Difference between revisions of "Moshe/0"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 74: Line 74:
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
<subcategory>Sins
 
<subcategory>Sins
 +
<p class="nonintro">In several places in Torah, commentators question Moshe's behavior and suggest that he might have sinned, even if this is not explicit in the text:</p>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li><b>&#160;<a href="Moshe's Killing of the Egyptian" data-aht="page">Moshe's Killing of the Egyptian</a> </b>(Shemot 2) - Many laud Moshe for killing the Egyptian taskmaster and view him as championing the cause of justice. Others, though, question whether his response was not overly harsh and if Moshe was justified in taking the law into his own hands:</li>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li><b>Justified</b>&#160;– The majority of commentators justify Moshe's actions by suggesting either that in killing the taskmaster Moshe was actively saving a life (<multilink><a href="ShemotRabbah1-28" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah</a><a href="ShemotRabbah1-28" data-aht="source">1:28</a><a href="Shemot Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shemot Rabbah</a></multilink>) or that the Egyptian was guilty of a capital crime, having committed adultery with the slain Hebrew's wife (<multilink><a href="TanchumaShemot9" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaShemot9" data-aht="source">Shemot 9</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink>). <multilink><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannShemot2-12" data-aht="source">R. D"Z Hoffman</a><a href="RDavidZviHoffmannShemot2-12" data-aht="source">Shemot 2:12</a><a href="R. David Zvi Hoffmann" data-aht="parshan">About R. David Zvi Hoffmann</a></multilink>, instead, argues that the trampling of human rights in Egypt was so massive that legal norms did not apply.</li>
 +
<li><b>Unjustified</b> –&#160;<multilink><a href="MidrashPetiratMosheOtzarHaMidrashimEisensteinp363" data-aht="source">Midrash Petirat Moshe</a><a href="MidrashPetiratMosheOtzarHaMidrashimEisensteinp363" data-aht="source">[Otzar HaMidrashim (Eisenstein, p. 363)]</a><a href="Midrash Petirat Moshe" data-aht="parshan">About Midrash Petirat Moshe</a></multilink> finds Moshe's deed blameworthy and suggests that he was even punished as a result.<fn>The Midrash contains a picturesque account of Moshe's dialogue with Hashem before his death, where Moshe pleads with Hashem not to die. Hashem responds that he is deserving of death for this very incident, telling Moshe, "כלום אמרתי לך שתהרוג את המצרי".</fn></li>
 +
<li><b>Unintentional</b>&#160;–&#160;<multilink><a href="RSaadiaGaonMishlei17-19" data-aht="source">R. Saadia Gaon</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonMishlei17-19" data-aht="source">Mishlei 17:19</a><a href="R. Saadia Gaon" data-aht="parshan">About R. Saadia Gaon</a></multilink> charts a middle ground, suggesting that Moshe's action was indeed problematic, but unintentional.&#160; He had meant only to harm the Egyptian, not to kill him.</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
</ul>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li><b><a href="Mystery at the Malon" data-aht="page">Moshe at the Malon</a></b>&#160;(Shemot 4) – Hashem's attempt to kill Moshe (or perhaps his son) during the incident at the inn implies that there had been some serious transgression.&#160; Yet, there is no explicit mention of any wrongdoing in the text.&#160; Moreover, attributing a crime to Moshe implies that Hashem had chosen an unworthy messenger! How, then, is the story to be understood?&#160; Is it a tale of sin and punishment or something else?