When Did the Ceremony on Mt. Eival Occur/2

When Was the Ceremony on Mt. Eival?

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Before the Conquest

The ceremony at Mt. Eival took place on the same day that the Israelites crossed the Jordan River and entered Israel.

Sources:4QJosh, Tosefta SotahSotah 8:6-7About the Tosefta, R. Yehuda and R. Eliezer in Yerushalmi SotahSotah 7:3About the Yerushalmi, Bavli SotahSotah 35bSotah 36aAbout the Bavli, RashiDevarim 27:2Yehoshua 4:3-9, 20Yehoshua 8:30-33About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki, R. Yosef KaraYehoshua 8:30-33About R. Yosef Kara, RadakYehoshua 8:30-35About R. David Kimchi, R. BachyaDevarim 27:1-3About R. Bachya b. Asher, HaKetav VeHaKabbalahDevarim 27:2About R. Yaakov Mecklenburg, Rav Hirsch

Chronology of the chapters – These commentators all maintain that the event is not recorded in its chronological place (which would have been in Chapter 4),¹ but do not explain the reason for the achronology.

"בַּיּוֹם אֲשֶׁר תַּעַבְרוּ אֶת הַיַּרְדֵּן" – According to this approach, the word "בַּיּוֹם" is understood literally to refer to the very same day that the nation crossed the Jordan River.  It is this directive (and the statement that Yehoshua acted as commanded by Moshe) which motivates them to posit that Yehoshua must not have waited before setting up the ceremony.

How did they get to Mt. Eival? This position must explain how the entire nation (including children)² could have traveled all the way from Gilgal to Mt. Eival (and back) in one day, especially if this was in still unconquered territory.³  The commentators offer two possible solutions:

• Miracle – Tosefta Sotah places Mt. Eival near Shekhem,⁴ but asserts that Hashem miraculously brought the nation there.
• Different mountain – R. Eliezer,⁵ in contrast, maintains that the verses refers not to the Mt. Eival which is near Shekhem, but to two mountains that are close to the Jordan.⁶ As evidence, he points to the Torah's description of the site as being "מוּל הַגִּלְגָּל".‎⁷

Why now? Since the ceremony marked a renewal of the covenant between Hashem and the Nation of Israel, it was appropriate to do so immediately upon entering the land.  Furthermore, in writing the Torah on the stones, the nation announced their recognition that the imminent conquest was contingent on their observance of the Torah.⁸

Stones for the ceremony – According to most of these sources,⁹ the stones that were used for the ceremony had been taken from the Jordan, as described in Yehoshua 4:2-3.¹⁰  The people carried the twelve rocks to the mountain, and then returned them to Gilgal where they were set up as memorial. Radak points out that the description of the gathering and erecting of the stones in Gilgal concludes with "כְּכֹל אֲשֶׁר צִוָּה מֹשֶׁה אֶת יְהוֹשֻׁעַ" (Yehoshua 4:10). This might support the idea that this act was a fulfillment of the commands of Devarim 27.

Why Mt. Eival and Gerizim? If the mountains were near the Jordan, that could explain their choice.  If they were more centrally located, however, why Hashem would choose a location that necessitated long travel.  In addition, regardless of which of the above positions one takes regarding the location of Mt. Eival, it is not clear why Hashem would choose to have the ceremony there rather than in Gilgal itself (especially considering that they were to dissemble the rocks from the mountain only to re-erect them in Gilgal.)¹¹  These sources might suggest a practical response; the mountains were needed for the acoustics they provided.

Memorial for crossing? In addition, as Yehoshua states that the monument in Gilgal was meant to memorialize the miracle of the crossing, it would seem that the stones took on a new function once they moved.

Relationship between Devarim 8:1-3 and 8:4-8 – These sources differ in how they explain the doubling:

• Two commandments – According to Rashi the two sets of verses constitute two distinct commandments.  Verses 1-3 refer to the stones that were to be set up in the Jordan, while verses 4-8 refer to the stones which were to be erected on Mt. Eival.¹²
• כלל ופרט – R. Bachya, in contrast, asserts that all of the verses speak of the stones used in the ceremony at Mt. Eival.¹³  The doubling is simply a "כלל ופרט", a literary technique in which a unit opens with a general statement whose details are then elaborated upon.

