Difference between revisions of "Haggadah:Yachatz/2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic has not yet undergone editorial review
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Focus of the custom</b> – According to this approach, the act of breaking the matzah is the primary goal of the custom. In fact, Shulchan Arukh HaRav implies that the broken piece of matzah need not have had a later purpose.  Only because the matzah is already broken, do we save it so that it can be used for a different mitzvah, the afikoman.</point> | <point><b>Focus of the custom</b> – According to this approach, the act of breaking the matzah is the primary goal of the custom. In fact, Shulchan Arukh HaRav implies that the broken piece of matzah need not have had a later purpose.  Only because the matzah is already broken, do we save it so that it can be used for a different mitzvah, the afikoman.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Which matza is broken and why?</b> Shulchan Arukh HaRav states that one breaks the middle matzah, and returns it there, since | + | <point><b>Which matza is broken and why?</b> Shulchan Arukh HaRav states that one breaks the middle matzah, and returns it there, since it will only be used after the top whole matzah. [The blessing HaMotzi is made  only on a full matzah, while the mitzvah of "Matzah" is fulfilled on the broken piece. Since "HaMotzi" precedes "Matzah", the matzot are stacked accordingly.]</point> |
− | <point><b>Why hide the slice?</b> According to Shulchan Arukh HaRav, the piece of matzah is placed beneath the tablecloth in imitation of the Exodus, | + | <point><b>Why hide the slice?</b> According to Shulchan Arukh HaRav, the piece of matzah is placed beneath the tablecloth in imitation of the Exodus, when the Israelites left Egypt with their dough wrapped in cloth ("מִשְׁאֲרֹתָם צְרֻרֹת בְּשִׂמְלֹתָם עַל שִׁכְמָם").  He points out that some have the further custom of wrapping it in a handkerchief and putting it on their shoulders.  [In this part of Yachatz, then, the matzah no longer commemorates the enslavement but rather the redemption.]</point> |
<point><b>Stealing the Afikoman</b> – These sources do not mention the custom at all; the only "hiding" of the matzah is its placement under the tablecloth.</point> | <point><b>Stealing the Afikoman</b> – These sources do not mention the custom at all; the only "hiding" of the matzah is its placement under the tablecloth.</point> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<p>Splitting the matzah is done in preparation for eating one of the halves.</p> | <p>Splitting the matzah is done in preparation for eating one of the halves.</p> | ||
<opinion>Motzi–Matzah | <opinion>Motzi–Matzah | ||
− | <p>Since | + | <p>Since "Motzi-Matzah" requires at least one whole matzah and a broken piece, the Seder leader breaks a matzah at Yachatz in preparation.</p> |
<mekorot><multilink><a href="מהרםחלאוהפסחיםקטו-" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="מהרםחלאוהפסחיםקטו-" data-aht="source">Cited in Maharam Chalawa Pesachim 115b</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RitvaHaggadahShelPesach" data-aht="source">Ritva</a><a href="RitvaHaggadahShelPesach" data-aht="source">Haggadah Shel Pesach</a><a href="R. Yom Tov b. Ashbel (Ritva)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yom Tov b. Ashbel</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RanPesachim25b" data-aht="source">Ran</a><a href="RanPesachim25b" data-aht="source">Commentary on Rif Pesachim 25b</a></multilink></mekorot> | <mekorot><multilink><a href="מהרםחלאוהפסחיםקטו-" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="מהרםחלאוהפסחיםקטו-" data-aht="source">Cited in Maharam Chalawa Pesachim 115b</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RitvaHaggadahShelPesach" data-aht="source">Ritva</a><a href="RitvaHaggadahShelPesach" data-aht="source">Haggadah Shel Pesach</a><a href="R. Yom Tov b. Ashbel (Ritva)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yom Tov b. Ashbel</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RanPesachim25b" data-aht="source">Ran</a><a href="RanPesachim25b" data-aht="source">Commentary on Rif Pesachim 25b</a></multilink></mekorot> | ||
− | <point><b> | + | <point><b>Motzi-Matza over a broken matzah?</b> Even though on Shabbat or Yom Tov one would normally make Hamotzi only on whole loaves (for lekehem mishneh), since "it is the way of the poor" (<a href="BavliPesachim109a" data-aht="source">Bavli Pesachim</a>) to eat only part of a loaf, it is customary at the Seder to use a broken piece of matzah alongside the whole one/s.</point> |
− | <point><b>Why before Maggid?</b></point> | + | <point><b>Why before Maggid?</b> According to the above reasoning, one would have assumed that Yachatz should take place right before "Motzi-Matza," as this is the best way to demonstrate that the broken piece is symbolic of poverty.  This is, in fact, the practice followed by the Rambam. The Ritva and Ran, however, point to the R. Hai Gaon who</point> |
<point><b>Focus of the custom</b></point> | <point><b>Focus of the custom</b></point> | ||
<point><b>Which matzah is broken and why?</b> None of these sources mention which matzah is split in half, nor do they mention in which position the half is placed after the splitting.</point> | <point><b>Which matzah is broken and why?</b> None of these sources mention which matzah is split in half, nor do they mention in which position the half is placed after the splitting.</point> |
Version as of 20:53, 19 March 2018
Yachatz
Exegetical Approaches
Introduction to Maggid
For the proper recitation of Maggid, it is necessary to have "poor man's bread," in the form of a broken piece of matzah, in front of the Seder participants.
