Difference between revisions of "Yaakov's Dividing of his Camp/2"
m |
m |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
<point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division in Chapter 32</b> – According to this approach, the division was for military purposes,<fn>Cf. <multilink><a href="TanchumaBuberVayishlach6" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaBuberVayishlach6" data-aht="source">Vayishlach 6</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RashiBereshit32-1-9" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBereshit32-1-9" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:1-9</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> who also speak of Yaakov preparing for war and point to the division of his camp as evidence.</fn> but there are different possible variations regarding the details:<br/> | <point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division in Chapter 32</b> – According to this approach, the division was for military purposes,<fn>Cf. <multilink><a href="TanchumaBuberVayishlach6" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaBuberVayishlach6" data-aht="source">Vayishlach 6</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RashiBereshit32-1-9" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBereshit32-1-9" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:1-9</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> who also speak of Yaakov preparing for war and point to the division of his camp as evidence.</fn> but there are different possible variations regarding the details:<br/> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Ambush</b> – R" E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both.<fn>See Yoav's similar strategy in <a href="ShemuelII10-9-12" data-aht="source">Shemuel II 10:9-12</a>, where he tells his brother, "אִם תֶּחֱזַק אֲרָם מִמֶּנִּי וְהָיִתָה לִּי לִישׁוּעָה וְאִם בְּנֵי עַמּוֹן יֶחֶזְקוּ מִמְּךָ וְהָלַכְתִּי לְהוֹשִׁיעַ לָךְ".</fn> The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp which "remained behind" (הַנִּשְׁאָר) would act to save the first | + | <li><b>Ambush</b> – R"E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both.<fn>See Yoav's similar strategy in <a href="ShemuelII10-9-12" data-aht="source">Shemuel II 10:9-12</a>, where he tells his brother, "אִם תֶּחֱזַק אֲרָם מִמֶּנִּי וְהָיִתָה לִּי לִישׁוּעָה וְאִם בְּנֵי עַמּוֹן יֶחֶזְקוּ מִמְּךָ וְהָלַכְתִּי לְהוֹשִׁיעַ לָךְ".</fn> The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp which "remained behind" ("הַנִּשְׁאָר") would act to save the first.  "לִפְלֵיטָה" would thus mean "to rescue" (לפליטת האחר).‎<fn>See <multilink><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit32" data-aht="source">HaKetav VeHaKabbalah</a><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32</a><a href="R. Yaakov Mecklenburg (HaKetav VeHaKabbalah)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yaakov Mecklenburg</a></multilink> who explains similarly.  However, there is no evidence for such a usage of "פְּלֵיטָה".  In its various appearances in Tanakh, it always means a remnant that is saved, not the salvation of others.  See, for instance, Bereshit 45:7, Melakhim II 19:31, and Yeshayahu 37:32 where it parallels "שארית".</fn></li> |
<li><b>Military formation</b> – H. Seri suggests that the two camps were not one behind the other, but rather side by side in military formation.  Whichever was not attacked first (הַנִּשְׁאָר) was to come to the salvation (לִפְלֵיטָה) of the other.</li> | <li><b>Military formation</b> – H. Seri suggests that the two camps were not one behind the other, but rather side by side in military formation.  Whichever was not attacked first (הַנִּשְׁאָר) was to come to the salvation (לִפְלֵיטָה) of the other.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
<li><b>Parallel formation</b> – H. Seri, in contrast, asserts that Yaakov set his family behind the two military camps, in similar parallel formation.  Leah and children were to one side, behind Zilpah, while Rachel and Yosef stood on the other side, behind Bilhah.<fn>Thus, contrary to R"E Ashkenazi (and the common reading) the family did not stand in one long line, subdivided into three groups: maidservants, Leah, and Rachel, but rather in two parallel groups, each subdivided into maidservant and real wife.  This explanation accounts for the double language in the verse ("וְאֶת לֵאָה וִילָדֶיהָ אַחֲרֹנִים וְאֶת רָחֵל וְאֶת יוֹסֵף אַחֲרֹנִים"), which describes both Rachel and Leah as being last ("אַחֲרֹנִים").</fn> </li> | <li><b>Parallel formation</b> – H. Seri, in contrast, asserts that Yaakov set his family behind the two military camps, in similar parallel formation.  Leah and children were to one side, behind Zilpah, while Rachel and Yosef stood on the other side, behind Bilhah.<fn>Thus, contrary to R"E Ashkenazi (and the common reading) the family did not stand in one long line, subdivided into three groups: maidservants, Leah, and Rachel, but rather in two parallel groups, each subdivided into maidservant and real wife.  This explanation accounts for the double language in the verse ("וְאֶת לֵאָה וִילָדֶיהָ אַחֲרֹנִים וְאֶת רָחֵל וְאֶת יוֹסֵף אַחֲרֹנִים"), which describes both Rachel and Leah as being last ("אַחֲרֹנִים").</fn> </li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Why is the second camp not mentioned in Chapter 33?</b> Since in the end there was no need | + | <point><b>Why is the second camp not mentioned in Chapter 33?</b> Since in the end Esav did not attack, there was no need to mention the military portion of Yaakov's camp in the account of Chapter 33.</point> |
