Difference between revisions of "Yaakov's Dividing of his Camp/2"
m |
m |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
<point><b>"וַיַּחַץ אֶת הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ" – Who was to be in each camp?</b><ul> | <point><b>"וַיַּחַץ אֶת הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ" – Who was to be in each camp?</b><ul> | ||
<li><b>Family and servants</b> – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov and his family were included in the first camp, but he does not specify who or what else joined them.</li> | <li><b>Family and servants</b> – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov and his family were included in the first camp, but he does not specify who or what else joined them.</li> | ||
− | <li><b>Only servants</b> – H. Seri asserts that Yaakov's family was not included in the division at all; he only divided "הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ", his household servants and hired hands.</li> | + | <li><b>Only servants</b> – H. Seri asserts that Yaakov's family was not included in the division at all; he only divided "הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ", his household servants and hired hands.  These men formed his fighting force.</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division</b> – According to this approach, the division was for military purposes,<fn>Cf. Tanchuma and Rashi who also speak of Yaakov preparing for war and point to the division of his camp as evidence.</fn> but the sources differ in the details:<br/> | <point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division</b> – According to this approach, the division was for military purposes,<fn>Cf. Tanchuma and Rashi who also speak of Yaakov preparing for war and point to the division of his camp as evidence.</fn> but the sources differ in the details:<br/> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><b>Ambush</b> – R" E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both. The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp that "remained behind" (הַנִּשְׁאָר) would act to save the first (לִפְלֵיטָה = לפליטת האחר).‎<fn>See HaKetav VeHaKaballah who explains the same.</fn></li> | <li><b>Ambush</b> – R" E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both. The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp that "remained behind" (הַנִּשְׁאָר) would act to save the first (לִפְלֵיטָה = לפליטת האחר).‎<fn>See HaKetav VeHaKaballah who explains the same.</fn></li> | ||
− | <li><b>Military formation</b> – H. Seri suggests that the two camps were not one behind the other, but rather in side by side military formation.  Whichever was not attacked first was to come to the salvation of the other.</li> | + | <li><b>Military formation</b> – H. Seri suggests that the two camps were not one behind the other, but rather in side by side military formation.  Whichever was not attacked first (הַנִּשְׁאָר) was to come to the salvation (לִפְלֵיטָה) of the other.</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Rearrangement of wives and children</b> – According to this | + | <point><b>Rearrangement of wives and children</b> – According to this approach, the verse assumes the original split into camps and only comes to describe a further division of Yaakov's family:<br/> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | + | <li>According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov rearranged his family so as to best watch over all.  He feared most for Leah and the maidservants' safety, not being sure if Hashem's promise of providence included them.<fn>Since Leah was given to him as a wife against his will and the others did not have full marital status, they might not have been included in the promise.</fn>  He therefore placed them in the middle, sandwiched between Yaakov in the front<fn>See Bereshit 33:3, that Yaakov passed all to get to the front.</fn> and Rachel in the back.  The second non-family camp is not mentioned at all since in the end there was no need for their intervention and they played no role.</li> | |
− | <li>According to R"E Ashkenazi, | + | <li>H. Seri, in contrast, asserts that Yaakov set his family behind the two military camps, in similar parallel formation. Leah and children were to one side, behind Zilpah, and Rachel and Yosef stood across, behind Bilhah. This explanation accounts for the double language in the verse, where it describes both Rachel and Leah as being last (וְאֶת לֵאָה וִילָדֶיהָ אַחֲרֹנִים וְאֶת רָחֵל וְאֶת יוֹסֵף אַחֲרֹנִים).</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Why send to Seir?</b> Ma'asei Hashem asserts that Yaakov hoped to reconcile with Esav.  He therefore explained to him that he was detained by Lavan for twenty years, not because he still stored any hatred or fear of his brother, but simply to provide for his family.</point> | <point><b>Why send to Seir?</b> Ma'asei Hashem asserts that Yaakov hoped to reconcile with Esav.  He therefore explained to him that he was detained by Lavan for twenty years, not because he still stored any hatred or fear of his brother, but simply to provide for his family.</point> |
Version as of 00:08, 27 November 2015
Yaakov's Dividing of his Camp
Exegetical Approaches
Yaakov's Camp Remained Split
Before encountering Esav, Yaakov split his camp as originally planned. This position subdivides regarding whether the goal was to escape from Esav or to confront him.
Flight
Yaakov divided his camp so that at least one portion of his household could flee and escape Esav's wrath.
- Family versus possessions – Abarbanel asserts that Yaakov placed his family in one camp and his possessions in the other. Akeidat Yitzchak concurs, but assumes that Yaakov had some men of war accompany each group.
- Maidservants versus real wives – R. Bachya learns from Bereshit 33:2 that the maidservants and children were in one camp with some of the possessions and hired hands, while Leah and Rachel and the rest of the property were in the other.
