Difference between revisions of "Yaakov's Dividing of his Camp/2"
m |
m |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<opinion>Two Stages | <opinion>Two Stages | ||
<p>The rearrangement of Yaakov's family in Bereshit 33 represents a further subdivision of his camp.</p> | <p>The rearrangement of Yaakov's family in Bereshit 33 represents a further subdivision of his camp.</p> | ||
− | <mekorot><multilink><a href="MaaseiHashemMaaseiAvot33" data-aht="source">R. Eliezer Ashkenazi</a><a href="MaaseiHashemMaaseiAvot33" data-aht="source">Ma'asei Hashem, Ma'asei Avot 33</a><a href="R. Eliezer Ashkenazi (Ma'asei Hashem)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Eliezer Ashkenazi (Ma'asei Hashem)</a></multilink>, | + | <mekorot><multilink><a href="MaaseiHashemMaaseiAvot33" data-aht="source">R. Eliezer Ashkenazi</a><a href="MaaseiHashemMaaseiAvot33" data-aht="source">Ma'asei Hashem, Ma'asei Avot 33</a><a href="R. Eliezer Ashkenazi (Ma'asei Hashem)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Eliezer Ashkenazi (Ma'asei Hashem)</a></multilink>, H. Seri<fn>See H. Seri, "ועתה הייתי לשתי מחנות", Megadim 40 (2004): 17-25.</fn></mekorot> |
<point><b>"וַיַּחַץ אֶת הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ" – Who was to be in each camp?</b><ul> | <point><b>"וַיַּחַץ אֶת הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ" – Who was to be in each camp?</b><ul> | ||
<li><b>Family and servants</b> – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov and his family were included in the first camp.  He does not specify who or what else joined them.</li> | <li><b>Family and servants</b> – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov and his family were included in the first camp.  He does not specify who or what else joined them.</li> | ||
− | <li><b>Only servants</b> – H. Seri asserts that Yaakov's family was not included in the division at all; he only divided "הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ", his household servants and hired hands.  These men | + | <li><b>Only servants</b> – H. Seri asserts that Yaakov's family was not included in the division at all; he only divided "הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ", his household servants and hired hands.  These men constituted his fighting force.</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division</b> – According to this approach, the division was for military purposes,<fn>Cf. <multilink><a href="TanchumaBuberVayishlach6" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaBuberVayishlach6" data-aht="source">Vayishlach 6</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RashiBereshit32-1-9" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBereshit32-1-9" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:1-9</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> who also speak of Yaakov preparing for war and point to the division of his camp as evidence.</fn> but | + | <point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division</b> – According to this approach, the division was for military purposes,<fn>Cf. <multilink><a href="TanchumaBuberVayishlach6" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaBuberVayishlach6" data-aht="source">Vayishlach 6</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RashiBereshit32-1-9" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBereshit32-1-9" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:1-9</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> who also speak of Yaakov preparing for war and point to the division of his camp as evidence.</fn> but there are different possible variations regarding the details:<br/> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Ambush</b> – R" E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both.<fn>See Yoav's similar strategy in <a href="ShemuelII10-9-12" data-aht="source">Shemuel II 10:9-12</a>, where he tells his brother, "אִם תֶּחֱזַק אֲרָם מִמֶּנִּי וְהָיִתָה לִּי לִישׁוּעָה וְאִם בְּנֵי עַמּוֹן יֶחֶזְקוּ מִמְּךָ וְהָלַכְתִּי לְהוֹשִׁיעַ לָךְ".</fn> The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp | + | <li><b>Ambush</b> – R" E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both.<fn>See Yoav's similar strategy in <a href="ShemuelII10-9-12" data-aht="source">Shemuel II 10:9-12</a>, where he tells his brother, "אִם תֶּחֱזַק אֲרָם מִמֶּנִּי וְהָיִתָה לִּי לִישׁוּעָה וְאִם בְּנֵי עַמּוֹן יֶחֶזְקוּ מִמְּךָ וְהָלַכְתִּי לְהוֹשִׁיעַ לָךְ".</fn> The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp which "remained behind" (הַנִּשְׁאָר) would act to save the first ("לִפְלֵיטָה" would thus mean לפליטת האחר).‎<fn>See <multilink><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit32" data-aht="source">HaKetav VeHaKabbalah</a><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32</a><a href="R. Yaakov Mecklenburg (HaKetav VeHaKabbalah)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yaakov Mecklenburg</a></multilink> who explains similarly.  However, there is no evidence for such a usage of "פְּלֵיטָה".  In its various appearances in Tanakh, it always means a remnant that is saved, not the salvation of others.  See, for instance, Bereshit 45:7, Melakhim II 19:31, and Yeshayahu 37:32 where it is parallel to "שארית".</fn></li> |
