Manifold Punishment/2

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Manifold Punishment

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Punished More than Deserved

Sometimes, people are punished more severely than their sins call for. This position subdivides in how it explains why this is justified:

Natural Order

Since this world is run via natural order, it is possible that the nation might receive more than its proper share of retribution.

"וְיָסַפְתִּי לְיַסְּרָה אֶתְכֶם שֶׁבַע עַל חַטֹּאתֵיכֶם" – Keli Yekar explains this verse literally.  Hashem threatens the people that if they continue to sin they will pay seven-fold for their crimes, for Hashem will leave them to chance, which has no mercy.
"כִּי לָקְחָה מִיַּד י"י כִּפְלַיִם בְּכׇל חַטֹּאתֶיהָ" – According to the opinion brought by Shadal, this verse, too, should be understood literally.  The people did, in fact, receive double the punishment due to them. Hashem had given them into the hands of their enemies, who proceeded to afflict Israel as they wished, resulting in their inflicting more suffering on the nation than deserved.
Why is this just: Divine providence vs. natural order – This approach justifies the disproportionate punishment by viewing it as part of the natural order by which the world is run. However, the position divides regarding whether natural order is the norm or the exception:
  • Natural order predominant – Hashem rarely intervenes to disrupt the natural running of the world, preferring to let nature takes its course.  As such, it is often possible to suffer from the vicissitudes of chance and human decisions. In addition, once Hashem unleashes His messengers to destroy, they are unlimited and indiscriminate, leading to the possibility that they might inflict unwarranted punishment.1
  • Divine providence predominant – Keli Yekar, in contrast, assumes that normally the world is run via Divine providence.  Hashem only leaves the world to chance as a punishment for sins.  This is the exact context in which the manifold punishment in Vayikra is mentioned. Hashem's threatens the nation: "וְאִם תֵּלְכוּ עִמִּי קֶרִי... וְהָלַכְתִּי אַף אֲנִי עִמָּכֶם בְּקֶרִי", telling them that if they don't recognize Hashem's providence, but rather assume that what occurs to them is the product of chance,2 Hashem will punish them accordingly and deliberately leave their fate to such chance.3
"וְהִכֵּיתִי אֶתְכֶם גַּם אָנִי" / "מִיַּד י"י " – Though this position assumes that the excessive suffering is actually inflicted by humans or natural forces, the verses nonetheless attribute it to Hashem since He is the one who begins the process.
Compensation in the World to Come? These sources might take one of two positions regarding the World to Come, in line with the different understandings of Divine providence above:
  • Compensation – According to those who say that this world is generally run by nature, full justice is only meted out in the World to Come.  At that point, anyone who suffered excessively in this world is compensated, so no injustice is committed.4
  • No compensation – According to the approach that the world is generally run by Divine providence, full justice is meted out already in this world.  In a case where Hashem intentionally hides His face, it is possible that the resulting afflictions are not compensated for in the Next World at all.  A lack of belief in Divine providence justifies the removal of that providence, even if this results in being punished out of proportion to one's crimes.
"אֲשֶׁר אֲנִי קָצַפְתִּי מְּעָט וְהֵמָּה עָזְרוּ לְרָעָה" – This verse in Zekharyah describes a reality in which other nations might punish Israel more than Hashem would have wanted, supporting the idea that Hashem does not always intervene to prevent undue punishment, and that sometimes the messengers chosen to inflict punishment go beyond their assignments.5  There are several examples of this throughout Tanakh:
  • Egypt – The decision to not only enslave the Israelites but also kill all firstborns has been understood by several sources6 as going beyond Hashem's decree of "וַעֲבָדוּם וְעִנּוּ אֹתָם אַרְבַּע מֵאוֹת שָׁנָה".
  • Assyria – Yeshayahu 10:5-11 suggests that though Assyria had been appointed Hashem's "rod of wrath" they attacked Israel beyond what Hashem desired. While Hashem sent Assyria "to take spoils," he was intent on destruction ("כִּי לְהַשְׁמִיד בִּלְבָבוֹ"), and as such merited his own punishment.7
Theodicy and collective punishment – The approach taken here has been used to explain other similar philosophical quandaries such as why the righteous suffer while the wicked prosper, or why collective punishment is justified. Rather than attempting to say that such phenomena don't exist, they are understood as the result of the natural order by which the world is run. For elaboration, see Theodicy – צדיק ורע לו and Collective Punishment.

Punished for Parent's Sins

Hashem's system of justice allows for the vicarious or collective punishment of children for their parent's sins, resulting in undue suffering of the descendant.

"כִּי לָקְחָה מִיַּד י"י כִּפְלַיִם בְּכׇל חַטֹּאתֶיהָ" – According to these sources, this verse can be understood according to its simple, literal sense. The nation did get punished "double," once for their own sins and once for the sins of their parents, in line with the principle of "פֹּקֵד עֲוֺן אָבֹת עַל בָּנִים" (Shemot 20:4).
"שֶׁבַע עַל חַטֹּאתֵיכֶם" – Ralbag understands the justice in this verse as working in the same manner; the Children of Israel are to reap more than their sins warrant due to their parents' sins. According to him, "seven-fold" is not literal, but rather a means of expressing that the nation is to be punished severely.
Collective or vicarious punishment – Ralbag understands that both the parents and the descendants are punished for the parent's crimes, while the other sources might maintain that children are punished instead of their parents.
Why is this just? Ralbag explains that when a child continues to sin in the path laid out by his parents, the sin is so ingrained in him that it requires a greater punishment to correct than would have been necessary had he been the first perpetrator.  Thus, though a small punishment might have otherwise sufficed for his sin, now double is necessary.
"פֹּקֵד עֲוֺן אָבֹת עַל בָּנִים": Individual or collective?

