Difference between revisions of "Philosophy:Collective Punishment/2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic is currently in progress
m |
m |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><b>Reward in world to come</b> – R. Saadia and R. Hoffmann explain that if innocent people suffer in this world it it not unjust for they will receive compensation in the world to come.</li> | <li><b>Reward in world to come</b> – R. Saadia and R. Hoffmann explain that if innocent people suffer in this world it it not unjust for they will receive compensation in the world to come.</li> | ||
− | <li><b>Punishment and warning to wicked</b> – R. Hoffmann adds that the collective suffering of the righteous should be viewed as | + | <li><b>Punishment and warning to wicked</b> – R. Hoffmann adds that the collective suffering of the righteous should be viewed as  part of the sinner's punishment.<fn>R. D"Z Hoffmann offers this explanation together with that above, recognizing that it alone might not justify the punishment of the innocent.</fn> Not only have the wicked caused themselves to perish, but they have also brought disaster on their entire generation.  The all encompassing tragedy further serves as a warning to onlookers of the magnitude of the consequences of evil.<fn>See R. Saadia who makes this point as well.</fn></li> |
<li><b>One body</b> – Ralbag, Akeidat Yitzchak, Abarbanel and Malbim explain that all members of the nation are connected, and constitute one body. Thus, it is only natural that if one "limb" sins, it will affect the rest.</li> | <li><b>One body</b> – Ralbag, Akeidat Yitzchak, Abarbanel and Malbim explain that all members of the nation are connected, and constitute one body. Thus, it is only natural that if one "limb" sins, it will affect the rest.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Natural order or Divine intervention?</b><ul> | <point><b>Natural order or Divine intervention?</b><ul> | ||
− | <li>According to Ralbag, Abarbanel and Malbim, collective punishment is not caused by active Divine intervention, but rather by passive removal of Divine providence. All members of a collective which | + | <li>According to Ralbag, Abarbanel and Malbim, collective punishment is not caused by active Divine intervention, but rather by passive removal of Divine providence. All members of a collective which merit Hashem's providence will suffer if that providence is removed due to the sin of just one or a few.  In such a case, natural order might then lead to the suffering of innocents.</li> |
− | <li>Netziv and R. Hoffman point out that the inverse is true as well; | + | <li>Netziv and R. Hoffman point out that the inverse is true as well; once there is an expression of collective punishment, miraculous intervention is needed to save the righteous individual, and only an extraordinary one will merit that.</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Individual providence?</b></point> | <point><b>Individual providence?</b></point> |
Version as of 10:33, 22 July 2015
Collective Punishment
Exegetical Approaches
Only the Sinners are Punished
Hashem only punishes the deserving and does not collectively punish anyone for someone else's crime.
Divine justice? This position is motivated by the understanding that justice demands that each person be punished for their own sins and not those of another.
Individual providence? This approach must maintain that Hashem watches over every being individually, and knows each of their actions so He can reward and punish each according to their deeds.
Reward and Punishment
Biblical Cases of Collective Punishment – These commentators try to explain away all the cases in Tanakh where there seems to be collective punishment by suggesting that in each instance the people who suffered were in fact guilty:
- The flood – These sources assert that the entire world was destroyed in the flood because, with the exception of Noach, everyone, animals included, had sinned.1
- Sedom – Rashi points out that the verse specifies that "כָּל הָעָם מִקָּצֶה" surrounded Lot's house, proving that there was not even one righteous man amongst them.2 R"Y Bekhor Shor adds that had there been, Hashem would have saved them individually;3 Avraham's complaint, "הַאַף תִּסְפֶּה צַדִּיק עִם רָשָׁע" was based on an erroneous understanding of Hashem's plan.4
- Plague of first-borns – Rashi explains that even the firstborns of maidservants and captives were killed because they, too, had enslaved the Israelites and were happy in their sorrow.
- Sin of golden calf – According to Rashi, drawing off Bavli Yoma 66, Hashem plagued only those who were guilty or worshiping the calf but who had escaped punishment by the Levites on technical grounds that they had not been warned beforehand.
- Sin of Spies – R"Y Bekhor Shor explains that only those of age to enter the military were punished because they were the ones who complained, being afraid to fight the Canaanites.
- Moshe's discussion during Korach's rebellion – According to R. Yosef Bekhor Shor, Moshe mistakenly believed that Hashem planned to kill the innocent "congregation of Israel" , but in fact Hashem had really referred to the guilty "congregration of Korach" alone. See Dialogue with the Divine During Korach's Rebellion for elaboration.
- City of Idolaters –
- Achan and death of the 36 – This approach could explain either that the 36 men were accomplices to Achan, helping him to hide the booty or the like, or that they had sinned in some other capacity and were being punished for those crimes.
- Plague in time of David – As the story opens with the fact that "וַיֹּסֶף אַף י"י לַחֲרוֹת בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל", these sources can easily explain that the nation had done something unconnected to David's deeds which had incurred the wrath of Hashem, and it was for this that they were plagued.5
What about babies? As it is difficult to say that infants or toddlers should be culpable for any sin, this approach must explain their deaths/punishments as being of a different nature, related to the principle of "פֹּקֵד עֲוֹן אָבֹת עַל בָּנִים", that children at times are punished for the sins of their parents.6 For a variety of approaches to this principle, see Are Children Punished for Parents' Sins?
Divine vs. human retribution – According to this approach, there is no difference between Divine and human retribution; collective punishment is never allowed. As such, to explain the actions of Shimon and Levi, this position must either posit that the brothers were wrong,7 or that the rest of the city had somehow participated in the crime. For elaboration and a discussion of the story, see Sin and Slaughter of Shekhem
Collective salvation
Slightly Guilty also Punished
When Hashem inflicts punishment, those who are totally innocent are never included. However, individuals who are guilty by association, or culpable to even a small degree, might be included in the punishment of a worse sinner.
Sources:Bavli Shabbat, Radak, Rif on Yehoshua, Abarbanel on Korach
Even the Innocent Punished
Sometimes Hashem collectively punishes the entire group and the innocent suffer together with the guilty.
Divine justice? These commentators offer several justifications for the notion of collective punishment:
- Reward in world to come – R. Saadia and R. Hoffmann explain that if innocent people suffer in this world it it not unjust for they will receive compensation in the world to come.
- Punishment and warning to wicked – R. Hoffmann adds that the collective suffering of the righteous should be viewed as part of the sinner's punishment.8 Not only have the wicked caused themselves to perish, but they have also brought disaster on their entire generation. The all encompassing tragedy further serves as a warning to onlookers of the magnitude of the consequences of evil.9
- One body – Ralbag, Akeidat Yitzchak, Abarbanel and Malbim explain that all members of the nation are connected, and constitute one body. Thus, it is only natural that if one "limb" sins, it will affect the rest.
Natural order or Divine intervention?
- According to Ralbag, Abarbanel and Malbim, collective punishment is not caused by active Divine intervention, but rather by passive removal of Divine providence. All members of a collective which merit Hashem's providence will suffer if that providence is removed due to the sin of just one or a few. In such a case, natural order might then lead to the suffering of innocents.
- Netziv and R. Hoffman point out that the inverse is true as well; once there is an expression of collective punishment, miraculous intervention is needed to save the righteous individual, and only an extraordinary one will merit that.
Individual providence?
Majority vs. minority of sinners?
Collective salvation?
Can humans also collectively punish?