Difference between revisions of "Yaakov's Dividing of his Camp/2"
m |
m |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<point><b>"וַיַּחַץ אֶת הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ" – Who was to be in each camp?</b><ul> | <point><b>"וַיַּחַץ אֶת הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ" – Who was to be in each camp?</b><ul> | ||
<li><b>Family versus possessions</b> – Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that Yaakov placed his family in one camp and his possessions in the other, but ensured that some warriors accompanied each group.</li> | <li><b>Family versus possessions</b> – Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that Yaakov placed his family in one camp and his possessions in the other, but ensured that some warriors accompanied each group.</li> | ||
− | <li><b>Maidservants versus full wives</b> – R. Bachya understands Yaakov's divisions of his camp in Bereshit 32 and Bereshit 33 to be one and the same.  Thus, he synchronizes between them and posits that what is explicit in Bereshit 33 applies also to the division of Bereshit 32.  | + | <li><b>Maidservants versus full wives</b> – R. Bachya understands Yaakov's divisions of his camp in Bereshit 32 and Bereshit 33 to be one and the same.  Thus, he synchronizes between them and posits that what is explicit in Bereshit 33 applies also to the division of Bereshit 32.  I.e., the maidservants and children were in one camp with some of the possessions and hired hands, while Leah and Rachel and the rest of the property were in the other.</li> |
<li><b>Division of possessions only</b> – According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and R. D"Z Hoffmann, in contrast, Yaakov split only his cattle and servants ("הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּו"),‎<fn>The other sources would read the term to be more inclusive and say that the family is subsumed under the term "עָם" as well.</fn> but he kept his entire family together with him, either in a group of their own,<fn>This is what R. Avraham b. HaRambam implies.</fn> or in the first camp.<fn>This is what R. D"Z Hoffmann maintains.</fn></li> | <li><b>Division of possessions only</b> – According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and R. D"Z Hoffmann, in contrast, Yaakov split only his cattle and servants ("הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּו"),‎<fn>The other sources would read the term to be more inclusive and say that the family is subsumed under the term "עָם" as well.</fn> but he kept his entire family together with him, either in a group of their own,<fn>This is what R. Avraham b. HaRambam implies.</fn> or in the first camp.<fn>This is what R. D"Z Hoffmann maintains.</fn></li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division</b> – Although all these sources assume that the word "לִפְלֵיטָה" | + | <point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division</b> – Although all these sources assume that the word "לִפְלֵיטָה" refers to a remnant that would survive, they differ regarding the specifics of Yaakov's plan and reasoning:<br/> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><b>Save his family</b> – Akeidat Yitzchak assumes that Yaakov placed the camp with his possessions first, hoping that Esav's wrath would abate after attacking it, leaving his family alive.</li> | <li><b>Save his family</b> – Akeidat Yitzchak assumes that Yaakov placed the camp with his possessions first, hoping that Esav's wrath would abate after attacking it, leaving his family alive.</li> | ||
− | <li><b>Save parts of all</b> – R. Bachya presents Yaakov as dividing his household more evenly, because he did not know which camp was to be attacked, and did not want to risk losing all his loved ones.<fn>He points to the advice given in Bavli Bava Metzia, that one should never "put all of one's eggs in one basket" but rather diversify one's investments.  See also <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah76-3" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah76-3" data-aht="source">76:3</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>.</fn>  Nonetheless, he still placed those most precious to him in the second camp, assuming that they would be safer.</li> | + | <li><b>Save parts of all</b> – R. Bachya presents Yaakov as dividing his household more evenly, because he did not know which camp was to be attacked, and did not want to risk losing all his loved ones.<fn>He points to the advice given in Bavli Bava Metzia, that one should never "put all of one's eggs in one basket" but rather diversify one's investments.  See also <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah76-3" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah76-3" data-aht="source">76:3</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>.</fn>  Nonetheless, he still placed those most precious to him in the second camp, assuming that they would be safer there.</li> |
− | <li><b>Save possessions</b> – R. Avraham b. HaRambam maintains that Yaakov did not split his family, preferring that his loved ones all share the same fate, be it death or salvation, while R. D"Z Hoffmann asserts that he kept them close by to | + | <li><b>Save possessions</b> – R. Avraham b. HaRambam maintains that Yaakov did not split his family, preferring that his loved ones all share the same fate, be it death or salvation, while R. D"Z Hoffmann asserts that he kept them close by to watch over them.  The division of possessions was simply an attempt to salvage whatever property he could.</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>The struggle with the "אִישׁ"</b> – These sources read the struggle in various ways,<fn>For details see <a href="Wrestling With Angels and Men" data-aht="page">Wrestling With Angels and Men</a>.</fn> but all agree that in the end Yaakov's confidence was boosted, though not to the extent that he decided to change his original strategy.</point> | <point><b>The struggle with the "אִישׁ"</b> – These sources read the struggle in various ways,<fn>For details see <a href="Wrestling With Angels and Men" data-aht="page">Wrestling With Angels and Men</a>.</fn> but all agree that in the end Yaakov's confidence was boosted, though not to the extent that he decided to change his original strategy.</point> |
Version as of 05:13, 27 November 2015
Yaakov's Dividing of his Camp
Exegetical Approaches
Yaakov's Camp Remained Split
Before encountering Esav, Yaakov split his camp as originally planned. This position subdivides regarding whether Yaakov's goal was to enable their escape from Esav or to better prepare for a military confrontation with him.
Flight
Yaakov divided his camp so that at least one portion of his household would manage to flee and survive the encounter with Esav.
- Family versus possessions – Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that Yaakov placed his family in one camp and his possessions in the other, but ensured that some warriors accompanied each group.
