Difference between revisions of "Why Couldn't David Build the Beit HaMikdash/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 12: Line 12:
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li><b>Death of the deserving</b> – Rambam claims that even though David was merciful to his fellow Israelites and only spilled the blood of non Jews and heretics, this nonetheless betrays his "cruel" nature.<fn>Cf. Ramban who does not speak about spilling blood specifically, but says that David was a "man of justice" who lacked the necessary mercy to build the Mikdash, a house of mercy.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Death of the deserving</b> – Rambam claims that even though David was merciful to his fellow Israelites and only spilled the blood of non Jews and heretics, this nonetheless betrays his "cruel" nature.<fn>Cf. Ramban who does not speak about spilling blood specifically, but says that David was a "man of justice" who lacked the necessary mercy to build the Mikdash, a house of mercy.</fn></li>
<li><b>Spilling of innocent blood</b> – Radak brings three possibilities regarding which innocent blood David might have been held accountable for: the death of Uriah,<fn>Even though our story precedes the death of Uriah, Hashem might have rejected David based on knowledge of his future actions.</fn> the death of&#160; the priests in Nov,<fn>Though it was Shaul who killed the priests, David viewed himself as accountable since he had sought their aid, despite knowing that Doeg was present and would inform on them.&#160; Thus, he knowingly endangered them, as he tells Evyatar, "אָנֹכִי סַבֹּתִי בְּכׇל נֶפֶשׁ בֵּית אָבִיךָ".</fn> or the deaths of righteous non-Jews whom he killed in battle.<fn>Though David's intentions were to prevent enemies from attacking Israel, his many wars took the lives not only of soldiers, but of innocent civilians as well.</fn> Prof. KiI adds that it might also refer to the many deaths that occurred during the civil war between David and Ishboshet.</li>
+
<li><b>Spilling of innocent blood</b> – Radak brings three possibilities regarding which innocent blood David might have been held accountable for: the death of Uriah,<fn>Even though our story precedes the death of Uriah, Hashem might have rejected David based on knowledge of his future actions.</fn> the death of&#160; the priests in Nov,<fn>Though it was Shaul who killed the priests, David viewed himself as accountable since he had knowingly endangered them, as he sought their aid, despite knowing that Doeg was present and would inform on them.&#160; Thus, he tells Evyatar, "אָנֹכִי סַבֹּתִי בְּכׇל נֶפֶשׁ בֵּית אָבִיךָ".</fn> or the deaths of righteous non-Jews whom he killed in battle.<fn>Though David's intentions were to prevent enemies from attacking Israel, his many wars took the lives not only of soldiers, but of innocent civilians as well.</fn> Prof. KiI adds that it might also refer to the many deaths that occurred during the civil war between David and Ishboshet.</li>
<li><b>Blood of Israelite soldiers</b> – Hoil Moshe points to David's general desire to embark on wars of conquest.&#160; David's willingness to endanger lives when not necessary for purposes of defense was problematic.<fn>His comments relate to his discussion of David's census and the ensuing plague described in Shemuel ii 24.&#160; He understands that David was punished because he wanted to embark on more wars of conquest, which would endanger lives for no reason, as they had finally achieved peace and war was not necessary. [See&#160;<a href="David's Counting of the Nation" data-aht="page">David's Counting of the Nation</a> for details.] Cf. Rav Shelomo Goren, Meishiv Milchama, I, pp. 15-25, who similalry argues that David could not build the Mikdash due to wars of conquest.</fn></li>
+
<li><b>Blood of Israelite soldiers</b> – Hoil Moshe points to David's general desire to embark on wars of conquest.<fn>Cf. Rav Shelomo Goren, Meishiv Milchama, I, pp. 15-25, who similarly blames David for endangering Israellite lives by embarking on the extra-terrestrial conquests of Aram Naharayim and Aram Zova before finishing the conquest of Yerushalayim.&#160; Since David forsook Yerushalayim and the site of the Mikdash, he was punished measure for measure that he could not build the Mikdash. [See also the <multilink><a href="SifreDevarim11-24" data-aht="source">Sifre</a><a href="SifreDevarim11-24" data-aht="source">11:24</a><a href="Sifre Devarim" data-aht="parshan">About Sifre Devarim</a></multilink> which issues the same critique of David for this but does not connect the sin to david's not being allowed to build the Mikdash.]&#160;</fn>&#160; David's willingness to endanger lives when not necessary for purposes of defense was problematic.<fn>The Hoil Moshe explains that this was also the reason for the plague that ensued after David's census of the nation in Shemuel II 24.&#160; He suggests that that David had counted the people specifically because he wanted to go to war, despite the fact that the nation had finally achieved peace and there was nor reason to do so. [See&#160;<a href="David's Counting of the Nation" data-aht="page">David's Counting of the Nation</a> for details.]</fn></li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
 
<point><b>"מִפְּנֵי הַמִּלְחָמָה"</b></point>
 
<point><b>"מִפְּנֵי הַמִּלְחָמָה"</b></point>

Version as of 03:57, 11 June 2017

Why Couldn't David Build the Beit HaMikdash?

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Defect in David

"דָּם לָרֹב שָׁפַכְתָּ" – Most of these sources point to this verse as evidence that the true reason that David could not build the Beit HaMikdash related to his spilling of blood.  They differ regarding which blood is being spoken about and why it was problematic:
  • Death of the deserving – Rambam claims that even though David was merciful to his fellow Israelites and only spilled the blood of non Jews and heretics, this nonetheless betrays his "cruel" nature.1
  • Spilling of innocent blood – Radak brings three possibilities regarding which innocent blood David might have been held accountable for: the death of Uriah,2 the death of  the priests in Nov,3 or the deaths of righteous non-Jews whom he killed in battle.4 Prof. KiI adds that it might also refer to the many deaths that occurred during the civil war between David and Ishboshet.
  • Blood of Israelite soldiers – Hoil Moshe points to David's general desire to embark on wars of conquest.5  David's willingness to endanger lives when not necessary for purposes of defense was problematic.6
"מִפְּנֵי הַמִּלְחָמָה"
Devarim
Why doesn't Natan give a reason?
Purpose of the Beit HaMikdash
Hashem's promise to David

Lack of Stability and Peace

Too Much Good