Difference between revisions of "Why Did Yonah Disobey Hashem/2"
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<category>Theological Objections | <category>Theological Objections | ||
<p>Yonah's disobedience stemmed from his fundamental beliefs regarding the institution of repentance.</p> | <p>Yonah's disobedience stemmed from his fundamental beliefs regarding the institution of repentance.</p> | ||
− | <mekorot><multilink><a href=" | + | <mekorot><multilink><a href="AbarbanelYonah4" data-aht="source">Abarbanel</a><a href="AbarbanelYonah4" data-aht="source">Yonah 4</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Abarbanel" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yitzchak Abarbanel</a></multilink>,<fn>This is not Abarbanel's main approach to understanding the story, but rather a secondary issue which comes out of his interpretation.</fn> various modern commentators<fn>See R"E Ben-Menachem, Da'at Mikra Commentary to Yonah, (1973): 7-8, Prof. U. Simon, Mikra LeYisrael, Commentary to Yonah (1992), Prof. D. Henshke, "למשמעו של ספר יונה", Megadim 20 (1998): 75-90, and many others.</fn></mekorot> |
− | <point><b>Objections to repentance</b> – These sources | + | <point><b>Objections to repentance</b> – These sources offer several ways of understanding the nature of Yonah's objection:<br/> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Repentance does not | + | <li><b>Repentance does not eliminate the need for punishment</b> – Though Yonah believed that repentance for misdeeds is desirable, he did not think that repentance removes the need for retribution. In his view, justice requires that everyone receive their due, and apologizing or regretting one's actions cannot change that.</li> |
− | <li><b>Repentance from fear insufficient</b> – According to Yonah, repentance that stems from fear of punishment is | + | <li><b>Repentance from fear is insufficient</b> – According to Yonah, repentance that stems from fear of punishment is insincere, and will never be permanent as it does not come from a true recognition of right and wrong and desire to change.  As soon as the danger ends, a person will return to their previous ways.</li> |
− | <li><b>No repentance for idolators</b> – | + | <li><b>No repentance for idolators</b> – According to Abarbanel, Yonah maintained that "תשובה" means returning to Hashem.  Thus, even if someone fixes their interpersonal behavior, their repentance can never be complete if they maintain their idolatrous beliefs.<fn>See <a href="Hardened Hearts" data-aht="page">Hardened Hearts</a> where Abarbanel is consistent in this view and justifies hardening Paroh's heart by suggesting that idolaters cannot truly repent, since it would be like "immersing in a ritual bath while holding an impure creature".</fn>  In other words, returning specifically to Hashem is a prerequisite for all repentance.</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Quality of Nineveh's repentance</b> – These sources evaluate the repentance of the people in different ways, in line with their positions above:<br/> | <point><b>Quality of Nineveh's repentance</b> – These sources evaluate the repentance of the people in different ways, in line with their positions above:<br/> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Inferior | + | <li><b>Sincere</b> – The repentance was actually sincere, and the all encompassing nature (including animals as well) simply reflects the degree of guilt that the people of Nineveh needed to expiate.<fn>See <a href="BavliTaanit16a" data-aht="source">Bavli Taanit 16a</a> which points to the people of Ninevah as a role model for proper repentance.</fn>  Yonah did not take issue with the quality of the repentance, but only with Hashem's reaction to it.</li> |
− | <li><b>Changed actions not beliefs</b> – Abarbanel claims that though the people repented of their crimes against their fellow men, they did not return to Hashem.  Thus, the verse states, "וַיַּרְא הָאֱלֹהִים אֶת מַעֲשֵׂיהֶם", emphasizing their actions but not their beliefs. Though earlier the text shares that "וַיַּאֲמִינוּ אַנְשֵׁי נִינְוֵה בֵּאלֹהִים", this connotes a recognition of godly authority but not a monotheistic belief in Hashem.  Thus, in contrast to the surrounding verses, Hashem is called " | + | <li><b>Inferior repentance</b> – The images of animals in sackcloth and the call for them to fast suggest that the entire scene is but a parody of repentance. If repentance involves regret and change of heart, involving animals is farcical.  This might support the idea that the change was prompted only by fear, and as such was superficial.<fn>See R. Yochanan in the <a href="YerushalmiTaanit2-1" data-aht="source">Yerushalmi Taanit 2:1</a> who similarly claims that the Ninevites' repentance was lacking, but does not bring textual support.</fn></li> |
