Difference between revisions of "Shas:Objects Which May Be Loaned/2"
(Topic Manager created an empty topic subpage) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <aht-xml> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <page type="Approaches"> | ||
<h1>Objects Which May Be Loaned</h1> | <h1>Objects Which May Be Loaned</h1> | ||
<div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div> | <div><b><center><span class="highlighted-notice">This topic has not yet undergone editorial review</span></center></b></div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <approaches> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <category>The Facts of the Case Prove Ownership | ||
| + | <p>Legal possession is entirely dependent on physical possession, and thus the defendant, who maintains physical possession, is also in legal possession of the object. However, the dubious nature of the transfer of possession, is enough to prove the claimant's case. This approach subdivides regarding the details of the dubiousness of the transfer, which depend on the chosen textual variant.</p> | ||
| + | <opinion> <mekorot><multilink><a href="RashiShevuot46b" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiShevuot46b" data-aht="source">Shevuot 46b</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RiMiGashShevuot46b" data-aht="source">Ri MiGash</a><a href="RiMiGashShevuot46b" data-aht="source">Shevuot 46b</a><a href="R. Yosef b. Meir HaLevi Ibn MiGash (Ri MiGash)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yosef b. Meir HaLevi Ibn MiGash</a></multilink></mekorot> | ||
| + | </opinion> | ||
| + | <opinion> <mekorot><multilink><a href="RChananelShevuot46b" data-aht="source">R. Chananel</a><a href="RChananelShevuot46b" data-aht="source">Shevuot 46b</a><a href="R. Chananel b. Chushiel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Chananel b. Chushiel</a></multilink></mekorot> | ||
| + | </opinion> | ||
| + | </category> | ||
| + | <category>The Original Owner Has Legal Possession | ||
| + | <p>Legal possession is dependent on the facts of the case, and need not follow the physical possession. If physical possession is unlikely to have been caused by a sale, then legal possession returns to the original owner. Thus, in such cases, despite the defendant being in physical possession of the object, the claimant retains his original legal possession, which results in a ruling in his favor.</p> | ||
| + | <mekorot><multilink><a href="RambamHilkhotGeneivah5-10-12" data-aht="source">Rambam</a><a href="RambamHilkhotGeneivah5-10-12" data-aht="source">Hilkhot Geneivah 5:10-12</a><a href="RambamHilkhotToeinveNitan8" data-aht="source">Hilkhot To'ein veNit'an 8</a><a href="RambamHilkhotToeinveNitan10-1-3" data-aht="source">Hilkhot To'ein veNit'an 10:1-3</a><a href="R. Moshe b. Maimon (Rambam, Maimonides)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Moshe b. Maimon</a></multilink></mekorot> | ||
| + | </category> | ||
| + | <category>Either, Depending on Object | ||
| + | <p>Legal possession is dependent on the object, and need not follow the physical possession. If physical possession of a certain object can happen legally without a sale, then legal possession returns to the original owner (thus resulting directly in a ruling favoring the claimant). If, however, it is unlikely that that object will be transferred legally without a sale, then legal possession remains with the physical possessor, which will require proof that the transfer of possession is dubious enough, in order to override the legal possession (also resulting in a ruling favoring the claimant).</p> | ||
| + | <mekorot>R. Tam as cited by <multilink><a href="TosafotShevuot46a-b" data-aht="source">Tosafot</a><a href="TosafotShevuot46a-b" data-aht="source">Shevuot 46a-b</a><a href="Ba'alei HaTosafot" data-aht="parshan">About Ba'alei HaTosafot</a></multilink></mekorot> | ||
| + | </category> | ||
| + | </approaches> | ||
| + | </page> | ||
| + | </aht-xml> | ||
Version as of 08:47, 9 January 2019
Objects Which May Be Loaned
Exegetical Approaches
The Facts of the Case Prove Ownership
Legal possession is entirely dependent on physical possession, and thus the defendant, who maintains physical possession, is also in legal possession of the object. However, the dubious nature of the transfer of possession, is enough to prove the claimant's case. This approach subdivides regarding the details of the dubiousness of the transfer, which depend on the chosen textual variant.
The Original Owner Has Legal Possession
Legal possession is dependent on the facts of the case, and need not follow the physical possession. If physical possession is unlikely to have been caused by a sale, then legal possession returns to the original owner. Thus, in such cases, despite the defendant being in physical possession of the object, the claimant retains his original legal possession, which results in a ruling in his favor.
Either, Depending on Object
Legal possession is dependent on the object, and need not follow the physical possession. If physical possession of a certain object can happen legally without a sale, then legal possession returns to the original owner (thus resulting directly in a ruling favoring the claimant). If, however, it is unlikely that that object will be transferred legally without a sale, then legal possession remains with the physical possessor, which will require proof that the transfer of possession is dubious enough, in order to override the legal possession (also resulting in a ruling favoring the claimant).
