Difference between revisions of "Purpose and Placement of the Incense Altar/2"
m |
m |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<mekorot><multilink><a href="TzerorHaMorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">R. Avraham Saba</a><a href="TzerorHaMorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Tzeror HaMor Shemot 30:1</a><a href="R. Avraham Saba (Tzeror HaMor)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham Saba (Tzeror HaMor)</a></multilink><fn>See also <multilink><a href="TanchumaTetzaveh15" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaTetzaveh15" data-aht="source">Tetzaveh 15</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink> and<multilink><a href="IbnEzraShemotFirstCommentary30-10" data-aht="source"> Ibn Ezra </a><a href="IbnEzraShemotFirstCommentary30-10" data-aht="source">Shemot First Commentary 30:10</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>who similarly point to the beloved and exalted nature of the incense altar/ offering, but do not use this to explain the placement of the command.</fn></mekorot> | <mekorot><multilink><a href="TzerorHaMorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">R. Avraham Saba</a><a href="TzerorHaMorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Tzeror HaMor Shemot 30:1</a><a href="R. Avraham Saba (Tzeror HaMor)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham Saba (Tzeror HaMor)</a></multilink><fn>See also <multilink><a href="TanchumaTetzaveh15" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaTetzaveh15" data-aht="source">Tetzaveh 15</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink> and<multilink><a href="IbnEzraShemotFirstCommentary30-10" data-aht="source"> Ibn Ezra </a><a href="IbnEzraShemotFirstCommentary30-10" data-aht="source">Shemot First Commentary 30:10</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>who similarly point to the beloved and exalted nature of the incense altar/ offering, but do not use this to explain the placement of the command.</fn></mekorot> | ||
<point><b>First and last</b> – R. Saba asserts that the discussion of the Mishkan is framed by its two most important vessels. It begins with the Ark and closes with the Incense Altar.</point> | <point><b>First and last</b> – R. Saba asserts that the discussion of the Mishkan is framed by its two most important vessels. It begins with the Ark and closes with the Incense Altar.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Function of the Incense Altar</b> – R. Saba | + | <point><b>Function of the Incense Altar</b> – R. Saba points to the role played by the incense in attaining atonement and abating the wrath of Hashem.  As evidence, he points  to the incense brought by Aharon to stop the plague in the aftermath of Korach's rebellion (<a href="Bemidbar17-9-13" data-aht="source">Bemidbar 17:9-13</a>). He further suggests that the statement "וְכִפֶּר אַהֲרֹן עַל קַרְנֹתָיו אַחַת בַּשָּׁנָה מִדַּם חַטַּאת הַכִּפֻּרִים" proves that the atonement of Yom HaKippurim is dependent upon it.<fn>This, though, is not the simplest way to understand the phrase.  The verse appears to be saying only that on Yom HaKippurim blood was sprinkled on the altar as part of the general atonement of the Mikdash, not that the altar itself served to atone for the Mikdash. Nonetheless, as the Golden Altar is the only vessel besides the <i>kaporet</i> (the cover of the ark) on which blood is sprinkled, it is fair to say that it, more than the other vessels, played a role in the atonement of Yom HaKippurim. Moreover, as part of the Yom HaKippurim service entailed bringing incense into the Holy of Holies, it clearly plays some significant function in the atoning service.</fn></point> |
<point><b>Purpose of the Tabernacle</b> – According to R. Saba the Tabernacle as a whole was built to atone for the Sin of the Golden Calf.<fn>See <a href="Purpose of the Mishkan" data-aht="page">Purpose of the Mishkan</a>.</fn>  As such, the Incense Altar, with its similar atoning function, is its second most central vessel.</point> | <point><b>Purpose of the Tabernacle</b> – According to R. Saba the Tabernacle as a whole was built to atone for the Sin of the Golden Calf.<fn>See <a href="Purpose of the Mishkan" data-aht="page">Purpose of the Mishkan</a>.</fn>  As such, the Incense Altar, with its similar atoning function, is its second most central vessel.</point> | ||
