Difference between revisions of "Purpose of the Sacrifices/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 9: Line 9:
 
<category>Atonement for Sins
 
<category>Atonement for Sins
 
<p>Sacrifices are a necessary part of the atonement process, aiding a sinner to cleanse himself of his misdeeds.</p>
 
<p>Sacrifices are a necessary part of the atonement process, aiding a sinner to cleanse himself of his misdeeds.</p>
<mekorot><multilink><a href="TanchumaTetzaveh15" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaTetzaveh15" data-aht="source">Tetzaveh 15</a><a href="TanchumaTetzaveh15_2" data-aht="source">Tetzaveh 15</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraVayikra1-1" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra1-1" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:1</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra1-4" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:4</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 30:1</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorVayikra1-4" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:4</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorVayikra2-13" data-aht="source">Vayikra 2:13</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorVayikra17-7" data-aht="source">Vayikra 17:7</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>,<fn>On Vayikra 17:7, R"Y Bekhor Shor also speaks of the role that sacrifices play in negating idolatrous practices.&#160; However, more often he speaks of their value in the atonement process.</fn> <multilink><a href="RambanVayikra1-9" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanShemot5-3" data-aht="source">Shemot 5:3</a><a href="RambanVayikra1-9" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:9</a><a href="RambanDerashatToratHashemTemimahpp163-167" data-aht="source">Derashat Torat Hashem Temimah (pp. 163-167)</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>,<fn>Ramban brings more than one reason for the command to offer sacrifices. He speaks of this approach as "דברים מתקבלים מושכים את הלב כדברי אגדה", but prefers his second approach below.</fn>&#160;<multilink><a href="SeferHaChinnukhMitzvah95" data-aht="source">Sefer HaChinnukh</a><a href="SeferHaChinnukhMitzvah95" data-aht="source">Sefer HaChinnukh Mitzvah 95</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RalbagVayikra1-4" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagShemotBeurHaMilot29-10" data-aht="source">Shemot Beur HaMilot 29:10</a><a href="RalbagVayikra1-4" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:4</a><a href="RalbagVayikra5-26" data-aht="source">Vayikra 5:26</a><a href="RalbagVayikra8-34" data-aht="source">Vayikra 8:34</a><a href="RalbagVayikra16-34" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:34</a><a href="RalbagBereshitToalot9" data-aht="source">Bereshit Toalot 9</a><a href="RalbagVayikraToalot1-4-17" data-aht="source">Vayikra Toalot 1:4-17</a><a href="RalbagShemuelI3-14" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 3:14</a><a href="RalbagDivreiHaYamimII30-22" data-aht="source">Divrei HaYamim II 30:22</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink>,<fn>Ralbag suggests that there could be several reasons for the sacrificial system, writing, "וראוי שתדע כי התורה תשתמש בענין אחד לתועלות רבות". See below how he also views them as being instituted to negate idolatrous practices and that they might aid a person to attain prophecy.</fn> <multilink><a href="SefornoMaamarKavvanotHaTorah8-9" data-aht="source">Seforno</a><a href="SefornoVayikra1-4" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:4</a><a href="SefornoMaamarKavvanotHaTorah8-9" data-aht="source">Maamar Kavvanot HaTorah 8-9</a><a href="R. Ovadyah Seforno" data-aht="parshan">About R. Ovadyah Seforno</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="NetzivShemot18-12" data-aht="source">Netziv</a><a href="NetzivShemot18-12" data-aht="source">Shemot 18:12</a><a href="NetzivVayikra2-1" data-aht="source">Vayikra 2:1</a><a href="R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin (Netziv)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin</a></multilink></mekorot>
+
<mekorot><multilink><a href="TanchumaTetzaveh15" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaTetzaveh15" data-aht="source">Tetzaveh 15</a><a href="TanchumaTetzaveh15_2" data-aht="source">Tetzaveh 15</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraVayikra1-1" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra1-1" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:1</a><a href="IbnEzraVayikra1-4" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:4</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorShemot30-1" data-aht="source">Shemot 30:1</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorVayikra1-4" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:4</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorVayikra2-13" data-aht="source">Vayikra 2:13</a><a href="RYosefBekhorShorVayikra17-7" data-aht="source">Vayikra 17:7</a><a href="R. Yosef Bekhor Shor" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef Bekhor Shor</a></multilink>,<fn>On Vayikra 17:7, R"Y Bekhor Shor also speaks of the role that sacrifices play in negating idolatrous practices.&#160; However, more often he speaks of their value in the atonement process.</fn> <multilink><a href="RambanVayikra1-9" data-aht="source">Ramban</a><a href="RambanShemot5-3" data-aht="source">Shemot 5:3</a><a href="RambanVayikra1-9" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:9</a><a href="RambanDerashatToratHashemTemimahpp163-167" data-aht="source">Derashat Torat Hashem Temimah (pp. 163-167)</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Nachman (Ramban, Nachmanides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Nachman</a></multilink>,<fn>Ramban brings more than one reason for the command to offer sacrifices. He speaks of this approach as "דברים מתקבלים מושכים את הלב כדברי אגדה", but prefers his second approach below.</fn>&#160;<multilink><a href="SeferHaChinnukhMitzvah95" data-aht="source">Sefer HaChinnukh</a><a href="SeferHaChinnukhMitzvah95" data-aht="source">Sefer HaChinnukh Mitzvah 95</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RalbagVayikra1-4" data-aht="source">Ralbag</a><a href="RalbagShemotBeurHaMilot29-10" data-aht="source">Shemot Beur HaMilot 29:10</a><a href="RalbagVayikra1-4" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:4</a><a href="RalbagVayikra5-26" data-aht="source">Vayikra 5:26</a><a href="RalbagVayikra8-34" data-aht="source">Vayikra 8:34</a><a href="RalbagVayikra16-34" data-aht="source">Vayikra 16:34</a><a href="RalbagBereshitToalot9" data-aht="source">Bereshit Toalot 9</a><a href="RalbagVayikraToalot1-4-17" data-aht="source">Vayikra Toalot 1:4-17</a><a href="RalbagShemuelI3-14" data-aht="source">Shemuel I 3:14</a><a href="RalbagDivreiHaYamimII30-22" data-aht="source">Divrei HaYamim II 30:22</a><a href="R. Levi b. Gershom (Ralbag, Gersonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Levi b. Gershom</a></multilink>,<fn>Ralbag suggests that there could be several reasons for the sacrificial system, writing, "וראוי שתדע כי התורה תשתמש בענין אחד לתועלות רבות". See below how he also views them as being instituted to negate idolatrous practices and that they might aid a person to attain prophecy.</fn> <multilink><a href="SefornoMaamarKavvanotHaTorah8-9" data-aht="source">Seforno</a><a href="SefornoVayikra1-4" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:4</a><a href="SefornoMaamarKavvanotHaTorah8-9" data-aht="source">Maamar Kavvanot HaTorah 8-9</a><a href="R. Ovadyah Seforno" data-aht="parshan">About R. Ovadyah Seforno</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="NetzivShemot18-12" data-aht="source">Netziv</a><a href="NetzivShemot18-12" data-aht="source">Shemot 18:12</a><a href="NetzivVayikra1-4_2" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:4</a><a href="NetzivVayikra2-1" data-aht="source">Vayikra 2:1</a><a href="R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin (Netziv)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin</a></multilink></mekorot>
 