− | <li><b>Military formation</b> – H. Seri suggests that the two camps were not one behind the other, but rather | + | <li><b>Military formation</b> – H. Seri suggests that the two camps were not one behind the other, but rather side by side in military formation.  Whichever was not attacked first (הַנִּשְׁאָר) was to come to the salvation (לִפְלֵיטָה) of the other.</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Rearrangement of wives and children</b> – According to this approach, the | + | <point><b>Rearrangement of wives and children</b> – According to this approach, the verses in Bereshit 33 are predicated on the original split into two camps and only come to describe a further division of Yaakov's family:<br/> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Line formation</b> – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov rearranged his family | + | <li><b>Line formation</b> – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov rearranged his family in order to best watch over all.  He feared most for Leah and the maidservants' safety, not being sure if Hashem's promise of providence<fn>See Hashem's words to Yaakov in Bereshit 28: "וְהִנֵּה אָנֹכִי עִמָּךְ וּשְׁמַרְתִּיךָ בְּכֹל אֲשֶׁר תֵּלֵךְ וַהֲשִׁבֹתִיךָ אֶל הָאֲדָמָה הַזֹּאת כִּי לֹא אֶעֱזָבְךָ"</fn> included them.<fn>Since Leah was given to him as a wife against his will and the others did not have full marital status, they might not have been included in the promise.</fn>  He therefore placed them in the middle, sandwiched between Yaakov in the front and Rachel in the back.<fn>See Bereshit 33:3, that Yaakov passed all to get to the front.</fn> </li> |
− | <li><b>Parallel formation</b> – H. Seri, in contrast, asserts that Yaakov set his family behind the two military camps, in similar parallel formation.  Leah and children were to one side, behind Zilpah, | + | <li><b>Parallel formation</b> – H. Seri, in contrast, asserts that Yaakov set his family behind the two military camps, in similar parallel formation.  Leah and children were to one side, behind Zilpah, while Rachel and Yosef stood on the other side, behind Bilhah.<fn>Thus, contrary to R"E Ashkenazi (and the common reading) the family did not stand in one long line, subdivided into three groups: maidservants, Leah, and Rachel, but rather in two parallel groups, each subdivided into maidservant and real wife.  This explanation accounts for the double language in the verse, where it describes both Rachel and Leah as being last (וְאֶת לֵאָה וִילָדֶיהָ אַחֲרֹנִים וְאֶת רָחֵל וְאֶת יוֹסֵף אַחֲרֹנִים). </fn> </li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Why is the second camp not mentioned?</b> Since in the end there was no need for the second camp's intervention and they played no role, they are not mentioned.</point> | <point><b>Why is the second camp not mentioned?</b> Since in the end there was no need for the second camp's intervention and they played no role, they are not mentioned.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Size of Yaakov's Camp</b> – This approach might assume that Yaakov's camp was of considerable size, and thus, a worthy opponent to Esav.  As such, Yaakov was not fearful of losing, but simply | + | <point><b>Size of Yaakov's Camp</b> – This approach might assume that Yaakov's camp was of considerable size, and thus, a worthy opponent to Esav.  As such, Yaakov was not fearful of losing, but was simply designing the best military strategy to ensure victory.</point> |
<point><b>Why send to Seir?</b> The Ma'asei Hashem asserts that before coming home, Yaakov hoped to reconcile with Esav.  He therefore explained to him that he was detained by Lavan for twenty years, not because he still stored any hatred or fear of his brother, but simply to provide for his family.</point> | <point><b>Why send to Seir?</b> The Ma'asei Hashem asserts that before coming home, Yaakov hoped to reconcile with Esav.  He therefore explained to him that he was detained by Lavan for twenty years, not because he still stored any hatred or fear of his brother, but simply to provide for his family.</point> | ||
