Difference between revisions of "Yaakov's Dividing of his Camp/2"
m |
m |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<category>Plan Implemented | <category>Plan Implemented | ||
− | <p>Yaakov's original plan to split his camp was still in place when he encountered Esav.  This position subdivides regarding the relationship between the initial division and the later reorganization of Yaakov's family in Bereshit 33:1-2.</p> | + | <p>Yaakov's original plan to split his camp was still in place when he encountered Esav.  This position subdivides regarding the precise relationship between the initial division in Bereshit 32 and the later reorganization of Yaakov's family in Bereshit 33:1-2.</p> |
<opinion>One and the Same | <opinion>One and the Same | ||
− | <p> | + | <p>The verses in each of Chapters 32 and 33 refer to the exact same division.</p> |
<mekorot><multilink><a href="RBachyaBereshit32-9" data-aht="source">R. Bachya</a><a href="RBachyaBereshit32-9" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:9</a><a href="R. Bachya b. Asher" data-aht="parshan">About R. Bachya b. Asher</a></multilink></mekorot> | <mekorot><multilink><a href="RBachyaBereshit32-9" data-aht="source">R. Bachya</a><a href="RBachyaBereshit32-9" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:9</a><a href="R. Bachya b. Asher" data-aht="parshan">About R. Bachya b. Asher</a></multilink></mekorot> | ||
− | <point><b>"וַיַּחַץ אֶת הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ" – Who was to be in each camp?</b> Since R. Bachya understands Yaakov's divisions of his camp in Bereshit 32 and Bereshit 33 to be one and the same, he synchronizes | + | <point><b>"וַיַּחַץ אֶת הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ" – Who was to be in each camp?</b> Since R. Bachya understands Yaakov's divisions of his camp in Bereshit 32 and Bereshit 33 to be one and the same, he synchronizes the verses in the two chapters, and posits that what is explicit in Bereshit 33 applies also to the division of Bereshit 32.  I.e., already in Chapter 32, the maidservants and children were placed in one camp with some of the possessions and hired hands, while Leah and Rachel and the rest of the property were in the other.<fn>Though Bereshit 33:2 at first read sounds as if it is speaking of a division into three (maidservants, Leah and Rachel), the fact that the verse states that both Leah and Rachel were "אַחֲרֹנִים" might suggest that they were both, together, in the "last" camp.</fn></point> |
− | <point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division</b> – According to R. Bachya, the word "לִפְלֵיטָה" refers to the remnant which | + | <point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division</b> – According to R. Bachya, the word "לִפְלֵיטָה" refers to the remnant which could escape.  Unsure which camp would be attacked, Yaakov divided his household somewhat evenly so as not to risk losing all his loved ones.<fn>He points to the advice given in Bavli Bava Metzia, that one should never "put all of one's eggs in one basket", but rather diversify one's investments.  See also <multilink><a href="BereshitRabbah76-3" data-aht="source">Bereshit Rabbah</a><a href="BereshitRabbah76-3" data-aht="source">76:3</a><a href="Bereshit Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Bereshit Rabbah</a></multilink>.</fn> Nonetheless, he still placed those most precious to him in the second camp, assuming that they would be safer there.  Thus, according to R. Bachya, had Esav attacked the maidservants who were the first to approach in Chapter 33, Leah and Rachel's families would have attempted to flee.</point> |
− | <point><b>The struggle with the "אִישׁ"</b> – R. Bachya maintains like the Midrash that the man with whom Yaakov struggled was Esav's guardian angel who affirmed that the blessings of Yitzchak rightfully belonged to Yaakov.  Despite the confirmation, though, Yaakov was not sufficiently confident that Esav would not attack and decided not to change his original plan.</point> | + | <point><b>The struggle with the "אִישׁ"</b> – R. Bachya maintains like the Midrash<fn>See Bereshit Rabbah 77:3.</fn> that the man with whom Yaakov struggled was Esav's guardian angel who affirmed that the blessings of Yitzchak rightfully belonged to Yaakov.  Despite the confirmation, though, Yaakov was not sufficiently confident that Esav would not attack and decided not to change his original plan.</point> |
<point><b>Rearrangement of wives and family</b> – According to R. Bachya, this is not a rearrangement, but a description of the original division, with the maidservants in one camp and real wives in the other. Presumably, the rest of the camp is not mentioned since they are unimportant in comparison.</point> | <point><b>Rearrangement of wives and family</b> – According to R. Bachya, this is not a rearrangement, but a description of the original division, with the maidservants in one camp and real wives in the other. Presumably, the rest of the camp is not mentioned since they are unimportant in comparison.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Size of Yaakov's camp</b> – This approach might assume that Yaakov's household was not particularly numerous | + | <point><b>Size of Yaakov's camp</b> – This approach might assume that Yaakov's household was not particularly numerous, and this led Yaakov to think that he had little chance of total victory.</point> |
