Difference between revisions of "Moshe/0"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 39: Line 39:
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
<subcategory>Misunderstanding the Nation
 
<subcategory>Misunderstanding the Nation
<p class="nonintro">How well did Moshe and the nation communicate?&#160; Is it possible that Moshe ever erred in understanding the nation's requests or needs?</p>
+
<p class="nonintro">How well did Moshe and the nation communicate?&#160; Is it possible that Moshe ever erred in understanding the nation's requests or needs?</p><p class="nonintro">The issue comes to the fore in the story of the <a href="Petition of the Two and a Half Tribes" data-aht="page">Petition of the Two and a Half Tribes</a> in Bemidbar 32. Moshe initially responds negatively to the tribes' request to settle the eastern bank of the Jordan, chastising them for leaving the burden of fighting to the rest of the nation.&#160; Immediately thereafter, Reuven and Gad express their willingness not just to fight, but even to lead the nation in battle, whereupon Moshe agrees to their original demands. What leads to the about-face both on the part of the tribes and on the part of Moshe? Did the tribes change their stance only due to Moshe's condemnation, or had they always planned to take part in the Conquest?</p><ul>
<p class="nonintro">The issue comes to the fore in the story of the <a href="Petition of the Two and a Half Tribes" data-aht="page">Petition of the Two and a Half Tribes</a> in Bemidbar 32. Moshe initially responds negatively to the tribes' request to settle the eastern bank of the Jordan, chastising them for leaving the burden of fighting to the rest of the nation.&#160; Immediately thereafter, Reuven and Gad express their willingness not just to fight, but even to lead the nation in battle, whereupon Moshe agrees to their original demands. What leads to the about-face both on the part of the tribes and on the part of Moshe? Did the tribes change their stance only due to Moshe's condemnation, or had they always planned to take part in the Conquest?</p>
 
<ul>
 
 
<li><b>Moshe misunderstood the nation</b>&#160;–&#160;<multilink><a href="AbarbanelBemidbar32" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelBemidbar32" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 32</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink> maintains that Moshe misunderstood the tribes' request and wrongly assumed that they did not want to participate in the Canaanite campaign when they had meant to all along. Thus, when they clarified their true intent he acquiesced.</li>
 
<li><b>Moshe misunderstood the nation</b>&#160;–&#160;<multilink><a href="AbarbanelBemidbar32" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelBemidbar32" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 32</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink> maintains that Moshe misunderstood the tribes' request and wrongly assumed that they did not want to participate in the Canaanite campaign when they had meant to all along. Thus, when they clarified their true intent he acquiesced.</li>
 
<li><b>Moshe understood the nation</b> – <multilink><a href="AkeidatYitzchakBemidbarPeirush32" data-aht="source">Akeidat Yitzchak</a><a href="AkeidatYitzchakBemidbarPeirush32" data-aht="source">Bemidbar Peirush 32</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Arama (Akeidat Yitzchak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Arama</a></multilink>, in contrast, justifies Moshe's angry reaction, opining that Moshe correctly read the tribes' petition and that it really was problematic both on the interpersonal level (as the tribes did not initially intend to join their brethren in the Conquest), and in relation to Hashem (as they rejected His Promised Land.) In face of Moshe's anger, the tribes revise their proposition and only then does Moshe agree.</li>
 
<li><b>Moshe understood the nation</b> – <multilink><a href="AkeidatYitzchakBemidbarPeirush32" data-aht="source">Akeidat Yitzchak</a><a href="AkeidatYitzchakBemidbarPeirush32" data-aht="source">Bemidbar Peirush 32</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Arama (Akeidat Yitzchak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Arama</a></multilink>, in contrast, justifies Moshe's angry reaction, opining that Moshe correctly read the tribes' petition and that it really was problematic both on the interpersonal level (as the tribes did not initially intend to join their brethren in the Conquest), and in relation to Hashem (as they rejected His Promised Land.) In face of Moshe's anger, the tribes revise their proposition and only then does Moshe agree.</li>
Line 47: Line 45:
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
<subcategory>Administrative Shortcomings
 
<subcategory>Administrative Shortcomings
<p class="nonintro">Some exegetes suggest that Moshe exhibited certain weaknesses as an administrator, while others think that saying so borders on the blasphemous:</p>
+
<p class="nonintro">Some exegetes suggest that Moshe exhibited certain weaknesses as an administrator, while others think that saying so borders on the blasphemous:</p><ul>
<ul>
 
