Difference between revisions of "Half Shekels – For Census or Tabernacle/2"
(Original Author: Neima Novetsky, Rabbi Hillel Novetsky) |
(Original Author: Neima Novetsky, Rabbi Hillel Novetsky) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<point><b>Why now?</b> Shadal explains that the census is being taken at this point because the people have just become a nation,<fn>According to Shadal the total from this census is provided in <aht source="Shemot38-25">Shemot 38</aht>. He asserts that this census is distinct from the one described in detail in Bemidbar 1, despite the fact that their totals are precisely the same. See his discussion in Bemidbar 1:46 for his explanation of the coincidence of the identical totals. For a broader analysis of the issue as a whole, see Censuses in the Wilderness.</fn> and it is a mere coincidence that it occurs before the building of the Mishkan.<fn>Shadal would maintain that the command is located in the midst of the instructions regarding the Mishkan since the proceeds benefited the Mishkan. However, this was just a collateral benefit, not the primary objective of the census.</fn></point> | <point><b>Why now?</b> Shadal explains that the census is being taken at this point because the people have just become a nation,<fn>According to Shadal the total from this census is provided in <aht source="Shemot38-25">Shemot 38</aht>. He asserts that this census is distinct from the one described in detail in Bemidbar 1, despite the fact that their totals are precisely the same. See his discussion in Bemidbar 1:46 for his explanation of the coincidence of the identical totals. For a broader analysis of the issue as a whole, see Censuses in the Wilderness.</fn> and it is a mere coincidence that it occurs before the building of the Mishkan.<fn>Shadal would maintain that the command is located in the midst of the instructions regarding the Mishkan since the proceeds benefited the Mishkan. However, this was just a collateral benefit, not the primary objective of the census.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>"עֲבֹדַת אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד"</b> – According to Shadal, this terms refers to the one-time labor of constructing the Tabernacle,<fn>Cf. Shemot 39:32 and many other verses.</fn> and not to its ongoing upkeep.<fn>See Shadal in <multilink><aht source="HaMishtadelShemot30-12">HaMishtadel</aht><aht source="HaMishtadelShemot30-12">Shemot 30:12</aht><aht parshan="Shadal">About R. S.D. Luzzatto</aht></multilink> who discusses whether the phrase "‏וְהָיָה לִבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל לְזִכָּרוֹן לִפְנֵי ה'‏" must imply that the contributions were used for an everlasting part of the Mishkan's structure, and cf. Cassuto below.</fn> The half-shekels collected in the census were used for fashioning the silver sockets, as described in <aht source="Shemot38-25">Shemot 38</aht>. However, Shadal emphasizes that the obligation to give was not motivated by a need for donations.<fn>Shadal argues against Abarbanel who views the collection as part of a plan to ensure that enough silver was collected, pointing out that the nation brought more than enough of every other material, so there should have been no concern that there would be a shortage of silver. According to Shadal, the only reason the shekels were incorporated into the foundations of the Tabernacle was so that there would be no future worries about the "evil eye" (at least as long as the Tabernacle was in existence).</fn></point> | <point><b>"עֲבֹדַת אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד"</b> – According to Shadal, this terms refers to the one-time labor of constructing the Tabernacle,<fn>Cf. Shemot 39:32 and many other verses.</fn> and not to its ongoing upkeep.<fn>See Shadal in <multilink><aht source="HaMishtadelShemot30-12">HaMishtadel</aht><aht source="HaMishtadelShemot30-12">Shemot 30:12</aht><aht parshan="Shadal">About R. S.D. Luzzatto</aht></multilink> who discusses whether the phrase "‏וְהָיָה לִבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל לְזִכָּרוֹן לִפְנֵי ה'‏" must imply that the contributions were used for an everlasting part of the Mishkan's structure, and cf. Cassuto below.</fn> The half-shekels collected in the census were used for fashioning the silver sockets, as described in <aht source="Shemot38-25">Shemot 38</aht>. However, Shadal emphasizes that the obligation to give was not motivated by a need for donations.<fn>Shadal argues against Abarbanel who views the collection as part of a plan to ensure that enough silver was collected, pointing out that the nation brought more than enough of every other material, so there should have been no concern that there would be a shortage of silver. According to Shadal, the only reason the shekels were incorporated into the foundations of the Tabernacle was so that there would be no future worries about the "evil eye" (at least as long as the Tabernacle was in existence).</fn></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Censuses in | + | <point><b>Censuses in Bemidbar 1 and 26</b> – In both of these censuses, there was no further need for half-shekels. Thus, none are mentioned.</point> |
