Difference between revisions of "The Prophet from Beit El/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 11: Line 11:
 
<p>The Prophet from Beit El hoped that by having the Man of God disobey his own words and prophetic sign, he could undo the prophecy against Beit El (and restore legitimacy to the worship taking place there.)</p>
 
<p>The Prophet from Beit El hoped that by having the Man of God disobey his own words and prophetic sign, he could undo the prophecy against Beit El (and restore legitimacy to the worship taking place there.)</p>
 
<mekorot>modern scholars<fn>See Prof. U. Simon, "אות נבואי גובר על שלושת מפיריו- מלך ישראל, נביא בית אל ואיש האלהים מיהודה", in קריאה ספרותית במקרא: סיפורי נביאים (Jerusalem, 1997) 157-188, and R"E Samet, <a href="http://herzogpress.herzog.ac.il/gilayon.asp?gilh=%D7%95&amp;ktav=1&amp;gil=6">גדול הוא קידוש ה' מחילול ה' - מלכים א' פרק י"ג - סיפר ופשרו</a> in Megadim 6 (Alon Shevut, 1988): 55-85.</fn></mekorot>
 
<mekorot>modern scholars<fn>See Prof. U. Simon, "אות נבואי גובר על שלושת מפיריו- מלך ישראל, נביא בית אל ואיש האלהים מיהודה", in קריאה ספרותית במקרא: סיפורי נביאים (Jerusalem, 1997) 157-188, and R"E Samet, <a href="http://herzogpress.herzog.ac.il/gilayon.asp?gilh=%D7%95&amp;ktav=1&amp;gil=6">גדול הוא קידוש ה' מחילול ה' - מלכים א' פרק י"ג - סיפר ופשרו</a> in Megadim 6 (Alon Shevut, 1988): 55-85.</fn></mekorot>
<point><b>Timing of the incident</b> – R"E Samet suggests that our chapter is a direct continuation of&#160;<a href="MelakhimI12-26-33" data-aht="source">Chapter 12</a> and takes place towards the beginning of Yerovam's reign, when he declared his new holiday in the eighth month and stood before the assembled crowd to bring incense on the altar.<fn>The phrase "וְיָרׇבְעָם עֹמֵד עַל הַמִּזְבֵּחַ לְהַקְטִיר" in verse 1 of our chapter echoes and continues the last verse of Chapter 12: " וַיַּעַל עַל הַמִּזְבֵּחַ אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה בְּבֵית אֵל בַּחֲמִשָּׁה עָשָׂר יוֹם בַּחֹדֶשׁ הַשְּׁמִינִי בַּחֹדֶשׁ אֲשֶׁר בָּדָא [מִלִּבּוֹ] (מלבד) וַיַּעַשׂ חָג לִבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וַיַּעַל עַל הַמִּזְבֵּחַ לְהַקְטִיר."</fn></point>
+
<point><b>Timing of the incident</b> – R"E Samet suggests that our chapter is a direct continuation of&#160;<a href="MelakhimI12-26-33" data-aht="source">Chapter 12</a> and takes place towards the beginning of Yerovam's reign, on the new holiday he had declared, when he stood before the assembled crowd to bring incense on the altar.<fn>The phrase "וְיָרׇבְעָם עֹמֵד עַל הַמִּזְבֵּחַ לְהַקְטִיר" in verse 1 of our chapter echoes and continues the last verse of Chapter 12: " וַיַּעַל עַל הַמִּזְבֵּחַ אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה בְּבֵית אֵל בַּחֲמִשָּׁה עָשָׂר יוֹם בַּחֹדֶשׁ הַשְּׁמִינִי בַּחֹדֶשׁ אֲשֶׁר בָּדָא [מִלִּבּוֹ] (מלבד) וַיַּעַשׂ חָג לִבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וַיַּעַל עַל הַמִּזְבֵּחַ לְהַקְטִיר."</fn></point>
 
<point><b>Miracles of the Man of God</b></point>
 
<point><b>Miracles of the Man of God</b></point>
<point><b>Yerovam's invitation</b> – R. Samet suggests that Yerovam was hoping that if the prophet acquiesced to eat by him, it would be taken as a sign that, despite the devastating prophecy, the Man of God did not view the city of Beit El and its king as reprehensible.&#160; A public, positive response from the Judean prophet<fn>R. Samet is assuming that a large crowd had come to Beit El for the holiday so the prohet's response would have made an impact on the masses.</fn> would have provided much needed legitimacy to Yerovam's religious upheaval.</point>
+
<point><b>Yerovam's invitation</b> – R. Samet suggests that Yerovam was hoping that if the prophet acquiesced to eat by him, it would be taken as a sign that, despite the devastating prophecy, the Man of God did not view the city of Beit El and its king as reprehensible.&#160; A public, positive response from the prophet<fn>R. Samet is assuming that a large crowd had come to Beit El for the holiday so the prohet's response would have made an impact on the masses.</fn> would have provided much needed legitimacy to Yerovam's religious upheaval.</point>
<point><b>Prohibition of eating and drinking in Beit El</b> – It was for this very reason that Hashem prohibited the Man of God from eating or drinking in Beit El.</point>
+
<point><b>Prohibition of eating and drinking in Beit El</b> – It was for this very reason that Hashem prohibited the Man of God from eating or drinking in Beit El.&#160; The refuals to partake in ameal in Biet el eyomboklized its total rejection</point>
 