<point><b>Why send to Seir?</b> R. Bachya asserts that Yaakov sent messengers to appease Esav's anger before returning home.  He therefore told him that he had amassed wealth through his own hard work, and not via his father's inheritance, and tried to find favor in Esav's eyes.<fn>It is possible that R. Bachya thinks that  Yaakov had sent word to Edom, but without any intention of meeting Esav face to face at this point on his journey.  Only when he heard that Esav was approaching, did he start preparing for a confrontation.</fn></point> | <point><b>Why send to Seir?</b> R. Bachya asserts that Yaakov sent messengers to appease Esav's anger before returning home.  He therefore told him that he had amassed wealth through his own hard work, and not via his father's inheritance, and tried to find favor in Esav's eyes.<fn>It is possible that R. Bachya thinks that  Yaakov had sent word to Edom, but without any intention of meeting Esav face to face at this point on his journey.  Only when he heard that Esav was approaching, did he start preparing for a confrontation.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Esav's intentions</b> – Despite Yaakov's message of peace, Esav approached as an enemy, intent on doing battle.</point> | <point><b>Esav's intentions</b> – Despite Yaakov's message of peace, Esav approached as an enemy, intent on doing battle.</point> | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
<li><b>Only servants</b> – H. Seri asserts that Yaakov's family was not included in the division at all; he only divided "הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ", his household servants and hired hands.  These men constituted his fighting force.</li> | <li><b>Only servants</b> – H. Seri asserts that Yaakov's family was not included in the division at all; he only divided "הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ", his household servants and hired hands.  These men constituted his fighting force.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division</b> – According to this approach, the division was for military purposes,<fn>Cf. <multilink><a href="TanchumaBuberVayishlach6" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaBuberVayishlach6" data-aht="source">Vayishlach 6</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RashiBereshit32-1-9" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBereshit32-1-9" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:1-9</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> who also speak of Yaakov preparing for war and point to the division of his camp as evidence.</fn> but there are different possible variations regarding the details:<br/> | + | <point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division in Chapter 32</b> – According to this approach, the division was for military purposes,<fn>Cf. <multilink><a href="TanchumaBuberVayishlach6" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaBuberVayishlach6" data-aht="source">Vayishlach 6</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RashiBereshit32-1-9" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBereshit32-1-9" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:1-9</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> who also speak of Yaakov preparing for war and point to the division of his camp as evidence.</fn> but there are different possible variations regarding the details:<br/> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Ambush</b> – R" E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both.<fn>See Yoav's similar strategy in <a href="ShemuelII10-9-12" data-aht="source">Shemuel II 10:9-12</a>, where he tells his brother, "אִם תֶּחֱזַק אֲרָם מִמֶּנִּי וְהָיִתָה לִּי לִישׁוּעָה וְאִם בְּנֵי עַמּוֹן יֶחֶזְקוּ מִמְּךָ וְהָלַכְתִּי לְהוֹשִׁיעַ לָךְ".</fn> The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp which "remained behind" (הַנִּשְׁאָר) would act to save the first ("לִפְלֵיטָה" would thus mean לפליטת האחר).‎<fn>See <multilink><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit32" data-aht="source">HaKetav VeHaKabbalah</a><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32</a><a href="R. Yaakov Mecklenburg (HaKetav VeHaKabbalah)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yaakov Mecklenburg</a></multilink> who explains similarly.  However, there is no evidence for such a usage of "פְּלֵיטָה".  In its various appearances in Tanakh, it always means a remnant that is saved, not the salvation of others.  See, for instance, Bereshit 45:7, Melakhim II 19:31, and Yeshayahu 37:32 where it | + | <li><b>Ambush</b> – R" E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both.<fn>See Yoav's similar strategy in <a href="ShemuelII10-9-12" data-aht="source">Shemuel II 10:9-12</a>, where he tells his brother, "אִם תֶּחֱזַק אֲרָם מִמֶּנִּי וְהָיִתָה לִּי לִישׁוּעָה וְאִם בְּנֵי עַמּוֹן יֶחֶזְקוּ מִמְּךָ וְהָלַכְתִּי לְהוֹשִׁיעַ לָךְ".</fn> The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp which "remained behind" (הַנִּשְׁאָר) would act to save the first ("לִפְלֵיטָה" would thus mean לפליטת האחר).‎<fn>See <multilink><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit32" data-aht="source">HaKetav VeHaKabbalah</a><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32</a><a href="R. Yaakov Mecklenburg (HaKetav VeHaKabbalah)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yaakov Mecklenburg</a></multilink> who explains similarly.  However, there is no evidence for such a usage of "פְּלֵיטָה".  In its various appearances in Tanakh, it always means a remnant that is saved, not the salvation of others.  See, for instance, Bereshit 45:7, Melakhim II 19:31, and Yeshayahu 37:32 where it parallels "שארית".</fn></li> |