<point><b>Meaning of קטורת</b> – R. Saba suggests that the root "קטר" means to tie, as it does in Aramaic. In its atoning role, the altar serves to tie together all the aspects of the Tabernacle.  It further connect and joins the nation to Hashem.</point> | <point><b>Meaning of קטורת</b> – R. Saba suggests that the root "קטר" means to tie, as it does in Aramaic. In its atoning role, the altar serves to tie together all the aspects of the Tabernacle.  It further connect and joins the nation to Hashem.</point> | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><b>Deodorizer</b> – Rambam asserts that the Incense Altar functioned as a deodorizer for the Mishkan.  The odors of the animal slaughter and blood would have been overwhelming if they were not countered by the fragrance of the incense.<fn>See also<multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source"> R"Y Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 30:1</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>  who compares the incense to the "מוגמר" of a king, incense brought at the end of  a festive meal to fill the room with fragrance.</fn>  He adds that it was necessary to ensure that there was a pleasant fragrance for, otherwise, the people would not properly honor the Mikdash.</li> | <li><b>Deodorizer</b> – Rambam asserts that the Incense Altar functioned as a deodorizer for the Mishkan.  The odors of the animal slaughter and blood would have been overwhelming if they were not countered by the fragrance of the incense.<fn>See also<multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source"> R"Y Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 30:1</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>  who compares the incense to the "מוגמר" of a king, incense brought at the end of  a festive meal to fill the room with fragrance.</fn>  He adds that it was necessary to ensure that there was a pleasant fragrance for, otherwise, the people would not properly honor the Mikdash.</li> | ||
− | <li><b>Container and platform</b> – The Meshekh Chokhmah points out that the incense is burned even without an altar,<fn>See <multilink><a href="BavliZevachim59a" data-aht="source">Bavli Zevachim</a><a href="BavliZevachim59a" data-aht="source">Zevachim 59a</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>, "והאמר רב גידל אמר רב מזבח שנעקר מקטירין קטרת במקומו. "</fn> which teaches that the Golden Altar, as opposed to the other vessels, is not in itself significant.  It is simply a convenient way to burn the incense.<fn>He | + | <li><b>Container and platform</b> – The Meshekh Chokhmah points out that the incense is burned even without an altar,<fn>See <multilink><a href="BavliZevachim59a" data-aht="source">Bavli Zevachim</a><a href="BavliZevachim59a" data-aht="source">Zevachim 59a</a><a href="Talmud Bavli" data-aht="parshan">About the Bavli</a></multilink>, "והאמר רב גידל אמר רב מזבח שנעקר מקטירין קטרת במקומו. "</fn> which teaches that the Golden Altar, as opposed to the other vessels, is not in itself significant.  It is simply a convenient way to burn the incense.<fn>He adds that the atoning function of the incense brought on Yom HaKippurim is limited to atoning for the impurities of the Mikdash itself, and thus contingent on the existence of the rest of the Mishkan.</fn></li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Context</b> – Discussion of the Incense Altar is followed by a description of the water basin (כיור), also a secondary vessel which played no role in any cultic rite, and only served to clean and prepare the priests for service.  This context, thus, supports this approach's position that the Incense Altar also played merely a technical role.</point> | <point><b>Context</b> – Discussion of the Incense Altar is followed by a description of the water basin (כיור), also a secondary vessel which played no role in any cultic rite, and only served to clean and prepare the priests for service.  This context, thus, supports this approach's position that the Incense Altar also played merely a technical role.</point> | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
<point><b>Incense in the story of Korach</b> – One might further question this position's view of the incense from the story of Korach's rebellion.  If the incense played such an insignificant role in the Tabernacle, why was it chosen to test who merited the priestly position?</point> | <point><b>Incense in the story of Korach</b> – One might further question this position's view of the incense from the story of Korach's rebellion.  If the incense played such an insignificant role in the Tabernacle, why was it chosen to test who merited the priestly position?</point> | ||
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
− | <opinion> | + | <opinion>Complementary Role |
− | <p>The Incense Altar played an important, | + | <p>The Incense Altar played an important role which was distinct from, but complemented the other service in the Mishkan.</p> |
<mekorot><multilink><a href="RambanShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 30:1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="SefornoShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Seforno</a><a href="SefornoShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 30:1</a><a href="R. Ovadyah Seforno" data-aht="parshan">About R. Ovadyah Seforno</a></multilink>, Vilna Gaon, modern scholars</mekorot> | <mekorot><multilink><a href="RambanShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 30:1</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="SefornoShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Seforno</a><a href="SefornoShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 30:1</a><a href="R. Ovadyah Seforno" data-aht="parshan">About R. Ovadyah Seforno</a></multilink>, Vilna Gaon, modern scholars</mekorot> | ||
