternal lineage</b> – Shadal and the Hoil Moshe need to offer a novel interpretation of Shemot 6, maintaining that Moshe's genealogy omits several generations and includes only the more prominent personalities.<fn>Cf. Rashbam Shemot 6:18 who posits that the genealogies mention only characters who appear in stories in the Torah, and see also Rashba in the first part of his responsum: "יש לנו להשיב ולומר שלא כל התולדות אשר היו להם זכר הכתוב רק מקצת מהם או מקצת מן הנזכרים, ואף על פי שהיו להם או למקצתם בנים אחרים רבים מאלה, אלא שלא זכר כאן רק אותם שהיה הצורך מביא לזכרם, מפני שאלה היו ראשי בית אבות למשפחותיהם והאחרים בלבד יקראו על שמם".</fn> Thus it, too, covers a period of 430 years.<fn>While Shadal (and the Hoil Moshe) understand the numbers of the years recorded for Levi, Kehat, and Amram as the literal lengths of their lives, Jost (cited by Shadal) attempts to explain these numbers as the duration of the periods their families remained as a tribal unit before subdividing. This allows him to add all of these numbers together and arrive at a sum close to 430. Jost's reading, however, is a difficult if not impossible rendering of the verses.</fn></point> |
− | <point><b>Moshe's maternal lineage</b> | + | <point><b>Moshe's maternal lineage</b> – The Torah records that Yocheved was Levi's "daughter born to him in Egypt" ("‏בַּת־לֵוִי אֲשֶׁר יָלְדָה אֹתָהּ לְלֵוִי בְּמִצְרָיִם") and Amram's aunt ("דֹּדָתוֹ"‎).<fn>See Shemot 2:1, 6:20, and Bemidbar 26:59.</fn> If so, Yocheved would need to have lived at least from the year of Levi's death until Moshe's birth, which would make her at least 256 years old when she gave birth to Moshe. Thus, in order to sustain his position, the Hoil Moshe is forced to interpret "בַּת־לֵוִי אֲשֶׁר יָלְדָה אֹתָהּ לְלֵוִי" as "a woman born to the tribe of Levi," rather than as a biological daughter of Levi himself.<fn>The Hoil Moshe acknowledges the difficulty in his interpretation. The problem lies not so much in rendering "בַּת" as a descendant – see <a href="Dictionary:אַב" data-aht="page">אב</a> for similar cases, but rather in the "אֲשֶׁר יָלְדָה אֹתָהּ לְלֵוִי בְּמִצְרָיִם" which appears to indicate that Yocheved was an actual child of Levi himself, born to him after his descent to Egypt.</fn> According to this, Yocheved could still be Amram's aunt, or, alternatively, "דֹּדָתוֹ" could be explained as a relative or cousin.<fn>As per the readings of the LXX, Peshitta, and Neofiti Shemot 6:20, and Demetrius (see discussion below for his reconstruction of Moshe's genealogy). [Cf. the similar case in Yirmeyahu 32:12, and see Radak there.] This position is also found in Karaite commentaries – see the comments of Yefet b. Eli and an additional Karaite interpreter published by M. Zucker, על תרגום רס"ג לתורה (New York, 1959): 489,493. The Karaites are explicitly motivated by a desire to show that the laws of the Torah are immutable and that Amram did not violate the later recorded prohibition of marrying an aunt. For elaboration, see <a href="$">Avot and Mitzvot</a>.</fn></point> |
<point><b>"וְדוֹר רְבִיעִי יָשׁוּבוּ הֵנָּה"</b> (Bereshit 15:16) – The Hoil Moshe Bereshit 15:16 explains that "generation" here doesn’t mean a literal generation, but rather the lifespan of an important personality which can extend over several generations.</point> | <point><b>"וְדוֹר רְבִיעִי יָשׁוּבוּ הֵנָּה"</b> (Bereshit 15:16) – The Hoil Moshe Bereshit 15:16 explains that "generation" here doesn’t mean a literal generation, but rather the lifespan of an important personality which can extend over several generations.</point> | ||
<point><b>400 in Bereshit vs. 430 in Shemot</b> – The Hoil Moshe Bereshit 15:16 suggests that 400 is merely used as a round number approximating the more precise tally of 430 years spent in Egypt.<fn>See below for the alternative that 30 years were added because of the Israelites' sins. An additional theoretical possibility might be that the Israelites lived in Egypt for 430 years, but were only oppressed for 400 years, but this would need to maintain that the oppression began thirteen years after Yaakov's death (i.e. thirty years after he and his family descended to Egypt) and while Yosef was still alive.