Difference between revisions of "Yeshayahu's Mission in Chapter 6/2"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
<div class="overview">
 
<div class="overview">
 
<h2>Overview</h2>
 
<h2>Overview</h2>
Commentators debate the nature of the prophecy of Yeshayhu 6 and why Yeshayahu merited specifically now to see a vision of Hashem. Many sources maintain that the chapter describes Yeshayahu's appointment as prophet, where he received his overall mission. Yet, as this necessitates positing achronology in the book, others disagree. Abarbanel suggests that the unique revelation might relate to the nature of the task that Yeshayahu received, to relay the news that the fate of the Ten Tribes was sealed and that they were soon to be exiled. A final position posits that the prophecy constitutes a re-initiation into prophecy, either because Yeshayahu had previously attempted to resign, had sinned, or more simply, because significant time had elapsed during which no rebuke had been necessary.</div>
+
<p>Commentators debate the nature of the prophecy of Yeshayahu 6 and why Yeshayahu merited specifically now to see a vision of Hashem. Many sources maintain that the chapter describes Yeshayahu's appointment as prophet, where he received his overall mission. Yet, as this necessitates positing achronology in the book, others disagree and date the prophecy to later in Yeshayahu's career. Thus, Abarbanel suggests that the revelation might relate to the nature of the task that Yeshayahu received. Yeshayahu was told that the fate of the Ten Tribes was sealed and that they were soon to be exiled. Such distressing news merited a unique introductory vision. A final position posits that the prophecy constitutes a re-initiation into prophecy, either because Yeshayahu had previously attempted to resign, had sinned, or more simply, because significant time had elapsed during which no rebuke had been necessary.</p></div>
 
 
 
<approaches>
 
<approaches>
  
Line 16: Line 15:
 
<point><b>Chronology of the chapters</b> – This position assumes that Sefer Yeshayahu is achronological, and must explain why Chapter 6 and the initiation to prophecy do not open the book:<fn>In contrast to Yeshayahu, both Yirmeyahu and Yechezkel open with the initiation of the prophet, as is expected.</fn><br/>
 
<point><b>Chronology of the chapters</b> – This position assumes that Sefer Yeshayahu is achronological, and must explain why Chapter 6 and the initiation to prophecy do not open the book:<fn>In contrast to Yeshayahu, both Yirmeyahu and Yechezkel open with the initiation of the prophet, as is expected.</fn><br/>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 +
<li><b>Thematic order preferred </b>– It is possible that thematic order takes precedence over chronological order. Chapters 1-5 describe the nation's sins, while Chapter 6 (through 12) focus on their punishment. When speaking to his contemporaries, Yeshayahu could open with a prophecy of doom since they were well aware of their misdeeds. Yet, when ordering his prophecies for future generations, it made sense for the prophet to begin with the nation's sins, giving the reader background to understand why the decree of destruction was deserved.<fn>For other cases where chronological order is sacrificed for thematic concerns, see <a href="Chronological and Thematic Order" data-aht="page">Chronological and Thematic Order</a>.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Relayed later</b> – Shadal posits that though Chapter 6 was the first prophecy that Yeshayahu received, it was only relayed later, after the prophecies of Chapters 2-5.<fn>See below that he claims that since Yeshayahu was tasked with telling the nation that Hashem was to ensure that they did not heed Yeshayahu's words, there was no point in sharing such news before rebuking them. Thus, Yeshayahu first chastised the people for twenty years, and only after they mocked his prophecies (<a href="Yeshayahu5-18-20" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 5:19</a>), proving Hashem's words correct, did he share that their refusal to listen was preordained.</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Relayed later</b> – Shadal posits that though Chapter 6 was the first prophecy that Yeshayahu received, it was only relayed later, after the prophecies of Chapters 2-5.<fn>See below that he claims that since Yeshayahu was tasked with telling the nation that Hashem was to ensure that they did not heed Yeshayahu's words, there was no point in sharing such news before rebuking them. Thus, Yeshayahu first chastised the people for twenty years, and only after they mocked his prophecies (<a href="Yeshayahu5-18-20" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 5:19</a>), proving Hashem's words correct, did he share that their refusal to listen was preordained.</fn></li>
<li><b>Thematic order preferred</b> – Alternatively, it is possible that thematic order takes precedence over chronological order. Chapters 1-5 describe the nation's sins, while Chapter 6 (through 12) focus on their punishment. When speaking to his contemporaries, Yeshayahu could open with a prophecy of doom since they were well aware of their misdeeds.&#160; Yet, when ordering his prophecies for future generations, it made sense for the prophet to begin with the nation's sins, giving the reader background to understand why the decree of destruction was deserved.</li>
 