<point><b>Purpose of the Mishkan</b> – According to these sources, the main function of the Mishkan, its vessels, and service was to invite and house Hashem's presence.<fn>See Ramban regarding <a href="Purpose of the Mishkan" data-aht="page">Purpose of the Mishkan</a> who is consistent in viewing the Mishkan as revolving around the Ark and viewing it as means of extending the revelation at Sinai.</fn> Seforno suggests that the Ark, from which Hashem spoke to Moshe, served as Hashem's throne, while the outer sanctuary with the Table and Menorah were like a living room. The sacrificial service on the Copper Altar is man's active attempt to draw God's presence down into the Mishkan.  Thus, each vessel, with the notable exception of the Incense Altar, serves a key role in transforming the Mishkan into Hashem's Home. One, however, might question whether the Table and Menorah really played any more of a role in inviting the Divine Presence than did the Incense Altar. After all, it too can be considered "furniture".<fn>See, for example, <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 30:1</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>, who makes the same analogy between the Mishkan and a king's palace, but suggests that the incense has a parallel as well.  It, too, was found in the homes of the elite who would burn incense at the end of festive meals.</fn></point> | <point><b>Purpose of the Mishkan</b> – According to these sources, the main function of the Mishkan, its vessels, and service was to invite and house Hashem's presence.<fn>See Ramban regarding <a href="Purpose of the Mishkan" data-aht="page">Purpose of the Mishkan</a> who is consistent in viewing the Mishkan as revolving around the Ark and viewing it as means of extending the revelation at Sinai.</fn> Seforno suggests that the Ark, from which Hashem spoke to Moshe, served as Hashem's throne, while the outer sanctuary with the Table and Menorah were like a living room. The sacrificial service on the Copper Altar is man's active attempt to draw God's presence down into the Mishkan.  Thus, each vessel, with the notable exception of the Incense Altar, serves a key role in transforming the Mishkan into Hashem's Home. One, however, might question whether the Table and Menorah really played any more of a role in inviting the Divine Presence than did the Incense Altar. After all, it too can be considered "furniture".<fn>See, for example, <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 30:1</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>, who makes the same analogy between the Mishkan and a king's palace, but suggests that the incense has a parallel as well.  It, too, was found in the homes of the elite who would burn incense at the end of festive meals.</fn></point> |
Version as of 00:26, 14 February 2019
The Incense Altar – Placement and Purpose
Exegetical Approaches
Exalted Status
The incense altar is mentioned at the end of the discussion of the Mishkan and its vessels to highlight its exalted status, being second only to the Ark in importance.
Distinct Function
The Incense Altar is discussed separately from the other vessels because it played a significantly different role than the other vessels. This position divides in its evaluation of that role:
Technical Role
The placement of the Incense Altar after the main discussion of the Mishkan's vessels highlights its lowly status and the technical role it played.
- Deodorizer – Rambam asserts that the Incense Altar functioned as a deodorizer for the Mishkan. The odors of the animal slaughter and blood would have been overwhelming if they were not countered by the fragrance of the incense.5 He adds that it was necessary to ensure that there was a pleasant fragrance for, otherwise, the people would not properly honor the Mikdash.
- Container and platform – The Meshekh Chokhmah points out that the incense is burned even without an altar,6 which teaches that the Golden Altar, as opposed to the other vessels, is not in itself significant. It is simply a convenient way to burn the incense.7
Complementary Role
The Incense Altar played an important role which was distinct from, but complemented the other service in the Mishkan.
- Honor - Seforno14 suggest that the incense is brought not to invite Hashem's glory, but rather to honor it once it has already arrived.15
- Atonement - Ramban and the Gr"A, instead, suggests that the Incense Altar plays an atoning role,16 which was totally unconnected to ushering in the Divine Presence, but nonetheless extremely important.17
- Screen - R"M Leibtag, R"E Samet and R"Y Grossman all suggest that, in contrast to the other vessels which were meant to usher in the Divine presence, the cloud of incense was meant to screen the revelation.18 The Mishkan created a paradox of sorts. Man, craving closeness, invites Hashem to dwell, but Hashem's Holy presence means that man must keep a distance. Thus, the cloud of incense served to create a barrier to protect the people and enable the encounter.19
Change in Plan
Technicalities
The placement of the unit discussing the Incense Altar says nothing about the function or intrinsic worth of the vessel. It is simply the result of technical, literary concerns.