<point><b>How do sacrifices aid in the atonement process?</b><ul>
 
<point><b>How do sacrifices aid in the atonement process?</b><ul>
 
<li><b>Exchange for sinner</b> – According to most of these commentators, the sacrifice serves as a substitute or redemption (כופר נפש) for the sinner, as it is killed in the individual's stead. Ramban adds that in watching the animal slaughtered, the person is forced to recognize that it should have been his blood which was spilled had it not been for Hashem's mercy.<fn>He suggests that as the individual watches each part of the animal be sacrificed, he thinks of his parallel limbs and how they aided him in sin.&#160; The guts and kidneys are the seat of thought and desire which led him to err, while the thigh represents his legs and hands which did the action. The animal's blood represents the sinner's soul. As such, watching the animal burn is a powerful symbol of the sinner's own potential fate.</fn> This knowledge should prevent him from sinning further.</li>
 
<li><b>Exchange for sinner</b> – According to most of these commentators, the sacrifice serves as a substitute or redemption (כופר נפש) for the sinner, as it is killed in the individual's stead. Ramban adds that in watching the animal slaughtered, the person is forced to recognize that it should have been his blood which was spilled had it not been for Hashem's mercy.<fn>He suggests that as the individual watches each part of the animal be sacrificed, he thinks of his parallel limbs and how they aided him in sin.&#160; The guts and kidneys are the seat of thought and desire which led him to err, while the thigh represents his legs and hands which did the action. The animal's blood represents the sinner's soul. As such, watching the animal burn is a powerful symbol of the sinner's own potential fate.</fn> This knowledge should prevent him from sinning further.</li>
<li><b>Fresh start</b> – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor and Ralbag, in contrast, assert that the atonement process is necessary to enable people to start afresh. If there was no way of cleansing one's self from sin, people would be less likely to be wary of future sins, thinking that they were dirty regardless.<fn>See <multilink><a href="ShadalShemot23-15" data-aht="source">Shadal </a><a href="ShadalVayikra1-2" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:2</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink>who also explains the need for individual sacrifices in the same manner.</fn> On the other hand, knowing that one's slate has been wiped clean provides an incentive to stay pure from sin.<fn>R"Y Bekhor Shor makes an analogy to a person who is wearing pure white clothing and therefore is very careful lest he get them dirty.&#160; Once he blackens them, however, he is not nearly as cautious.</fn></li>
+
<li><b>Fresh start</b> – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor and Ralbag, in contrast, assert that the atonement process is necessary to enable people to start afresh. If there was no way of cleansing one's self from sin, people would be less likely to be wary of future sins, thinking that they were dirty regardless.<fn>See also Ra'avad, HaEmunah HaRamah 3 "ברפואה הנפשית" who explains similarly and <multilink><a href="ShadalShemot23-15" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalVayikra1-2" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:2</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink> below who views the purpose of some of the individual sacrifices in the same manner.</fn> On the other hand, knowing that one's slate has been wiped clean provides an incentive to stay pure from sin.<fn>R"Y Bekhor Shor makes an analogy to a person who is wearing pure white clothing and therefore is very careful lest he get them dirty.&#160; Once he blackens them, however, he is not nearly as cautious.</fn></li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
 
<point><b>Animals rather than words?</b><ul>
 
<point><b>Animals rather than words?</b><ul>
<li>If a sacrifice is supposed to stand in for the individual, it is clear why a living being must be used.<fn>Sefer HaChinnukh and Seforno further explain why animals (rather than fish or the like) were chosen.&#160;Seforno suggests that since animals provide man with food, clothing, and milk, they are vital to his survival and as such an appropriate redemption for his soul.&#160; In addition, since they are the most similar creatures to humans, they are the most fitting to serve as his substitute.&#160; Sefer HaChinnukh adds that the only difference between humans and animals is the knowledge given to mankind. In his sin, however, the individual did not make good use of his intellect, lowering him to the level of animal.</fn>&#160; Sefer HaChinnukh adds that words alone do not affect a person in the way that an active process does.&#160; It is only through the visual of seeing the animal die, that the wrongness of the sinner's actions seeps into his heart.<fn>The adage "a picture is worth a thousand words" is true of the process of repentance as well.</fn></li>
+
<li><b>Physical substitute</b> – If a sacrifice is supposed to stand in for the individual, it is clear why a living being must be used.<fn>Sefer HaChinnukh and Seforno further explain why animals (rather than fish or the like) were chosen.&#160;Seforno suggests that since animals provide man with food, clothing, and milk, they are vital to his survival and as such an appropriate redemption for his soul.&#160; In addition, since they are the most similar creatures to humans, they are the most fitting to serve as his substitute.&#160; Sefer HaChinnukh adds that the only difference between humans and animals is the knowledge given to mankind. In his sin, however, the individual did not make good use of his intellect, lowering him to the level of animal.</fn>&#160; Sefer HaChinnukh adds that words alone do not affect a person in the way that an active process does.&#160; It is only through the visual of seeing the animal die, that the wrongness of the sinner's actions seeps into his heart.<fn>The adage "a picture is worth a thousand words" is true of the process of repentance as well.</fn></li>
<li>According to R. Yosef Bekhor Shor, in contrast, it is unclear why the "restart process" had to be accomplished specifically through animal sacrifice rather than prayer or the like. Ralbag opines that had a person simply confessed his sins or repented in his heart, he would not think that would suffice to achieve atonement, so Hashem provided an active ritual for him to partake in.</li>
+
<li><b>Words don't suffice</b> – According to R. Yosef Bekhor Shor, in contrast, it is unclear why the "restart process" had to be accomplished specifically through animal sacrifice rather than prayer or the like. Ralbag opines that had a person simply confessed his sins or repented in his heart, he would not think that would suffice to achieve atonement, so Hashem provided an active ritual for him to partake in.</li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
 
