Why Did Yonah Disobey Hashem/2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic has not yet undergone editorial review
Why Did Yonah Disobey Hashem?
Exegetical Approaches
Self Interest
Yonah's reluctance to fulfill Hashem's command was motivated by personal reasons. This position subdivides regarding the exact nature of the concern:
Feared being Labeled a False Prophet
Yonah feared that when the people of Nineveh repented, Hashem's decree of destruction would be overturned and he would be viewed as a false prophet.
Must prophecies come true? Yonah's fear makes sense only if people believed that all prophecies must come true, regardless of one's actions. This might emerge from a simple understanding of Devarim 18:22, yet it would seem to negate the principle that individuals have the ability to overturn decrees through repentance, as expressed in Yirmeyahu 18.1 Yonah himself obviously assumed that prophecies of destruction are conditional on behavior,2 but for some reason figured that the general populace would not agree.3
How can a prophet defy the word of Hashem? Alkumisi, the Karaite, explains that Yonah never expected to get away with his actions, but rather thought he would die. He does not explain however, why Hashem would choose a messenger that would defy him.
The storm and fish – This position views the storm and being swallowed by the fish as a means of punishing Yonah and teaching him that he can not flee from the will of God.
Yonah's behavior in the boat and fish – Since Yonah preferred death over being called a false prophet, he was passive and apathetic in the boat, not joining in everyone's prayers for salvation. He was even willing to be thrown overboard. He was similarly initially silent in the fish, and only turned to Hashem after three days4 when he realized that Hashem would not let him die or escape doing His bidding.
"עַל כֵּן קִדַּמְתִּי לִבְרֹחַ תַּרְשִׁישָׁה" – When Yonah sees the people's repentance and Hashem's overturning of his decree, he is distressed since this is what will lead others to call him a false prophet, and he explains that this is what initially led him to flee. Ibn Ezra rejects this and argues that, originally, Yonah had not yet been told to announce the impending destruction of the people, and he should have had no reason to fear being labeled a liar. However, even though not explicitly stated in the text, it is possible that Yonah was already given the full instructions in his initial call to prophecy.
Message of the "קיקיון" – It is unclear how these commentators understand the analogy of the gourd and what it was supposed to teach Yonah. Presumably, Hashem wanted to inculcate a message about the value of mercy and an appreciation for life to show Yonah that instead of worrying about his personal reputation, he should have been thinking about the lives of the Ninevites.
Why forgive? According to this position, Hashem's decision to overturn the decree resulted from the people's repentance. His explanation to Yonah regarding the number of people in the city was just part of his lesson to Yonah that he should care about others beyond himself.
Objections to this position – Ibn Ezra challenges this position on several grounds:
- He asks why Yonah would care what the people of Nineveh thought of him; after all, he was not even living among them!
- Moreover, he questions how the inhabitants of Nineveh could possibly have concluded that Yonah was a false prophet. They obviously understood that there was a chance that their repentance could overturn the decree, so they apparently thought that the prophet's role was to prompt them to change. As such, when they were spared they would never think to accuse him!
Evaluation of Yonah – According to this approach, Yonahe merges as self centered, caring more about preserving his good name than saving the lives of deserving individuals.
Futile Mission
Yonah was convinced that not all of the people of Nineveh would repent, but Hashem would forgive them regardless, making his efforts futile. Being old and tired, he preferred that Hashem send someone in his stead.
Sources:R. Eliezer of Beaugency
How can a prophet defy the word of Hashem? According to R. Eliezer of Beaugency, Yonah did not really defy Hashem, and did not even want to refuse the command openly. Instead, he chose to make himself scarce in the hopes that Hashem would choose a different messenger in his place.
Biblical parallels – R"E of Beaugency compares Yonah to Moshe who similarly preferred not to act as Hashem's messenger and requested, "שְׁלַח נָא בְּיַד תִּשְׁלָח". He suggests that really Yonah's refusal is no worse than that of others leaders who try to reject Hashem's call to prophecy.
Yonah's assumptions – In contrast to other commentators, R"E of Beaugency has Yonah assume that the people of Nineveh would not repent fully. This would seem to be a logical assumption based on the numerous failed attempts of prophets throughout Tanakh.
The storm and fish – These events were meant to move Yonah into submission so as to fulfill Hashem's mission.
Timing of Yonah's conversation in Chapter 4 – According to R"E of Beaugency these verses are out of order, and take place before the end of the forty days. Immediately after announcing the city's destruction, Yonah left and built himself a hut to "see what the city's fate was to be."5 As such, at the time of the conversation, he was still unaware of the people's repentance.