<point><b>Size of Yaakov's Camp</b> – This approach might assume that Yaakov's camp was of considerable size, and thus, a worthy opponent to Esav.  As such, Yaakov was not fearful of losing, but was simply designing the best military strategy to ensure victory.</point> | <point><b>Size of Yaakov's Camp</b> – This approach might assume that Yaakov's camp was of considerable size, and thus, a worthy opponent to Esav.  As such, Yaakov was not fearful of losing, but was simply designing the best military strategy to ensure victory.</point> | ||
<point><b>Why send to Seir?</b> The Ma'asei Hashem asserts that before coming home, Yaakov hoped to reconcile with Esav.  He therefore explained to him that he was detained by Lavan for twenty years, not because he still stored any hatred or fear of his brother, but simply to provide for his family.</point> | <point><b>Why send to Seir?</b> The Ma'asei Hashem asserts that before coming home, Yaakov hoped to reconcile with Esav.  He therefore explained to him that he was detained by Lavan for twenty years, not because he still stored any hatred or fear of his brother, but simply to provide for his family.</point> | ||
<point><b>Esav's intentions</b> – The Ma'asei Hashem maintains that Yaakov's messengers returned with a positive assessment of Esav, that he was coming to greet him with an honor guard.  Yaakov, though, was unsure if this was not simply a ruse. Perhaps Esav planned to approach like a brother into the midst of his camp, only to then attack like an enemy.  It was this uncertainty which led him to divide his camp.<fn>Esav's intentions would become obvious at some point, and if they were evil, the second camp could come to the rescue.  R"E Ashkenazi claims that had it been clear that Eav was to wage war, Yaakov would not have feared and would have simply readied himself for battle.</fn></point> | <point><b>Esav's intentions</b> – The Ma'asei Hashem maintains that Yaakov's messengers returned with a positive assessment of Esav, that he was coming to greet him with an honor guard.  Yaakov, though, was unsure if this was not simply a ruse. Perhaps Esav planned to approach like a brother into the midst of his camp, only to then attack like an enemy.  It was this uncertainty which led him to divide his camp.<fn>Esav's intentions would become obvious at some point, and if they were evil, the second camp could come to the rescue.  R"E Ashkenazi claims that had it been clear that Eav was to wage war, Yaakov would not have feared and would have simply readied himself for battle.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Unanswered prayers</b> – These sources do not address this question.</point> | <point><b>Unanswered prayers</b> – These sources do not address this question.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>The tribute for Esav</b> – R" E Ashkenazi argues against the claim that the purpose of the offering was to appease Esav, suggesting that if Esav was still angered over the birthright and blessing, and intent on killing Yaakov, the gift would not sway him.<fn>Since Esav planned to annihilate Yaakov's camp, all of Yaakov's property would be his in any case.</fn>  As such, R" E Ashkenazi proposes instead that Yaakov sent the gift to gauge Esav's feelings.<fn>As evidence of this understanding, he points to the words: אֲכַפְּרָה פָנָיו בַּמִּנְחָה הַהֹלֶכֶת לְפָנָי וְאַחֲרֵי כֵן אֶרְאֶה פָנָיו אוּלַי יִשָּׂא פָנָי.  Yaakov planned to look at Esav's face from afar after receiving the gift, to determine whether or not he was appeased.  If not, Yaakov planned to attack immediately before Esav had a chance to enter his camp.</fn></point> | + | <point><b>The tribute for Esav</b> – R" E Ashkenazi argues against the claim that the purpose of the offering was to appease Esav, suggesting that if Esav was still angered over the birthright and blessing, and intent on killing Yaakov, the gift would not sway him.<fn>Since Esav planned to annihilate Yaakov's camp, all of Yaakov's property would be his in any case.</fn>  As such, R" E Ashkenazi proposes instead that Yaakov sent the gift to gauge Esav's feelings.<fn>As evidence of this understanding, he points to the words:  "אֲכַפְּרָה פָנָיו בַּמִּנְחָה הַהֹלֶכֶת לְפָנָי וְאַחֲרֵי כֵן אֶרְאֶה פָנָיו אוּלַי יִשָּׂא פָנָי".  Yaakov planned to look at Esav's face from afar after receiving the gift, to determine whether or not he was appeased.  If not, Yaakov planned to attack immediately before Esav had a chance to enter his camp.</fn></point> |
<point><b>"גַּם הִנֵּה עַבְדְּךָ יַעֲקֹב אַחֲרֵינוּ"</b> – R"E Ashkenazi asserts that Yaakov had each group of gift-bearers say these words, so that Esav would lose his guard, not knowing exactly when Yaakov was to come. This way Esav would not think to put on a facade of happiness to trick Yaakov, but would allow his true feelings to show, allowing Yaakov the ability to react and attack if necessary.</point> | <point><b>"גַּם הִנֵּה עַבְדְּךָ יַעֲקֹב אַחֲרֵינוּ"</b> – R"E Ashkenazi asserts that Yaakov had each group of gift-bearers say these words, so that Esav would lose his guard, not knowing exactly when Yaakov was to come. This way Esav would not think to put on a facade of happiness to trick Yaakov, but would allow his true feelings to show, allowing Yaakov the ability to react and attack if necessary.</point> | ||
<point><b>Crossing the Yabbok</b> – According to this approach, the crossing was not part of a flight, but simply the next part of the route that needed to be taken.</point> | <point><b>Crossing the Yabbok</b> – According to this approach, the crossing was not part of a flight, but simply the next part of the route that needed to be taken.</point> |
Version as of 02:23, 1 December 2015
Yaakov's Dividing of his Camp
Exegetical Approaches
Plan Implemented
Yaakov's original plan to split his camp was still in place when he encountered Esav. This position subdivides regarding the precise relationship between the initial division in Bereshit 32 and the later reorganization of Yaakov's family in Bereshit 33:1-2.