</fn> According to this approach, the prophecy in Bereshit 15 is intended only to be a general foretelling of the future (rather than a precise historical account), and thus both the exact duration and location of the exile are not provided.<fn>The verse uses the vaguers "בְּאֶרֶץ לֹא לָהֶם" rather than specifying Egypt.</fn></point> | <point><b>400 in Bereshit vs. 430 in Shemot</b> – The Hoil Moshe Bereshit 15:16 suggests that 400 is merely used as a round number approximating the more precise tally of 430 years spent in Egypt.<fn>See below for the alternative that 30 years were added because of the Israelites' sins. An additional theoretical possibility might be that the Israelites lived in Egypt for 430 years, but were only oppressed for 400 years, but this would need to maintain that the oppression began thirteen years after Yaakov's death (i.e. thirty years after he and his family descended to Egypt) and while Yosef was still alive.</fn> According to this approach, the prophecy in Bereshit 15 is intended only to be a general foretelling of the future (rather than a precise historical account), and thus both the exact duration and location of the exile are not provided.<fn>The verse uses the vaguers "בְּאֶרֶץ לֹא לָהֶם" rather than specifying Egypt.</fn></point> | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<point><b>Duration of the slavery</b> – Theoretically, this approach could posit that the Israelites were enslaved for over 300 years. However, the Hoil Moshe maintains that the harsh decrees spanned only the reign of the two kings mentioned in Sefer Shemot, or a period of about a hundred years.<fn>For more on the Hoil Moshe's historical reconstruction, see <a href="New King or Dynasty" data-aht="page">Melekh Chadash</a> and <a href="$">Egyptian Chronology</a>.</fn></point> | <point><b>Duration of the slavery</b> – Theoretically, this approach could posit that the Israelites were enslaved for over 300 years. However, the Hoil Moshe maintains that the harsh decrees spanned only the reign of the two kings mentioned in Sefer Shemot, or a period of about a hundred years.<fn>For more on the Hoil Moshe's historical reconstruction, see <a href="New King or Dynasty" data-aht="page">Melekh Chadash</a> and <a href="$">Egyptian Chronology</a>.</fn></point> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
− | + | <category name="Plan Changed">Change in Plans | |
<p>The Israelites were supposed to be in Egypt for a full 400-430 years, but Hashem shortened their stay.</p> | <p>The Israelites were supposed to be in Egypt for a full 400-430 years, but Hashem shortened their stay.</p> | ||
<mekorot><multilink><a href="MekhiltaBo14" data-aht="source">Rabbi (Yehuda) in the Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael</a><a href="MekhiltaBo14" data-aht="source">Bo 14</a><a href="Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael" data-aht="parshan">About the Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="PesiktaDRKHaChodesh5-7" data-aht="source">Pesikta DeRav Kahana</a><a href="PesiktaDRKHaChodesh5-7" data-aht="source">HaChodesh 5:7</a><a href="Pesikta DeRav Kahana" data-aht="parshan">About Pesikta DeRav Kahana</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="TanchumaMasei7" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaMasei7" data-aht="source">Masei 7</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="PirkeiDRE47" data-aht="source">Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a><a href="PirkeiDRE47" data-aht="source">47</a><a href="Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer" data-aht="parshan">About Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a></multilink>.</mekorot> | <mekorot><multilink><a href="MekhiltaBo14" data-aht="source">Rabbi (Yehuda) in the Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael</a><a href="MekhiltaBo14" data-aht="source">Bo 14</a><a href="Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael" data-aht="parshan">About the Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="PesiktaDRKHaChodesh5-7" data-aht="source">Pesikta DeRav Kahana</a><a href="PesiktaDRKHaChodesh5-7" data-aht="source">HaChodesh 5:7</a><a href="Pesikta DeRav Kahana" data-aht="parshan">About Pesikta DeRav Kahana</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="TanchumaMasei7" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaMasei7" data-aht="source">Masei 7</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="PirkeiDRE47" data-aht="source">Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a><a href="PirkeiDRE47" data-aht="source">47</a><a href="Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer" data-aht="parshan">About Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer</a></multilink>.</mekorot> | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