<point><b>Details of bringing sacrifices:</b><ul>
 
<point><b>Details of bringing sacrifices:</b><ul>
<li><b>סמיכה and וידוי</b> – Ramban notes that sacrifices are accompanied by the individual's laying of hands on the animal and a confession, as the main goal of the offering is to atone for sins.&#160; Ralbag and Seforno further suggest that the laying of hands signifies the individual's transferring of his transgressions onto the animal.<fn>As evidence, they point to the ceremony of the two goats on Yom HaKippurim, where the verse more explicitly connects the ritual of the laying of hands and transfer of sins, "וְסָמַךְ אַהֲרֹן אֶת שְׁתֵּי יָדָו עַל רֹאשׁ הַשָּׂעִיר הַחַי וְהִתְוַדָּה עָלָיו אֶת כׇּל עֲוֺנֹת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל... וְנָתַן אֹתָם עַל רֹאשׁ הַשָּׂעִיר"</fn> </li>
+
<li><b>סמיכה and וידוי</b> – Ramban notes that sacrifices are accompanied by the individual's laying of hands on the animal and a confession, as the main goal of the offering is to atone for sins.&#160; Ralbag and Seforno further suggest that the laying of hands signifies the individual's transferring of his transgressions onto the animal.<fn>As evidence, they point to the ceremony of the two goats on Yom HaKippurim, where the verse more explicitly connects the ritual of the laying of hands and transfer of sins, "וְסָמַךְ אַהֲרֹן אֶת שְׁתֵּי יָדָו עַל רֹאשׁ הַשָּׂעִיר הַחַי וְהִתְוַדָּה עָלָיו אֶת כׇּל עֲוֺנֹת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל... וְנָתַן אֹתָם עַל רֹאשׁ הַשָּׂעִיר"</fn></li>
 
<li><b>"עַל כׇּל קׇרְבָּנְךָ תַּקְרִיב מֶלַח"</b> – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor claims that salt, a substance which lasts forever, is symbolic of the fact that sacrifices serve as an eternal covenant of atonement.</li>
 
<li><b>"עַל כׇּל קׇרְבָּנְךָ תַּקְרִיב מֶלַח"</b> – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor claims that salt, a substance which lasts forever, is symbolic of the fact that sacrifices serve as an eternal covenant of atonement.</li>
 
<li><b>Prohibition of blood and fat</b> – If the blood is meant to represent the soul of the sinner, it is logical that it cannot be eaten by the individual bringing the sacrifice.</li>
 
<li><b>Prohibition of blood and fat</b> – If the blood is meant to represent the soul of the sinner, it is logical that it cannot be eaten by the individual bringing the sacrifice.</li>
<li><b>Giving of limbs to priest</b>&#160;– Seforno suggest that a sinner gives of the limbs he used for sin (via the animal's parallel limbs) to the priest who had spent his time n service of Hashem.&#160; This exchange promotes atonement, as the priest helps to carry the burden of the sins as well.<fn>He quotes Bavli Pesachim 59b, "הֲכֹּהֲנִים אוֹכְלִים וּבְעָלִים מִתְכַּפְּרִים"</fn></li>
+
<li><b>Giving of limbs to priest</b>&#160;– Seforno suggest that a sinner gives of the limbs he used for sin (via the animal's parallel limbs) to the priest who had, in contrast, used his body to serve Hashem.&#160; This exchange promotes atonement, as the priest helps to carry the burden of the sins as well.<fn>He quotes Bavli Pesachim 59b, "הֲכֹּהֲנִים אוֹכְלִים וּבְעָלִים מִתְכַּפְּרִים"</fn></li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
 
<point><b>Are all sacrifices aimed at atonement?</b> While the verses explicitly relate the חטאת and אשם to expiation from sin, this is not true of the other sacrifices, making one question if this approach can work for all types of offerings<fn>See R. D"Z Hoffmann who questions this approach on these grounds.</fn>: <br/>
 
<point><b>Are all sacrifices aimed at atonement?</b> While the verses explicitly relate the חטאת and אשם to expiation from sin, this is not true of the other sacrifices, making one question if this approach can work for all types of offerings<fn>See R. D"Z Hoffmann who questions this approach on these grounds.</fn>: <br/>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li><b>All for atonement</b> – All of these sources point to the phrase "וְנִרְצָה לוֹ לְכַפֵּר עָלָיו" by the Olah offering to prove that it too plays a role in atonement.<fn>See R. Akiva in <a href="BavliYoma36a" data-aht="source">Bavli Yoma</a> that one brings an Olah if one has not observed a positive commandment or has trangressed a negative commandment that is linked to a positive one (לאו שניתק לעשה).&#160; The&#160;<a href="YerushalmiYoma8-7" data-aht="source">Yerushalmi Yoma</a> (see also Vayikra Rabbah and others), on the other hand, suggest that the sacrifice is brought for negative thoughts, while R. Yosef Bekhor Shor posits that it is brought simply in case one has sinned, even if one is unaware of a particular misdeed.</fn> Ralbag and Netziv<fn>See also Tachuma which mentions the Shelamim but not the Minchah.</fn> add that despite the silence in the text, the Minchah and Shelamim offering also come to atone.<fn>Netziv draws off</fn> As such, all offerings might have an expiatory component.</li>
+
<li><b>All for atonement</b> – These sources all point to the phrase "וְנִרְצָה לוֹ לְכַפֵּר עָלָיו" by the Olah offering to prove that it too plays a role in atonement (though they differ regarding which crime is being expiated).<fn>See R. Akiva in <a href="BavliYoma36a" data-aht="source">Bavli Yoma</a> that one brings an Olah if one has not observed a positive commandment or has trangressed a negative commandment that is linked to a positive one (לאו שניתק לעשה).&#160; The&#160;<a href="YerushalmiYoma8-7" data-aht="source">Yerushalmi Yoma</a> (see also Vayikra Rabbah and others), on the other hand, suggest that the sacrifice is brought for negative thoughts, while R. Yosef Bekhor Shor posits that it is brought simply in case one has sinned, even if one is unaware of a particular misdeed.&#160; Finally, Netziv suggests that it comes to atone for any action against Hashem which prevented the individual from attaining knowledge of Hashem. He bases himself off the verse in Hoshea which says, "כִּי חֶסֶד חָפַצְתִּי וְלֹא זָבַח וְדַעַת אֱלֹהִים מֵעֹלוֹת".&#160; If Hashem says He prefers knowledge of God to Olot, it must be a deed which led to&#160; lack of this which leads one to bring an Olah.</fn> Ralbag and Netziv<fn>See also Tanchuma which mentions the Shelamim but not the Minchah.</fn> add that despite the silence in the text, the Minchah and Shelamim offering also come to atone.<fn>Ralbag proves this from the fact that there is a laying of the hands or סמיכה, which he views a s a sign of transfer of sin, on the Minchah and Shelamim just like on other sacrifices. He also points to the rebuke to Eli's sons where they are told, "אִם יִתְכַּפֵּר עֲוֺן בֵּית עֵלִי בְּזֶבַח וּבְמִנְחָה" which suggests that in other circumstances their sins could be forgiven via a Zevach of Minchah.&#160; <br/>Netziv suggests that one brings a Minchah for corruption of the soul, in the sense that his מידות are lacking.</fn> As such, all offerings might have an expiatory component.</li>
 