 
<li><b>Yitro's Advice</b> (Shemot 18) – When Yitro sees the nation standing online to await Moshe's judgment, he suggests that Moshe delegate some of his responsibilities to lighten the load. Yitro's advice seems like such an obvious and simple solution that one cannot help but wonder: How could it be that Moshe, the greatest of all men and in possession of a direct line to Hashem, needed Yitro's help to figure this out? [For discussion, see <a href="Did Moshe Need Yitro's Advice" data-aht="page">Did Moshe Need Yitro's Advice</a>.]</li>
 
<li><b>Yitro's Advice</b> (Shemot 18) – When Yitro sees the nation standing online to await Moshe's judgment, he suggests that Moshe delegate some of his responsibilities to lighten the load. Yitro's advice seems like such an obvious and simple solution that one cannot help but wonder: How could it be that Moshe, the greatest of all men and in possession of a direct line to Hashem, needed Yitro's help to figure this out? [For discussion, see <a href="Did Moshe Need Yitro's Advice" data-aht="page">Did Moshe Need Yitro's Advice</a>.]</li>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
Line 66: Line 63:
 
<li><b>Moshe and the Egyptian </b>(Shemot 2) - Many laud Moshe for killing the Egyptian taskmaster and view him as championing the cause of justice, yet others question whether his response was not overly harsh and if he was justified in taking the law into his own hands. [See <a href="Moshe's Killing of the Egyptian" data-aht="page">Moshe's Killing of the Egyptian</a>.]</li>
 
<li><b>Moshe and the Egyptian </b>(Shemot 2) - Many laud Moshe for killing the Egyptian taskmaster and view him as championing the cause of justice, yet others question whether his response was not overly harsh and if he was justified in taking the law into his own hands. [See <a href="Moshe's Killing of the Egyptian" data-aht="page">Moshe's Killing of the Egyptian</a>.]</li>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li><b>Justified</b>&#160;– The majority of commentators justify Moshe's actions, by suggesting either that in killing the taskmaster Moshe was actively saving a life (Shemot Rabbah) or that the Egyptian was guilty of a capital crime, having committed adultery with the slain Hebrew's wife (Tanchuma). R. D"Z Hoffman, instead, argues that the trampling of human rights in Egypt was so massive that legal norms did not apply.</li>
+
<li><b>Justified</b>&#160;– The majority of commentators justify Moshe's actions, by suggesting either that in killing the taskmaster Moshe was actively saving a life (<multilink><a href="ShemotRabbah1-28" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah</a><a href="ShemotRabbah1-28" data-aht="source">1:28</a><a href="Shemot Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shemot Rabbah</a></multilink>) or that the Egyptian was guilty of a capital crime, having committed adultery with the slain Hebrew's wife (<multilink><a href="TanchumaShemot9" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaShemot9" data-aht="source">Shemot 9</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink>). R. D"Z Hoffman, instead, argues that the trampling of human rights in Egypt was so massive that legal norms did not apply.</li>
<li><b>Unjustified</b> – Midrash Petirat Moshe finds Moshe's deed blameworthy and suggests that he was even punished as a result.<fn>The Midrash contains a picturesque account of Moshe's dialogue with Hashem before his death, where Moshe pleads with Hashem not to die. Hashem responds that he is deserving of death for this very incident, telling Moshe, "כלום אמרתי לך שתהרוג את המצרי".</fn></li>
+
<li><b>Unjustified</b> –&#160;<multilink><a href="MidrashPetiratMosheOtzarHaMidrashimEisensteinp363" data-aht="source">Midrash Petirat Moshe</a><a href="MidrashPetiratMosheOtzarHaMidrashimEisensteinp363" data-aht="source">[Otzar HaMidrashim (Eisenstein, p. 363)]</a><a href="Midrash Petirat Moshe" data-aht="parshan">About Midrash Petirat Moshe</a></multilink> finds Moshe's deed blameworthy and suggests that he was even punished as a result.<fn>The Midrash contains a picturesque account of Moshe's dialogue with Hashem before his death, where Moshe pleads with Hashem not to die. Hashem responds that he is deserving of death for this very incident, telling Moshe, "כלום אמרתי לך שתהרוג את המצרי".</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Unintentional</b>&#160;– R. Saadia Gaon charts a middle ground, suggesting that Moshe's action was indeed problematic, but unintentional.&#160; He had meant only to harm the Egyptian, not to kill him.</li>
 