<point><b>Only 210 years in Egypt</b> – According to Rabbi Yehuda in the Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael, Hashem could have shortened the 400 year period by any amount, and there is no evidence for specifically a 210 year stint.<fn>Indeed, see the note above that from Rabbi Yehuda's words in the Mekhilta, it is not even clear that Hashem did abbreviate the period.</fn> However, the Pesikta and Tanchuma specify that Hashem reduced the decree to 210 years. They are likely influenced by the position of Seder Olam Rabbah below.<fn>See also <multilink><a href="RashiSHS2-10" data-aht="source">Rashi Shir HaShirim</a><a href="RashiSHS2-10" data-aht="source">Shir HaShirim 2:10-11</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About Rashi</a></multilink> who synthesizes the approach of the Mekhilta with that of Seder Olam Rabbah below. Rashi explains that Hashem didn't simply reduce the 400 year period, but rather changed its starting point by reinterpreting the verse to begin from the birth of Yitzchak (as per Seder Olam Rabbah).</fn></point> | <point><b>Only 210 years in Egypt</b> – According to Rabbi Yehuda in the Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael, Hashem could have shortened the 400 year period by any amount, and there is no evidence for specifically a 210 year stint.<fn>Indeed, see the note above that from Rabbi Yehuda's words in the Mekhilta, it is not even clear that Hashem did abbreviate the period.</fn> However, the Pesikta and Tanchuma specify that Hashem reduced the decree to 210 years. They are likely influenced by the position of Seder Olam Rabbah below.<fn>See also <multilink><a href="RashiSHS2-10" data-aht="source">Rashi Shir HaShirim</a><a href="RashiSHS2-10" data-aht="source">Shir HaShirim 2:10-11</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About Rashi</a></multilink> who synthesizes the approach of the Mekhilta with that of Seder Olam Rabbah below. Rashi explains that Hashem didn't simply reduce the 400 year period, but rather changed its starting point by reinterpreting the verse to begin from the birth of Yitzchak (as per Seder Olam Rabbah).</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Israelite population growth</b> – The Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael,<fn>Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Bo 12.</fn> Pesikta,<fn>Pesikta DeRav Kahana 11.</fn> and Tanchuma<fn>Tanchuma Shemot 5</fn> all explain that the growth was supernatural. See <a href="$">Fertility Rate</a> for more.</point> | <point><b>Israelite population growth</b> – The Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael,<fn>Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Bo 12.</fn> Pesikta,<fn>Pesikta DeRav Kahana 11.</fn> and Tanchuma<fn>Tanchuma Shemot 5</fn> all explain that the growth was supernatural. See <a href="$">Fertility Rate</a> for more.</point> | ||
− | + | </category> | |
− | + | <category name="Never 430 Years">Never 430 Years | |
<p>The Israelites were never supposed to be in Egypt for a full 400-430 years, and the verses which speak of a 400 or 430 year stay need to be reinterpreted as counting, not from the descent to Egypt, but rather from a different starting point.<fn>To some extent, the verse of Bereshit 15:13 poses less of a problem than the verses in Shemot 12:40-41, as it is vaguer – which land is not specified, the 400 is perhaps only a round number and not a precise figure, and the verse contains more possibilities for what the number is describing. [This is why the Rabbinic tradition about the emendation of the translators of the Torah into Greek appears only with regard to the verses in Shemot.] On the other hand, see below that the contrast to Bereshit 15:15-16 would appear to eliminate the option that 15:13 speaks of Avraham himself or of the land of Canaan.