<li><b>Some for atonement </b>– It is also possible that there is a distinction between obligatory and voluntary sacrifices:<b><br/></b></li>
 
<li><b>Some for atonement </b>– It is also possible that there is a distinction between obligatory and voluntary sacrifices:<b><br/></b></li>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
Line 76: Line 76:
 
<category>Gratitude and Honor
 
<category>Gratitude and Honor
 
<p>Bringing sacrifices to Hashem is a means through which the nation can honor and show gratitude to Him.</p>
 
<p>Bringing sacrifices to Hashem is a means through which the nation can honor and show gratitude to Him.</p>
<mekorot><multilink><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot3" data-aht="source">R. Saadia Gaon</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryShemot18-8" data-aht="source">Commentary Shemot 18:8</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot3" data-aht="source">HaEmunot VeHaDeiot 3</a><a href="R. Saadia Gaon" data-aht="parshan">About R. Saadia Gaon</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="ShadalShemot23-15" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalShemot23-15" data-aht="source">Shemot 23:15</a><a href="ShadalVayikra1-2" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:2</a><a href="ShadalVayikra1-4" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:4</a><a href="ShadalVayikra2-13" data-aht="source">Vayikra 2:13</a><a href="ShadalYirmeyahu7-22" data-aht="source">Yirmeyahu 7:22</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink><fn>This is how Shadal views the purpose of the system as a whole and the need for קרבנות ציבור .&#160; He does, however, also suggest that individual sacrifices served more specific goals, such as attaining atonement.&#160; In this he follows R"Y Bekhor Shor in highlighting the need of an individual for a process by which he can see himself as cleansed from sin.</fn></mekorot>
+
<mekorot><multilink><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot3" data-aht="source">R. Saadia Gaon</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonCommentaryShemot18-8" data-aht="source">Commentary Shemot 18:8</a><a href="RSaadiaGaonHaEmunotVeHaDeiot3" data-aht="source">HaEmunot VeHaDeiot 3</a><a href="R. Saadia Gaon" data-aht="parshan">About R. Saadia Gaon</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="ShadalShemot23-15" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalShemot23-15" data-aht="source">Shemot 23:15</a><a href="ShadalVayikra1-2" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:2</a><a href="ShadalVayikra1-4" data-aht="source">Vayikra 1:4</a><a href="ShadalVayikra2-13" data-aht="source">Vayikra 2:13</a><a href="ShadalYirmeyahu7-22" data-aht="source">Yirmeyahu 7:22</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink><fn>This is how Shadal views communal sacrifices and the need for a sacrificial system as a whole.&#160; He does, however, also suggest that individual sacrifices served more specific goals, such as attaining atonement or seeking aid.&#160; He follows R"Y Bekhor Shor in highlighting the need of an individual for a process by which he can see himself as cleansed from sin.</fn></mekorot>
 
<point><b>Why via sacrifices?</b> According to both R. Saadia Gaon and Shadal, the sacrificial system stemmed from peoples' innate need to relate to Hashem in the way that they relate to humans.<fn>Shadal writes: כי לא יתכן לאדם להתנהג עם אלהיו כי אם על דרך שהוא מתנהג עם מלך בשר .ודם</fn> They differ, however, in whether they view the institution as being initiated by Hashem or the people: <br/>
 
<point><b>Why via sacrifices?</b> According to both R. Saadia Gaon and Shadal, the sacrificial system stemmed from peoples' innate need to relate to Hashem in the way that they relate to humans.<fn>Shadal writes: כי לא יתכן לאדם להתנהג עם אלהיו כי אם על דרך שהוא מתנהג עם מלך בשר .ודם</fn> They differ, however, in whether they view the institution as being initiated by Hashem or the people: <br/>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>R. Saadia suggests that Hashem, cognizant of human needs, set up a system through which the nation would honor Him the way they would a king, by giving of their best: meat, wine, incense and fat.&#160;</li>
+
<li>R. Saadia suggests that Hashem, cognizant of human needs, set up a system through which the nation would honor and thank Him the way they would a king, by giving of their best: meat, wine, incense and fat.&#160;</li>
 
<li>Shadal, in contrast, suggests that people had originally brought sacrifices of their own volition. Seeing that the practice was of great benefit to the nation as it inculcated belief in God's providence, Hashem had it continue and obligated it, despite the fact that he Had no need for the offerings. &#160;</li>
 