</li>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li><b>Sinned in not circumcising his son</b> – Many Tannaitic sources. working backwards from the circumcision at the story's conclusion, suggest that Moshe must have been lax in circumcising his son. While <multilink><a href="YerushalmiNedarim3-9" data-aht="source">Yerushalmi Nedarim</a><a href="YerushalmiNedarim3-9" data-aht="source">Nedarim 3:9</a><a href="Yerushalmi Nedarim" data-aht="parshan">About Yerushalmi Nedarim</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="ShemotRabbah5-8" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah</a><a href="ShemotRabbah5-8" data-aht="source">5:8</a><a href="Shemot Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shemot Rabbah</a></multilink> attempt to minimize Moshe's guilt by explaining that there was merely a slight delay due to the journey,&#160;<multilink><a href="MekhiltaDeRabbiYishmaelShemot18-3" data-aht="source">R. Elazar HaModai</a><a href="MekhiltaDeRabbiYishmaelShemot18-3" data-aht="source">18:3</a><a href="Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Shemot" data-aht="parshan">About Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Shemot</a></multilink> tries to find a crime more befitting Hashem's harsh response, and proposes that Moshe has sealed a pact with Yitro that one of his sons would never be circumcised.</li>
 +
<li><b>Sinned in delaying his mission</b> – <multilink><a href="RashbamShemot4-14" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamShemot4-14" data-aht="source">Shemot 4:14</a><a href="RashbamShemot4-24" data-aht="source">Shemot 4:24</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink> connects the sin to the larger context of the story and the national mission upon which Moshe was embarking.&#160; He suggests that Moshe sinned in bringing his family to Egypt as this caused him to tarry and delay the redemption of Israel.<fn>He compares Moshe's sin to those of Bilam, Yaakov and Yonah who similarly tried to avoid fulfilling the mission assigned them by Hashem, and who were similarly punished. Each is put into a potentially fatal situation, and, like Moshe, each of Yaakov and Bilam are also injured or touched on the thigh. It is possible that in all three cases the leg is specifically chosen as a "measure for measure" punishment for not going to do what Hashem desired. For more on Rashbam's reading of each of these stories, see&#160;<a href="Wrestling With Angels and Men" data-aht="page">Wrestling With Angels and Men</a> and <a href="Why Was Hashem Angry at Bilam" data-aht="page">Why Was Hashem Angry at Bilam</a>.</fn></li>
 +
<li><b>Miscalculation</b> –&#160;<multilink><a href="IbnEzraShemotFirstCommentary2-2" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraShemotSecondCommentary4-20" data-aht="source">Shemot Second Commentary 4:20</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink> implies that Moshe did not so much sin as make an error in judgment.&#160; As bringing Moshe's family to Egypt might have demoralized the nation,<fn>The people might have believed that Moshe was merely coming to live with his family in Egypt and that the redemption was not imminent.</fn> Hashem told Moshe to circumcise his son enroute so as to ensure that the family remain behind.</li>
 +
<li><b>No sin</b> –&#160;<multilink><a href="RYosefibnKaspiShemot4-24" data-aht="source">Ibn Kaspi </a><a href="RYosefibnKaspiShemot4-24" data-aht="source">Shemot 4:24</a><a href="RYosefibnKaspiBemidbar20-10" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 20:10</a><a href="R. Yosef ibn Kaspi" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef ibn Kaspi</a></multilink> goes further to suggest that Moshe did not err at all. Moshe's anxiety at having to confront Paroh and warn him of his son's impending death is what made Moshe gravely ill.</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
<li><b>"לָמָה הֲרֵעֹתָה לָעָם הַזֶּה"</b> – After Moshe's initial failed negotiations with Paroh, he accuses Hashem, "why have you harmed the nation?!" Considering that Hashem had previously told him that Paroh was not going to acquiesce immediately, Moshe's complaint appears unwarranted, leading commentators to question its validity</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li><b><a href="Moshe's Misstep and Mei Merivah" data-aht="page">Moshe's Misstep and Mei Merivah</a></b> (Bemidbar 20) – In this story Hashem explicitly punishes Moshe (and Aharon), telling them "לֹא הֶאֱמַנְתֶּם בִּי לְהַקְדִּישֵׁנִי לְעֵינֵי בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל".&#160; It is not at all clear, however, what specific action constituted the sin, and why this error was so grievous that it resulted in the brothers being refused entry into the Land.