Purpose of the ceremony

Why these mountians

Mid-Conquest

The nation went to Mt. Eival after defeating the Ai and gaining access to the vicinity.

Sources:perhaps RalbagDevarim 27:2-10Yehoshua 8:30-31About R. Levi b. Gershom,¹⁴ AbarbanelDevarim 27:1About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel,

Chronology of the chapters – This position maintains the chronology of the chapters, suggesting that the ceremony appears in the text exactly when it took place.

Relationship between Devarim 8:1-3 and 8:4-8 – Abarbanel claims that the opening verses of the unit are a description of what the people will desire to do on the day of the crossing of the Jordan, while verses 4ff represent Hashem's command of what they should do instead.¹⁵  The people, in the manner of conquerors everywhere, will naturally be inclined to memorialize the crossing in writing,¹⁶ for their own honor. Hashem therefore tells them that they should build not a monument, but an altar, and write on its stones not the narrative of the crossing but words of Torah.  This should be erected specifically on Mt. Eival. As such, the stones will serve to glorify God rather than man.

"בַּיּוֹם אֲשֶׁר תַּעַבְרוּ" versus "וְהָיָה בְּעׇבְרְכֶם" – According to Abarbanel, Hashem had never commanded the people to enact the ceremony on the day that they entered Israel.  The statement "וְהָיָה בַּיּוֹם אֲשֶׁר תַּעַבְרוּ אֶת הַיַּרְדֵּן" referred only to what the people on their own wanted to do.  Hashem's directive was more general, "וְהָיָה בְּעׇבְרְכֶם אֶת הַיַּרְדֵּן", telling the nation only that they must erect the stones at some point after crossing into Israel.  This meant that Yehoshua had no reason to try to implement Hashem's command immediately.

Relationship to monument in Gilgal – Abarbanel claims that the stones mentioned in Yehoshua 4 have nothing to do with those erected on Mt. Eival.  The monument in Gilgal was meant to commemorate the miracle of the splitting of the Jordan.¹⁷   Abarbanel explains that the concluding phrase, that Yehoshua spoke the words of Hashem,  "כְּכֹל אֲשֶׁר צִוָּה מֹשֶׁה אֶת יְהוֹשֻׁעַ" is unrelated to the commands of Devarim 27.¹⁸  It rather refers to Yehoshua relaying to the nation Hashem's speech of encouragement in Yehoshua 1, which paralleled Moshe's speech of Devarim 11.

Why now? Abarbanel asserts that after Yehoshua saw that Akhan had violated the covenant, leading to the defeat against the Ai, he decided it was an opportune time to renew the covenant and warn the people of the curses to befall all offenders.

After the Conquest

The Israelites first performed the ceremony after the 14 years of conquest and inheritance.

Sources:JosephusAntiquities of the Jews 5:1:19About Josephus, R. Yishmael in Yerushalmi SotahSotah 7:3About the Yerushalmi

Two Stages

The nation fulfilled Moshe's command in two stages.  Though the first stage took place immediately after entry into Israel, the completed ceremony only occurred later.

Sources:perhaps R. D"Z Hoffmann, Malbim

¹ See 4QJosh, a copy of Sefer Yehoshua found in Qumran, which actually places the story (or at least verses 8:34-35, which have remained) at the end of Chapter 4 after the narrative regrading the erection of the stones in Gilgal.

² See Yehoshua 8:35, which speaks of the all inclusive nature of the ceremony (כׇּל קְהַל" "יִשְׂרָאֵל וְהַנָּשִׁים וְהַטַּף וְהַגֵּר הַהֹלֵךְ בְּקִרְבָּם)

³ Though it is possible that the area of Shekhem itself had already been in Israel's hands from the Patriarchal period, the rest of the route from Gilgal to Mt. Eival would necessitate going through enemy territory.

⁴ This choice of site is supported by the description of the mountains being "אֵצֶל אֵלוֹנֵי מֹרֶה", which appears to be in the vicinity of Shekhem.  See Bereshit 12:6, "וַיַּעֲבֹר אַבְרָם בָּאָרֶץ עַד מְקוֹם שְׁכֶם עַד אֵלוֹן מוֹרֶה."  R. Yehudah in the Sifre explains the phrase, "דֶּרֶךְ מְבוֹא הַשֶּׁמֶשׁ" to refer to where the sun rises, allowing for a western location.  Finally, the problematic marker "מוּל הַגִּלְגָּל" could be explained, as does Shadal , to refer not to the Gilgal of Yehoshua 4, but to a site of the same name in the central region of the land.