<li>Shadal, in contrast, suggests that people had originally brought sacrifices of their own volition. Seeing that the practice was of great benefit to the nation as it inculcated belief in God's providence, Hashem had it continue and obligated it, despite the fact that he Had no need for the offerings. &#160;</li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
<point><b>Animals over prayer?</b> Shadal suggests, that on one level, there was no real need to command animal sacrifice since the nation could just as easily have honored Hashem through praise and song. However, if that was the method chosen, the people would not have come to internalize Hashem's majesty to the same degree. Since other nations worshiped through active sacrifices, the people would have viewed mere words as an inferior method, signifying an inferior God.<fn>In this, Shadal's approach is similar to the Rambam. However, he understands this to be true of every generation and not just those who left Egypt.&#160; People in all ages tend respect that which is given more honor and appears more glorious.&#160; Therefore Hashem commanded the Israelites to build Him a magnificent house and offer sacrifices as was done by other nations.</fn></point>
+
<point><b>Animal sacrifice over prayer?</b> While R. Saadia believes that there is a fundamental need to worship Hashem via sacrifice specifically (as one must give to Hashem of the best of one's possessions), Shadal opines that in reality the nation could just as easily have honored Hashem through praise and song. However, due to peoples' nature, if that was the method chosen, the nation would not have come to internalize Hashem's majesty to the same degree. Since other nations worshiped through active sacrifices, the people would have viewed mere words as an inferior method of worship, and concluded that Hashem as such must be an inferior god.<fn>In this, Shadal's approach is similar to Rambam. However, he understands this to be true of every generation and not just those who left Egypt.&#160; People in all ages tend respect that which is given more honor and appears more glorious.&#160; Therefore, for all times, worship via sacrifices in a magnificent house is necessary.</fn></point>
 
<point><b>Other benefits of sacrifices</b><ul>
 
<point><b>Other benefits of sacrifices</b><ul>
 
<li>R. Saadia suggests that the bringing of sacrifices enables a give-and-take relationship. Though Hashem has no need for any of the foods brought to him, He uses the offerings as an opportunity to return a gift to the people.<fn>In return for honoring Hashem with their possessions, Hashem listens to the people's supplications and saves them from distress. R. Saadia points to MIshlei 3:9-10 where this reciprocal relationship is expressed: "כַּבֵּד אֶת י"י מֵהוֹנֶךָ וּמֵרֵאשִׁית כׇּל תְּבוּאָתֶךָ וְיִמָּלְאוּ אֲסָמֶיךָ שָׂבָע וְתִירוֹשׁ יְקָבֶיךָ יִפְרֹצוּ".</fn></li>
 
<li>R. Saadia suggests that the bringing of sacrifices enables a give-and-take relationship. Though Hashem has no need for any of the foods brought to him, He uses the offerings as an opportunity to return a gift to the people.<fn>In return for honoring Hashem with their possessions, Hashem listens to the people's supplications and saves them from distress. R. Saadia points to MIshlei 3:9-10 where this reciprocal relationship is expressed: "כַּבֵּד אֶת י"י מֵהוֹנֶךָ וּמֵרֵאשִׁית כׇּל תְּבוּאָתֶךָ וְיִמָּלְאוּ אֲסָמֶיךָ שָׂבָע וְתִירוֹשׁ יְקָבֶיךָ יִפְרֹצוּ".</fn></li>
 
<li>Shadal points to the interpersonal benefits gained by the centralized aspects of the sacrificial system.&#160; The need to bring sacrifices to one specific location served to unite the people as they came together and worried for one another.</li>
 
<li>Shadal points to the interpersonal benefits gained by the centralized aspects of the sacrificial system.&#160; The need to bring sacrifices to one specific location served to unite the people as they came together and worried for one another.</li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
<point><b>Purpose of the Mishkan</b> – According to this approach, the Mishkan as a whole served the same purpose as the sacrifices, being a means to honor God in a manner analogous to humans modes of honor. Shadal emphasizes how building a luxurious house replete with golden vessels and servants adorned in finery increased the respect the people felt towards Hashem.<fn>He reiterates that the nation believed that the more glorious the house and servants , the more important must be the king whom they are serving.</fn> As above, he adds that having a centralized building to which all could come together to honor Hashem also served the purpose of unifying the nation and spreading love among them.</point>
+
<point><b>Purpose of the Mishkan</b> – According to this approach, the Mishkan as a whole served the same purpose as the sacrifices, being a means to honor God in a manner analogous to humans modes of honor. Shadal emphasizes how building a luxurious house replete with golden vessels and servants adorned in finery increased the respect the people felt towards Hashem.<fn>He reiterates that the nation believed that the more glorious the house and servants , the more important must be the king whom they are serving.</fn> As above, he adds that having a centralized building to which all could come together also served the purpose of unifying the nation and spreading love among them.</point>
<point><b>Types of sacrifices</b> – Shadal differentiates between the purpose of Olot and Shelamim, suggesting that Olot were brought to honor Hashem while Shelamim served to enhance the love and friendship between the people.<fn>Shadal suggests that this is the reason one is prohibited from leaving over from the sacrifice.&#160; In order for the individual to finish eating the sacrifice in Yerushalayim, he is forced to share it&#160; with strangers, enabling everyone to meet new people and connect.</fn>&#160; This matches the two goals he thinks the Mishkan and sacrificial system as a whole serve. He further suggests that individual offerings might have individual goals, whether to ask for forgiveness,<fn>Shadal notes that there is no sacrifice for a sin committed intentionally, so that no one will come to think that Hashem can not be bribed into forgiveness.</fn> request help or express gratitude.</point>
+
<point><b>Types of sacrifices</b> – Shadal differentiates between the purpose of Olot and Shelamim, suggesting that Olot were brought to honor Hashem while Shelamim served to enhance love and friendship between people.<fn>Shadal suggests that this is the reason one is prohibited from leaving over from the sacrifice.&#160; In order for the individual to finish eating the sacrifice in Yerushalayim, he is forced to share it&#160; with strangers, enabling everyone to meet new people and connect.</fn>&#160; This matches the two goals he thinks the Mishkan and the sacrificial system as a whole serve. He further suggests that individual offerings might have individual goals, whether to ask for forgiveness,<fn>Shadal notes that there is no sacrifice for a sin committed intentionally, so that no one will come to think that Hashem can not be bribed into forgiveness.</fn> request help or express gratitude.</point>
<point><b>Sacrifices before the Mishkan</b> – Shadal suggests that people, from the earliest of times, brought all sorts of sacrifices, either to thank God, appease him, or request of Him (and it was these actions which led to the institution in the first place).&#160; R. Saadia, in contrast, maintains that only עולות were brought before the receiving of the Torah.<fn>Based on this, R. Saadia attempt to prove that Yitro, who offered "עֹלָה וּזְבָחִים" must have come to Mt. Sinai only after the receiving of the Torah. For elaboration, see <a href="Chronology – Shemot 18" data-aht="page">Chronology – Shemot 18</a>.</fn>&#160;</point>
+
<point><b>Sacrifices before the Mishkan</b> – Shadal suggests that people, from the earliest of times, brought all sorts of sacrifices, either to thank God, appease him, or request of Him (and it was these actions which led to the institution in the first place).&#160; R. Saadia, in contrast, maintains that only עולות were brought before the receiving of the Torah.<fn>Based on this, R. Saadia attempt to prove that Yitro, who offered "עֹלָה וּזְבָחִים" must have come to Mt. Sinai only after the receiving of the Torah. For elaboration, see <a href="Chronology – Shemot 18" data-aht="page">Chronology – Shemot 18</a>.</fn></point>
 