</li>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li><b>Sin</b> – Commentators mine almost every word of the text, raising numerous possible sins, including: lack of faith (<multilink><a href="RashbamBemidbar20-10-12" data-aht="source">Rashbam</a><a href="RashbamBemidbar20-10-12" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 20:10-12</a><a href="R. Shemuel b. Meir (Rashbam)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel b. Meir</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="SefornoBemidbar20-8" data-aht="source">Seforno</a><a href="SefornoBemidbar20-8" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 20:8</a><a href="R. Ovadyah Seforno" data-aht="parshan">About R. Ovadyah Seforno</a></multilink>),<fn>They suggest that Moshe's hitting the rock rather than speaking to it was the problematic action. Moshe doubted whether simply talking to the rock would elicit the miracle.</fn> desecration of Hashem's name (<multilink><a href="RambanBemidbar20-8" data-aht="source">R. Chananel</a><a href="RambanBemidbar20-8" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 20:8</a><a href="R. Chananel b. Chushiel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Chananel b. Chushiel</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashiBemidbar20-11-12" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBemidbar20-11-12" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 20:11-12</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorDevarim1-37" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorDevarim1-37" data-aht="source">Devarim 1:37</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>),<fn>According to Rashi hitting rather than speaking to the rock minimized the miracle and caused a lesser sanctification of Hashem's name. R. Yosef Bekhor Shor explains instead that Moshe's posing his words, "...הֲמִן הַסֶּלַע הַזֶּה", as a question caused the people to think that he doubted that Hashem could indeed bring forth water from the stone. Finally, R. Chananel points to Moshe's problematic use of the word "נוֹצִיא" specifically. Moshe's saying "we will bring forth water" led the nation to wonder whether he and Aharon, rather than Hashem, were the source of the miracle.</fn> excessive anger (<multilink><a href="RambamShemonahPerakimchapter4" data-aht="source">Rambam</a><a href="RambamShemonahPerakimchapter4" data-aht="source">Shemonah Perakim chapter 4</a><a href="MorehNevukhim2-35" data-aht="source">Moreh Nevukhim 2:35</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Maimon (Rambam, Maimonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Maimon</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RYosefibnKaspiBemidbar20-10" data-aht="source">Ibn Kaspi</a><a href="RYosefibnKaspiBemidbar20-10" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 20:10</a><a href="R. Yosef ibn Kaspi" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef ibn Kaspi</a></multilink>),<fn>According to Rambam and Ibn Kaspi the nation did not deserve rebuke for their complaints as the lack of water legitimized their murmurings.&#160; As such, Moshe's angry retort "listen you rebels" was unwarranted.</fn> and faulty leadership (<multilink><a href="MinchahBelulahBemidbar20-12" data-aht="source">Minchah Belulah</a><a href="MinchahBelulahBemidbar20-12" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 20:12</a><a href="R. Avraham Porto (Minchah Belulah)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham Porto</a></multilink>).<fn>see above that Minchah Belulah blames Moshe and Aharon for not standing up to the people on their own, but instead "fleeing" to the Tent of Meeting.</fn>&#160;</li>
 +
<li><b>No Sin</b> – <multilink><a href="RalbagBemidbar20-8" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagBemidbar20-8" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 20:8</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink>&#160;and Abarbanel also raise the possibility that Moshe did not sin at all in this episode and that his being denied entry was either collective punishment for sins of the nation, or due to to previous misdeeds.</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
</ul>
 
