Difference between revisions of "Yaakov's Dividing of his Camp/2"
m |
m |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
<li><b>Only servants</b> – H. Seri asserts that Yaakov's family was not included in the division at all; he only divided "הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ", his household servants and hired hands.  These men constituted his fighting force.</li> | <li><b>Only servants</b> – H. Seri asserts that Yaakov's family was not included in the division at all; he only divided "הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ", his household servants and hired hands.  These men constituted his fighting force.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division in Chapter 32</b> – According to this approach, | + | <point><b>"וְהָיָה הַמַּחֲנֶה הַנִּשְׁאָר לִפְלֵיטָה" – Purpose of the division in Chapter 32</b> – According to this approach, this division was for military purposes,<fn>Cf. <multilink><a href="TanchumaBuberVayishlach6" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaBuberVayishlach6" data-aht="source">Vayishlach 6</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="RashiBereshit32-1-9" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiBereshit32-1-9" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32:1-9</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink> who also speak of Yaakov preparing for war and point to the division of his camp as evidence.</fn> but there are different possible variations regarding the details:<br/> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><b>Ambush</b> – R"E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both.<fn>See Yoav's similar strategy in <a href="ShemuelII10-9-12" data-aht="source">Shemuel II 10:9-12</a>, where he tells his brother, "אִם תֶּחֱזַק אֲרָם מִמֶּנִּי וְהָיִתָה לִּי לִישׁוּעָה וְאִם בְּנֵי עַמּוֹן יֶחֶזְקוּ מִמְּךָ וְהָלַכְתִּי לְהוֹשִׁיעַ לָךְ".</fn> The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp which "remained behind" ("הַנִּשְׁאָר") would act to save the first.  "לִפְלֵיטָה" would thus mean "to rescue" (לפליטת האחר).‎<fn>See <multilink><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit32" data-aht="source">HaKetav VeHaKabbalah</a><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32</a><a href="R. Yaakov Mecklenburg (HaKetav VeHaKabbalah)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yaakov Mecklenburg</a></multilink> who explains similarly.  However, there is no evidence for such a usage of "פְּלֵיטָה".  In its various appearances in Tanakh, it always means a remnant that is saved, not the salvation of others.  See, for instance, Bereshit 45:7, Melakhim II 19:31, and Yeshayahu 37:32 where it parallels "שארית".</fn></li> | <li><b>Ambush</b> – R"E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both.<fn>See Yoav's similar strategy in <a href="ShemuelII10-9-12" data-aht="source">Shemuel II 10:9-12</a>, where he tells his brother, "אִם תֶּחֱזַק אֲרָם מִמֶּנִּי וְהָיִתָה לִּי לִישׁוּעָה וְאִם בְּנֵי עַמּוֹן יֶחֶזְקוּ מִמְּךָ וְהָלַכְתִּי לְהוֹשִׁיעַ לָךְ".</fn> The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp which "remained behind" ("הַנִּשְׁאָר") would act to save the first.  "לִפְלֵיטָה" would thus mean "to rescue" (לפליטת האחר).‎<fn>See <multilink><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit32" data-aht="source">HaKetav VeHaKabbalah</a><a href="HaKetavVeHaKabbalahBereshit32" data-aht="source">Bereshit 32</a><a href="R. Yaakov Mecklenburg (HaKetav VeHaKabbalah)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yaakov Mecklenburg</a></multilink> who explains similarly.  However, there is no evidence for such a usage of "פְּלֵיטָה".  In its various appearances in Tanakh, it always means a remnant that is saved, not the salvation of others.  See, for instance, Bereshit 45:7, Melakhim II 19:31, and Yeshayahu 37:32 where it parallels "שארית".</fn></li> |
Version as of 04:15, 1 December 2015
Yaakov's Dividing of his Camp
Exegetical Approaches
Plan Implemented
Yaakov's original plan to split his camp was still in place when he encountered Esav. This position subdivides regarding the precise relationship between the initial division in Bereshit 32 and the later reorganization of Yaakov's family in Bereshit 33:1-2.
