Difference between revisions of "Yaakov's Dividing of his Camp/2"
m |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<li><b>Family versus possessions</b> – Abarbanel asserts that Yaakov placed his family in one camp and his possessions in the other.  Akeidat Yitzchak concurs, but assumes that Yaakov had some men of war accompany each group.</li> | <li><b>Family versus possessions</b> – Abarbanel asserts that Yaakov placed his family in one camp and his possessions in the other.  Akeidat Yitzchak concurs, but assumes that Yaakov had some men of war accompany each group.</li> | ||
<li><b>Maidservants versus real wives</b> – R. Bachya learns from <a href="Bereshit33-1-17" data-aht="source">Bereshit 33:2 </a>that the maidservants and children were in one camp with some of the possessions and hired hands, while Leah and Rachel and the rest of the property were in the other.</li> | <li><b>Maidservants versus real wives</b> – R. Bachya learns from <a href="Bereshit33-1-17" data-aht="source">Bereshit 33:2 </a>that the maidservants and children were in one camp with some of the possessions and hired hands, while Leah and Rachel and the rest of the property were in the other.</li> | ||
− | <li><b>Division of possessions only</b> – According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and R. D"Z Hoffmann, in contrast, Yaakov only split his cattle and servants ("הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּו")‎<fn>The other sources would read the term to be more inclusive and say that the family is subsumed under the term "עָם" as well.</fn> but kept his entire | + | <li><b>Division of possessions only</b> – According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and R. D"Z Hoffmann, in contrast, Yaakov only split his cattle and servants ("הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּו")‎<fn>The other sources would read the term to be more inclusive and say that the family is subsumed under the term "עָם" as well.</fn> but kept his entire family together with him, either in a group of their own,<fn>This is what R. Avraham b. HaRambam implies.</fn> or in the first camp.<fn>This is what R. D"Z Hoffmann maintains.</fn></li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division</b> – Though all these sources assume that the word "לִפְלֵיטָה" means a remnant that would be salvaged, they differ regarding the specifics of Yaakov's plan and reasoning:<br/> | <point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division</b> – Though all these sources assume that the word "לִפְלֵיטָה" means a remnant that would be salvaged, they differ regarding the specifics of Yaakov's plan and reasoning:<br/> | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
<opinion>Fight | <opinion>Fight | ||
− | <p>The rearrangement of the camp was a military strategy, meant to | + | <p>The rearrangement of the camp was a military strategy, meant to prepare for the expected battle with Esav.</p> |
<mekorot><multilink><a href="MaaseiHashemMaaseiAvot33" data-aht="source">R. Eliezer Ashkenazi</a><a href="MaaseiHashemMaaseiAvot33" data-aht="source">Ma'asei Hashem, Ma'asei Avot 33</a><a href="R. Eliezer Ashkenazi (Ma'asei Hashem)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Eliezer Ashkenazi (Ma'asei Hashem)</a></multilink>, modern scholars<fn>See H. Seri, "ועתה הייתי לשתי מחנות", Megadim 40 (2004): 17-25.</fn></mekorot> | <mekorot><multilink><a href="MaaseiHashemMaaseiAvot33" data-aht="source">R. Eliezer Ashkenazi</a><a href="MaaseiHashemMaaseiAvot33" data-aht="source">Ma'asei Hashem, Ma'asei Avot 33</a><a href="R. Eliezer Ashkenazi (Ma'asei Hashem)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Eliezer Ashkenazi (Ma'asei Hashem)</a></multilink>, modern scholars<fn>See H. Seri, "ועתה הייתי לשתי מחנות", Megadim 40 (2004): 17-25.</fn></mekorot> | ||
<point><b>"וַיַּחַץ אֶת הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ" – Who was to be in each camp?</b><ul> | <point><b>"וַיַּחַץ אֶת הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ" – Who was to be in each camp?</b><ul> | ||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
<point><b>"גַּם הִנֵּה עַבְדְּךָ יַעֲקֹב אַחֲרֵינוּ"</b> – Since Yaakov was planning on confronting and fighting Esav, this statement is true. R"E Ashkenazi asserts that Yaakov had each group of gift-bearers say this, so that Esav would lose his guard, not knowing exactly when Yaakov was to come. This way Esav would not think to put on a facade of happiness to trick Yaakov, but would allow his true feelings to show, allowing Yaakov the ability to react and attack if necessary.</point> | <point><b>"גַּם הִנֵּה עַבְדְּךָ יַעֲקֹב אַחֲרֵינוּ"</b> – Since Yaakov was planning on confronting and fighting Esav, this statement is true. R"E Ashkenazi asserts that Yaakov had each group of gift-bearers say this, so that Esav would lose his guard, not knowing exactly when Yaakov was to come. This way Esav would not think to put on a facade of happiness to trick Yaakov, but would allow his true feelings to show, allowing Yaakov the ability to react and attack if necessary.</point> | ||