</subcategory>
 
</subcategory>
 
<subcategory>Errors in Judgment
 
<subcategory>Errors in Judgment
<p class="nonintro">Several commentators suggest that, at times, Moshe might have made errors in judgement:</p><ul>
+
<p class="nonintro">Several commentators suggest that, at times, Moshe might have made errors in judgement:</p>
 +
<ul>
 
<li><b><a href="Mystery at the Malon" data-aht="page">Mystery at the Malon</a> </b>– See Ibn Ezra's understanding of the story discussed above.</li>
 
<li><b><a href="Mystery at the Malon" data-aht="page">Mystery at the Malon</a> </b>– See Ibn Ezra's understanding of the story discussed above.</li>
 
<li><b>Story of the Spies</b>&#160;– See Abarbanel who suggests that the nation requested spies to determine the route of the conquest and which cities they should attack, but Moshe, on his own, added that they should also evaluate the strength of the people and the fortifications of the cities and the like. Though Moshe had good intentions, it was this further scrutiny that led to the spies' failure.<fn>Cf. R. Medan in <a href="The Story of the Spies in Bemidbar and Devarim" data-aht="page">The Story of the Spies in Bemidbar and Devarim</a> who suggests that the spies were sent on a dual mission: a military reconnaissance mission as well as a surveying mission to determine the tribal inheritances and that Moshe erred in combining the two.&#160; Had the missions remained separate, maybe the mishap of the Spies would never have occurred.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Story of the Spies</b>&#160;– See Abarbanel who suggests that the nation requested spies to determine the route of the conquest and which cities they should attack, but Moshe, on his own, added that they should also evaluate the strength of the people and the fortifications of the cities and the like. Though Moshe had good intentions, it was this further scrutiny that led to the spies' failure.<fn>Cf. R. Medan in <a href="The Story of the Spies in Bemidbar and Devarim" data-aht="page">The Story of the Spies in Bemidbar and Devarim</a> who suggests that the spies were sent on a dual mission: a military reconnaissance mission as well as a surveying mission to determine the tribal inheritances and that Moshe erred in combining the two.&#160; Had the missions remained separate, maybe the mishap of the Spies would never have occurred.</fn></li>

Version as of 00:27, 11 September 2019

Moshe – Overview

This topic is still being developed and updated

Unique Traits

Miracles

The concluding verses of Torah suggest that no other prophet compares to Moshe, not only in his prophetic prowess, but also in all of the signs and wonders he wrought. What, though, was so exceptional about Moshe's miracle-making? Did not other prophets perform similar feats?1 [See Moshe's Epitaph – Signs and Wonders and Miracles for full discussion.]

Sense of Justice

See Tzeror HaMor Tzeror HaMor Shemot 2:11About R. Avraham Saba (Tzeror HaMor)who points to the fact that Moshe saved not just his fellow Israelites from injustice but also unknown Midianite women as proof that Moshe was driven by a sense of justice and mercy and not just kinship.  It was this trait, he suggests, that merited Moshe to be the leader of Israel.

Humility

Possible Flaws

Misunderstanding Hashem

Commentators disagree as to whether it is legitimate to maintain that Moshe could have ever misunderstood Hashem. After all, if a prophet can make a mistake and misinterpret Hashem's words, how can he be trusted to correctly transmit Hashem's messages?

Lack in Leadership

  • Administrative Shortcomings – Some exegetes suggest that Moshe exhibited certain weaknesses as an administrator, while others think that saying so borders on the blasphemous:
    • Yitro's Advice (Shemot 18) – When Yitro sees the nation standing online to await Moshe's judgment, he suggests that Moshe delegate some of his responsibilities to lighten the load. Yitro's advice seems like such an obvious and simple solution that one cannot help but wonder: How could it be that Moshe, the greatest of all men and in possession of a direct line to Hashem, needed Yitro's help to figure this out?
  • Lack of initiative? Though many suggest that Moshe's sin at Mei Merivah in Bemidbar 20 related to the realm of man and God, others suggest that the problem was one of faulty leadership, specifically Moshe's lack of initiative.
    • See, for instance, Minchah BelulahBemidbar 20:12About R. Avraham Porto who asserts that in "fleeing" to the Tent of Meeting, Moshe betrayed a fear of the nation and an inability to act and rebuke them on his own.
    • Others, though, see in this very same action a positive act.  According to them, prophetic greatness lies in strict obedience to Hashem's word.  A prophet should not act on his own, but must always consult with Hashem and follow Hashem's commands. For further discussion, see Prophetic Actions Without Explicit Divine Sanction.
  • Misunderstanding the nation? –  Commentators raise the possibility that in certain instances there might have been a communication gap between Moshe and the people:
    • Petition of the Two and a Half Tribes – In this story, Moshe initially responds negatively to the request to settle the eastern bank of the Jordan, chastising the tribes for leaving the burden of fighting to the rest of the nation (Bemidbar 32).  Immediately thereafter, Reuven and Gad express their willingness not just to fight, but even to lead the nation in battle, whereupon Moshe agrees to their original demands. What leads to the about-face both on the part of the tribes and on the part of Moshe? Did the tribes change their stance only due to Moshe's condemnation, or had they always planned to take part in the Conquest?  Might Moshe have misunderstood their intent?
      • Moshe misjudges – AbarbanelBemidbar 32About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel maintains that Moshe misunderstood the tribes' request and wrongly assumed that they did not want to participate in the Canaanite campaign when they had meant to all along.9
      • Moshe judges correctly Akeidat YitzchakBemidbar Peirush 32About R. Yitzchak Arama, in contrast, justifies Moshe's angry reaction, opining that Moshe correctly read the tribes' petition and that it really was problematic both on the interpersonal level,10 and in relation to Hashem.11 In face of Moshe's anger, the tribes revise their proposition and only then does Moshe agree.