One and the Same
The verses in each of Chapters 32 and 33 refer to the exact same division.
Division and Subdivision
The rearrangement of Yaakov's family in Bereshit 33 represents a further subdivision of his camp.
- Family and servants – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov and his family were included in the first camp. He does not specify who or what else joined them.
- Only servants – H. Seri asserts that Yaakov's family was not included in the division at all; he only divided "הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ", his household servants and hired hands. These men constituted his fighting force.
- Ambush – R"E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both.7 The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp which "remained behind" ("הַנִּשְׁאָר") would act to save the first. "לִפְלֵיטָה" would thus mean "to rescue" (לפליטת האחר).8
- Military formation – H. Seri suggests that the two camps were not one behind the other, but rather side by side in military formation. Whichever was not attacked first (הַנִּשְׁאָר) was to come to the salvation (לִפְלֵיטָה) of the other.
- Line formation – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov rearranged his family in order to best watch over all. He feared most for Leah and the maidservants' safety, not being sure if Hashem's promise of providence9 included them.10 He therefore placed them in the middle, sandwiched between Yaakov in the front and Rachel in the back.11
- Parallel formation – H. Seri, in contrast, asserts that Yaakov set his family behind the two military camps, in similar parallel formation. Leah and children were to one side, behind Zilpah, while Rachel and Yosef stood on the other side, behind Bilhah.12
Plan Changed
Although Yaakov originally intended to divide his camp, he changed his mind before meeting Esav. Yaakov's defeat of the angel / man in the nocturnal encounter sufficiently reassured him, so that he no longer saw a need to rearrange his camp.
- Family versus possessions – The Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that Yaakov placed his family in one camp and his possessions in the other, but that some warriors accompanied each group.
- Split only non-family members – R. Avraham b. HaRambam asserts that Yaakov divided his possessions and larger household into two camps, but that he kept his wives and children with him, distinct from both.18 He preferred that they either all survive or all perish together.
- Possessions split, children not – According to Netziv, Yaakov and his sons stayed together in one camp with some of the possessions and wives, while the rest of the property and wives were in another camp.19 He assumes that Yaakov trusted in Hashem's promise20 that he and his children would stay safe and so he felt no need to split them.21
- According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and Netziv, after being encouraged by the struggle with the angel/man, Yaakov no longer felt it necessary to split his camp, but he did rearrange his family. R. Avraham b. HaRambam maintains that the assembly line was a show of honor; Yaakov lined the family up according to their importance much the way dignitaries might be ordered in front of a king.23
- The Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that although originally Yaakov had intended to place his own camp second, after being encouraged by the vision of the "איש", he switched the order so that his own camp would be first.24
- Recombined – According to R. Avrhama b. HaRambam and Netziv, by the time of the encounter, the two camps had been recombined.
- Followed behind – According to the Akeidat Yitzchak, the verses detailing the actual meeting mention only the members of the family camp, as the rest of the household and possessions followed them and played no role
Plan Foiled
While Yaakov originally split his camp in an attempt to enable his family to flee, his plan was thwarted, and Yaakov and his family were nonetheless forced to confront Esav. This position subdivides regarding the reason for the plan's failure:
Nocturnal Struggle Prevented Escape
The struggle with the angel / man prevented Yaakov from being able to implement his plan and escape with his family. This forced him to recombine his camps.
Miscalculated Esav's Route
Yaakov split his camp and fled with his family, but he miscalculated on which bank of the Yabbok River Esav would arrive. As a result, it was specifically the family camp which found itself face to face with Esav, which was the opposite of Yaakov's intent.