</fn> This option subdivides regarding the point from which the 430 years are counted:<fn>The categorization below is organized by how the approaches interpreted the 430 figure. However, some of the positions may have first established the starting point for the 400 number, and then worked backwards to explain the 430. See J. Heinemann, "210 Years of Egyptian Exile," JJS 22 (1971): 19-30 who attempts to reconstruct the historical development of the various Midrashic motifs.</fn></p> | <p>The Israelites were never supposed to be in Egypt for a full 400-430 years, and the verses which speak of a 400 or 430 year stay need to be reinterpreted as counting, not from the descent to Egypt, but rather from a different starting point.<fn>To some extent, the verse of Bereshit 15:13 poses less of a problem than the verses in Shemot 12:40-41, as it is vaguer – which land is not specified, the 400 is perhaps only a round number and not a precise figure, and the verse contains more possibilities for what the number is describing. [This is why the Rabbinic tradition about the emendation of the translators of the Torah into Greek appears only with regard to the verses in Shemot.] On the other hand, see below that the contrast to Bereshit 15:15-16 would appear to eliminate the option that 15:13 speaks of Avraham himself or of the land of Canaan.</fn> This option subdivides regarding the point from which the 430 years are counted:<fn>The categorization below is organized by how the approaches interpreted the 430 figure. However, some of the positions may have first established the starting point for the 400 number, and then worked backwards to explain the 430. See J. Heinemann, "210 Years of Egyptian Exile," JJS 22 (1971): 19-30 who attempts to reconstruct the historical development of the various Midrashic motifs.</fn></p> | ||
<opinion name="430 From Aliyah">430 Years From Avraham's Aliyah | <opinion name="430 From Aliyah">430 Years From Avraham's Aliyah | ||
Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
<point><b>Duration of the slavery</b> – According to Jubilees 46, the oppression began after the deaths of Yosef and all of his brothers, and thus lasted 147 years. Abarbanel opts for a lower figure of 86 years for the most severe stage of the oppression (וְעִנּוּ אֹתָם)‎.<fn>See Seder Olam Rabbah and other sources cited above.</fn></point> | <point><b>Duration of the slavery</b> – According to Jubilees 46, the oppression began after the deaths of Yosef and all of his brothers, and thus lasted 147 years. Abarbanel opts for a lower figure of 86 years for the most severe stage of the oppression (וְעִנּוּ אֹתָם)‎.<fn>See Seder Olam Rabbah and other sources cited above.</fn></point> | ||
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
− | + | </category> | |
</approaches> | </approaches> | ||
</page> | </page> | ||
</aht-xml> | </aht-xml> |
Version as of 11:21, 6 January 2015
The Duration of the Egyptian Exile
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
Faced with the apparent contradictions between the explicit verses which speak of 400 or 430 years and the upper limit of 350 years derived from Moshe’s genealogy, different commentators chose to take some verses at face value while reinterpreting others. This yields a full spectrum of approaches regarding the total number of years the Israelites spent in Egypt.
Shadal and the Hoil Moshe maintain that the Children of Israel were in Egypt for the full 430 years. They propose that Moshe's genealogy omits several generations and includes only the more prominent personalities. Others view Moshe's genealogy as a full listing and therefore suggest that the nation was in Egypt for much less than 430 years. To do so, they reread the verses which speak of 430 or 400, suggesting that this time span does not begin with the descent to Egypt but with some other event such as Avraham's journey to Israel, the Covenant of the Pieces, or the birth of Yitzchak. Depending on which of these approaches is chosen, the Children of Israel might have been in Egypt anywhere between 210 and 240 years. There is also a compromise approach which suggests that though the original plan was for a full 400 year exile in Egypt, Hashem changed his mind and shortened the stay.1
Full 430 Years
The Israelites lived in Egypt for a full 430 years.