<point><b>Esav's intentions</b> – The Ma'asei Hashem maintains that Yaakov's messengers returned with a positive assessment of Esav, that he was coming to greet him with an honor guard.  Yaakov, though, was unsure if this was not simply a ruse. Perhaps Esav planned to approach like a brother into the midst of his camp, only to then attack like an enemy.  It was this uncertainty which led him to divide his camp.<fn>Esav's intentions would become obvious at some point, and if they were evil, the second camp could come to the rescue.  R"E Ashkenazi claims that had it been clear that Eav was to wage war, Yaakov would not have feared and would have simply readied himself for battle.</fn></point> | <point><b>Esav's intentions</b> – The Ma'asei Hashem maintains that Yaakov's messengers returned with a positive assessment of Esav, that he was coming to greet him with an honor guard.  Yaakov, though, was unsure if this was not simply a ruse. Perhaps Esav planned to approach like a brother into the midst of his camp, only to then attack like an enemy.  It was this uncertainty which led him to divide his camp.<fn>Esav's intentions would become obvious at some point, and if they were evil, the second camp could come to the rescue.  R"E Ashkenazi claims that had it been clear that Eav was to wage war, Yaakov would not have feared and would have simply readied himself for battle.</fn></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Unanswered prayers</b> – These sources do not address | + | <point><b>Unanswered prayers</b> – These sources do not address this question.</point> |
<point><b>The tribute for Esav</b> – R" E Ashkenazi argues against the claim that the purpose of the offering was to appease Esav, suggesting that if Esav was still angered over the birthright and blessing, and intent on killing Yaakov, the gift would not sway him.<fn>Since Esav planned to annihilate Yaakov's camp, all Yaakov's property would be his in any case.</fn>  As such, R" E Ashkenazi proposes instead that Yaakov sent the gift to gauge Esav's feelings.<fn>As evidence of this understanding, he points to the words: אֲכַפְּרָה פָנָיו בַּמִּנְחָה הַהֹלֶכֶת לְפָנָי וְאַחֲרֵי כֵן אֶרְאֶה פָנָיו אוּלַי יִשָּׂא פָנָי.  Yaakov planned to look at Esav's face from afar after receiving the gift, to determine whether or not he was appeased.  If not, Yaakov planned to attack immediately before Esav had a chance to enter his camp.</fn></point> | <point><b>The tribute for Esav</b> – R" E Ashkenazi argues against the claim that the purpose of the offering was to appease Esav, suggesting that if Esav was still angered over the birthright and blessing, and intent on killing Yaakov, the gift would not sway him.<fn>Since Esav planned to annihilate Yaakov's camp, all Yaakov's property would be his in any case.</fn>  As such, R" E Ashkenazi proposes instead that Yaakov sent the gift to gauge Esav's feelings.<fn>As evidence of this understanding, he points to the words: אֲכַפְּרָה פָנָיו בַּמִּנְחָה הַהֹלֶכֶת לְפָנָי וְאַחֲרֵי כֵן אֶרְאֶה פָנָיו אוּלַי יִשָּׂא פָנָי.  Yaakov planned to look at Esav's face from afar after receiving the gift, to determine whether or not he was appeased.  If not, Yaakov planned to attack immediately before Esav had a chance to enter his camp.</fn></point> | ||
− | <point><b>"גַּם הִנֵּה עַבְדְּךָ יַעֲקֹב אַחֲרֵינוּ"</b> – R"E Ashkenazi asserts that Yaakov had each group of gift-bearers say | + | <point><b>"גַּם הִנֵּה עַבְדְּךָ יַעֲקֹב אַחֲרֵינוּ"</b> – R"E Ashkenazi asserts that Yaakov had each group of gift-bearers say these words, so that Esav would lose his guard, not knowing exactly when Yaakov was to come. This way Esav would not think to put on a facade of happiness to trick Yaakov, but would allow his true feelings to show, allowing Yaakov the ability to react and attack if necessary.</point> |
<point><b>Crossing the Yabbok</b> – According to this approach, the crossing was not part of a flight, but simply the next part of the route that needed to be taken.</point> | <point><b>Crossing the Yabbok</b> – According to this approach, the crossing was not part of a flight, but simply the next part of the route that needed to be taken.</point> | ||
<point><b>The struggle with the "אִישׁ"</b> – According to the Maasei Hashem, this was a failed attempt by the guardian angel of Esav to retrieve the deed of sale of the birthright.  After the struggle he conceded Yaakov's rights to it.  However, the event did not persuade Yaakov to act differently than originally planned, since his doubts concerning Esav's intentions were still in place.</point> | <point><b>The struggle with the "אִישׁ"</b> – According to the Maasei Hashem, this was a failed attempt by the guardian angel of Esav to retrieve the deed of sale of the birthright.  After the struggle he conceded Yaakov's rights to it.  However, the event did not persuade Yaakov to act differently than originally planned, since his doubts concerning Esav's intentions were still in place.</point> | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