<point><b>Crossing the Yabok</b> – According to this approach, the crossing was not part of a flight, but simply the next part of the route that needed to be taken.</point> | <point><b>Crossing the Yabok</b> – According to this approach, the crossing was not part of a flight, but simply the next part of the route that needed to be taken.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>The struggle with the "איש" | + | <point><b>The struggle with the "איש"</b> – According to the Maasei Hashem, this was a failed attempt by the guardian angel of Esav to retrieve the deed of sale of the birthright.  After the struggle he conceded Yaakov's rights to it.  However, the event did not persuade Yaakov to act differently than originally planned, since his doubts concerning Esav's intentions were still in place.</point> |
<point><b>The aftermath - did Yaakov ever make it to Seir?</b> According to R"E Ashkenazi, after the two brothers made peace, it would be illogical that Yaakov would then lie about coming to Seir.  He thus asserts that Yaakov did in fact follow Esav until the region of Seir<fn>He assumes that Esav was not asking that Yaakov come and stay for a visit, but simply suggesting that the two travel together, much the way a king might appoint a servant to accompany a departing dignitary part of the way home.<br/>Cf. Hoil Moshe who suggests instead that Yaakov came to visit his brother at some later point, and might have even made multiple trips as he shepherded in the area.</fn> and only then headed to Sukkot.  He even suggests that Yaakov accepted the offer to have some of Esav's men accompany him.<fn>He reads Yaakov's words, "לָמָּה זֶּה אֶמְצָא חֵן בְּעֵינֵי אֲדֹנִי" as a polite refusal, but not a real one and claims that the verse mentions only that Esav returned to Seir, because he left some of the 400 to accompany Yaakov.</fn></point> | <point><b>The aftermath - did Yaakov ever make it to Seir?</b> According to R"E Ashkenazi, after the two brothers made peace, it would be illogical that Yaakov would then lie about coming to Seir.  He thus asserts that Yaakov did in fact follow Esav until the region of Seir<fn>He assumes that Esav was not asking that Yaakov come and stay for a visit, but simply suggesting that the two travel together, much the way a king might appoint a servant to accompany a departing dignitary part of the way home.<br/>Cf. Hoil Moshe who suggests instead that Yaakov came to visit his brother at some later point, and might have even made multiple trips as he shepherded in the area.</fn> and only then headed to Sukkot.  He even suggests that Yaakov accepted the offer to have some of Esav's men accompany him.<fn>He reads Yaakov's words, "לָמָּה זֶּה אֶמְצָא חֵן בְּעֵינֵי אֲדֹנִי" as a polite refusal, but not a real one and claims that the verse mentions only that Esav returned to Seir, because he left some of the 400 to accompany Yaakov.</fn></point> | ||
</opinion> | </opinion> |
Version as of 01:43, 27 November 2015
Yaakov's Dividing of his Camp
Exegetical Approaches
Yaakov's Camp Remained Split
Before encountering Esav, Yaakov split his camp as originally planned. This position subdivides regarding whether the goal was to escape from Esav or to confront him.
Flight
Yaakov divided his camp so that at least one portion of his household could flee and escape Esav's wrath.
- Family versus possessions – Abarbanel asserts that Yaakov placed his family in one camp and his possessions in the other. Akeidat Yitzchak concurs, but assumes that Yaakov had some men of war accompany each group.
- Maidservants versus real wives – R. Bachya learns from Bereshit 33:2 that the maidservants and children were in one camp with some of the possessions and hired hands, while Leah and Rachel and the rest of the property were in the other.
- Division of possessions only – According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and R. D"Z Hoffmann, in contrast, Yaakov only split his cattle and servants ("הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּו")1 but kept his entire family together with him, either in a group of their own,2 or in the first camp.3
- Save family – According to Akeidat Yitzchak and Abarbanel, Yaakov was hoping that Esav would only attack the camp with his possessions, allowing his immediate family to escape.4
- Save parts of all – R. Bachya presents Yaakov as dividing his household more evenly, because he did not know which camp was to be attacked, and did not want to risk losing all his loved ones.5 Nonetheless, he still placed those most precious to him in the second camp, assuming that they would be safer.
- Save possessions – R. Avraham b. HaRambam maintains that Yaakov did not split his family, preferring that his loved ones all share the same fate, be it death or salvation, while R. D"Z Hoffmann asserts that he kept them close by to keep an eye over them. The division of possessions was simply an attempt to save whatever property he could.