Shadal and the Hoil Moshe maintain that the Israelites were in Egypt for a full 430 years. To do so, they must posit that Moshe's genealogy in Shemot 6 omits several generations and includes only the more prominent personalities.
Change in Plans
The Israelites were supposed to be in Egypt for a full 400-430 years, but Hashem shortened their stay.
This approach resolves the discrepancy between four generations and 430/400 years by suggesting that there was a change in the Divine plan. Although Hashem originally decreed a longer exile in Egypt, He later shortened the stay to 210 years.
Never 430 Years
The Israelites were never supposed to be in Egypt for a full 400-430 years, and the verses which speak of a 400 or 430 year stay need to be reinterpreted as counting, not from the descent to Egypt, but rather from a different starting point.27 This option subdivides regarding the point from which the 430 years are counted:28
430 Years From Avraham's Aliyah
The 430 years are counted from the time when Avraham began his journey to the land of Israel. There are two variations of this possibility:
Departure at Age 70
The 430 year count begins when Avraham originally departed Ur Kasdim at the age of 70.29
This approach suggests that the 430 year count begins when Avraham departed Ur Kasdim at the age of 70 while the 400 years is counted from the birth of Yitzchak (the beginning of the sojourn of Avraham's "seed"). The exile in Egypt, then, lasted 210 years.
- Reinterpreting two of its terms – R. Saadia adopts this method. Thus he suggests that "בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל" can refer also to the Israelites' ancestors such as Avraham,34 and that "בְּמִצְרָיִם" encompasses not only Egypt proper, but all lands which were under Egyptian dominion.35 These broader definitions then allow him to explain that the 430 figure includes also the years from the time that the Patriarchs lived in Canaan and Haran (as those lands were then under Egyptian control).36
- Assuming that the verse is giving only the central facts and not the full details – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor thus explains that the verse mentions only the stay in Egypt because that was the main part of the exile.37
- Separating the 430 figure from the rest of the verse – R. Avraham b. HaRambam suggests that the verse is merely saying that the Israelites were in Egypt until the end of the 430 year Patriarchal era which began with Avraham.38
Arrival at Age 75
The 430 year count begins when Avraham arrived in the land of Canaan at age 75.45
Demetrius and Josephus propose that the 430 year count begins when Avraham arrived in the land of Canaan at age 75, and they apparently view the 400 as merely a round number. The nation was thus in Egypt for a total of 215 years.
430 Years From Covenant
The 430 years are counted from the Covenant of the Pieces (ברית בין הבתרים). This possibility further subdivides regarding when the Covenant took place:
Covenant at Age 70
The Covenant of the Pieces (ברית בין הבתרים) occurred when Avraham was 70 years old.56
This approach suggests that the 430 years began with the Covenant which happened when Avraham was 70 years old. It thus needs to rearrange the chronology of Sefer Bereshit and also assume either that the Covenant took place outside of Israel or that Avraham came to Israel only to leave and return again. The 400 years are counted from the birth of Yitzchak. This leaves 210 years for the sojourn in Egypt.
- Reinterpreting "בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל" to refer also to the Israelites' ancestors such as Avraham61 and "בְּמִצְרָיִם" to encompass not only Egypt proper, but all lands which were under Egyptian dominion62 – This appears to be the option adopted by the Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael and Mekhilta DeRashbi.