<mekorot><multilink><a href="RAvrahambHaRambamBereshit33-1-213" data-aht="source">R. Avraham b. HaRambam #2</a><a href="RAvrahambHaRambamBereshit32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32</a><a href="RAvrahambHaRambamBereshit33-1-213" data-aht="source">Bereshit 33:1-2, 13</a><a href="R. Avraham Maimonides" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham Maimonides</a></multilink>, Akeidat Yitzchak, <multilink><a href="NetzivBereshit32" data-aht="source">Netziv</a><a href="NetzivBereshit32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32</a><a href="NetzivBereshit33-1-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 33:1, 8</a><a href="R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin (Netziv)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin</a></multilink></mekorot> | <mekorot><multilink><a href="RAvrahambHaRambamBereshit33-1-213" data-aht="source">R. Avraham b. HaRambam #2</a><a href="RAvrahambHaRambamBereshit32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32</a><a href="RAvrahambHaRambamBereshit33-1-213" data-aht="source">Bereshit 33:1-2, 13</a><a href="R. Avraham Maimonides" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham Maimonides</a></multilink>, Akeidat Yitzchak, <multilink><a href="NetzivBereshit32" data-aht="source">Netziv</a><a href="NetzivBereshit32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32</a><a href="NetzivBereshit33-1-8" data-aht="source">Bereshit 33:1, 8</a><a href="R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin (Netziv)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin</a></multilink></mekorot> | ||
<point><b>"וַיַּחַץ אֶת הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ" –  Who was to be in each camp?</b><ul> | <point><b>"וַיַּחַץ אֶת הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ" –  Who was to be in each camp?</b><ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Family versus possessions – </b>The Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that Yaakov placed his family in one camp and his possessions in the other, but | + | <li><b>Family versus possessions – </b>The Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that Yaakov placed his family in one camp and his possessions in the other, but that some warriors accompanied each group.</li> |
− | <li><b>Split only non-family members</b> – R. Avraham b. HaRambam asserts that Yaakov divided his possessions and larger household into two camps but that he kept his wives and children with him, distinct from both.<fn>Accordng to him, the word "עָם" refers to the masses of people and cattle who were with Yaakov, but not to his close relatives.</fn>  He preferred that they either all | + | <li><b>Split only non-family members</b> – R. Avraham b. HaRambam asserts that Yaakov divided his possessions and larger household into two camps, but that he kept his wives and children with him, distinct from both.<fn>Accordng to him, the word "עָם" refers to the masses of people and cattle who were with Yaakov, but not to his close relatives.</fn>  He preferred that they either all survive or all perish together.</li> |
<li><b>Possessions split, children not</b> – According to Netziv, Yaakov and his sons stayed together in one camp with some of the possessions and wives, while the rest of the property and wives were in another camp.<fn>Like R. Avraham b. HaRambam, he too reads "הָעָם" to refer to the larger household rather than Yaakov's immediate family.</fn>  He assumes that Yaakov trusted in Hashem's promise<fn>See Hashem's words to Yaakov in Bereshit 28: "וְהִנֵּה אָנֹכִי עִמָּךְ וּשְׁמַרְתִּיךָ בְּכֹל אֲשֶׁר תֵּלֵךְ וַהֲשִׁבֹתִיךָ אֶל הָאֲדָמָה הַזֹּאת כִּי לֹא אֶעֱזָבְךָ"</fn> that he and his children would stay safe and so he felt no need to split them.<fn>He did, nonetheless, worry about his wives, since they were not of his blood, and thus, perhaps not included in the promise "to watch over you".</fn></li> | <li><b>Possessions split, children not</b> – According to Netziv, Yaakov and his sons stayed together in one camp with some of the possessions and wives, while the rest of the property and wives were in another camp.<fn>Like R. Avraham b. HaRambam, he too reads "הָעָם" to refer to the larger household rather than Yaakov's immediate family.</fn>  He assumes that Yaakov trusted in Hashem's promise<fn>See Hashem's words to Yaakov in Bereshit 28: "וְהִנֵּה אָנֹכִי עִמָּךְ וּשְׁמַרְתִּיךָ בְּכֹל אֲשֶׁר תֵּלֵךְ וַהֲשִׁבֹתִיךָ אֶל הָאֲדָמָה הַזֹּאת כִּי לֹא אֶעֱזָבְךָ"</fn> that he and his children would stay safe and so he felt no need to split them.<fn>He did, nonetheless, worry about his wives, since they were not of his blood, and thus, perhaps not included in the promise "to watch over you".</fn></li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