<li><b>Military formation</b> – H. Seri suggests that the two camps were not one behind the other, but rather side by side in military formation.  Whichever was not attacked first (הַנִּשְׁאָר) was to come to the salvation (לִפְלֵיטָה) of the other.</li> | <li><b>Military formation</b> – H. Seri suggests that the two camps were not one behind the other, but rather side by side in military formation.  Whichever was not attacked first (הַנִּשְׁאָר) was to come to the salvation (לִפְלֵיטָה) of the other.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Rearrangement of wives and children</b> – According to this approach, the verses in Bereshit 33 are predicated on the original split into two camps and only come to describe a further division of Yaakov's family:<br/> | + | <point><b>Rearrangement of wives and children in Chapter 33</b> – According to this approach, the verses in Bereshit 33 are predicated on the original split into two camps and only come to describe a further division of Yaakov's family:<br/> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Line formation</b> – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov rearranged his family in order to best watch over all.  He feared most for Leah and the maidservants' safety, not being sure if Hashem's promise of providence<fn>See Hashem's words to Yaakov in Bereshit 28: "וְהִנֵּה אָנֹכִי עִמָּךְ וּשְׁמַרְתִּיךָ בְּכֹל אֲשֶׁר תֵּלֵךְ וַהֲשִׁבֹתִיךָ אֶל הָאֲדָמָה הַזֹּאת כִּי לֹא אֶעֱזָבְךָ"</fn> included them.<fn>Since Leah was given to him as a wife against his will and the others did not have full marital status, they might not have been included in the promise.</fn>  He therefore placed them in the middle, sandwiched between Yaakov in the front and Rachel in the back.<fn>See Bereshit 33:3, that Yaakov passed all to | + | <li><b>Line formation</b> – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov rearranged his family in order to best watch over all.  He feared most for Leah and the maidservants' safety, not being sure if Hashem's promise of providence<fn>See Hashem's words to Yaakov in Bereshit 28: "וְהִנֵּה אָנֹכִי עִמָּךְ וּשְׁמַרְתִּיךָ בְּכֹל אֲשֶׁר תֵּלֵךְ וַהֲשִׁבֹתִיךָ אֶל הָאֲדָמָה הַזֹּאת כִּי לֹא אֶעֱזָבְךָ"</fn> included them.<fn>Since Leah was given to him as a wife against his will and the others did not have full marital status, they might not have been included in the promise.</fn>  He therefore placed them in the middle, sandwiched between Yaakov in the front and Rachel in the back.<fn>See Bereshit 33:3, that Yaakov passed all of his family in order to move to the front.</fn> </li> |
<li><b>Parallel formation</b> – H. Seri, in contrast, asserts that Yaakov set his family behind the two military camps, in similar parallel formation.  Leah and children were to one side, behind Zilpah, while Rachel and Yosef stood on the other side, behind Bilhah.<fn>Thus, contrary to R"E Ashkenazi (and the common reading) the family did not stand in one long line, subdivided into three groups: maidservants, Leah, and Rachel, but rather in two parallel groups, each subdivided into maidservant and real wife.  This explanation accounts for the double language in the verse ("וְאֶת לֵאָה וִילָדֶיהָ אַחֲרֹנִים וְאֶת רָחֵל וְאֶת יוֹסֵף אַחֲרֹנִים"), which describes both Rachel and Leah as being last ("אַחֲרֹנִים").</fn> </li> | <li><b>Parallel formation</b> – H. Seri, in contrast, asserts that Yaakov set his family behind the two military camps, in similar parallel formation.  Leah and children were to one side, behind Zilpah, while Rachel and Yosef stood on the other side, behind Bilhah.<fn>Thus, contrary to R"E Ashkenazi (and the common reading) the family did not stand in one long line, subdivided into three groups: maidservants, Leah, and Rachel, but rather in two parallel groups, each subdivided into maidservant and real wife.  This explanation accounts for the double language in the verse ("וְאֶת לֵאָה וִילָדֶיהָ אַחֲרֹנִים וְאֶת רָחֵל וְאֶת יוֹסֵף אַחֲרֹנִים"), which describes both Rachel and Leah as being last ("אַחֲרֹנִים").</fn> </li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Why is the second camp not mentioned?</b> Since in the end there was no need for the second camp's intervention and they played no role, they are not mentioned.</point> | + | <point><b>Why is the second camp not mentioned in Chapter 33?</b> Since in the end there was no need for the second camp's intervention and they played no role, they are not mentioned.</point> |
<point><b>Size of Yaakov's Camp</b> – This approach might assume that Yaakov's camp was of considerable size, and thus, a worthy opponent to Esav.  As such, Yaakov was not fearful of losing, but was simply designing the best military strategy to ensure victory.</point> | <point><b>Size of Yaakov's Camp</b> – This approach might assume that Yaakov's camp was of considerable size, and thus, a worthy opponent to Esav.  As such, Yaakov was not fearful of losing, but was simply designing the best military strategy to ensure victory.</point> | ||
<point><b>Why send to Seir?</b> The Ma'asei Hashem asserts that before coming home, Yaakov hoped to reconcile with Esav.  He therefore explained to him that he was detained by Lavan for twenty years, not because he still stored any hatred or fear of his brother, but simply to provide for his family.</point> | <point><b>Why send to Seir?</b> The Ma'asei Hashem asserts that before coming home, Yaakov hoped to reconcile with Esav.  He therefore explained to him that he was detained by Lavan for twenty years, not because he still stored any hatred or fear of his brother, but simply to provide for his family.</point> |
Version as of 02:12, 1 December 2015
Yaakov's Dividing of his Camp
Exegetical Approaches
Plan Implemented
Yaakov's original plan to split his camp was still in place when he encountered Esav. This position subdivides regarding the precise relationship between the initial division in Bereshit 32 and the later reorganization of Yaakov's family in Bereshit 33:1-2.