Symbolism of breaking the matzah – According to all these sources, the matzah is broken so that it represents poor man's bread, as the Bavli writes: מה דרכו של עני בפרוסה אף כאן בפרוסה.
Ha Lachma Anya vs. all of Maggid
- R. Yitzchak ibn Giat, the teachers of Ritva, and the Orchot Chayyim all state that the broken matzah is required specifically for Ha Lachma Anya, since the passage explicitly refers to "poor man's bread". As we say "this is the bread of the poor," we have an example right in front of us.
- In contrast, Shulchan Arukh HaRav explains that all of "Maggid" must be recited in the presence of a broken matzah. He reaches this conclusion by combining the two explanations of "לחם עוני" given in Bavli Pesachim, that it is both "bread over which one answers matters" (i.e. over which one recites the haggadah) and that it is "poor man's bread" (i.e. a broken piece).
Focus of the custom – According to this approach, the act of breaking the matzah is the primary goal of the custom. In fact, Shulchan Arukh HaRav implies that the broken piece of matzah need not have had a later purpose. Only because the matzah is already broken, do we save it so that it can be used for a different mitzvah, the afikoman.
Which matza is broken and why? Shulchan Arukh HaRav states that one breaks the middle matzah, and returns it there, since it will only be used after the top whole matzah. [The blessing HaMotzi is made only on a full matzah, while the mitzvah of "Matzah" is fulfilled on the broken piece. Since "HaMotzi" precedes "Matzah", the matzot are stacked accordingly.]
Why hide the slice? According to Shulchan Arukh HaRav, the piece of matzah is placed beneath the tablecloth in imitation of the Exodus, when the Israelites left Egypt with their dough wrapped in cloth ("מִשְׁאֲרֹתָם צְרֻרֹת בְּשִׂמְלֹתָם עַל שִׁכְמָם"). He points out that some have the further custom of wrapping it in a handkerchief and putting it on their shoulders. [In this part of Yachatz, then, the matzah no longer commemorates the enslavement but rather the redemption.]
Stealing the Afikoman – These sources do not mention the custom at all; the only "hiding" of the matzah is its placement under the tablecloth.
Preparation for Eating Matzah
Splitting the matzah is done in preparation for eating one of the halves.
Motzi–Matzah
Since "Motzi-Matzah" requires at least one whole matzah and a broken piece, the Seder leader breaks a matzah at Yachatz in preparation.
Motzi-Matza over a broken matzah? Even though on Shabbat or Yom Tov one would normally make Hamotzi only on whole loaves (for lekehem mishneh), since "it is the way of the poor" (Bavli Pesachim) to eat only part of a loaf, it is customary at the Seder to use a broken piece of matzah alongside the whole one/s.
Why before Maggid? According to the above reasoning, one would have assumed that Yachatz should take place right before "Motzi-Matza," as this is the best way to demonstrate that the broken piece is symbolic of poverty. This is, in fact, the practice followed by the Rambam. The Ritva and Ran, however, point to the R. Hai Gaon who
Focus of the custom
Which matzah is broken and why? None of these sources mention which matzah is split in half, nor do they mention in which position the half is placed after the splitting.
Why hide the slice? The Ritva explains that the placement under the tablecloth is meant to re-enact the Exodus: "מִשְׁאֲרֹתָם צְרֻרֹת בְּשִׂמְלֹתָם".
Afikoman
One breaks the matzah in order to save the remaining half and ensure that there is sufficient matzah for the Afikoman.
Why hide the slice? Or Zarua and Orchot Chayyim write that one hides the half of matzah reserved for afikoman so that it would not be eaten by mistake.
Why before Maggid?
The middle matzah – The three sources differ on the choice of matzah placement, but none of them explain their choices:
- Rashi and Orchot Chayyim write that the broken half should be placed between the two unbroken matzot, but they do not detail which matzah should be broken.
- Raavan agrees that the broken matzah should be placed between the other two, but specifies that one should break the first matzah.
- In contrast, Or Zarua states that the middle matzah should be broken, and does not say in which position it should be placed.
Purpose of its Own
Breaking the matzah is intended to provoke questions from the children participating at the seder.
Sources:Possibility in Orchot Chayyim
The middle matzah – According to the Orchot Chayyim, the broken half should be placed between the two unbroken matzot, but he does not detail which matzah should be broken, nor does he explain the placement.
Why hide the slice?
Why before Maggid?