Sins

In several places in Torah, commentators question Moshe's behavior and suggest that he might have sinned, even if this is not explicit in the text:

  • Moshe at the Malon (Shemot 4) – Hashem's attempt to kill Moshe (or perhaps his son) during the incident at the inn implies that there had been some serious transgression.  Yet, there is no explicit mention of any wrongdoing in the text.  Moreover, attributing a crime to Moshe implies that Hashem had chosen an unworthy messenger! How, then, is the story to be understood?  Is it a tale of sin and punishment or something else?
  • "לָמָה הֲרֵעֹתָה לָעָם הַזֶּה" – After Moshe's initial failed negotiations with Paroh, he accuses Hashem, "why have you harmed the nation?!" Considering that Hashem had previously told him that Paroh was not going to acquiesce immediately, Moshe's complaint appears unwarranted, leading commentators to question its validity

Errors in Judgment

Several commentators suggest that, at times, Moshe might have made errors in judgement:

  • Mystery at the Malon – See Ibn Ezra's understanding of the story discussed above.
  • Story of the Spies – See Abarbanel who suggests that the nation requested spies to determine the route of the conquest and which cities they should attack, but Moshe, on his own, added that they should also evaluate the strength of the people and the fortifications of the cities and the like. Though Moshe had good intentions, it was this further scrutiny that led to the spies' failure.19

Anger

Several commentators have faulted Moshe for unwarranted anger:

Speech Impediment

The three verses of Shemot 4:10, 6:12, and 6:30 describe Moshe's speech impediment using the terms of "כְבַד פֶּה וּכְבַד לָשׁוֹן" and "עֲרַל שְׂפָתָיִם‎". Exegetes debate whether or not this disability was of a physical nature, and why Hashem would choose a disabled messenger to be His spokesman. See Moshe's Speech Impediment.

Birth and Upbringing

Miraculous Birth?

Commentators divide in how they view Moshe's birth and early years, with some presenting every aspect of these as being filled with miracles and others seeing them in a more natural light.

Palace Upbringing

Why might Hashem have orchestrated events so that Moshe would be brought up specifically in the palace of a king?

Family Ties

What did Moshe know of his biological family? Did his family maintain a relationship with him after he was adopted by the princess?  Shemot 4:14 implies that he and Aharon had a close relationship, but if he grew up in the palace where did this come from? These questions are related to a textual ambiguity. Shemot 2:10 states, "וַיִּגְדַּל הַיֶּלֶד וַתְּבִאֵהוּ לְבַת פַּרְעֹה וַיְהִי לָהּ לְבֵן".  How old was Moshe when he "grew up" and was adopted by the princess?