<li><b>Unintentional</b>&#160;– R. Saadia Gaon charts a middle ground, suggesting that Moshe's action was indeed problematic, but unintentional.&#160; He had meant only to harm the Egyptian, not to kill him.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
Line 83: Line 80:
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
<subcategory>Anger
+
<subcategory>AngerSeveral commentators have faulted Moshe for unwarranted anger:
Several commentators have faulted Moshe for unwarranted anger:<b> </b><br/>
 
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li><b>Explicit cases</b>&#160;– The Torah explicitly notes Moshe's wrath in three places:<fn>See below that there is one other episode in which Tanakh explicitly presents Moshe as filled with anger.&#160; Upon seeing the people worship the Golden Calf, Moshe's ire is raised: "וַיְהִי כַּאֲשֶׁר קָרַב אֶל הַמַּחֲנֶה וַיַּרְא אֶת הָעֵגֶל וּמְחֹלֹת וַיִּחַר אַף מֹשֶׁה". In this case, though, no&#160; commentators criticize Moshe's reaction as being unwarranted.</fn>&#160; <a href="Shemot16-20" data-aht="source">Shemot 16:20</a> (after the nation leaves over from the manna), <a href="Vayikra10-16" data-aht="source">Vayikra 10:16</a> (when Aharon's sons burn the goat of the sin-offering), and <a href="Bemidbar31-14" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 31:14</a> (when the officers leave the women alive in the war with Midyan).</li>
 
<li><b>Explicit cases</b>&#160;– The Torah explicitly notes Moshe's wrath in three places:<fn>See below that there is one other episode in which Tanakh explicitly presents Moshe as filled with anger.&#160; Upon seeing the people worship the Golden Calf, Moshe's ire is raised: "וַיְהִי כַּאֲשֶׁר קָרַב אֶל הַמַּחֲנֶה וַיַּרְא אֶת הָעֵגֶל וּמְחֹלֹת וַיִּחַר אַף מֹשֶׁה". In this case, though, no&#160; commentators criticize Moshe's reaction as being unwarranted.</fn>&#160; <a href="Shemot16-20" data-aht="source">Shemot 16:20</a> (after the nation leaves over from the manna), <a href="Vayikra10-16" data-aht="source">Vayikra 10:16</a> (when Aharon's sons burn the goat of the sin-offering), and <a href="Bemidbar31-14" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 31:14</a> (when the officers leave the women alive in the war with Midyan).</li>
Line 91: Line 87:
 
<li>However, <multilink><a href="RalbagSheminiT9" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagVayikra10-20" data-aht="source">Vayikra 10:20</a><a href="RalbagSheminiT9" data-aht="source">Shemini Toelet 9</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink> excuses such outbursts by saying that Moshe was so spiritual that he was angered even by what appeared to be slight deviations from Halakhah.<fn>This is consistent with Ralbag's explanations of Moshe's other flaws – see the discussions below regarding <a href="Did Moshe Need Yitro's Advice" data-aht="page">Moshe and Yitro's Advice</a> and <a href="Moshe's Speech Impediment" data-aht="page">Moshe's Speech Impediment</a>.</fn></li>
 
<li>However, <multilink><a href="RalbagSheminiT9" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagVayikra10-20" data-aht="source">Vayikra 10:20</a><a href="RalbagSheminiT9" data-aht="source">Shemini Toelet 9</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink> excuses such outbursts by saying that Moshe was so spiritual that he was angered even by what appeared to be slight deviations from Halakhah.<fn>This is consistent with Ralbag's explanations of Moshe's other flaws – see the discussions below regarding <a href="Did Moshe Need Yitro's Advice" data-aht="page">Moshe and Yitro's Advice</a> and <a href="Moshe's Speech Impediment" data-aht="page">Moshe's Speech Impediment</a>.</fn></li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
</ul>
+
</ul><ul>
<ul>
 
 
<li><b>Non explicit cases</b> – There are a number of additional cases where some commentators claim that Moshe's temper got the better of him:</li>
 
<li><b>Non explicit cases</b> – There are a number of additional cases where some commentators claim that Moshe's temper got the better of him:</li>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
Line 103: Line 98:
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
<subcategory>Speech Impediment
 