<point><b>The struggle with the "אִישׁ"</b> – Both R. Avraham b. HaRambam and the Netziv assert that the "איש" came to bolster Yaakov's confidence that he would be able to defeat Esav.<fn>For further discussion of this read of the story see <a href="Wrestling With Angels and Men" data-aht="page">Wrestling With Angels and Men</a>.</fn></point> | <point><b>The struggle with the "אִישׁ"</b> – Both R. Avraham b. HaRambam and the Netziv assert that the "איש" came to bolster Yaakov's confidence that he would be able to defeat Esav.<fn>For further discussion of this read of the story see <a href="Wrestling With Angels and Men" data-aht="page">Wrestling With Angels and Men</a>.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Rearrangement of wives and children</b><ul> | <point><b>Rearrangement of wives and children</b><ul> | ||
− | <li>According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and Netziv, after being encouraged by the struggle with the angel/man, Yaakov no longer felt it necessary to split his camp, but he did rearrange his family. R. Avraham b. HaRambam maintains that the assembly line was a show of honor; Yaakov lined the family up according to their importance much the way dignitaries might be ordered in front of a king.<fn>Netziv, in contrast, suggests that this was a sign of submission. Furthermore, since Yaakov had been hurt in the thigh by the angel, he was concerned that this might mean that Esav could still harm him a little, even if he would not be victorious. As such, he placed those less dear to him first that they should absorb whatever blow might be hit.</fn></li> | + | <li>According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and Netziv, after being encouraged by the struggle with the angel/man, Yaakov no longer felt it necessary to split his camp, but he did rearrange his family.  R. Avraham b. HaRambam maintains that the assembly line was a show of honor; Yaakov lined the family up according to their importance much the way dignitaries might be ordered in front of a king.<fn>Netziv, in contrast, suggests that this was a sign of submission. Furthermore, since Yaakov had been hurt in the thigh by the angel, he was concerned that this might mean that Esav could still harm him a little, even if he would not be victorious. As such, he placed those less dear to him first that they should absorb whatever blow might be hit.</fn></li> |
<li>The Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that although originally Yaakov had intended to place his own camp second, after being encouraged by the vision of the "איש", he switched the order so that his own camp would be first.<fn>He suggests that once he was no longer worried about his family's personal safety, he could worry about his possessions. Yaakov did not want Esav's "evil eye" to fall on the cattle and harm them, and so he moved them to the back.</fn></li> | <li>The Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that although originally Yaakov had intended to place his own camp second, after being encouraged by the vision of the "איש", he switched the order so that his own camp would be first.<fn>He suggests that once he was no longer worried about his family's personal safety, he could worry about his possessions. Yaakov did not want Esav's "evil eye" to fall on the cattle and harm them, and so he moved them to the back.</fn></li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Why | + | <point><b>Why is the other camp not mentioned?</b><ul> |
− | <li><b>Recombined</b> – According to R. Avrhama b. HaRambam and Netziv, by the time of the encounter the two camps had been | + | <li><b>Recombined</b> – According to R. Avrhama b. HaRambam and Netziv, by the time of the encounter, the two camps had been recombined.</li> |
