Difference between revisions of "Miryam's Critique of Moshe in Art/0"
m |
m |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
<subcategory>Focus of the Complaint | <subcategory>Focus of the Complaint | ||
− | While the Cushite woman is | + | While the Cushite woman is included in both the engraving and in Jordaens' portrait, she is entirely absent from the stained glass.<fn>This, in part, is simply a product of the particular scene each artist chose to depict, but she could have easily been included in all three images, or in none.</fn> This reflects a question that arises from the text itself. |
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
<subcategory>Did Moshe Know? | <subcategory>Did Moshe Know? | ||
− | In the engraving, Miryam and Aharon appear to challenge Moshe to his face, rather than speaking about him behind his back. Does this reading have any support in the text? Was Moshe even aware of the slander against him?  Verse two states, "וַיִּשְׁמַע י״י", perhaps | + | In the engraving, Miryam and Aharon appear to challenge Moshe to his face, rather than speaking about him behind his back. Does this reading have any support in the Biblical text?  Was Moshe even aware of the slander against him?  Verse two states, "וַיִּשְׁמַע י״י", perhaps implying that Hashem alone, and not Moshe, heard the siblings' words.  On the other hand, verse 3 mentions Moshe's humility, perhaps to suggest that though Moshe was aware of the defamation, he felt no need to stand up for his honor.<fn>See R"Y Bekhor Shor who writes, "ואף בזאת היה עניו, שלא היה תובע עלבונו, ולפיכך תבעו הקב"ה".  See Ramban similarly, "יזכיר ענותו שסבל ולא ענם, והשם קנא לו".</fn> See the debate in the Sifre, in which both possibilities are raised. |
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
<subcategory>Moshe's Relationship with his Wife | <subcategory>Moshe's Relationship with his Wife | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
<subcategory>What is Tzaraat? | <subcategory>What is Tzaraat? | ||
+ | Only the stained glass image focuses on Miryam's punishment, and even here it is difficult to see how the artist envisioned the affliction of tzaraat.. | ||
</subcategory> | </subcategory> | ||
</category> | </category> |
Version as of 04:04, 27 May 2021
Miryam's Critique of Moshe in Art
Introduction
Bemidbar 12 revolves around both Miryam and Aharon's critique of Moshe and his Cushite marriage and Hashem's subsequent reprimand and punishment. Each of the images shown here illustrates a different phase of the story. Jacob Jordaens1 depicts only the married couple, Moshe and his Cushite wife, while the engraving2 focuses on the central part of the story, the slander. The stained glass3 moves to the story's conclusion, the punishment of Miryam and request for mercy. The artists differ in both whom they decide to portray and how they depict each of the characters, highlighting the central questions of the text itself: Who was Moshe's Cushite wife? About what were Miryam and Aharon upset? Is this a story about racism, sibling rivalry, or something else entirely?Contrasting Images
Moses and his Ethiopian Wife Sephora
Jordaen's painting is, in essence, a dual portrait of Moshe and his wife. Though painted as a couple, there is no hint of intimacy between the two and nothing that draws them together. Moshe stands in front, looking forward at the viewer rather than at his wife. He is richly clothed in blue and red, holding what appears to be the tablet of the law in his left hand. His facial emotions and the gesturing of his open hand are difficult to interpret. His wife, a black women, stands behind him, her darkness contrasting with his whiteness. She, too, is richly garbed, wearing a gold cloak and hat. She is positioned at an angle to her husband, and like Moshe, gazes at the viewer rather than her spouse. Her right hand is raised and points to her heart.
Miriam and Aaron Complain Against Moses
The engraving is a much busier composition, with all four of the story's central figures depicted in the foreground. The artist positions them into two distinct groups. Miryam and Aharon (identifiable due to his priestly garb) face Moshe and his wife, each gesticulating at the other. Moshe's wife is not colored, and stands with her husband as a united team. The second scene of the story is depicted to the viewer's right, where the three leaders stand by the Tent of Meeting and a very anthropomorphic king-like God speaks to them from within. The final scene is lightly illustrated in the background of the work, where the siblings plead before Moshe and Miryam is cast out of the camp.
Miryam is Cursed with Leprosy
The last image focuses only on the three siblings, with Moshe's wife absent from the composition. All three, somewhat surprisingly, are brown-skinned, though the artist plays with the image to reveal white legs underneath. Miryam kneels in front of Moshe on the ground, her arms crisscrossed against her chest in a gesture of submission and apology. Aharon puts his hand on top of her head, perhaps in solidarity, perhaps to declare her impure. He is dressed in everyday garb rather than priestly clothing. Moshe stands next to him, their backs almost touching, as he looks down at his sister. In the background, the tents of the camp stand tall, one of which might be the Ohel Moed.
Relationship to the Biblical Text
The artists' choices reflect certain ambiguities in the Biblical text and different possible interpretive stances:
Who Was the Cushite?
While Jordaens paints the Cushite as a black woman, the engraving depicts her in the same light shades as the other figures. Though the stained glass image does not include the Cushite at all, it depicts all the other characters in brownish tones. The various choices highlight one of the key questions of the chapter: Who was Moshe's Cushite wife? Was she a black woman from Cush,4 as might be implied by the simple sense of the verses, or might she be Zipporah, Moshe's Midianite wife known to us from earlier chapters?5 Even if she were black, would her skin color have marked her as different than everyone else or were all the Israelites dark in color?6 Would her appearance have labeled her as an "other", ripe for ridicule?7 See the discussion in Miryam's Critique of Moshe and his Cushite Marriage.
Focus of the Complaint While the Cushite woman is included in both the engraving and in Jordaens' portrait, she is entirely absent from the stained glass.8 This reflects a question that arises from the text itself.
Did Moshe Know? In the engraving, Miryam and Aharon appear to challenge Moshe to his face, rather than speaking about him behind his back. Does this reading have any support in the Biblical text? Was Moshe even aware of the slander against him? Verse two states, "וַיִּשְׁמַע י״י", perhaps implying that Hashem alone, and not Moshe, heard the siblings' words. On the other hand, verse 3 mentions Moshe's humility, perhaps to suggest that though Moshe was aware of the defamation, he felt no need to stand up for his honor.9 See the debate in the Sifre, in which both possibilities are raised.
Moshe's Relationship with his Wife
While the artist of the woodcut chooses to present Moshe and his wife as a unit, Jordaens is much more ambiguous about their relationship. Is the Cushite's gesture towards her heart an expression that she feels loved or that she is lacking and desiring it? Do the independent stances of the two indicate a lack of connection or is their posturing insignificant?
Commentators raise similar questions about Moshe's relationship as portrayed in the Biblical text. Were Miryam and Aharon upset about the fact of marriage or about the dynamics thereof? Rashi suggests that, due to Moshe's prophetic responsibilities, he had separated himself from his wife and it was this about which Miryam complained. One wonders, too, how the earlier mention of Moshe and Zipporah's separation ("אחר שילוחיה"), plays into the story of Bemidbar. Did Moshe take another wife because there was something lacking in the earlier relationship? See Miryam's Critique of Moshe and אחר שלוחיה.