- Reading the 430 year figure as describing the duration of the Patriarchal period, whose endpoint coincided with the Exodus – R. Shemuel b. Chofni Gaon,63 R. Yonah ibn Janach.64
- Assuming that the verse is giving only the central facts and not the full details – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor thus explains that the verse mentions only the stay in Egypt because that was the main part of the exile.65
- Achronology – As the events of Bereshit 12-14 and the first part of Bereshit 15 proceed sequentially from when Avraham was 75 years old, the story of the Covenant of the Pieces in Bereshit 15:7-21 cannot be in chronological order and is not a continuation of the first part of Bereshit 15.69
- Setting – Since according to Bereshit 12:4-5 Avraham arrived in Israel only after he was 75, one must posit either that the Covenant of the Pieces took place outside of Israel before Avraham came to Israel70 or that Avraham had made an earlier pilot trip to Israel before he was 70, left,71 and then returned at 75.72
Covenant at Age 80
The Covenant of the Pieces (ברית בין הבתרים) occurred when Avraham was 80 years old.
Ramban suggests that the 430 years began with the Covenant which occurred when Avraham was 80, midway between the ages mentioned in the surrounding chapters. This leaves 220 years for the actual sojourn in Egypt. To reconcile the discrepancy between 400 and 430, Ramban suggests that the original plan included 400 years of wandering but an additional 30 were added later due to the sins of the nation.
- In his Commentary on the Torah, Ramban suggests that the verse is an elliptical construction and should be read as if the word "עַד" precedes the 430 years. Thus, he interprets the 430 as referring to the aforementioned period specified to Avraham at the Covenant of the Pieces,83 rather than to the time spent in Egypt.84
- In his Critique of the Rambam's Sefer HaMitzvot, Ramban posits that the verse is speaking generally about the majority of the 430 years, which was in fact spent in Egypt.85 Ramban also adds that the 430 year period began with Avraham's first exile from Canaan. Assuming that Ramban is referring to Avraham's descent to Egypt,86 the 430 years would then be bookended by two exiles to Egypt.
- Ramban explains that the verse is a מקרא מסורס and "אַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת שָׁנָה" is a dangling modifier which refers back to "גֵר יִהְיֶה זַרְעֲךָ בְּאֶרֶץ לֹא לָהֶם", rather than to the immediately preceding words of "וַעֲבָדוּם וְעִנּוּ אֹתָם".87
- Ramban maintains that the 400 years incorporate the years of Avraham himself from the time of the Covenant,88 in spite of the fact that the verse specifies "זַרְעֲךָ".89
- Ramban must argue that "בְּאֶרֶץ לֹא לָהֶם" includes Canaan.90
- The verses in Bereshit should be understood as saying that following the 400 years, there will be an additional period of thirty years until the Amorites are fully deserving of punishment and the Israelites will return to the land.
- The verse in Bereshit describes the original plan which called for only 400 years of wandering and oppression. Ultimately, however, their exile was prolonged by thirty years as a penalty for bad behavior,91 and thus Shemot speaks of 430 years.92
Covenant at Age 85
The Covenant of the Pieces (ברית בין הבתרים) occurred when Avraham was 85 years old.
According to Ralbag, the 430 years began with the Covenant of the Pieces which took place when Avraham was 85 years old, the age recorded in the very next chapter. The 400 years begin from the birth of Yaakov. In order to reconcile this number with the 430 which began 75 years earlier, Ralbag must suggest that Hashem decided to shorten this original decree by 45 years, leaving 225 years for the Egyptian exile.
- Ralbag says that "זַרְעֲךָ" refers to Yaakov and the 400 years are counted from his birth, as Yaakov spent much of his life wandering and was the first to dwell in Egypt on a permanent basis.101
- Ralbag suggests that this verse is also slightly elliptical, and is saying that the bondage will last until the end of the 400 year period which began with the birth of Yaakov.102
- Ralbag says that ultimately Hashem shortened the 400 year decree by 45 years.103 This allows him to reconcile it with the 430 count which began 75 years earlier.104
430 Years From Yitzchak's Birth
The 430 years are counted from the birth of Yitzchak, when Avraham was 100 years old.
This approach counts the 430 years from the birth of Yitzchak, according to which the actual stay in Egypt was 240 years. Abarbanel explains that the 400 years is either a round number or, like Ramban above, that 30 years were later added due to the nation's sins.