<point><b>""אִשֵּׁה רֵיחַ נִיחוֹחַ לַי"י""</b></point>
 
<point><b>""אִשֵּׁה רֵיחַ נִיחוֹחַ לַי"י""</b></point>
 
<point><b>"וְלֹא יִזְבְּחוּ עוֹד אֶת זִבְחֵיהֶם לַשְּׂעִירִם"</b> – According to Shadal these verses are focusing on the prohibition in the Wilderness to eat meat for pleasure wherever one desires, lest one sacrifice to the Seirim. The sacrifice mentioned is simply a means to allow eating meat without worrying about the issue. Thus the verse can not be brought as evidence that the system as a whole was instituted to combat idolatry.</point>
 
<point><b>"וְלֹא יִזְבְּחוּ עוֹד אֶת זִבְחֵיהֶם לַשְּׂעִירִם"</b> – According to Shadal these verses are focusing on the prohibition in the Wilderness to eat meat for pleasure wherever one desires, lest one sacrifice to the Seirim. The sacrifice mentioned is simply a means to allow eating meat without worrying about the issue. Thus the verse can not be brought as evidence that the system as a whole was instituted to combat idolatry.</point>

Version as of 06:06, 26 February 2017

Purpose of the Sacrifices

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Atonement for Sins

Sacrifices are a necessary part of the atonement process, aiding a sinner to cleanse himself of his misdeeds.

How do sacrifices aid in the atonement process?
  • Exchange for sinner – According to most of these commentators, the sacrifice serves as a substitute or redemption (כופר נפש) for the sinner, as it is killed in the individual's stead. Ramban adds that in watching the animal slaughtered, the person is forced to recognize that it should have been his blood which was spilled had it not been for Hashem's mercy.4 This knowledge should prevent him from sinning further.
  • Fresh start – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor and Ralbag, in contrast, assert that the atonement process is necessary to enable people to start afresh. If there was no way of cleansing one's self from sin, people would be less likely to be wary of future sins, thinking that they were dirty regardless.5 On the other hand, knowing that one's slate has been wiped clean provides an incentive to stay pure from sin.6
Animals rather than words?
  • Physical substitute – If a sacrifice is supposed to stand in for the individual, it is clear why a living being must be used.7  Sefer HaChinnukh adds that words alone do not affect a person in the way that an active process does.  It is only through the visual of seeing the animal die, that the wrongness of the sinner's actions seeps into his heart.8
  • Words don't suffice – According to R. Yosef Bekhor Shor, in contrast, it is unclear why the "restart process" had to be accomplished specifically through animal sacrifice rather than prayer or the like. Ralbag opines that had a person simply confessed his sins or repented in his heart, he would not think that would suffice to achieve atonement, so Hashem provided an active ritual for him to partake in.
Details of bringing sacrifices:
  • סמיכה and וידוי – Ramban notes that sacrifices are accompanied by the individual's laying of hands on the animal and a confession, as the main goal of the offering is to atone for sins.  Ralbag and Seforno further suggest that the laying of hands signifies the individual's transferring of his transgressions onto the animal.9
  • "עַל כׇּל קׇרְבָּנְךָ תַּקְרִיב מֶלַח" – R. Yosef Bekhor Shor claims that salt, a substance which lasts forever, is symbolic of the fact that sacrifices serve as an eternal covenant of atonement.
  • Prohibition of blood and fat – If the blood is meant to represent the soul of the sinner, it is logical that it cannot be eaten by the individual bringing the sacrifice.
  • Giving of limbs to priest – Seforno suggest that a sinner gives of the limbs he used for sin (via the animal's parallel limbs) to the priest who had, in contrast, used his body to serve Hashem.  This exchange promotes atonement, as the priest helps to carry the burden of the sins as well.10
Are all sacrifices aimed at atonement? While the verses explicitly relate the חטאת and אשם to expiation from sin, this is not true of the other sacrifices, making one question if this approach can work for all types of offerings11:
  • All for atonement – These sources all point to the phrase "וְנִרְצָה לוֹ לְכַפֵּר עָלָיו" by the Olah offering to prove that it too plays a role in atonement (though they differ regarding which crime is being expiated).12 Ralbag and Netziv13 add that despite the silence in the text, the Minchah and Shelamim offering also come to atone.14 As such, all offerings might have an expiatory component.
  • Some for atonement – It is also possible that there is a distinction between obligatory and voluntary sacrifices:
    • Sefer HaChinnukh concedes that the atonement explanation of sacrifices does not seem to suffice for voluntary offerings.  However, he suggests that nonetheless the humbling process attained by the slaughter is a goal even without sin and thus there is a similar purpose to all sacrifices.
    • Ibn Ezra, Ramban and Ralbag15 suggest that there might be more than one purpose for the bringing of sacrifices.  As such the achieving of atonement might be the primary goal of certain offerings but only secondary (or even nonexistent) in others.
"אִשֵּׁה רֵיחַ נִיחוֹחַ לַי"י" – These commentators might suggest that this phrase is a metaphoric way of saying that sacrifices are pleasing to Hashem since they serve to redeem the nation and bring them back to the correct path.16
Purpose of the Mishkan
Sacrifices before the Mishkan – According to Seforno, until the Sin of the Golden Calf, there were only voluntary sacrifices.17  It was only in the aftermath of the sin,18 when the nation proved itself unworthy, that the system of obligatory offerings in a centralized location and under the guidance of priests was instated. Abarbanel19 adds that it was only then  that Hashem realized the need to institute a process of atonement through sacrifices.20
"וְלֹא צִוִּיתִים... עַל דִּבְרֵי עוֹלָה וָזָבַח" – Seforno claims that this is true.  At the time of the Exodus, Hashem had not desired that there be a sacrificial system; the institution was only created in the aftermath of the Sin of the Golden Calf.
General attitude of the prophets towards sacrifices – These sources might explain that none of the prophets really meant to insinuate that Hashem was against the sacrificial system.  Hashem was rather expressing that He preferred that the nation not sin to begin with and thus not need to offer sacrifices for atonement.21
"וְלֹא יִזְבְּחוּ עוֹד אֶת זִבְחֵיהֶם לַשְּׂעִירִם"

Inviting the Divine Presence

The sacrifices were intended to prepare either the nation as a whole, or each individual, to receive the Divine presence and thereby continue the experience of revelation attained at Sinai.