<subcategory>Speech Impediment
<p class="nonintro">The three verses of <a href="Shemot4-10" data-aht="source">Shemot 4:10</a>, <a href="Shemot6-12" data-aht="source">6:12</a>, and <a href="Shemot6-30" data-aht="source">6:30</a> describe Moshe's speech impediment using the terms of "כְבַד פֶּה וּכְבַד לָשׁוֹן" and "עֲרַל שְׂפָתָיִם&#8206;". Exegetes debate whether or not this disability was of a physical nature, and why Hashem would choose a disabled messenger to be His spokesman. See <a href="Moshe's Speech Impediment" data-aht="page">Moshe's Speech Impediment</a>.</p>
+
<p class="nonintro">The three verses of <a href="Shemot4-10" data-aht="source">Shemot 4:10</a>, <a href="Shemot6-12" data-aht="source">6:12</a>, and <a href="Shemot6-30" data-aht="source">6:30</a> describe Moshe's speech impediment using the terms of "כְבַד פֶּה וּכְבַד לָשׁוֹן" and "עֲרַל שְׂפָתָיִם&#8206;". Exegetes debate whether or not this disability was of a physical nature, and why Hashem would choose a disabled messenger to be His spokesman. See <a href="Moshe's Speech Impediment" data-aht="page">Moshe's Speech Impediment</a>.</p><ul>
<ul>
 
 
<li><b>Physical disability</b>&#160;– According to&#160;<multilink><a href="ShemotRabbah1-26" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah</a><a href="ShemotRabbah1-26" data-aht="source">1:26</a><a href="Shemot Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shemot Rabbah</a></multilink>,&#160;<multilink><a href="RBachyaShemot4-10" data-aht="source">R. Chananel</a><a href="RBachyaShemot4-10" data-aht="source">Cited by R. Bachya Shemot 4:10</a><a href="R. Chananel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Chananel b. Chushiel</a></multilink> and&#160;<multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot4-10-11" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot4-10-11" data-aht="source">Shemot 4:10-11</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>, Moshe's speech impediment was of a physical nature and involved difficulties in letter pronunciation or stuttering. The <multilink><a href="DerashotHaRan5" data-aht="source">Ran</a><a href="DerashotHaRan5" data-aht="source">Derashot HaRan 5</a><a href="R. Nissim Gerondi (Ran)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Nissim Gerondi</a></multilink><br/>states that Hashem intentionally chose a leader who was not a charismatic speaker to insure that all would recognize that the miracles of the Exodus were brought about not by oratorical talents but rather by Hashem's will.<fn>R. Yosef Bekhor Shor similarly suggests that Hashem wanted to demonstrate that the Divine will could be realized even via a messenger lacking a silver tongue.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Physical disability</b>&#160;– According to&#160;<multilink><a href="ShemotRabbah1-26" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah</a><a href="ShemotRabbah1-26" data-aht="source">1:26</a><a href="Shemot Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shemot Rabbah</a></multilink>,&#160;<multilink><a href="RBachyaShemot4-10" data-aht="source">R. Chananel</a><a href="RBachyaShemot4-10" data-aht="source">Cited by R. Bachya Shemot 4:10</a><a href="R. Chananel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Chananel b. Chushiel</a></multilink> and&#160;<multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot4-10-11" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot4-10-11" data-aht="source">Shemot 4:10-11</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>, Moshe's speech impediment was of a physical nature and involved difficulties in letter pronunciation or stuttering. The <multilink><a href="DerashotHaRan5" data-aht="source">Ran</a><a href="DerashotHaRan5" data-aht="source">Derashot HaRan 5</a><a href="R. Nissim Gerondi (Ran)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Nissim Gerondi</a></multilink><br/>states that Hashem intentionally chose a leader who was not a charismatic speaker to insure that all would recognize that the miracles of the Exodus were brought about not by oratorical talents but rather by Hashem's will.<fn>R. Yosef Bekhor Shor similarly suggests that Hashem wanted to demonstrate that the Divine will could be realized even via a messenger lacking a silver tongue.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Non-physical disability</b> –&#160;<multilink><a href="RashbamShemot4-10" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamShemot4-10" data-aht="source">Shemot 4:10</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink> deems it impossible that Hashem would elect to transmit the Torah through a stutterer, leading him to posit that Moshe's challenge was an inability to speak Egyptian well.<fn>Having left Egypt while still young, he was not as fluent as needed to feel comfortable speaking in the king's palace.</fn>&#160;<multilink><a href="LekachTovShemot4-10" data-aht="source">Lekach Tov</a><a href="LekachTovShemot4-10" data-aht="source">Shemot 4:10</a><a href="R. Toviah b. Eliezer (Lekach Tov)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Toviah b. Eliezer</a></multilink> and&#160;<multilink><a href="RalbagVayikra10-20" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagShemotBeurHaMilot4-10" data-aht="source">Shemot Beur HaMilot 4:10</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink> more simply suggest that Moshe was not a gifted orator and incapable of ordering his speech in a clear and organized manner. Ralbag explains that this was a result of Moshe's high spiritual level which led him to have difficulties in mundane dealings with humans.<fn>See Ralbag's similar take on Moshe's administrative shortcomings in <a href="Did Moshe Need Yitro's Advice" data-aht="page">Did Moshe Need Yitro's Advice</a>.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Non-physical disability</b> –&#160;<multilink><a href="RashbamShemot4-10" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamShemot4-10" data-aht="source">Shemot 4:10</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink> deems it impossible that Hashem would elect to transmit the Torah through a stutterer, leading him to posit that Moshe's challenge was an inability to speak Egyptian well.<fn>Having left Egypt while still young, he was not as fluent as needed to feel comfortable speaking in the king's palace.</fn>&#160;<multilink><a href="LekachTovShemot4-10" data-aht="source">Lekach Tov</a><a href="LekachTovShemot4-10" data-aht="source">Shemot 4:10</a><a href="R. Toviah b. Eliezer (Lekach Tov)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Toviah b. Eliezer</a></multilink> and&#160;<multilink><a href="RalbagVayikra10-20" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagShemotBeurHaMilot4-10" data-aht="source">Shemot Beur HaMilot 4:10</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink> more simply suggest that Moshe was not a gifted orator and incapable of ordering his speech in a clear and organized manner. Ralbag explains that this was a result of Moshe's high spiritual level which led him to have difficulties in mundane dealings with humans.<fn>See Ralbag's similar take on Moshe's administrative shortcomings in <a href="Did Moshe Need Yitro's Advice" data-aht="page">Did Moshe Need Yitro's Advice</a>.</fn></li>
Line 110: Line 104:
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
<subcategory>Errors in Judgment
 