<point><b>Post-census donation in Bemidbar 31</b> – Shadal asserts that this case is unrelated to the instructions in Shemot 30, as the giving in Bemidbar follows a census rather than preceding it, and is of gold and silver articles rather than half-shekels.<fn>Shadal thus rejects the contrasting view (cited below) of R. Meir, the father of Rashbam.</fn></point> | <point><b>Post-census donation in Bemidbar 31</b> – Shadal asserts that this case is unrelated to the instructions in Shemot 30, as the giving in Bemidbar follows a census rather than preceding it, and is of gold and silver articles rather than half-shekels.<fn>Shadal thus rejects the contrasting view (cited below) of R. Meir, the father of Rashbam.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Shaul's censuses</b> – These do not mention the giving of half-shekels as, once again, none were necessary. Shadal would likely explain that both "בָזֶק" and "טְּלָאִים" are names of places.<fn>Cf. "טֶלֶם" in Yehoshua 15:24.</fn></point> | <point><b>Shaul's censuses</b> – These do not mention the giving of half-shekels as, once again, none were necessary. Shadal would likely explain that both "בָזֶק" and "טְּלָאִים" are names of places.<fn>Cf. "טֶלֶם" in Yehoshua 15:24.</fn></point> |
Version as of 21:43, 9 March 2014
Half Shekels – For Census or Tabernacle?
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
Commentators disagree over the circumstances which mandate the donations detailed in Shemot 30:12-16. One group of commentators explain that the census is the determining factor. Within this option, Shadal maintains that half-shekels were given only in the very first census in the wilderness, while Rashi asserts that a similar procedure was followed in subsequent countings as well.
A second category of exegetes argues that support of the Mishkan or Mikdash is the main purpose, and that there is no need to give during a census. This view also divides, with Josephus positing that the verses describe a one-off contribution to build the Mishkan, and R. Saadia claiming that the Torah is speaking of an annual obligation to support Hashem's Sanctuary. Finally, some commentators suggest that both a census and the Mishkan play a role, with Chizkuni requiring a combination of both a census and a capital campaign to create an obligation to donate, and Ramban concluding that each factor alone warrants a collection.
Census Focused
Shemot 30:12-16 commands Moshe to conduct a census using shekalim, rather than through a simple headcount. While the proceeds are used for the Tabernacle, this is not the main objective, and the Torah is not mandating a regular donation to the Mikdash.
One-time Obligation
These verses were an instruction on only a single occasion in the wilderness to count the nation via the giving of half-shekels. All future censuses, in contrast, do not require a similar donation.
All Future Censuses
These verses constitute an enduring ordinance that all future censuses be performed through the counting of donated items such as half-shekels, rather than via a forbidden headcount.
Mishkan Contributions
The Torah is mandating financial support for the Mikdash, and a census is merely a vehicle through which this is achieved.
One-time Building Fund
The verses in Shemot 30 were an ephemeral command to donate for the construction of the Tabernacle, and this was in effect only during the first year in the wilderness. This obligation does not apply to future generations.
Ongoing Maintenance
These verses are an eternal mitzvah to provide annual support for the Mishkan or Mikdash.
Combination of Factors
Both the need for a census and the requirement to support the Mishkan/Mikdash are involved in the obligation to give the half-shekels. Commentators discuss whether both factors must be present, or whether each factor suffices on its own.
- A periodic obligation – According to Chizkuni, the two commands are connected and relate to only certain periods in history. Any time that there is both a need to count and a need to build a Tabernacle/Temple, one must do so through a half shekel donation.
- Both are ongoing – Ramban asserts that there is both an ongoing obligation to give a half shekel whenever there is a census and a separate annual obligation to contribute shekalim to the Mikdash.
- One and one – According to the GR"A, the command to give some sort of redemptive object when counting is an ongoing obligation for future generations,40 whereas the command to give half shekels for the Tabernacle was a one time command for the generation of the desert.41
- Sin of pride – Ramban43 asserts that David's census did actually involve a collection of shekalim,44 but a plague came nonetheless since David had no purpose in the counting and was thus culpable of a certain hubris.45
- Lost protection – Chizkuni argues that the plague came because the silver from the Tabernacle was no longer around to protect during a census.
- No ransom – According to the GR"A, the plague came because David did not count in the proper way, and did not collect some redemptive object.46