"כִּי יָדַעְתִּי כִּי אַתָּה אֵל חַנּוּן וְרַחוּם... וְנִחָם עַל הָרָעָה" – As Yonah still assumed that the people were persisting in their evil, he complained to Hashem why He nonetheless would forgive them and change the decree. Yonah argued that if that was Hashem's plan, and Yonah was to play no useful role, then why did Yonah have to trouble to travel and tire himself! R"E of Beaugency does not explain how Yonah knew that Hashem had decided not to destroy the city.
Request to die – According to R"E of Beuagency this request stemmed from Yonah's weariness and low morale, and is parallel to Eliyahu's similar cry, "קַח נַפְשִׁי," also said after a long journey, when the prophet felt that all his efforts were futile.
"הַהֵיטֵב חָרָה לָךְ" – R"E of Beaugency reads this as Hashem questioning Yonah, "Is this really a good reason to be upset? Even if the people do not repent, and I have mercy, should you be so angry?"
Message of the "קיקיון" – Even though Yonah was mistaken, and the people really did change, Hashem wanted to teach Yonah that regardless, he should not be distressed if Hashem decides to have mercy on his creations when they are undeserving.6 Thus, he shows Yonah how he cares so much for a gourd which he did not even plant, to demonstrate how much more so Hashem would care for those He created. Hashem appears to be saying that repentance is not the only consideration when deciding to destroy or save; sometimes parental love overrides justice.
"אֲשֶׁר לֹא יָדַע בֵּין יְמִינוֹ לִשְׂמֹאלוֹ" – Hashem tells Yonah that the city is filled with people who do not know right from wrong, like babies and animals, and it is for them that Hashem would be willing to forgive the entire city even had they not changed their ways.
Patriotism
Yonah's decision was rooted in his love of Israel and desire for their preservation.
What is at stake for Israel? These sources disagree regarding how Yonah's refusal could help Israel:
- Most of these commentators maintain that Yonah was concerned lest the quick repentance of Nineveh cast a bad light on Israel who refused to change its ways despite numerous prophetic rebukes.
- Abarbanel, in contrast, asserts that Yonah knew that Assyria was destined to exile the ten tribes and he refused to be the vehicle through which Israel's enemy was saved from destruction.
"לִבְרֹחַ... מִלִּפְנֵי י"י"– Did Yonah really think he could flee from God?
- Ibn Ezra7 points out that the text uses the phrase "לִבְרֹחַ... מִלִּפְנֵי י"י" rather than "מפני ה'" to indicate that though Yonah knew that he could never hide from Hashem Himself, he believed that he could go outside of Israel where Hashem's providence was weaker and there was no prophetic inspiration.8 He might not be able to escape Hashem, but perhaps he could avoid his destiny.
- R. Yonatan in the Mekhilta9 claims that Yonah was willing to die for Israel' sake, as he says to the sailors, "הֲטִילֻנִי אֶל הַיָּם". Yonah, then, might never have expected to avoid the repercussions of his actions.
Behavior in the boat – Abarbanel claims that Yonah knew that he had gone against Hashem's will, and that is what he means when he identifies himself as "עִבְרִי אָנֹכִי" (from the language of transgression). He does not pray to Hashem for salvation, or seek forgiveness and promise to set out for Nineveh, because he prefers to die than to be the vehicle to save Assyria, and thereby bring destruction to Israel.
Yonah in the fish – It is in the fish that Yonah realizes that Hashem won't spare him from fulfilling his mission, even through death. Abarbanel explains Yonah's words "אֲנִי אָמַרְתִּי נִגְרַשְׁתִּי מִנֶּגֶד עֵינֶיךָ אַךְ אוֹסִיף לְהַבִּיט אֶל הֵיכַל קׇדְשֶׁךָ" to mean that Yonah originally thought that he could hide from his prophetic mission, but now recognized that he was meant to eventually return and prophesy again. This leads to his change of heart and decision to fulfill the prophecy.10
Message of the "קיקיון" – Radak asserts that Hashem showed Yonah how he felt sorry for the plant, if only because its removal caused him pain. Thus, he should understand how Hashem would feel sorrow simply because His glory is diminished through the loss of his creations. Radak, however, does not explain how this relates to Yonah's reluctance to cast Israel in a bad light. Perhaps Hashem is teaching Yonah that he should realize that Hashem cares for all his creatures, not just about Israel.
Evaluation of Yonah – According to this approach, Yonah's motives were positive, though he was misguided in his methods.
Theological Concerns
Yonah's objection stemmed from a fundamental disagreement with Hashem regarding the institution of repentance.
Objections to repentance – These sources disagree regarding Yonah's specific objection to repentance:
- Repentance does not eradicate punishment – Though Yonah believed that repentance for misdeeds is desirable, he did not think that repentance removes the need for retribution. Justice requires that everyone get their due, and apologizing or regretting one's actions does not change that.