<subcategory>Errors in Judgment
<p class="nonintro">Commentators disagree as to whether this happened:</p>
+
<p class="nonintro">Commentators disagree as to whether this happened:</p><ul>
<ul>
 
 
<li>Moshe could have made errors of judgment – see <a href="Mystery at the Malon" data-aht="page">Mystery at the Malon</a>.</li>
 
<li>Moshe could have made errors of judgment – see <a href="Mystery at the Malon" data-aht="page">Mystery at the Malon</a>.</li>
 
<li>Moshe did not make errors of judgment –&#160;</li>
 
<li>Moshe did not make errors of judgment –&#160;</li>

Version as of 03:18, 2 September 2019

Moshe – Overview

This page is a stub.
Please contact us if you would like to assist in its development.


Unique Traits

Prophetic Powers

See

Miracles

The concluding verses of Torah suggest that no other prophet compares to Moshe, not only in his prophetic prowess, but also in all of the signs and wonders he wrought. What, though, was so exceptional about Moshe's miracle-making? Did not other prophets perform similar feats?1 Commentators differ in their understanding of what made Moshe's miracles unique: [See Moshe's Epitaph – Signs and Wonders and Miracles for more.]

Wisdom

See

Standing up for Justice

Possible Flaws

Misunderstanding Hashem

Commentators disagree as to whether it is legitimate to maintain that Moshe could have ever misunderstood Hashem. After all, if a prophet can make a mistake, how can he be trusted to correctly transmit Hashem's word?

Misunderstanding the Nation

How well did Moshe and the nation communicate?  Is it possible that Moshe ever erred in understanding the nation's requests or needs?

The issue comes to the fore in the story of the Petition of the Two and a Half Tribes in Bemidbar 32. Moshe initially responds negatively to the tribes' request to settle the eastern bank of the Jordan, chastising them for leaving the burden of fighting to the rest of the nation.  Immediately thereafter, Reuven and Gad express their willingness not just to fight, but even to lead the nation in battle, whereupon Moshe agrees to their original demands. What leads to the about-face both on the part of the tribes and on the part of Moshe? Did the tribes change their stance only due to Moshe's condemnation, or had they always planned to take part in the Conquest?