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
<point><b>"בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ"</b> – As this prophecy is dated "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ", it seems that Yeshayahu was first initiated into prophecy with Uziyahu's death&#160; This, however, appears to contradict&#160;<a href="Yeshayahu1-1" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 1:1</a> which states that Yeshayahu prophesied <i>during</i> the reign of Uziyahu.&#160; These commentators offer various solutions to the problem:<br/>
+
<point><b>"בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ"</b> – As this prophecy is dated "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ", it seems that Yeshayahu was first initiated into prophecy with Uzziyahu's death&#160; This, however, appears to contradict&#160;<a href="Yeshayahu1-1" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 1:1</a> which states that Yeshayahu prophesied <i>during</i> the reign of Uzziyahu.&#160; These commentators offer various solutions to the problem:<br/>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li><b>Metaphoric death</b> – Rashi and Rid suggest that the phrase "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the year when Uziyahu was struck with <i>tzara'at</i> and metaphorically died,<fn>They claim that "המצורע חשוב במת".&#160; The Biur, instead, suggests that once Uziyahu was stuck with <i>tzara'at</i> and lost his rule to his son, it was as if he died.</fn> rather than to the year of his actual death.&#160; If so, Yeshayahu was initiated in the middle of Uziyahu's reign and prophesied for several years before his death.</li>
+
<li><b>Metaphoric death</b> – Rashi and Rid suggest that the phrase "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the year when Uzziyahu was struck with <i>tzara'at</i> and metaphorically died,<fn>They claim that "המצורע חשוב במת".&#160; The Biur, instead, suggests that once Uzziyahu was stuck with <i>tzara'at</i> and lost his rule to his son, it was as if he died.</fn> rather than to the year of his actual death.&#160; If so, Yeshayahu was initiated in the middle of Uzziyahu's reign and prophesied for several years before his death.</li>
<li><b>Initiated in the year prior to Uziyahu's death</b> – Ibn Ezra, instead, points out that the verse speaks of the <b>year </b>(not the day) of Uziyahu's death.<fn>See, though, N. Meshel, "חזון הכסא והשרפים – נבואת ההפקדה של ישעיהו," Beit MIkra 48:4 (2003): 345-366, who questions this reading, pointing to the similar heading in Yeshayahu 14:28, "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ אָחָז".&#160; From context, this appears to refer to the year after Achaz' death as the following verses speak of Achaz as having already died: "אַל תִּשְׂמְחִי פְלֶשֶׁת כֻּלֵּךְ כִּי נִשְׁבַּר שֵׁבֶט מַכֵּךְ."&#160; If so, it would seem that Yeshayahu 6:1 also speaks of the days after Uziyahu's death.</fn> As such, Yeshayahu could have received several months worth of prophecies during Uziyahu's reign.<fn>See Radak who questions this possibility from Divrei HaYamim II 26:22, "וְיֶתֶר דִּבְרֵי עֻזִּיָּהוּ <b>הָרִאשֹׁנִים</b> וְהָאַחֲרֹנִים כָּתַב יְשַׁעְיָהוּ בֶן אָמוֹץ הַנָּבִיא," which suggests that Yeshayahu prophesied not only at the end of Uziyahu's life, but also in the beginning of his reign.&#160; Radak himself responds that the verse might simply refer to events narrated by Yeshayahu that took place before he began to prophesy.</fn></li>