  • Moved after weaning – Shemot Rabbah1:261:261:285:8About Shemot Rabbah suggests that the phrase "וַיִּגְדַּל הַיֶּלֶד" refers to Moshe's weaning and that Moshe moved to the palace at the age of two. If so, it is possible that Moshe did not really know his family. Shadal,33 however, asserts that Yocheved visited her son from time to time, and that Moshe thus had a continued connection to his family.34
  • Moved as a youth – Alternatively, though, one could suggest that "וַיִּגְדַּל הַיֶּלֶד" means that Moshe only left his home after he matured and was no longer a young boy. See R. Chama in Shemot Rabbah5:2About Shemot Rabbah who suggests that Moshe was 12 when taken from his parents' home.
  • Never moved – HaKorem uniquely suggests that Moshe actually never moved to live in the palace.  According to him, the word "וַיְהִי לָהּ לְבֵן" in Shemot 2:10 refers to Yocheved, who requested of Paroh's daughter that she (Yocheved) receive the boy as a son in place of her nursing fee. Alternatively, the phrase "וַיְהִי לָהּ לְבֵן" does refer to the princess, but might merely mean that she served as a "godmother" while Moshe lived in his real home.35

Religious Identity

Journey to Belief

At what age did Moshe recognize that he was an Israelite?  How did he know that the Israelites were "his brothers"? Had he any connection to his nation and Hebrew roots while growing up? What did he know of Hashem? Though most readers assume that Moshe was "religious from birth", the verses are less clear.

  • Always viewed himself as Israelite – According to those opinions that Moshe lived at home for a significant period of time or that he never moved to the palace at all (see discussion above), Moshe was likely always very connected to his nation, its values, and its monotheistic belief system.
  • Cognizant of Israelite identity only later RambanShemot 2:11About R. Moshe b. Nachman, in contrast, maintains that Moshe first found out that he was Israelite in later years, right before he went out to "see his brothers". This would suggest that he knew almost nothing about his nation or its belief system when fleeing to Midyan. If so, Moshe's story might be one of a journey towards belief rather than of a leader born into it. It is perhaps first at the "burning bush," when Hashem reveals Himself to Moshe, that their relationship begins.
  • Somewhere in the middle -– Ralbag takes a middle position, implying that though Moshe grew up in the palace, he nonetheless knew about his Israelite roots early on. He even raises the possibility that everyone in the palace might have known that Moshe was an Israelite.36  It is not clear according to this reading, however, how this knowledge impacted Moshe. What did Moshe knew about Hashem? Did he prefer to identify as Hebrew or Egyptian?

The issue is related to several other questions:

  • When Moshe saved the Hebrew from the taskmaster, were his actions motivated by a feeling of brotherhood or just a strong sense of justice?
  • When the daughters of Reuel speak about Moshe's aiding them, they say, "אִישׁ מִצְרִי הִצִּילָנוּ".  Does this imply that Moshe, too, viewed himself first and foremost as an Egyptian?
  • How is one to understand Moshe's marriage to Zipporah, the daughter of a Midianite priest? [See discussion below.]
  • "גֵּר הָיִיתִי בְּאֶרֶץ נׇכְרִיָּה" - In naming his son Gershom, was Moshe suggesting that he felt like a foreigner in Midyan because they were not Israelite (Malbim), or because they were not Egyptian?

Intermarriage?

The question of whether Moshe intermarried arises regarding both his marriage to Zipporah, described in Shemot 2, and his marriage to the Cushite woman, alluded to in Bemidbar 12:

I. Moshe's Marriage to Zipporah – How could Moshe marry the daughter of an idolatrous priest?  [For elaboration, see Moshe's Family Life, Zipporah, and Yitro – Religious Identity.]

II. Moshe's Marriage to the Cushite – Bemidbar 12:1 shares that Miryam and Aharon complained about "the Cushite woman which Moshe took". This is the first time that this marriage is spoken of in Tanakh.  When and why did Moshe marry a Cushite?  The fact that the siblings gossip about it in Bemidbar would suggest that it took place after the Revelation at Sinai.  If so, why was this legitimate? Were the siblings not justified in their critique?

Was Moshe's Son Uncircumcised and Why?

Marriage and Family Life

Marriage

Divorce?

Children

In-laws

Siblings