- Maidservants versus full wives – R. Bachya understands Yaakov's divisions of his camp in Bereshit 32 and Bereshit 33 to be one and the same. Thus, he synchronizes between them and posits that what is explicit in Bereshit 33 applies also to the division of Bereshit 32. I.e., the maidservants and children were in one camp with some of the possessions and hired hands, while Leah and Rachel and the rest of the property were in the other.
- Division of possessions only – According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and R. D"Z Hoffmann, in contrast, Yaakov split only his cattle and servants ("הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּו"),1 but he kept his entire family together with him, either in a group of their own,2 or in the first camp.3
- Save his family – Akeidat Yitzchak assumes that Yaakov placed the camp with his possessions first, hoping that Esav's wrath would abate after attacking it, leaving his family alive.
- Save parts of all – R. Bachya presents Yaakov as dividing his household more evenly, because he did not know which camp was to be attacked, and did not want to risk losing all his loved ones.4 Nonetheless, he still placed those most precious to him in the second camp, assuming that they would be safer there.
- Save possessions – R. Avraham b. HaRambam maintains that Yaakov did not split his family, preferring that his loved ones all share the same fate, be it death or salvation, while R. D"Z Hoffmann asserts that he kept them close by to watch over them. The division of possessions was simply an attempt to salvage whatever property he could.
- No rearrangement – According to R. Bachya, this is not a rearrangement, but a description of the original division, with the maidservants in one camp and real wives in the other. Presumably, the rest of the camp is not mentioned since they are unimportant in comparison.
- Change of plan – Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that although originally Yaakov had intended to place his own camp second, after being encouraged by the vision of the "איש", he switched the order so that his own camp would be first. Thus, the verses detailing the actual meeting mention only the members of the family camp, as the rest of the household and possessions followed them.6
- Second stage – R. D"Z Hoffmann asserts that this is simply a further division. Despite the encouragement gained by the vision, Yaakov still feared his brother's vengeance and therefore took precautions to order his family so that the most precious were last. Only they are mentioned since they comprised the first camp which actively confronted Esav, while the others were behind and played no role.
- Reconciliation – According to R. D"Z Hoffmann Yaakov had decided on his own to visit Esav in Seir to make up. He sent messengers to let Esav know that he was coming in good faith and to see if he could expect his forgiveness.
- Send word, not confront – It is also possible that Yaakov had sent word to Edom (to either test his feelings or appease him), but without any intention of meeting Esav face to face at this point on his journey.7 Only when he heard that Esav was approaching, did he start preparing for a confrontation.
Fight
The rearrangement of the camp was a military strategy, meant to prepare for the anticipated battle with Esav.
- Family and servants – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov and his family were included in the first camp. He does not specify who or what else joined them.
- Only servants – H. Seri asserts that Yaakov's family was not included in the division at all; he only divided "הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ", his household servants and hired hands. These men formed his fighting force.
- Ambush – R" E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both. The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp that "remained behind" (הַנִּשְׁאָר) would act to save the first (לִפְלֵיטָה = לפליטת האחר).10
- Military formation – H. Seri suggests that the two camps were not one behind the other, but rather in side by side military formation. Whichever was not attacked first (הַנִּשְׁאָר) was to come to the salvation (לִפְלֵיטָה) of the other.
- Line formation – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov rearranged his family so as to best watch over all. He feared most for Leah and the maidservants' safety, not being sure if Hashem's promise of providence11 included them.12 He therefore placed them in the middle, sandwiched between Yaakov in the front and Rachel in the back.13 The second non-family camp is not mentioned in the verses at all since in the end there was no need for their intervention and they played no role.
- Parallel formation – H. Seri, in contrast, asserts that Yaakov set his family behind the two military camps, in similar parallel formation. Leah and children were to one side, behind Zilpah, and Rachel and Yosef stood to the other side, behind Bilhah.14 The verse might not mention the military camps (even though they were present) as they are simply assumed, and in the end did not need to fight.
Change of Plan
Although Yaakov originally intended to divide his camp, he changed his mind before meeting Esav. Yaakov's defeat of the angel / man in the nocturnal encounter sufficiently reassured him, so that he no longer saw a need to rearrange his camp.
- Split only non-family members – R. Avraham b. HaRambam asserts that Yaakov divided his possessions and larger household into two camps but that he kept his wives and children with him, distinct from both.20 He preferred that they either all survived or all perished together.
- Possessions split, children not – According to Netziv, Yaakov and his sons stayed together in one camp with some of the possessions and wives, while the rest of the property and wives were in another camp.21 He assumes that Yaakov trusted in Hashem's promise22 that he and his children would stay safe and so he felt no need to split them.23
- According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam, the assembly line was a show of honor; he lined the family up according to their importance much the way dignitaries might be ordered in front of a king.
- Netziv, in contrast, suggests that this was a sign of submission. Furthermore, since Yaakov had been hurt in the thigh by the angel, he was concerned that this might mean that Esav could still harm him a little, even if he would not be victorious. As such, he placed those less dear to him first that they should absorb whatever blow might be hit.
Plan Failed
While Yaakov split his camp in an attempt to enable his family to run away, his plan was thwarted, and Yaakov and his family were nonetheless forced to confront Esav. This position subdivides regarding the reason for the plan's failure:
Nocturnal Struggle Prevented Escape
The struggle with the angel / man prevented Yaakov from being able to implement his plan and escape with his family. This forced him to recombine his camps.
Miscalculation of Esav's Route
Yaakov split his camp and fled with his family, but he miscalculated on which side of the Yabbok Esav would arrive. As a result, it was specifically the family camp which found itself face to face with Esav.