− | <li><b>Followed behind</b> – According to | + | <li><b>Followed behind</b> – According to the Akeidat Yitzchak, the verses detailing the actual meeting mention only the members of the family camp, as the rest of the household and possessions followed them and played no role</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Why send to Seir?</b> According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and Netziv, Esav had not yet permanently moved to Seir, but rather lived there part time.  As such, it was a very real possibility that Esav might come to attack Yaakov upon his return, leading Yaakov to send messengers to test out Esav's feelings towards him.<fn>Netziv explains that he sent the messengers to Seir specifically because he thought that in Canaan, out of deference to his father, Esav would not act on his hatred even if he was still angry.  This would have left Yaakov in doubt whether he was still in danger or not; only by sending to Seir, could know where he stood.</fn></point> | <point><b>Why send to Seir?</b> According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and Netziv, Esav had not yet permanently moved to Seir, but rather lived there part time.  As such, it was a very real possibility that Esav might come to attack Yaakov upon his return, leading Yaakov to send messengers to test out Esav's feelings towards him.<fn>Netziv explains that he sent the messengers to Seir specifically because he thought that in Canaan, out of deference to his father, Esav would not act on his hatred even if he was still angry.  This would have left Yaakov in doubt whether he was still in danger or not; only by sending to Seir, could know where he stood.</fn></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Esav's intentions</b> – All these sources assume that Esav's entourage was intent on battling with Yaakov.</point> | + | <point><b>Esav's intentions</b> – All of these sources assume that Esav's entourage was intent on battling with Yaakov.</point> |
<point><b>"וְהִכַּנִי אֵם עַל בָּנִים"</b> – According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam, these words reflect Yaakov's fear that Esav would have no mercy and attempt to kill not just him but his entire family. The Netziv, in contrast, understands that Yaakov was concerned specifically about the mothers, that Esav might harm them as they protected their children.<fn>He reads the phrase, "אֵם עַל בָּנִים" literally to refer to the mothers as they stand atop their children guarding them.</fn> Due to Hashem's promise, though, he did not fear that the children themselves would perish.<fn>See above that he thought that Hashem' promise of protection included his sons, who were part of him, but not necessarily his wives.</fn></point> | <point><b>"וְהִכַּנִי אֵם עַל בָּנִים"</b> – According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam, these words reflect Yaakov's fear that Esav would have no mercy and attempt to kill not just him but his entire family. The Netziv, in contrast, understands that Yaakov was concerned specifically about the mothers, that Esav might harm them as they protected their children.<fn>He reads the phrase, "אֵם עַל בָּנִים" literally to refer to the mothers as they stand atop their children guarding them.</fn> Due to Hashem's promise, though, he did not fear that the children themselves would perish.<fn>See above that he thought that Hashem' promise of protection included his sons, who were part of him, but not necessarily his wives.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Unanswered prayers</b> – The Akeidat Yitzchak posits that, after Yaakov's prayer to Hashem, he "slept in the camp" preparing for Hashem to answer him via a prophetic vision. However, Hashem did not respond immediately since Yaakov needed to do more on the human level before expecting Divine intervention. Only after Yaakov sent the gift did Hashem reply through the nocturnal encounter with the angel / man.<fn>Cf. <multilink><a href="RadakBereshit32-4-81422-31" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakBereshit32-4-81422-31" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:4-8, 14, 22-31</a></multilink> on verse 14, that Yaakov waited at night for Hashem's response, and that it finally came through the interaction with the angel.</fn></point> | <point><b>Unanswered prayers</b> – The Akeidat Yitzchak posits that, after Yaakov's prayer to Hashem, he "slept in the camp" preparing for Hashem to answer him via a prophetic vision. However, Hashem did not respond immediately since Yaakov needed to do more on the human level before expecting Divine intervention. Only after Yaakov sent the gift did Hashem reply through the nocturnal encounter with the angel / man.<fn>Cf. <multilink><a href="RadakBereshit32-4-81422-31" data-aht="source">Radak</a><a href="RadakBereshit32-4-81422-31" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:4-8, 14, 22-31</a></multilink> on verse 14, that Yaakov waited at night for Hashem's response, and that it finally came through the interaction with the angel.</fn></point> |
Version as of 22:14, 30 November 2015
Yaakov's Dividing of his Camp
Exegetical Approaches
Plan Implemented
Yaakov's original plan to split his camp was still in place when he encountered Esav. This position subdivides regarding the relationship between the initial division and the later reorganization of Yaakov's family in Bereshit 33:1-2.
