Difference between revisions of "Purpose of the Laws of Kashrut/2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic has not yet undergone editorial review
m |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Sefer HaChinukh defends this position saying that we can trust Hashem to know better than any scientist which foods are healthy and which not.</point> | Sefer HaChinukh defends this position saying that we can trust Hashem to know better than any scientist which foods are healthy and which not.</point> | ||
<point><b>The signs</b> – Rambam explains that there is nothing intrinsic in the signs which provide a health benefit to the animal.  They are only necessary so as to differentiate between the different animals.</point> | <point><b>The signs</b> – Rambam explains that there is nothing intrinsic in the signs which provide a health benefit to the animal.  They are only necessary so as to differentiate between the different animals.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Context in Vayikra  | + | <point><b>Context in Vayikra:  laws of purity</b> – According to this position, it is not clear how these laws are connected to the laws of purity and impurity.  These sources might suggest that the other laws of impurity are also related to disease.  See for example Ralbag on <a href="Tzara'at" data-aht="page">Tzara'at</a>.</point> |
− | <point><b>Context in Devarim | + | <point><b>Context in Devarim:  laws of idolatry</b></point> |
<point><b>Why is the purpose not stated?</b> Sefer HaChinukh claims that had this reason been given, individuals would think they know better and decide for themselves what is healthy and what is not, rather than relying on Hashem's list.  R. D"Z Hoffmann argues that if this were the true reason, it would have been better to include it as people tend to want to observe commandment which are beneficial to them.<fn>As such, he brings the lack of reason as a proof against this understanding of the commandment.</fn></point> | <point><b>Why is the purpose not stated?</b> Sefer HaChinukh claims that had this reason been given, individuals would think they know better and decide for themselves what is healthy and what is not, rather than relying on Hashem's list.  R. D"Z Hoffmann argues that if this were the true reason, it would have been better to include it as people tend to want to observe commandment which are beneficial to them.<fn>As such, he brings the lack of reason as a proof against this understanding of the commandment.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>"וִהְיִיתֶם קְדֹשִׁים"</b> – The conclusion of "וִהְיִיתֶם קְדֹשִׁים" suggests that somehow Kashrut laws enable the nation to become holy, which does not correspond to this approach's understanding.  Presumably these sources would suggest that the verse is a general statement, not related specifically to the laws of Kashrut but to general observance of Hashem's mizvot.<fn>See <multilink><a href="RYosefKaraVayikra11-44" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Kara</a><a href="RYosefKaraVayikra11-44" data-aht="source">Vayikra 11:44</a><a href="R. Yosef Kara" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Kara</a></multilink> who explains the verse this way.</fn></point> | <point><b>"וִהְיִיתֶם קְדֹשִׁים"</b> – The conclusion of "וִהְיִיתֶם קְדֹשִׁים" suggests that somehow Kashrut laws enable the nation to become holy, which does not correspond to this approach's understanding.  Presumably these sources would suggest that the verse is a general statement, not related specifically to the laws of Kashrut but to general observance of Hashem's mizvot.<fn>See <multilink><a href="RYosefKaraVayikra11-44" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Kara</a><a href="RYosefKaraVayikra11-44" data-aht="source">Vayikra 11:44</a><a href="R. Yosef Kara" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Kara</a></multilink> who explains the verse this way.</fn></point> | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
<category>Spiritual Benefit | <category>Spiritual Benefit | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<opinion>Perfecting Personality | <opinion>Perfecting Personality | ||
<p>The laws of Kashrut are to elevate the soul, as eating disgusting foods lowers the man to the level of the animal.</p> | <p>The laws of Kashrut are to elevate the soul, as eating disgusting foods lowers the man to the level of the animal.</p> | ||
Line 57: | Line 42: | ||
<point><b>"וְלֹא תְטַמְּאוּ אֶת נַפְשֹׁתֵיכֶם"</b> – Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that there is nothing impure physically about these prohibited animals, rather it must be spiritually.</point> | <point><b>"וְלֹא תְטַמְּאוּ אֶת נַפְשֹׁתֵיכֶם"</b> – Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that there is nothing impure physically about these prohibited animals, rather it must be spiritually.</point> | ||