− | <li><b>Sincere</b> – Alternatively, the repentance was actually sincere, and the all encompassing nature simply reflects the degree of guilt that the people | + | <li><b>Changed actions not beliefs</b> – Abarbanel claims that though the people repented of their crimes against their fellow men, they did not return to Hashem.  Thus, the verse states, "וַיַּרְא הָאֱלֹהִים אֶת מַעֲשֵׂיהֶם", emphasizing their actions but not their beliefs. Though earlier the text shares that "וַיַּאֲמִינוּ אַנְשֵׁי נִינְוֵה בֵּאלֹהִים", this connotes a recognition of godly authority but not a monotheistic belief in Hashem.  Thus, in contrast to the surrounding verses, Hashem is called "אֱלֹהִים" and not by His proper name, Hashem.<fn>Note how the sailors and Yonah both cry out not to Elokim, but to Hashem. See R. Tzvi Romm, "The Failed Teshuvah of Nineveh", in the Benjamin and Rose Berger Torah to Go Series (2015): 10-14, who analyzes the various changes of Hashem's name throughout the story and what this says about the quality of the people's repentance.</fn></li> |
+ | <li><b>Sincere</b> – Alternatively, the repentance was actually sincere, and the all encompassing nature simply reflects the degree of guilt that the people of Nineveh needed to expiate.<fn>See <a href="BavliTaanit16a" data-aht="source">Bavli Taanit 16a</a> which points to the people of Ninevah as a role model for proper repentance.</fn>  Yonah did not have an issue with the quality of the repentance, but only with Hashem's reaction to it.</li> | ||
+ | </ul></point> | ||
+ | <point><b>"כִּי יָדַעְתִּי כִּי אַתָּה אֵל חַנּוּן וְרַחוּם אֶרֶךְ אַפַּיִם וְרַב חֶסֶד וְנִחָם עַל הָרָעָה"</b> – Yonah's own explanation for his actions might support this reading of the story.  He says that he fled "because Hashem is a merciful God"; it is the fact that Hashem is merciful, rather than just, that troubles Yonah.  It is not coincidental that in quoting Hashem's attributes, he strikingly leaves out the attribute of Hashem's justice. In his opinion, eradicating deserved punishment might be merciful, but it is not "אמת".‎<fn>R"E Ben-Menachem points to Yonah's name, יונה בן <b>אמ</b>י<b>ת</b>י, as further support that he was a man marked by his belief in "אמת".</fn></point> | ||
+ | <point><b>Message of the "קיקיון"</b> – The analogy can be understood to have either of the following messages, each matching one of the potential objections of Yonah to Nineveh's repentance:<br/> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li>Hashem is attempting to teach Yonah that repentance, however short-lived, is not worthless.  Though his gourd lived for merely a day, Yonah cared deeply about it; while it was there it provided for him.  So too, Hashem teaches Yonah, even if the people of Nineveh eventually revert to evil, since at the moment their repentance is sincere, it is accepted.<fn>It is possible that this was the message Yonah was meant to learn in the fish as well. Hashem placed him in a position of near-destruction and he, like the people of Nineveh, repented only out of fear, reverting back to his original position soon after.  Despite the knowledge that Yonah's repentance might be short lived, Hashem still saved him. </fn></li> | ||
+ | <li>Alternatively, Hashem is simply trying to teach Yonah about fatherly love. Yonah, who did not even invest in the gourd, desired its life, how much more so should Hashem, who fathered his creations, desire their survival!  Repentance allows for erasure of destruction, not because of justice, but because of love.    </li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | |||
<point><b>Comparison to Avraham in Sedom</b> – According to this approach, Yonah and Avraham might represent contrasting models of the desired balance between mercy and justice.  Avraham appears to call for mercy at all costs, asking that the wicked not be punished on behalf of the few righteous in Sedom.<fn>For this and other understandings of Avraham's request regarding Sedom, see <a href="Avraham's Prayer for Sedom" data-aht="page">Avraham's Prayer for Sedom</a>.</fn> Yonah disagrees, claiming that the wicked should not be saved even if they repent. Hashem appears to agree with Avraham, telling him that with the requisite number of righteous He won't destroy Sedom, and telling Yonah similarly that He has mercy on Nineveh due to the great number of its innocent residents "who don't differentiate between their right and left."