- Repentance from fear insufficient – According to Yonah, repentance that stems from fear of punishment is not sincere, and will never be long lasting as it does not come from a true recognition of right and wrong and desire to change. As soon as the danger ends, a person is likely to return to their old ways.
- No repentance for idolators – According to Abarbanel, Yonah believed that "תשובה" means returning to Hashem; thus even if someone fixes their interpersonal behavior, if they still maintain idolatrous beliefs, their repentance is not complete.13 Returning to God is a prerequisite for all repentance.
Quality of Nineveh's repentance – These sources evaluate the repentance of the people in different ways, in line with their positions above:
- Inferior Repentance – The images of animals in sack cloth and the call for them to fast suggest that the entire scene is but a parody of repentance. If repentance involves regret and change of heart, involving animals is farcical. This might support the idea that the change was prompted only by fear, and as such was superficial.14
- Changed actions not beliefs – Abarbanel claims that though the people repented of their crimes against their fellow men, they did not return to Hashem. Thus, the verse states, "וַיַּרְא הָאֱלֹהִים אֶת מַעֲשֵׂיהֶם", emphasizing their actions but not their beliefs. Though earlier the text shares that "וַיַּאֲמִינוּ אַנְשֵׁי נִינְוֵה בֵּאלֹהִים", this connotes a recognition of godly authority but not a monotheistic belief in Hashem. Thus, in contrast to the surrounding verses, Hashem is called "אלֹהִים" and not by His proper name, Hashem.15
- Sincere – Alternatively, the repentance was actually sincere, and the all encompassing nature simply reflects the degree of guilt that the people felt needed to be expiated.16
"כִּי יָדַעְתִּי כִּי אַתָּה אֵל חַנּוּן וְרַחוּם אֶרֶךְ אַפַּיִם וְרַב חֶסֶד וְנִחָם עַל הָרָעָה" – Yonah's own explanation for his actions might support this reading of the story. He says that he fled "because Hashem is a merciful God"; it is the fact that Hashem is merciful, rather than just, that troubles Yonah. It is not coincidental that in quoting Hashem's attributes, he strikingly leaves out the attribute of Hashem's justice. Eradicating deserved punishment might be merciful, but it is not "אמת".17
Comparison to Avraham in Sedom – According to this approach, Yonah and Avraham might represent contrasting models of the desired balance between mercy and justice. Avraham appears to call for mercy at all costs, asking that the wicked not be punished on behalf of the few righteous in Sedom.18 Yonah disagrees, claiming that the wicked should not be saved even if they repent. Hashem appears to agree with Avraham, telling him that with the requisite number of righteous He won't destroy Sedom, and telling Yonah similarly that He has mercy on Nineveh due to the great number of its innocent residents "who don't differentiate between their right and left."
Comparison to Eliyahu – The only other case in Tanakh in which a prophet appears to successfully effect change in the people is Eliyahu at Mt. Carmel. Interestingly, there, too, immediately afterwards the prophet asks for death. The request might come in part from Eliyahu's recognition that the change was short-lived. Eliyahu, like Yonah, does not see the value in temporary repentance.
Message of the gourd – The analogy can be understood to have either of the following messages, each fitting one of the potential objections of Yonah to Nineveh's repentance:
- Hashem is attempting to teach Yonah that repentance, however short-lived, is not worthless. Though his gourd lived for just a day, Yonah cared deeply about it; while it was there it provided for him. So too, Hashem teaches Yonah, even if the people of Nineveh eventually revert to evil, since at the moment their repentance is sincere, it is accepted.
- Alternatively, Hashem is simply trying to teach Yonah about fatherly love. Yonah, who did not even invest in the gourd, desired its life, how much more so should Hashem, who fathered his creations, desire their survival! Repentance allows for erasure of destruction not because of justice, but because of love.
Did Not Disobey
Yonah never attempted to flee and disregard Hashem's directive.
Sources:R. Saadia Gaon,19 Yefet b. Eli the Karaite</a>20Yonah 1:3Yonah 1:15-16Yonah 4: 2-4Yonah 2:2Yonah 2:10Yonah 3:3Yonah 3:11About Yefet b. Eli the Karaite
"וַיָּקׇם יוֹנָה לִבְרֹחַ תַּרְשִׁישָׁה" – According to both R. Saadia and Yefet these words do not connote disobedience:
- Rereading the word "לִבְרֹחַ" – Yefet reinterprets the word "לִבְרֹחַ" to mean "to hurry",21 and suggests that not only did Yonah not flee from Hashem's word, but he actually hurried to fulfill it. Yonah felt that travel by sea would be the quickest route to Nineveh, and thus heading to Tarshish was means of expediting the mission.22
- Assumed fulfillment – According to R. Saadia Gaon, Yonah actually fulfilled Hashem's first mission, even though it is not mentioned in the verses,23 and these words only reflect his attempt at avoiding being called a second time. Since the first mission entailed only rebuking the people of Nineveh, but contained no prophecy of destruction, Yonah was not worried about the possibility of being called a false prophet, and was willing to do as told.24 Afterwards, however, he fled outside of Israel where there is no prophecy to avoid being called upon to deliver a message of specific doom.