⁵ See his opinion in the Sifre and Yerushalmi Sotah 7:3.  See also R. Elazar in the Yerushalmi who similarly says, "שתי גבשושיות עשו וקראו זה הר גריזים וזה הר עיבל".

⁶ This position is likely motivated not only by textual concerns, but by polemical ones as well.  It attempts to rid all basis to the Samaritan's claims regarding the holiness of Mt. Gerizim in the area of Shekhem.  Not only was the altar built on Mt. Eival and not Mt. Gerizim, but the entire ceremony took place in a different geographical location.

⁷ As further support, he points to the phrase, "בְּעֵבֶר הַיַּרְדֵּן," explaining that the Torah is saying that the site is close to the Jordan.  In addition the term "דֶּרֶךְ מְבוֹא הַשֶּׁמֶשׁ" suggests that is in an area in which the sun sets, some place in the east..

⁸ See Ibn EzraDevarim 27:3About R. Avraham ibn Ezra and RambanDevarim 27:3About R. Moshe b. Nachman who explain that this is the meaning of the phrase "וְכָתַבְתָּ עֲלֵיהֶן אֶת כׇּל דִּבְרֵי הַתּוֹרָה הַזֹּאת בְּעׇבְרֶךָ לְמַעַן אֲשֶׁר תָּבֹא אֶל הָאָרֶץ"; only if you remember and observe Torah will you be able to inherit the land. [Ramban also raises the possibility that the phrase teaches that we came to the land only as as to observe the Torah.]

⁹ See, however, Rashi on Devarim 27 where (in contrast to his explanation in Yehoshua) he seems to suggest that there were three sets of stones,  those placed in the Jordan, those erected in Gilgal and those used on Mt Eval.

¹⁰ These were distinct from the stones that were set up in the river itself (Yehoshua 4:9).

¹¹ If they had left them on the mountain, and one posits a Shekhem region for the location of Mt. Eival, then one could suggest that Hashem wanted the momument to be in a central location for posterity.  However, once the stones were returned to Gilgal the centrality of Mt. Eival becomes irrelevant.

¹² This is a somewhat difficult read.  First of all, the Jordan is not mentioned at all in the verses and must be assumed. HaKetav VeHaKabbalah further notes that the Torah was not written on the stones set up in the river.  Finally, verse 4 speaks of the stones of Mt. Eival as being "הָאֲבָנִים הָאֵלֶּה", apparently equating them with those spoken of earlier.

¹³ This is supported by the fact that verse 4 speaks of "הָאֲבָנִים הָאֵלֶּה", referring back to the stones previously mentioned.

¹⁴ Though it is clear that Ralbag assumes that the ceremony took place by the time the Conquest was complete, it is not clear exactly when he holds that it happened as he only writes, "עד והארץ שקטה ממלחמה, זכר שכבר בנה יהושע מזבח לה'".

¹⁵ He distinguishes between the language of " וַהֲקֵמֹתָ לְךָ אֲבָנִים" in verse 2 and "תָּקִימוּ אֶת הָאֲבָנִים" in verse 4, suggesting that the former is descriptive while the latter is imperative.

¹⁶ He claims that the word "בְּעׇבְרֶךָ" in the phrase "וְכָתַבְתָּ עֲלֵיהֶן אֶת כׇּל דִּבְרֵי הַתּוֹרָה הַזֹּאת בְּעׇבְרֶךָ" is not a time marker, but rather refers to the content of the "Torah" that the people will desire to write.  The people will desire to record the miraculous events of the entry into Israel, including the events of the Wilderness period, their defeat of Sichon and Og, and finally the splitting of the Jordan.

¹⁷ Unlike the stones at Mt. Eival, these stones were not written upon, nor made into an altar. 

¹⁸ He points out that Devarim 27 was aimed at the nation and not Yehoshua specifically so the phrase "כְּכֹל אֲשֶׁר צִוָּה מֹשֶׁה אֶת יְהוֹשֻׁעַ " would not be referring to that directive.