השראת השכינה: For the individual or nation?
  • Individual – R. Yehuda HaLevi asserts that if a person does not prepare themselves to receive Divine inspiration, Hashem's spirit won't cling to them.  The sacrifices serve as the spiritual nourishment needed by man to connect to Hashem. Ralbag similarly suggests that sacrifices help prepare a person to attain prophecy.
  • National – Ramban, in contrast, explains that sacrifices also invite Divine inspiration on a national level, and views them as a necessary condition for Hashem's presence to dwell in the Mikdash.23
Why via animals? These sources offer different explanations as to why receiving Divine inspiration was conditional on animal sacrifice specifically:
  • Physical and metaphysical connected – R. Yehuda HaLevi draws a comparison to a human's need for physical nourishment to ensure that the soul clings to the body, suggesting that there is a similar need for a physical offering so that Hashem can cleave to man.
  • Isolate the intellect – Ralbag asserts that to prophesy an individual must isolate his intellect by anesthetizing his other senses.  Watching the animal die on the altar allows his physical aspects to slumber (in empathy with the animal and in recognition of its mortality), preparing the intellect for Divine inspiration.
  • Symbolic of a dwelling place – This approach could also suggest that if the Mishkan was meant to house Hashem's presence, it needed to resemble a King's palace,24 with all the accompanying accoutrements, light, bread, incense and meat.25
  • Covenantal meal – It is also possible that the sacrifices were meant to re-enact the  meal which usually accompanied a covenant.26  If the Mishkan was meant to be an extension of the revelation at Sinai,27 the bringing of sacrifices could be seen as the continuous renewal of the Sinaitic covenant and the accompanying revelation of Hashem.28
"וּכְבוֹד י"י מָלֵא אֶת הַמִּשְׁכָּן" – Ramban attempts to prove that animal sacrifices specifically are the necessary prerequisite for Divine inspiration from the fact that the Divine presence only filled the Tabernacle after offerings were given on the eighth day of the consecration ceremony.29 As further evidence, he points to Bilaam who brings sacrifices so as to receive Divine inspiration and prophecy. Ralbag similarly points to many cases throughout Sefer Bereshit where Hashem appears to someone soon after they build an altar.30
"אִשֵּׁה רֵיחַ נִיחוֹחַ לַי"י" – Ramban explains the words "רֵיחַ נִיחוֹחַ" in light of the phrase "נָחָה רוּחַ אֵלִיָּהוּ עַל אֱלִישָׁע," suggesting that the offering of a sacrifice enables a resting of the Divine spirit. He further uses this verse as proof that sacrifices were an ideal desired by Hashem with inherent worth, rather than simply a means to wean the people away from idolatry as the Rambam argues.
"וְנִרְצָה לוֹ" – This phrase, too, suggests that sacrifices were pleasing to Hashem.
Meaning of קרבן – Ramban suggests that the word "קרבן" is "לשון קריבה ואחדות" and means to come close.  Thus, the word itself hints to the sacrifice's purpose: to bring humans closer to the Divine.
Purpose of the Mishkan – According to Ramban, the Mishkan as a whole was aimed at facilitating the continuation of the Divine revelation which began at Mt. Sinai.  It housed the Ark and Tablets of the Covenant, thereby mystically transforming the building into an extension of Sinai and enabling the one-time Divine revelation to become a continuous one.31
Sacrifices before the Mishkan – Ramban claims that the fact that sacrifices were given from the earliest of times, suggests that there was something inherent in the process which helped people in their relationship with the Divine.  It was only after the revelation at Sinai, however, that they became obligatory, since it was then that Hashem wanted to turn the Mishkan into a portable Sinai with the Divine spirit ever present.
Types of sacrifices – According to Ramban, it is possible that Hashem commanded to offer עולות and שלמים specifically so as to reproduce the sacrifices brought during the ceremony at Sinai.32  The חטאות and אשמים, on the other hand, are meant to purify the Mishkan after people sin so as to prevent Hashem's presence from leaving the sanctuary.
Details:
  • "עַל כׇּל קׇרְבָּנְךָ תַּקְרִיב מֶלַח" – Salt, a symbol of eternity, might represent the eternal nature of the Covenant of Sinai.
  • Sprinkling of blood – This, too, might be meant to re-enact the sprinkling of blood that accompanied the Covenant of Sinai.33
  • Prohibition of leavened bread
Attitude of the prophets towards sacrifices – These sources would likely explain that the prophets did not oppose sacrifices in and of themselves.  They only argued that bringing sacrifices without keeping the terms of Hashem's covenant would be of no utility.
"וְלֹא צִוִּיתִים... עַל דִּבְרֵי עוֹלָה וָזָבַח" – According to this approach, Yirmeyahu
"וְלֹא יִזְבְּחוּ עוֹד אֶת זִבְחֵיהֶם לַשְּׂעִירִם"
Service of Hashem – Ramban's attitude towards sacrifices is consistent with his view of prayer.  He views prayer as a secondary form of service to God, claiming that the commandment only includes calling out to Hashem in times of distress; all other prayers are not obligatory from the Torah at all.34 True service of Hashem is via sacrifices, not through word alone, but via deed.35
Purpose of commandments – This position assumes that commandments must have worth in and of themselves and that Hashem would be unlikely to command something only to negate a false view or practice.36

Gratitude and Honor

Bringing sacrifices to Hashem is a means through which the nation can honor and show gratitude to Him.