One and the Same
The verses in each of Chapters 32 and 33 refer to the exact same division.
Division and Subdivision
The rearrangement of Yaakov's family in Bereshit 33 represents a further subdivision of his camp.
- Family and servants – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov and his family were included in the first camp. He does not specify who or what else joined them.
- Only servants – H. Seri asserts that Yaakov's family was not included in the division at all; he only divided "הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ", his household servants and hired hands. These men constituted his fighting force.
- Ambush – R" E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both.7 The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp which "remained behind" (הַנִּשְׁאָר) would act to save the first ("לִפְלֵיטָה" would thus mean לפליטת האחר).8
- Military formation – H. Seri suggests that the two camps were not one behind the other, but rather side by side in military formation. Whichever was not attacked first (הַנִּשְׁאָר) was to come to the salvation (לִפְלֵיטָה) of the other.
- Line formation – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov rearranged his family in order to best watch over all. He feared most for Leah and the maidservants' safety, not being sure if Hashem's promise of providence9 included them.10 He therefore placed them in the middle, sandwiched between Yaakov in the front and Rachel in the back.11
- Parallel formation – H. Seri, in contrast, asserts that Yaakov set his family behind the two military camps, in similar parallel formation. Leah and children were to one side, behind Zilpah, while Rachel and Yosef stood on the other side, behind Bilhah.12
Plan Changed
Although Yaakov originally intended to divide his camp, he changed his mind before meeting Esav. Yaakov's defeat of the angel / man in the nocturnal encounter sufficiently reassured him, so that he no longer saw a need to rearrange his camp.
- Family versus possessions – The Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that Yaakov placed his family in one camp and his possessions in the other, but that some warriors accompanied each group.
- Split only non-family members – R. Avraham b. HaRambam asserts that Yaakov divided his possessions and larger household into two camps, but that he kept his wives and children with him, distinct from both.18 He preferred that they either all survive or all perish together.
- Possessions split, children not – According to Netziv, Yaakov and his sons stayed together in one camp with some of the possessions and wives, while the rest of the property and wives were in another camp.19 He assumes that Yaakov trusted in Hashem's promise20 that he and his children would stay safe and so he felt no need to split them.21
- According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and Netziv, after being encouraged by the struggle with the angel/man, Yaakov no longer felt it necessary to split his camp, but he did rearrange his family. R. Avraham b. HaRambam maintains that the assembly line was a show of honor; Yaakov lined the family up according to their importance much the way dignitaries might be ordered in front of a king.23
- The Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that although originally Yaakov had intended to place his own camp second, after being encouraged by the vision of the "איש", he switched the order so that his own camp would be first.24
- Recombined – According to R. Avrhama b. HaRambam and Netziv, by the time of the encounter, the two camps had been recombined.
- Followed behind – According to the Akeidat Yitzchak, the verses detailing the actual meeting mention only the members of the family camp, as the rest of the household and possessions followed them and played no role
Plan Foiled
While Yaakov originally split his camp in an attempt to enable his family to flee, his plan was thwarted, and Yaakov and his family were nonetheless forced to confront Esav. This position subdivides regarding the reason for the plan's failure:
Nocturnal Struggle Prevented Escape
The struggle with the angel / man prevented Yaakov from being able to implement his plan and escape with his family. This forced him to recombine his camps.
Miscalculated Esav's Route
Yaakov split his camp and fled with his family, but he miscalculated on which bank of the Yabbok River Esav would arrive. As a result, it was specifically the family camp which found itself face to face with Esav, which was the opposite of Yaakov's intent.