+
<li><b>Initiated in the year prior to Uzziyahu's death</b> – Ibn Ezra, instead, points out that the verse speaks of the <b>year </b>(not the day) of Uzziyahu's death.<fn>See, though, N. Meshel, "חזון הכסא והשרפים – נבואת ההפקדה של ישעיהו," Beit MIkra 48:4 (2003): 345-366, who questions this reading, pointing to the similar heading in Yeshayahu 14:28, "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ אָחָז".&#160; From context, this appears to refer to the year after Achaz' death as the following verses speak of Achaz as having already died: "אַל תִּשְׂמְחִי פְלֶשֶׁת כֻּלֵּךְ כִּי נִשְׁבַּר שֵׁבֶט מַכֵּךְ."&#160; If so, it would seem that Yeshayahu 6:1 also speaks of the days after Uzziyahu's death.</fn> As such, Yeshayahu could have received several months worth of prophecies during Uzziyahu's reign.<fn>See Radak who questions this possibility from Divrei HaYamim II 26:22, "וְיֶתֶר דִּבְרֵי עֻזִּיָּהוּ <b>הָרִאשֹׁנִים</b> וְהָאַחֲרֹנִים כָּתַב יְשַׁעְיָהוּ בֶן אָמוֹץ הַנָּבִיא," which suggests that Yeshayahu prophesied not only at the end of Uzziyahu's life, but also in the beginning of his reign.&#160; Radak himself responds that the verse might simply refer to events narrated by Yeshayahu that took place before he began to prophesy.</fn></li>
<li><b>Date of transmission</b> – Finally, Shadal asserts that the opening "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the date that Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy,<fn>This, however, is somewhat difficult considering the continuation of the verse, "וָאֶרְאֶה אֶת אֲדֹנָי יֹשֵׁב עַל כִּסֵּא רָם וְנִשָּׂא", from which it sounds that the date in the heading of the chapter refers to the receiving of the vision.</fn> not to the year in which he received it.<fn>He suggests that there could have been as many as twenty years between the receiving and relaying of the prophecy. Nonetheless, Shadal does not date any other prophecy in the book to Uziyahu's reign, explaining that Yeshayahu might simply not have recorded these for future generations.</fn></li>
+
<li><b>Date of transmission</b> – Finally, Shadal asserts that the opening "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the date that Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy,<fn>This, however, is somewhat difficult considering the continuation of the verse, "וָאֶרְאֶה אֶת אֲדֹנָי יֹשֵׁב עַל כִּסֵּא רָם וְנִשָּׂא", from which it sounds that the date in the heading of the chapter refers to the receiving of the vision.</fn> not to the year in which he received it.<fn>He suggests that there could have been as many as twenty years between the receiving and relaying of the prophecy. Nonetheless, Shadal does not date any other prophecy in the book to Uzziyahu's reign, explaining that Yeshayahu might simply not have recorded these for future generations.</fn></li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
<point><b>Vision of Hashem</b> – Since this is Yeshayahu's first prophecy, it is logical why he merits a vision of Hashem.&#160; This is comparable to the opening prophecy of Yechezkel who also sees "מַרְאוֹת אֱלֹהִים".</point>
+
<point><b>Vision of Hashem</b> – Since this is Yeshayahu's first prophecy, it is logical why he merits a vision of Hashem.&#160; This is comparable to the opening prophecy of Yechezkel who also sees "מַרְאוֹת אֱ-לֹהִים".</point>
 