<point><b>Prohibition of blood and chelev</b> – Sefer HaChinukh explains that the prohibition of eating blood and chelev is for the same purpose, as it is eating what enables the animal to live.  A person should not eat the soul of an animal.</point> | <point><b>Prohibition of blood and chelev</b> – Sefer HaChinukh explains that the prohibition of eating blood and chelev is for the same purpose, as it is eating what enables the animal to live.  A person should not eat the soul of an animal.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Similar prohibitions</b> | + | <point><b>Similar prohibitions</b><ul> |
+ | <li>Ramban asserts that also the prohibitions of eating meat and milk together and of slaughtering the mother and children the same day, are to teach us not to be cruel towards animals.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Prohibition of eating meat – Several commentaors<fn>See the opinion of Ibn Kaspi, R"Y Albo, and Tzeror HaMor in <a href="Permission to Eat Meat" data-aht="page">Permission to Eat Meat</a>.</fn> understand the initial prohibition to eat all meat<fn>They assert that originally man was meant to be vegetarian and that only in the aftermath of the flood was meat permitted.</fn> in a similar manner, pointing to its deleterious effects on man's moral fiber.  They assert that the act of killing an animal for it's meat leads man to become cruel and that the consumption of animals tarnishes the soul and intellect.</li> | ||
+ | </ul></point> | ||
+ | </opinion> | ||
+ | <opinion>Learning Limits | ||
+ | <p>The laws of Kashrut limit the number of animals one can eat, in order to train people to control our desires.</p> | ||
+ | <mekorot><multilink><a href="4Maccabees1-33-34" data-aht="source">4 Maccabees</a><a href="4Maccabees1-33-34" data-aht="source">4 Maccabees 1:33-34</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="PhiloTheSpecialLawsIV100-104" data-aht="source">Philo</a><a href="PhiloTheSpecialLawsIV100-104" data-aht="source">The Special Laws IV 100-104</a><a href="Philo" data-aht="parshan">About Philo</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RBachyaVayikra11-44" data-aht="source">R. Bachya</a><a href="RBachyaVayikra11-13" data-aht="source">Vayikra 11:13</a><a href="RBachyaVayikra11-44" data-aht="source">Vayikra 11:44</a><a href="R. Bachya b. Asher" data-aht="parshan">About R. Bachya b. Asher</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="AkeidatYitzchakTorah60" data-aht="source">Akeidat Yitzchak</a><a href="AkeidatYitzchakTorah60" data-aht="source">Torah 60</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Arama (Akeidat Yitzchak)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Arama</a></multilink>,</mekorot> | ||
+ | <point><b>Why these animals?</b><ul> | ||
+ | <li>Philo notes that swine is considered to be the nicest of all meats, and fish which lack scales are the most delicate of fish, suggesting that Hashem chose to prohibit the most desired of animals.</li> | ||
+ | <li>Alternatively, there is nothing inherent in the animals chosen to be prohibited; the purpose was simply to choose a selection to be off-limits for consumption.</li> | ||
+ | </ul></point> | ||
+ | <point><b>The signs</b> – According to this approach the signs are simply a convenient way to select a category of animals to be prohibited.</point> | ||
+ | <point><b>Context in Vayikra:  laws of purity</b></point> | ||
+ | <point><b>Context in Devarim:  laws of idolatry</b></point> | ||
+ | <point><b>"וִהְיִיתֶם קְדֹשִׁים"</b> – This approach assumes that to be holy means to overcome one's desires and control one's spirit.</point> | ||
+ | <point><b>Similar prohibitions:</b><ul> | ||
+ | <li>R. Bachya writes that many commandments have a similar purpose, such as prohibited sexual relations and fast days.<fn>R. Bachya also says that prayer, charity, and other acts of kindness further curb one's lust.  Perhaps the act of giving counters the desire to consume.</fn></li> | ||
+ | <li><b>Vegetarian</b> – This approach might agree with those who maintain that ideally humans were meant to be vegetarian, as Hashem wanted them to learn limits.</li> | ||
+ | <li></li> | ||
+ | </ul></point> | ||
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
</category> | </category> | ||
Line 64: | Line 69: | ||