  • Moshe misunderstood the nation – AbarbanelBemidbar 32About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel maintains that Moshe misunderstood the tribes' request and wrongly assumed that they did not want to participate in the Canaanite campaign when they had meant to all along. Thus, when they clarified their true intent he acquiesced.
  • Moshe understood the nationAkeidat YitzchakBemidbar Peirush 32About R. Yitzchak Arama, in contrast, justifies Moshe's angry reaction, opining that Moshe correctly read the tribes' petition and that it really was problematic both on the interpersonal level (as the tribes did not initially intend to join their brethren in the Conquest), and in relation to Hashem (as they rejected His Promised Land.) In face of Moshe's anger, the tribes revise their proposition and only then does Moshe agree.

Administrative Shortcomings

Some exegetes suggest that Moshe exhibited certain weaknesses as an administrator, while others think that saying so borders on the blasphemous:

  • Yitro's Advice (Shemot 18) – When Yitro sees the nation standing online to await Moshe's judgment, he suggests that Moshe delegate some of his responsibilities to lighten the load. Yitro's advice seems like such an obvious and simple solution that one cannot help but wonder: How could it be that Moshe, the greatest of all men and in possession of a direct line to Hashem, needed Yitro's help to figure this out? [For discussion, see Did Moshe Need Yitro's Advice.]
  • Moshe and Mei Merivah.(Bemidbar 20) – Though many suggest that Moshe's sin at Mei Merivah related to the realm of man and God, others suggest that the problem was one of faulty leadership.
  • Bemidbar 11  

Sins

Commentators question Moshe's behavior in several stories, allowing for the possibility that he sinned even when not explicit in the text:

  • Moshe and the Egyptian (Shemot 2) - Many laud Moshe for killing the Egyptian taskmaster and view him as championing the cause of justice, yet others question whether his response was not overly harsh and if he was justified in taking the law into his own hands. [See Moshe's Killing of the Egyptian.]
    • Justified – The majority of commentators justify Moshe's actions, by suggesting either that in killing the taskmaster Moshe was actively saving a life (Shemot Rabbah1:28About Shemot Rabbah) or that the Egyptian was guilty of a capital crime, having committed adultery with the slain Hebrew's wife (TanchumaShemot 9About the Tanchuma). R. D"Z Hoffman, instead, argues that the trampling of human rights in Egypt was so massive that legal norms did not apply.
    • Unjustified – Midrash Petirat Moshe[Otzar HaMidrashim (Eisenstein, p. 363)]About Midrash Petirat Moshe finds Moshe's deed blameworthy and suggests that he was even punished as a result.9
    • Unintentional – R. Saadia Gaon charts a middle ground, suggesting that Moshe's action was indeed problematic, but unintentional.  He had meant only to harm the Egyptian, not to kill him.
  • Moshe at the Malon (Shemot 4) – Hashem's attempt to kill Moshe (or perhaps his son) during the incident at the inn implies that there had been some serious transgression.  Yet, there is no explicit mention of any wrongdoing in the text.  Moreover, attributing a crime to Moshe implies that Hashem had chosen an unworthy messenger! How, then, is the story to be understood?  Is it a tale of sin and punishment or something else?
    • Sinned in not circumcising his son
    • Sinned in delaying his mission
    • No sin

AngerSeveral commentators have faulted Moshe for unwarranted anger:

Speech Impediment

The three verses of Shemot 4:10, 6:12, and 6:30 describe Moshe's speech impediment using the terms of "כְבַד פֶּה וּכְבַד לָשׁוֹן" and "עֲרַל שְׂפָתָיִם‎". Exegetes debate whether or not this disability was of a physical nature, and why Hashem would choose a disabled messenger to be His spokesman. See Moshe's Speech Impediment.

Errors in Judgment

Commentators disagree as to whether this happened:

  • Moshe could have made errors of judgment – see Mystery at the Malon.
  • Moshe did not make errors of judgment – 

Religious Identity

Was Moshe's Son Uncircumcised and Why?

Upbringing, Marriage and Family Life

Miraculous Birth?

Commentators divide in how they views Moshe's birth and early years, with some presenting

Palace Upbringing

Moshe's Marriage