One and the Same
Bereshit 32 and Bereshit 33 refer to the exact same division.
Two Stages
The rearrangement of Yaakov's family in Bereshit 33 represents a further subdivision of his camp.
- Family and servants – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov and his family were included in the first camp. He does not specify who or what else joined them.
- Only servants – H. Seri asserts that Yaakov's family was not included in the division at all; he only divided "הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ", his household servants and hired hands. These men constituted his fighting force.
- Ambush – R" E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both.6 The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp which "remained behind" (הַנִּשְׁאָר) would act to save the first ("לִפְלֵיטָה" would thus mean לפליטת האחר).7
- Military formation – H. Seri suggests that the two camps were not one behind the other, but rather side by side in military formation. Whichever was not attacked first (הַנִּשְׁאָר) was to come to the salvation (לִפְלֵיטָה) of the other.
- Line formation – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov rearranged his family in order to best watch over all. He feared most for Leah and the maidservants' safety, not being sure if Hashem's promise of providence8 included them.9 He therefore placed them in the middle, sandwiched between Yaakov in the front and Rachel in the back.10
- Parallel formation – H. Seri, in contrast, asserts that Yaakov set his family behind the two military camps, in similar parallel formation. Leah and children were to one side, behind Zilpah, while Rachel and Yosef stood on the other side, behind Bilhah.11
Plan Changed
Although Yaakov originally intended to divide his camp, he changed his mind before meeting Esav. Yaakov's defeat of the angel / man in the nocturnal encounter sufficiently reassured him, so that he no longer saw a need to rearrange his camp.
- Family versus possessions – The Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that Yaakov placed his family in one camp and his possessions in the other, but that some warriors accompanied each group.
- Split only non-family members – R. Avraham b. HaRambam asserts that Yaakov divided his possessions and larger household into two camps, but that he kept his wives and children with him, distinct from both.17 He preferred that they either all survive or all perish together.
- Possessions split, children not – According to Netziv, Yaakov and his sons stayed together in one camp with some of the possessions and wives, while the rest of the property and wives were in another camp.18 He assumes that Yaakov trusted in Hashem's promise19 that he and his children would stay safe and so he felt no need to split them.20
- According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and Netziv, after being encouraged by the struggle with the angel/man, Yaakov no longer felt it necessary to split his camp, but he did rearrange his family. R. Avraham b. HaRambam maintains that the assembly line was a show of honor; Yaakov lined the family up according to their importance much the way dignitaries might be ordered in front of a king.22
- The Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that although originally Yaakov had intended to place his own camp second, after being encouraged by the vision of the "איש", he switched the order so that his own camp would be first.23
- Recombined – According to R. Avrhama b. HaRambam and Netziv, by the time of the encounter, the two camps had been recombined.
- Followed behind – According to the Akeidat Yitzchak, the verses detailing the actual meeting mention only the members of the family camp, as the rest of the household and possessions followed them and played no role
Plan Foiled
While Yaakov originally split his camp in an attempt to enable his family to flee, his plan was thwarted, and Yaakov and his family were nonetheless forced to confront Esav. This position subdivides regarding the reason for the plan's failure:
Nocturnal Struggle Prevented Escape
The struggle with the angel / man prevented Yaakov from being able to implement his plan and escape with his family. This forced him to recombine his camps.
Miscalculated Esav's Route
Yaakov split his camp and fled with his family, but he miscalculated on which bank of the Yabbok River Esav would arrive. As a result, it was specifically the family camp which found itself face to face with Esav, which was the opposite of Yaakov's intent.