- Division of possessions only – According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and R. D"Z Hoffmann, Yaakov only split his cattle and servants1 but kept his entire family together with him (either in a group of their own,2 or in the first camp).3
- Save family – According to Akeidat Yitzchak and Abarbanel, Yaakov was hoping that Esav would only attack the camp with his possessions, allowing his immediate family to escape.4
- Save some of all – R. Bachya presents Yaakov as dividing his household more evenly, perhaps because he did not know which camp was to be attacked and did not want to risk losing all his loved ones.5 Nonetheless, he still placed those most precious to him in the second camp, assuming that they would be safer.
- Save possessions – R. Avraham b. HaRambam maintains that Yaakov preferred that his loved ones all share the same fate, be it death or salvation, while R. D"Z Hoffmann asserts that he kept them close by to keep an eye over them. The division of possessions was simply an attempt to save whatever property he could.
- No Rearrangement – According to R. Bachya, this is not a rearrangement, but a description of the original division, with the maidservants in one camp and real wives in the other. Presumably the rest of the camp is not mentioned since they are unimportant in comparison.
- Change of plan – Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that though originally Yaakov had thought to place his own camp second, after being encouraged by the vision, he switched so that his camp would be first. The verses, thus, speak only about the family as the rest of the household and property were behind.7
- Original plan failed – According to Abarbanel, Yaakov miscalculated and Esav approached from the side of the Yabok to which he had crossed with his family, and thus (in direct opposition to Yaakov's hopes) it was only they who in the end confronted Esav. Realizing he had no choice but to face his brother, he arranged his family to greet Esav, placing his most loved in the back.
- Second stage – R. D"Z Hoffmann asserts that this is simply a further division. Yaakov had always planned on being part of the first camp and having his family with him as he confronted Esav. Thus, it is they who are described. Despite the encouragement gained by the vision, Yaakov still feared his brother's vengeance and therefore took precautions to order his family so that the most precious were last.
- Test – According to Abarbanel, when Yaakov met the angels in Mahanayim (32:2-3) it was revealed to him that Esav was en route and close by. He, therefore, sent messengers to test his brother's feelings.8
- Reconciliation – According to R. D"Z Hoffmann, in contrast, Yaakov had decided on his own to visit Esav in Seir to make up. He sent messengers to let Esav know that he was coming in good faith and to see if he could expect his forgiveness.
- Send word, not confront – It is also possible that Yaakov had sent word to Edom (to either test the waters or appease him), but without any intention of meeting Esav face to face at this point on his journey.9 Only when he heard that Esav was approaching, did he think about a confrontation.
Fight
The rearrangement of the camp was a military strategy, meant to facilitate the expected battle against Esav.
- Family and servants – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov and his family were included in the first camp, but he does not specify who or what else joined them.
- Only servants – H. Seri asserts that Yaakov's family was not included in the division at all; he only divided "הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ", his household servants and hired hands. These men formed his fighting force.
- Ambush – R" E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both. The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp that "remained behind" (הַנִּשְׁאָר) would act to save the first (לִפְלֵיטָה = לפליטת האחר).15
- Military formation – H. Seri suggests that the two camps were not one behind the other, but rather in side by side military formation. Whichever was not attacked first (הַנִּשְׁאָר) was to come to the salvation (לִפְלֵיטָה) of the other.
- According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov rearranged his family so as to best watch over all. He feared most for Leah and the maidservants' safety, not being sure if Hashem's promise of providence included them.16 He therefore placed them in the middle, sandwiched between Yaakov in the front17 and Rachel in the back. The second non-family camp is not mentioned at all since in the end there was no need for their intervention and they played no role.
- H. Seri, in contrast, asserts that Yaakov set his family behind the two military camps, in similar parallel formation. Leah and children were to one side, behind Zilpah, and Rachel and Yosef stood across, behind Bilhah. This explanation accounts for the double language in the verse, where it describes both Rachel and Leah as being last (וְאֶת לֵאָה וִילָדֶיהָ אַחֲרֹנִים וְאֶת רָחֵל וְאֶת יוֹסֵף אַחֲרֹנִים).
Change of Plan
Though Yaakov originally intended to divide his camp, he changed his mind before meeting Esav. The position divides regarding the reason for the change of heart:
No Longer Necessary
After his victory over the angel/man, Yaakov no longer feared his brother and saw no need to rearrange his camp in preparation for the encounter.
- Split only non-family members – R. Avraham b. HaRambam asserts that Yaakov divided his possessions and larger household into two camps but that he kept his wives and children with him, distinct from both.20 He preferred that they either all survived or all perished together.
- Possessions split, children not – According to Netziv, Yaakov and his sons stayed together in one camp with some of the possessions and wives, while the rest of the property and wives were in another camp.21 He assumes that Yaakov trusted in Hashem's promise22 that he and his children would stay safe and so he felt no need to split them.23
- According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam, the assembly line was a show of honor; he lined the family up according to their importance much the way dignitaries might be ordered in front of a king.
- Netziv, in contrast, suggests that this was a sign of submission. Furthermore, since Yaakov had been hurt in the thigh by the angel, he was concerned that this might mean that Esav could still harm him a little, even if he would not be victorious. As such, he placed those less dear to him first that they should absorb whatever blow might be hit.
No Longer Possible
Though Yaakov wanted to split his camp right up to the moment of meeting, the struggle with the angel/man prevented him from being able to do so.