<mekorot><multilink><a href="HaMishtadelVayikra11-1" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="HaMishtadelVayikra11-1" data-aht="source">HaMishtadel Vayikra 11:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink>,<fn>Shadal notes that this only explains the need for the laws under specific circumstances, and that when the whole world will believe in Hashem, their will be no purpose for such laws. Therefore in addition Shadal writes that purpose of the laws are to teach man his limits, and serve as a constant reminder of Hashem who commanded these laws.</fn></mekorot> | <mekorot><multilink><a href="HaMishtadelVayikra11-1" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="HaMishtadelVayikra11-1" data-aht="source">HaMishtadel Vayikra 11:1</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink>,<fn>Shadal notes that this only explains the need for the laws under specific circumstances, and that when the whole world will believe in Hashem, their will be no purpose for such laws. Therefore in addition Shadal writes that purpose of the laws are to teach man his limits, and serve as a constant reminder of Hashem who commanded these laws.</fn></mekorot> | ||
<point><b>Ancient Near Eastern parallels</b> – Shadal maintains that the same way the priests of other nations are isolated and have their own laws and prohibitions, so too every person in Israel is different from the nations.</point> | <point><b>Ancient Near Eastern parallels</b> – Shadal maintains that the same way the priests of other nations are isolated and have their own laws and prohibitions, so too every person in Israel is different from the nations.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Context in Devarim | + | <point><b>Context in Devarim:  laws of idolatry</b> – This understanding fits with the context of the laws in Devarim, laws of idolatry, where it is emphasized that we are a holy nation whom Hashem chose.</point> |
<point><b>"וִהְיִיתֶם קְדֹשִׁים"</b> – These verses emphasize how Hashem separated us and took us out of Egypt, and therefore these commandments are to remove us from the abominations of the Egyptians.</point> | <point><b>"וִהְיִיתֶם קְדֹשִׁים"</b> – These verses emphasize how Hashem separated us and took us out of Egypt, and therefore these commandments are to remove us from the abominations of the Egyptians.</point> | ||
<point><b>Similar prohibitions</b></point> | <point><b>Similar prohibitions</b></point> |
Version as of 23:49, 6 May 2018
Purpose of the Laws of Kashrut
Exegetical Approaches
Health Benefit
The laws of Kashrut were instituted in order to protect the health of the members of the nation.
Why these animals? According to this approach all the prohibited animals are unhealthy, while the permitted animals are not. Rashbam points to Bavli Shabbat 86b which states that non-Jews "דאכלין שקצים ורמשים חביל גופייהו". Predators and carnivores are prone to transfer diseases. Rambam further notes that pigs are particularly unhygienic1 and if they were allowed to be eaten, they would be much more present in the community and market, introducing more filth into the area.
Scientific validity of health benefit claims – Many commentators question the above claims:
- Akeidat Yitzchak2 notes that this position's claim is not supported by scientific reality, as we see many non-Jews eating the prohibited foods with no unfortunate consequences.3
- Abarbanel also questions that there are many other unhealthy foods which are not mentioned, and if the Torah's goal was to keep us healthy one would expect it to include a complete list.
The signs – Rambam explains that there is nothing intrinsic in the signs which provide a health benefit to the animal. They are only necessary so as to differentiate between the different animals.
Context in Vayikra: laws of purity – According to this position, it is not clear how these laws are connected to the laws of purity and impurity. These sources might suggest that the other laws of impurity are also related to disease. See for example Ralbag on Tzara'at.
Context in Devarim: laws of idolatry
Why is the purpose not stated? Sefer HaChinukh claims that had this reason been given, individuals would think they know better and decide for themselves what is healthy and what is not, rather than relying on Hashem's list. R. D"Z Hoffmann argues that if this were the true reason, it would have been better to include it as people tend to want to observe commandment which are beneficial to them.4
"וִהְיִיתֶם קְדֹשִׁים" – The conclusion of "וִהְיִיתֶם קְדֹשִׁים" suggests that somehow Kashrut laws enable the nation to become holy, which does not correspond to this approach's understanding. Presumably these sources would suggest that the verse is a general statement, not related specifically to the laws of Kashrut but to general observance of Hashem's mizvot.5
Prohibition of נבילה and טריפה – The Rambam explicitly writes that the same reasoning applies by the נבילה and טריפה which are hard to digest. Sefer HaChinukh notes that the fact the animal became a טריפה proves the animal is sick.