</point> | <point><b>Comparison to Avraham in Sedom</b> – According to this approach, Yonah and Avraham might represent contrasting models of the desired balance between mercy and justice.  Avraham appears to call for mercy at all costs, asking that the wicked not be punished on behalf of the few righteous in Sedom.<fn>For this and other understandings of Avraham's request regarding Sedom, see <a href="Avraham's Prayer for Sedom" data-aht="page">Avraham's Prayer for Sedom</a>.</fn> Yonah disagrees, claiming that the wicked should not be saved even if they repent. Hashem appears to agree with Avraham, telling him that with the requisite number of righteous He won't destroy Sedom, and telling Yonah similarly that He has mercy on Nineveh due to the great number of its innocent residents "who don't differentiate between their right and left."</point> | ||
<point><b>Comparison to Eliyahu</b> – The only other case in Tanakh in which a prophet appears to successfully effect change in the people is Eliyahu at Mt. Carmel.  Interestingly, there, too, immediately afterwards the prophet asks for death.  The request might come in part from Eliyahu's recognition that the change was short-lived. Eliyahu, like Yonah, does not see the value in temporary repentance.</point> | <point><b>Comparison to Eliyahu</b> – The only other case in Tanakh in which a prophet appears to successfully effect change in the people is Eliyahu at Mt. Carmel.  Interestingly, there, too, immediately afterwards the prophet asks for death.  The request might come in part from Eliyahu's recognition that the change was short-lived. Eliyahu, like Yonah, does not see the value in temporary repentance.</point> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</category> | </category> | ||
<category>Patriotism | <category>Patriotism |
Version as of 00:14, 11 October 2016
Why Did Yonah Disobey Hashem?
Exegetical Approaches
Theological Objections
Yonah's disobedience stemmed from his fundamental beliefs regarding the institution of repentance.
- Repentance does not eliminate the need for punishment – Though Yonah believed that repentance for misdeeds is desirable, he did not think that repentance removes the need for retribution. In his view, justice requires that everyone receive their due, and apologizing or regretting one's actions cannot change that.
- Repentance from fear is insufficient – According to Yonah, repentance that stems from fear of punishment is insincere, and will never be permanent as it does not come from a true recognition of right and wrong and desire to change. As soon as the danger ends, a person will return to their previous ways.
- No repentance for idolators – According to Abarbanel, Yonah maintained that "תשובה" means returning to Hashem. Thus, even if someone fixes their interpersonal behavior, their repentance can never be complete if they maintain their idolatrous beliefs.3 In other words, returning specifically to Hashem is a prerequisite for all repentance.
- Sincere – The repentance was actually sincere, and the all encompassing nature (including animals as well) simply reflects the degree of guilt that the people of Nineveh needed to expiate.4 Yonah did not take issue with the quality of the repentance, but only with Hashem's reaction to it.
- Inferior repentance – The images of animals in sackcloth and the call for them to fast suggest that the entire scene is but a parody of repentance. If repentance involves regret and change of heart, involving animals is farcical. This might support the idea that the change was prompted only by fear, and as such was superficial.5
- Changed actions not beliefs – Abarbanel claims that though the people repented of their crimes against their fellow men, they did not return to Hashem. Thus, the verse states, "וַיַּרְא הָאֱלֹהִים אֶת מַעֲשֵׂיהֶם", emphasizing their actions but not their beliefs. Though earlier the text shares that "וַיַּאֲמִינוּ אַנְשֵׁי נִינְוֵה בֵּאלֹהִים", this connotes a recognition of godly authority but not a monotheistic belief in Hashem. Thus, in contrast to the surrounding verses, Hashem is called "אֱלֹהִים" and not by His proper name, Hashem.6
- Sincere – Alternatively, the repentance was actually sincere, and the all encompassing nature simply reflects the degree of guilt that the people of Nineveh needed to expiate.7 Yonah did not have an issue with the quality of the repentance, but only with Hashem's reaction to it.