Why via sacrifices? According to both R. Saadia Gaon and Shadal, the sacrificial system stemmed from peoples' innate need to relate to Hashem in the way that they relate to humans.38 They differ, however, in whether they view the institution as being initiated by Hashem or the people:
  • R. Saadia suggests that Hashem, cognizant of human needs, set up a system through which the nation would honor and thank Him the way they would a king, by giving of their best: meat, wine, incense and fat. 
  • Shadal, in contrast, suggests that people had originally brought sacrifices of their own volition. Seeing that the practice was of great benefit to the nation as it inculcated belief in God's providence, Hashem had it continue and obligated it, despite the fact that he Had no need for the offerings.  
Animal sacrifice over prayer? While R. Saadia believes that there is a fundamental need to worship Hashem via sacrifice specifically (as one must give to Hashem of the best of one's possessions), Shadal opines that in reality the nation could just as easily have honored Hashem through praise and song. However, due to peoples' nature, if that was the method chosen, the nation would not have come to internalize Hashem's majesty to the same degree. Since other nations worshiped through active sacrifices, the people would have viewed mere words as an inferior method of worship, and concluded that Hashem as such must be an inferior god.39
Other benefits of sacrifices
  • R. Saadia suggests that the bringing of sacrifices enables a give-and-take relationship. Though Hashem has no need for any of the foods brought to him, He uses the offerings as an opportunity to return a gift to the people.40
  • Shadal points to the interpersonal benefits gained by the centralized aspects of the sacrificial system.  The need to bring sacrifices to one specific location served to unite the people as they came together and worried for one another.
Purpose of the Mishkan – According to this approach, the Mishkan as a whole served the same purpose as the sacrifices, being a means to honor God in a manner analogous to humans modes of honor. Shadal emphasizes how building a luxurious house replete with golden vessels and servants adorned in finery increased the respect the people felt towards Hashem.41 As above, he adds that having a centralized building to which all could come together also served the purpose of unifying the nation and spreading love among them.
Types of sacrifices – Shadal differentiates between the purpose of Olot and Shelamim, suggesting that Olot were brought to honor Hashem while Shelamim served to enhance love and friendship between people.42  This matches the two goals he thinks the Mishkan and the sacrificial system as a whole serve. He further suggests that individual offerings might have individual goals, whether to ask for forgiveness,43 request help or express gratitude.
Sacrifices before the Mishkan – Shadal suggests that people, from the earliest of times, brought all sorts of sacrifices, either to thank God, appease him, or request of Him (and it was these actions which led to the institution in the first place).  R. Saadia, in contrast, maintains that only עולות were brought before the receiving of the Torah.44
""אִשֵּׁה רֵיחַ נִיחוֹחַ לַי"י""
"וְלֹא יִזְבְּחוּ עוֹד אֶת זִבְחֵיהֶם לַשְּׂעִירִם" – According to Shadal these verses are focusing on the prohibition in the Wilderness to eat meat for pleasure wherever one desires, lest one sacrifice to the Seirim. The sacrifice mentioned is simply a means to allow eating meat without worrying about the issue. Thus the verse can not be brought as evidence that the system as a whole was instituted to combat idolatry.
Attitude of the Neviim towards sacrifices – Shadal understands these verses as condemnation only of sacrifices which are unaccompanied by proper deeds,45 and as an attack against the misconception that sacrifices alone (without repentance and change of action) can appease God.46 He points to Devarim 10:17, "אֲשֶׁר לֹא יִשָּׂא פָנִים וְלֹא יִקַּח שֹׁחַד" to emphasize how Hashem, unlike what was believed about other gods, can not be bribed.
"וְלֹא צִוִּיתִים... עַל דִּבְרֵי עוֹלָה וָזָבַח" – Shadal asserts that Yirmeyahu is only saying that this was not the first commandment given after the Exodus.  Beforehand, the people received the Decalogue and the many interpersonal laws of Parashat Mishpatim.  By giving the laws in this order Hashem wanted to ensure that the people realized that the goal of the commandments is not mainly to honor Hashem (who has no need of the glory), but to aid mankind to be the best they can be.
Details of bringing sacrifices:
  • "עַל כׇּל קׇרְבָּנְךָ תַּקְרִיב מֶלַח" – Shadal suggests that all covenants are accompanied by salt. Since when bringing a sacrifice we too enter into a covenant with God, it is similarly brought with salt
Purpose of mItzvot – Shadal agrees with Rambam that certain commandments might be given even if they don't have intrinsic worth, as long as they serve to bring people to better themselves or increase their belief in God.47 However,

Symbol of Submission

Sources:R. D"Z Hoffmann

Anti-Idolatry

Sacrifices are not the ideal way of worship, and were only instituted as a means to wean the nation away from idolatry.

Concession to human nature
Why animals? Hashem commanded that we sacrifice to Him animals, paralleling the rest of the nations who would offer animals to their idols.  However, in contrast to them who would offer lions, bears, and wild animals, Hashem commanded to only bring sheep, goats, and cattle, as most idol worshipers would never slaughter these animals.
Purpose of the Mishkan – According to the Rambam, the Mishkan was not the preferred way of worshiping Hashem, and was only built so the people can direct away their tendencies to worship idolatry.
Sacrifices before the Mishkan – Ramban notes that the existence of sacrifices before there were idolators constitutes a difficulty for this approach.
Details of bringing sacrifices:
  • סמיכה and וידוי –
  • Prohibition of blood and chelev – following the goal of wiping the traces of idolatry who thought the blood was impure, the Torah stated that blood is pure and purifies people.50
  • "עַל כׇּל קׇרְבָּנְךָ תַּקְרִיב מֶלַח" – 
  • Prohibition of honey – according to the Rambam idol worshipers would always sweeten their sacrifices and never salt them, so Hashem commanded us the opposite prohibiting honey and commanding to always bring salt.
  • only cattle
Attitude of the Neviim towards sacrifices – Rambam understands the focus of worshiping Hashem is not offering sacrifices, and therefore the prophets are rebuking the people who would rush to bring sacrifices, as in the ideal Hashem really does not want them brought.
Types of sacrifices
"אִשֵּׁה רֵיחַ נִיחוֹחַ לַי"י"
"וְלֹא יִזְבְּחוּ עוֹד אֶת זִבְחֵיהֶם לַשְּׂעִירִם" – These verses support this read, that the nation will sacrifice to Hashem so they won't feel that need to give sacrifices to the "שְּׂעִירִם".
Korban Pesach – See the Rambam's approach in Purpose of the Pesach, that it was commanded to cleanse the Israelites and as a demonstrative act against idolatry, and specifically the Egyptian god.