- No Rearrangement – According to R. Bachya, this is not a rearrangement, but a description of the original division, with the maidservants in one camp and real wives in the other. Presumably the rest of the camp is not mentioned since they are unimportant in comparison.
- Change of plan – Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that though originally Yaakov had thought to place his own camp second, after being encouraged by the vision of the "איש", he switched so that his camp would be first. The verses, thus, speak only about the family as the rest of the household and property were behind.7
- Original plan failed – According to Abarbanel, Yaakov miscalculated and Esav approached from the side of the Yabok to which he had crossed with his family, and thus (in direct opposition to Yaakov's hopes) it was only they who in the end confronted Esav. Realizing he had no choice but to face his brother, he arranged his family to greet Esav, placing his most loved in the back.
- Second stage – R. D"Z Hoffmann asserts that this is simply a further division. Despite the encouragement gained by the vision, Yaakov still feared his brother's vengeance and therefore took precautions to order his family so that the most precious were last. Only they are mentioned since they comprised the first camp which actively confronted Esav, while teh others were behind and played no role.
- Test – According to Abarbanel, when Yaakov met the angels in Mahanayim (32:2-3) it was revealed to him that Esav was en route and close by. He, therefore, sent messengers to test his brother's feelings.8
- Reconciliation – According to R. D"Z Hoffmann, in contrast, Yaakov had decided on his own to visit Esav in Seir to make up. He sent messengers to let Esav know that he was coming in good faith and to see if he could expect his forgiveness.
- Send word, not confront – It is also possible that Yaakov had sent word to Edom (to either test the waters or appease him), but without any intention of meeting Esav face to face at this point on his journey.9 Only when he heard that Esav was approaching, did he think about a confrontation.
Fight
The rearrangement of the camp was a military strategy, meant to prepare for the expected battle with Esav.
- Family and servants – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov and his family were included in the first camp, but he does not specify who or what else joined them.
- Only servants – H. Seri asserts that Yaakov's family was not included in the division at all; he only divided "הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ", his household servants and hired hands. These men formed his fighting force.
- Ambush – R" E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both. The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp that "remained behind" (הַנִּשְׁאָר) would act to save the first (לִפְלֵיטָה = לפליטת האחר).14
- Military formation – H. Seri suggests that the two camps were not one behind the other, but rather in side by side military formation. Whichever was not attacked first (הַנִּשְׁאָר) was to come to the salvation (לִפְלֵיטָה) of the other.
- Line formation – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov rearranged his family so as to best watch over all. He feared most for Leah and the maidservants' safety, not being sure if Hashem's promise of providence15 included them.16 He therefore placed them in the middle, sandwiched between Yaakov in the front and Rachel in the back.17 The second non-family camp is not mentioned at all since in the end there was no need for their intervention and they played no role.
- Parallel formation – H. Seri, in contrast, asserts that Yaakov set his family behind the two military camps, in similar parallel formation. Leah and children were to one side, behind Zilpah, and Rachel and Yosef stood to the other side, behind Bilhah.18 H. Seri could say that the verse does not mention the military camps even though they were present and preceded Yaakov, as they are simply assumed, and in the end did not need to fight.
Change of Plan
Though Yaakov originally intended to divide his camp, he changed his mind before meeting Esav. The position divides regarding the reason for the change of heart:
No Longer Necessary
After his victory over the angel/man, Yaakov no longer feared his brother and saw no need to rearrange his camp in preparation for the encounter.
- Split only non-family members – R. Avraham b. HaRambam asserts that Yaakov divided his possessions and larger household into two camps but that he kept his wives and children with him, distinct from both.24 He preferred that they either all survived or all perished together.
- Possessions split, children not – According to Netziv, Yaakov and his sons stayed together in one camp with some of the possessions and wives, while the rest of the property and wives were in another camp.25 He assumes that Yaakov trusted in Hashem's promise26 that he and his children would stay safe and so he felt no need to split them.27
- According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam, the assembly line was a show of honor; he lined the family up according to their importance much the way dignitaries might be ordered in front of a king.
- Netziv, in contrast, suggests that this was a sign of submission. Furthermore, since Yaakov had been hurt in the thigh by the angel, he was concerned that this might mean that Esav could still harm him a little, even if he would not be victorious. As such, he placed those less dear to him first that they should absorb whatever blow might be hit.
No Longer Possible
Though Yaakov wanted to split his camp right up to the moment of meeting, the struggle with the angel/man prevented him from being able to do so.