"מִלִּפְנֵי י"י" – Yefet explains that the phrase "מִלִּפְנֵי י"י" means from the place of Hashem's command.
What is motivating this reading? Both R. Saadia and Yefet's somewhat forced reading of the story is motivated by philosophical considerations. They are influenced by the Islamic doctrine of prophetic impeccability ('isma) and the idea that Hashem would never chose a prophet who would be disobedient.25 As such, it is unfathomable to them that Yonah could have attempted to avoid fulfilling Hashem's mission.
The storm and fish – Yefet maintains that both the storm and being swallowed by the fish were not meant to punish Yonah but to serve as a miraculous sign which would lead people to believe in him as a prophet. He points out that as soon as the storm subsides, the sailors are indeed filled with faith, "וַיִּירְאוּ הָאֲנָשִׁים יִרְאָה גְדוֹלָה אֶת י"י".26
Yonah's prayer in the fish – According to Yefet, the fact that Yonah is able to pray and doesn't lose his wits in the fish proves that he recognized that this was Hashem's means of saving him from the sea rather than a punishment. He further claims that Yonah's words "אַךְ אוֹסִיף לְהַבִּיט אֶל הֵיכַל קׇדְשֶׁךָ" were prophetic, and that he knew clearly that he was to emerge from the fish and eventually return to Israel. This could explain why there is not much petition in the prayer, but rather thanksgiving.
"וַיֵּלֶךְ אֶל נִינְוֵה כִּדְבַר י"י" – Yefet notes that the fact that only after Hashem's second call to prophesy does the verse say that he did so "according to the word of Hashem" should not lead one to conclude that after the first call he did not abide by Hashem's word.27 The phrase is left out of Chapter 1 only for technical reasons.28
Nineveh's repentance: "וַיַּאֲמִינוּ אַנְשֵׁי נִינְוֵה בֵּאלֹהִים" – According to Yefet the people's newfound belief was a direct result of having heard about the wonders that happened to Yonah at sea.29 Without such knowledge, what would have led them to believe in the prophet's prediction?
Why is Yonah upset after the people repent? According to Yefet, Yonah's distress is not directly related to the repentance of Nineveh, which he had been eager to promote, but rather due to the huge contrast between their reaction to prophetic rebuke and that of Israel. Despite scores of prophets, Israel still persisted in her evil ways.30
"עַל כֵּן קִדַּמְתִּי לִבְרֹחַ תַּרְשִׁישָׁה" – Before sharing with Hashem his distress over Israel, Yonah reiterates to Hashem the reason he hurried to Tarshish: Since Hashem is merciful, Yonah knew that if he could bring the people to repentance, Hashem would forgive them. As such, he had been eager to fulfill the mission.
"Take my life" – Yonah's request to die out of his anguish over the fact that Israel continues to sin feels like a non sequitur, not really following from Yonah's announcement that he hurried ot fulfill Hashem's words ("עַל כֵּן קִדַּמְתִּי לִבְרֹחַ תַּרְשִׁישָׁה"). According to Yefet, Yonah is saying that now that he had successfully filled his mission, it was time to return to Israel, but he preferred to die rather than go back and see the nation punished for its sinful ways.
"הַהֵיטֵב חָרָה לָךְ" – Yefet reads this reply of Hashem as a show of solidarity with Yonah's sorrow. Hashem tells Yonah that he is right to be upset; Hashem, too, finds it difficult when He sends prophets to Israel and they take no heed.
Message of the gourd – According to Yefet, the analogy of the gourd was meant to teach the need for mercy. Hashem saved the people of Nineveh not only because of their repentance but also because he felt mercy for his creations, especially for the many innocent children and animals. It is not clear, however, why such a message was necessary for Yonah, who on his own had desired the repentance of Nineveh, and wanted to avert their destruction. Yefet suggests that the message might not have been for the prophet himself, but for others who were to hear it.31
"מִשְׁתֵּים עֶשְׂרֵה רִבּוֹ אָדָם אֲשֶׁר לֹא יָדַע בֵּין יְמִינוֹ לִשְׂמֹאלוֹ" – Yefet claims that this refers to the many innocent children of Nineveh, who cannot be held accountable for any evil actions.