Sin More Egregious than Appears

The sin for which the nation is punished is actually more severe than the verses makes it appear.  As such, the harsh punishment described is justified.

"וְיָסַפְתִּי לְיַסְּרָה אֶתְכֶם שֶׁבַע עַל חַטֹּאתֵיכֶם"
  • Most of these sources claim that the seven-fold punishment is measure for measure punishment for the nation's seven-fold transgression.9 As such, there is a one to one correspondence between sin and punishment, not seven to one.10
  • Ralbag, instead, maintains that the verses are speaking of a repeat offender, who, being mired in his sin, requires greater punishment to help him out of his morass than other sinners do.11
"כִּי לָקְחָה מִיַּד י"י כִּפְלַיִם בְּכׇל חַטֹּאתֶיהָ" – Radak12 explains that the "double punishment" refers to the two exiles, each a punishment for its own set of sins. The nation's many crimes (כׇל חַטֹּאתֶיהָ) merited them two stints in exile.  According to this reading, the prophecy of Yeshayahu speaks of Messianic times. Yeshayahu comforts the nation by telling them that since they have already suffered through two exilic periods, their punishment is finally complete, and the final redemption is at hand.
"Seven" and "Double": Literal or figurative? Most of these sources read each of the terms literally, suggesting that Hashem speaks of either seven or two punishments (and not simply "many" punishments), to match either seven or two sets of sins.  Ralbag, however, might be reading "seven" as a figurative term for "many".
Who is punished? The commentaries on Vayikra understand the punishment to be inflicted on one generation, who has itself erred in multiple ways, while Radak on Yeshayahu assumes that the prophet is speaking of the nation's sins and retribution during two distinct generations.
Divine providence – This approach assumes that the world is run by Divine providence and that Hashem watches over the nation to punish it exactly as it deserves, and no more.  As these verses speak only on the national level, however, it is not clear if these sources would say the same regarding individual providence.
World to Come – The existence of a World to Come does not preclude justice in this world; thus Hashem never punishes Israel unduly.  It is also possible that the World to Come is reserved for individual justice, while all justice pertaining to the nation as a whole must be meted out already in this world.
Theodicy – Aspects of this approach can be used to address the lager question of unjust suffering of the righteous (צדיק ורע לו).  It is possible that, like here, this is just a misperception of  reality.  One who appears righteous to the outsider, might not really be as upright as he seems, and his sins might be greater or more severe than first thought.  For further discussion, see Theodicy – צדיק ורע לו.
"וְהָשֵׁב לִשְׁכֵנֵינוּ שִׁבְעָתַיִם אֶל חֵיקָם" – In this verse, the people speak about their enemies getting a seven-fold punishment.  this approach might explain that the people are not requesting undue punishment for them either.

Punishment Less Harsh than Appears

The verses' description of the punishment makes it sound worse than it really is.  As such, the nation did not really suffer more than deserved.

"וְיָסַפְתִּי לְיַסְּרָה אֶתְכֶם שֶׁבַע עַל חַטֹּאתֵיכֶם" – Though these sources agree that in reality the people did not suffer as much as the verse suggests, they differ in how they explain why the verse suggests that they did:
  • Intentional exaggeration – Hashem deliberately exaggerated when speaking of the people's punishment, so as to most effectively frighten them into obedience.
  • Unintentional exaggeration – Alternatively, the impression of excessive punishment is unintentional. 
    • Figurative language –  In Tanakh the number seven is simply a figurative way to express a large quantity.13 As such, Hashem was merely relaying that the people will deserve a large punishment, not that they will get seven times their due.
    • Relative punishment – According to Akeidat Yitzchak, the punishment mentioned is relative.  Hashem told the nation that if they did not improve their ways, they would be punished seven times the amount they had been punished previously (but in proportion to their crimes).
"כִּי לָקְחָה מִיַּד י"י כִּפְלַיִם בְּכׇל חַטֹּאתֶיהָ" – The general approaches mentioned above can be applied to the verse in Yeshayahu as well:
  • Intentional exaggeration – According to most of these sources,14 the exaggeration is intentional.  When comforting another, it is natural to exaggerate the afflictions that the person suffered.15 Thus, Hashem, too, intentionally overstated the people's suffering so as to better comfort them.
  • Unintentional exaggeration – Ibn Ezra, in contrast, suggests that the prophet was simply speaking in relative terms. Yeshayahu told the people that they received double the punishment that other nations received (presumably because they sinned more than others).16
דברה תורה בלשון בני אדם – This approach assume that Tanakh is not always meant to be taken literally; it might instead expresses itself in the way that people do. As such, certain verses can best be understood in light of the reality of people's behavior and speech, recognizing that they use figurative language, hyperbole and the like.
Divine providence – This position assumes that the world is run via Divine providence, and that Hashem would never let the collective of Israel suffer if not warranted. It is possible, however, that individual providence works differently, and though the collective always gets its just due, individual Israelites do not.
Theodicy – The approach presented here to explain disproportionate punishment can be applied to the more general issue of "צדיק ורע לו".  In such cases, too, it only seems that someone is getting more punishment than deserved.  On closer inspection, however, it might turn out that the apparent suffering was actually not a punishment at all. For elaboration, see Theodicy – צדיק ורע לו.