- Hashem is attempting to teach Yonah that repentance, however short-lived, is not worthless. Though his gourd lived for merely a day, Yonah cared deeply about it; while it was there it provided for him. So too, Hashem teaches Yonah, even if the people of Nineveh eventually revert to evil, since at the moment their repentance is sincere, it is accepted.9
- Alternatively, Hashem is simply trying to teach Yonah about fatherly love. Yonah, who did not even invest in the gourd, desired its life, how much more so should Hashem, who fathered his creations, desire their survival! Repentance allows for erasure of destruction, not because of justice, but because of love.
Patriotism
Yonah's defiance of Hashem's command was rooted in his love of Israel and desire for their preservation.
- Most of these commentators maintain that Yonah was concerned lest the immediate repentance of Nineveh cast Israel in a bad light, as the Children of Israel had refused to change their ways despite numerous prophetic rebukes.
- Abarbanel, in contrast, asserts that Yonah knew that Assyria was destined to exile the ten tribes, and thus he did not want to be the vehicle through which Israel's enemy was saved from destruction.
- R. Yonatan in the Mekhilta11 claims that Yonah was willing to die for Israel's sake, as he says to the sailors, "הֲטִילֻנִי אֶל הַיָּם". Yonah, then, might never have expected to avoid the repercussions of his actions.
- Ibn Ezra12 points out that the text uses the phrase "לִבְרֹחַ... מִלִּפְנֵי י"י" rather than "מפני י"י" to indicate that though Yonah knew that he could never hide from Hashem Himself, he believed that he could go outside of Israel where Hashem's providence was weaker and where there would be no prophetic inspiration.13
Self Interest
Yonah's reluctance to fulfill Hashem's command was motivated by personal concerns. This position subdivides regarding the exact nature of the concern:
Feared being Labeled a False Prophet
Yonah feared that when the people of Nineveh repented, Hashem's decree of destruction would be overturned and he would be viewed as a false prophet.
- He asks why Yonah would care what the people of Nineveh thought of him; after all, he was not even living among them!
- Moreover, he questions how the inhabitants of Nineveh could possibly have concluded that Yonah was a false prophet. They obviously understood that there was a chance that their repentance could overturn the decree, so they apparently thought that the prophet's role was to prompt them to change. As such, when they were spared they would never think to accuse him!
Futile Mission
Yonah was certain that the people of Nineveh would not repent and that Hashem would nonetheless forgive them, thus rendering Yonah's efforts futile and irrelevant. Being old and feeble, he preferred that Hashem send someone in his stead.
Did Not Disobey
Yonah never attempted to flee, but rather fully adhered to Hashem's instructions.
- Assumed fulfillment – According to R. Saadia Gaon, Yonah actually fulfilled Hashem's initial mission, even though this is not explicitly stated in the text,24 and he fled only to avoid being called a second time. Since the first mission entailed only rebuking the people of Nineveh, but contained no prophecy of destruction, Yonah was not worried about the possibility of being called a false prophet should the people repent, and was willing to do as told.25 Afterwards, however, he fled outside of Israel where there is no prophetic inspiration to avoid being called upon to deliver a prediction of doom.
- Rereading the word "לִבְרֹחַ" – Yefet reinterprets the word "לִבְרֹחַ" to mean "to hurry",26 and he suggests that not only did Yonah not flee from Hashem's word, but he actually hastened to fulfill it. Yonah felt that travel by sea would be the quickest route to Nineveh, and thus heading to Tarshish was the best way to expedite the mission.27