Is Torah a medical book? Akeidat Yitzchak claims that since the purpose of Torah is not to teach us medicine but rather to instill good character and deeds, it does not make sense that the laws of Kashrut would have been instituted for their health benefits.
Spiritual Benefit
Perfecting Personality
The laws of Kashrut are to elevate the soul, as eating disgusting foods lowers the man to the level of the animal.
Sources:Ibn Ezra, Ramban, Sefer HaChinukh, Ralbag, Akeidat Yitzchak, Abarbanel, Seforno,6 Shadal, Netziv,
Why these animals? A person becomes what they eat, and therefore Hashem only permitted animals which have a good nature, and prohibited animals which own traits that Hashem didn't want humans to learn.
- Beasts – Abarbanel7 maintains that the animals which chew their cud and have a split hove are all herbivores,8 and therefore those animals are not as cruel as the carnivores who are predators. One who eats a beast of prey will turn into a beast of prey, and Hashem wants us to avoid such a lifestyle.
- Birds – The majority of the prohibited birds are birds of prey.9
The signs
- "מַפְרֶסֶת פַּרְסָה וְשֹׁסַעַת שֶׁסַע"10 – Herbivores don't have nails like carnivores, rather they have a split hove to enable them to run to far distances and climb on rocks in order to collect enough food.
- "מַעֲלַת גֵּרָה" – Herbivores do not have canine and grinding teeth, and therefore they can't eat bones rather only plants. However, plants are not easy to digest and they need to chew multiple times through their multiple stomachs in order to digest them.
- "סְנַפִּיר וְקַשְׂקֶשֶׂת" –
"וִהְיִיתֶם קְדֹשִׁים" – Seforno asserts that by adhering to these laws the nation will become as close as possible to Hashem's holiness.
"וְלֹא תְטַמְּאוּ אֶת נַפְשֹׁתֵיכֶם" – Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that there is nothing impure physically about these prohibited animals, rather it must be spiritually.
Prohibition of blood and chelev – Sefer HaChinukh explains that the prohibition of eating blood and chelev is for the same purpose, as it is eating what enables the animal to live. A person should not eat the soul of an animal.
Similar prohibitions
- Ramban asserts that also the prohibitions of eating meat and milk together and of slaughtering the mother and children the same day, are to teach us not to be cruel towards animals.
- Prohibition of eating meat – Several commentaors11 understand the initial prohibition to eat all meat12 in a similar manner, pointing to its deleterious effects on man's moral fiber. They assert that the act of killing an animal for it's meat leads man to become cruel and that the consumption of animals tarnishes the soul and intellect.
Learning Limits
The laws of Kashrut limit the number of animals one can eat, in order to train people to control our desires.
Why these animals?
- Philo notes that swine is considered to be the nicest of all meats, and fish which lack scales are the most delicate of fish, suggesting that Hashem chose to prohibit the most desired of animals.
- Alternatively, there is nothing inherent in the animals chosen to be prohibited; the purpose was simply to choose a selection to be off-limits for consumption.
The signs – According to this approach the signs are simply a convenient way to select a category of animals to be prohibited.
Context in Vayikra: laws of purity
Context in Devarim: laws of idolatry
"וִהְיִיתֶם קְדֹשִׁים" – This approach assumes that to be holy means to overcome one's desires and control one's spirit.
Similar prohibitions:
- R. Bachya writes that many commandments have a similar purpose, such as prohibited sexual relations and fast days.13
- Vegetarian – This approach might agree with those who maintain that ideally humans were meant to be vegetarian, as Hashem wanted them to learn limits.
Separation From the Nations
The purpose of the laws is for Israel to have different dietary needs than the rest of the world.
Ancient Near Eastern parallels – Shadal maintains that the same way the priests of other nations are isolated and have their own laws and prohibitions, so too every person in Israel is different from the nations.
Context in Devarim: laws of idolatry – This understanding fits with the context of the laws in Devarim, laws of idolatry, where it is emphasized that we are a holy nation whom Hashem chose.
"וִהְיִיתֶם קְדֹשִׁים" – These verses emphasize how Hashem separated us and took us out of Egypt, and therefore these commandments are to remove us from the abominations of the Egyptians.
Similar prohibitions