<point><b>Prohibition of returning via the same path</b> – Prof. Simon suggests that returning to one's point of departure and retracing one's footsteps signify a cancelling of the journey.<fn>He compares it to the command not to return to Egypt to buy horses, where Hashem says, "לֹא תֹסִפוּן לָשׁוּב בַּדֶּרֶךְ הַזֶּה עוֹד".&#160; Willingly returning to Egypt is considered a lack of recognition of the Exodus, a undoing of sorts of the original miracle.</fn>&#160; Had the prophet returned the way he had come it could be viewed as a reversal of his mission and decree.</point>
 
<point><b>Prohibition of returning via the same path</b> – Prof. Simon suggests that returning to one's point of departure and retracing one's footsteps signify a cancelling of the journey.<fn>He compares it to the command not to return to Egypt to buy horses, where Hashem says, "לֹא תֹסִפוּן לָשׁוּב בַּדֶּרֶךְ הַזֶּה עוֹד".&#160; Willingly returning to Egypt is considered a lack of recognition of the Exodus, a undoing of sorts of the original miracle.</fn>&#160; Had the prophet returned the way he had come it could be viewed as a reversal of his mission and decree.</point>
 
<point><b>הנביא מבית אל: True or false&#160; prophet?</b></point>
 
<point><b>הנביא מבית אל: True or false&#160; prophet?</b></point>
Line 37: Line 37:
 
<category name="Selfishness">
 
<category name="Selfishness">
 
Personal Gain
 
Personal Gain
<p>The prophet from Beit El hoped to sway the man of God to defect to Beit El and work with him in his prophetic business.</p>
+
<p>The prophet from Beit El desired to protect his prophetic business and standing with the king / hoped to sway the Man of God to defect to Beit El and work with him in his prophetic business.</p>
 +
<mekorot>Josephus, modern scholars</mekorot>
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
</approaches>
 
</approaches>
 
</page>
 
</page>
 
</aht-xml>
 
</aht-xml>

Version as of 01:15, 6 December 2017

The Prophet from Beit El

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Reversal of Prophecy

The Prophet from Beit El hoped that by having the Man of God disobey his own words and prophetic sign, he could undo the prophecy against Beit El (and restore legitimacy to the worship taking place there.)

Sources:modern scholars1
Timing of the incident – R"E Samet suggests that our chapter is a direct continuation of Chapter 12 and takes place towards the beginning of Yerovam's reign, on the new holiday he had declared, when he stood before the assembled crowd to bring incense on the altar.2
Miracles of the Man of God
Yerovam's invitation – R. Samet suggests that Yerovam was hoping that if the prophet acquiesced to eat by him, it would be taken as a sign that, despite the devastating prophecy, the Man of God did not view the city of Beit El and its king as reprehensible.  A public, positive response from the prophet3 would have provided much needed legitimacy to Yerovam's religious upheaval.
Prohibition of eating and drinking in Beit El – It was for this very reason that Hashem prohibited the Man of God from eating or drinking in Beit El.  The refuals to partake in ameal in Biet el eyomboklized its total rejection
Prohibition of returning via the same path – Prof. Simon suggests that returning to one's point of departure and retracing one's footsteps signify a cancelling of the journey.4  Had the prophet returned the way he had come it could be viewed as a reversal of his mission and decree.
הנביא מבית אל: True or false  prophet?
Why wasn't the נביא at the ceremony?
How was the man of God convinced?
Harsh punishment
Why does the navi get the prophecy?
חוטא נשכר?

Test of Prophet

The Prophet from Beit El did not know if the Man of God was a legitimate prophet or an emissary sent by Rechovam to attack Beit El for political reasons. His invitation was intended to discover whether or not he truly spoke the word of Hashem.

Sources:modern scholars5
Prohibition of eating and drinking in Beit El
הנביא מבית אל: True or false prophet? According to these sources, the prophet from Beit El was atrue prophet

Act of Altruism

The prophet's motives were misguided, but altruistic. He simply wanted to prevent the Man of God from going home hungry.

Sources:Abarbanel

Personal Gain

The prophet from Beit El desired to protect his prophetic business and standing with the king / hoped to sway the Man of God to defect to Beit El and work with him in his prophetic business.

Sources:Josephus, modern scholars