One and the Same
The verses in each of Chapters 32 and 33 refer to the exact same division.
Division and Subdivision
The arrangement of Yaakov's family in Bereshit 33 represents a further subdivision of his camp.
- Family and servants – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov and his family were included in the first camp. He does not specify who or what else joined them.
- Only servants – H. Seri asserts that Yaakov's family was not included in the division at all; he only divided "הָעָם אֲשֶׁר אִתּוֹ", his household servants and hired hands. These men constituted his fighting force.
- Ambush – R"E Ashkenazi suggests that if the first camp was attacked, the second was to come to its rescue and thereby save both.7 The verse does not mean that the camp left over after the attack would escape, but that the camp which "remained behind" ("הַנִּשְׁאָר") would act to save the first. "לִפְלֵיטָה" would thus mean "to rescue" (לפליטת האחר).8
- Military formation – H. Seri suggests that the two camps were not one behind the other, but rather side by side in military formation. Whichever was not attacked first (הַנִּשְׁאָר) was to come to the salvation (לִפְלֵיטָה) of the other.
- Line formation – According to R"E Ashkenazi, Yaakov arranged his family in order to best watch over all. He feared most for Leah and the maidservants' safety, not being sure if Hashem's promise of providence9 included them.10 He therefore placed them in the middle, sandwiched between Yaakov in the front and Rachel in the back.11
- Parallel formation – H. Seri, in contrast, asserts that Yaakov set his family behind the two military camps, in similar parallel formation. Leah and children were to one side, behind Zilpah, while Rachel and Yosef stood on the other side, behind Bilhah.12
Plan Changed
Chapter 32 describes Yaakov original division of his camp, in which his family was placed in the relative safety of the second camp. However, Chapter 33 follows Yaakov's defeat of the angel / man in the nocturnal encounter which sufficiently reassured him, so that he either no longer saw a need to split his camp or became brave enough to approach with his family as part of the first camp.
- Family vs. possessions – The Akeidat Yitzchak asserts that Yaakov placed his family in one camp and his possessions in the other, but that some warriors accompanied each group.
- Split only non-family members – R. Avraham b. HaRambam asserts that Yaakov divided his possessions and larger household into two camps, but that he kept his wives and children with him, distinct from both.18 He preferred that they either all survive or all perish together.
- Possessions split but children not – According to Netziv, Yaakov and his sons stayed together in one camp with some of the possessions and wives, while the rest of the property and wives were in another camp.19 He assumes that Yaakov trusted in Hashem's promise20 that he and his children would stay safe and so he felt no need to split them.21
- According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and Netziv, after being encouraged by the struggle with the angel/man, Yaakov no longer felt it necessary to split his camp. R. Avraham b. HaRambam maintains that the assembly line was a show of honor; Yaakov lined the family up according to their importance much the way dignitaries might be ordered in front of a king.23
- In contrast, the Akeidat Yitzchak maintains that while Yaakov's morale was bolstered, he did not undo the original split or let down his guard entirely. He asserts that although originally Yaakov had intended to place his own camp second, after being encouraged by the vision of the "אִישׁ", he switched the order so that his own camp would be first.24
- Recombined – According to R. Avraham b. HaRambam and Netziv, by the time of the encounter, the two camps had been recombined.
- Followed behind – According to the Akeidat Yitzchak, the verses detailing the actual meeting mention only the members of the family camp, as the rest of the household and possessions followed them and played no role
Plan Foiled
While Yaakov originally split his camp in an attempt to enable his family to flee, his plan was thwarted, and Yaakov and his family were nonetheless forced to confront Esav. This position subdivides regarding the reason for the plan's failure:
Nocturnal Struggle Prevented Escape
The struggle with the angel / man prevented Yaakov from being able to implement his plan and escape with his family. This forced him to recombine his camps.
Miscalculated Esav's Route
Yaakov split his camp and fled with his family, but he miscalculated on which bank of the Yabbok River Esav would arrive. As a result, it was specifically the family camp which found itself face to face with Esav, which was the opposite of Yaakov's intent.