<point><b>"...אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי"</b> – Rashi, Rid, and Shadal explain "נִדְמֵיתִי" to mean "&#8206;&#8207;&#8206;נכרתי".&#8206;<fn>Rashi and Rid points to the root's usage in Tzefanya 1:11, "כִּי <b>נִדְמָה</b> כׇּל עַם כְּנַעַן" where it is paralleled to "<b>נִכְרְתוּ</b> כׇּל נְטִילֵי כָסֶף".</fn> Yeshayahu thought that he was deserving of death since he was unworthy of seeing Hashem's glory.</point>
 
<point><b>"...אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי"</b> – Rashi, Rid, and Shadal explain "נִדְמֵיתִי" to mean "&#8206;&#8207;&#8206;נכרתי".&#8206;<fn>Rashi and Rid points to the root's usage in Tzefanya 1:11, "כִּי <b>נִדְמָה</b> כׇּל עַם כְּנַעַן" where it is paralleled to "<b>נִכְרְתוּ</b> כׇּל נְטִילֵי כָסֶף".</fn> Yeshayahu thought that he was deserving of death since he was unworthy of seeing Hashem's glory.</point>
<point><b>"וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ וְחַטָּאתְךָ תְּכֻפָּר"</b> – According to Rid and Shadal, Hashem was not referring to any specific sin for which Yeshayahu needed atoning,<fn>Rashi, in contrast, explains that Yeshayahu's words "וּבְתוֹךְ עַם טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם אָנֹכִי יוֹשֵׁב" constituted slander of Israel and needed atoning. Ibn Ezra also points to a specific crime of Yeshayahu, the fact that he was an "אִישׁ טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם". He suggests that Yeshayahu bemoaned that he had learned negative speech habits from the nation, making him unworthy of being Hashem's spokesman. [As evidence, Ibn Ezra points to the prophet's words in Yeshayahu 8:11, "וְיִסְּרֵנִי מִלֶּכֶת בְּדֶרֶךְ הָעָם הַזֶּה".] Hashem thus purges his mouth, preparing him for his mission.</fn> but to a general purification process. As Yeshayahu began his task as Hashem's messenger and spokesman, Hashem prepared him by cleansing him of all sins and purifying his mouth.<fn>Shadal points out that in Tanakh purification often takes place via fire. Thus, here too, Hashem places a burning coal on Yeshayahu's lips. The verse states, "וַיַּגַּע עַל פִּי", the same language used when Yirmeyahu is appointed prophet.&#160; There, however, it represents Hashem's placing His word into the prophet's mouth.</fn></point>
+
<point><b>"וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ וְחַטָּאתְךָ תְּכֻפָּר"</b> – According to Rid and Shadal, Hashem was not referring to any specific sin for which Yeshayahu needed atoning,<fn>Rashi, in contrast, explains that Yeshayahu's words "וּבְתוֹךְ עַם טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם אָנֹכִי יוֹשֵׁב" constituted slander of Israel and needed atoning. Ibn Ezra also points to a specific crime of Yeshayahu, the fact that he was an "אִישׁ טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם". He suggests that Yeshayahu bemoaned that he had learned negative speech habits from the nation, making him unworthy of being Hashem's spokesman. [As evidence, Ibn Ezra points to the prophet's words in Yeshayahu 8:11, "וְיִסְּרֵנִי מִלֶּכֶת בְּדֶרֶךְ הָעָם הַזֶּה".] Hashem thus purges his mouth, preparing him for his mission.</fn> but to a general purification process. As Yeshayahu began his task as Hashem's messenger and spokesman, Hashem prepared him by cleansing him of all sins and purifying his mouth.<fn>Shadal points out that in Tanakh, purification often takes place via fire. Thus, here too, Hashem places a burning coal on Yeshayahu's lips. The verse states, "וַיַּגַּע עַל פִּי", the same language used when Yirmeyahu is appointed prophet.&#160; There, however, it represents Hashem's placing His word into the prophet's mouth.</fn></point>
 
<point><b>The task</b> – These sources differ in their understanding of Hashem's mission to Yeshayahu and what is meant by the statements: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" and "הַשְׁמֵן לֵב הָעָם הַזֶּה...&#160; פֶּן יִרְאֶה בְעֵינָיו...&#160; וָשָׁב וְרָפָא לוֹ"<br/>
 
<point><b>The task</b> – These sources differ in their understanding of Hashem's mission to Yeshayahu and what is meant by the statements: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" and "הַשְׁמֵן לֵב הָעָם הַזֶּה...&#160; פֶּן יִרְאֶה בְעֵינָיו...&#160; וָשָׁב וְרָפָא לוֹ"<br/>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li><b>Description of future</b> – According to Rashi, Hashem was not commanding that Yeshayahu should actively harden the people's hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.<fn>He apparently reads the verb "הַשְׁמֵן"' as an&#160;infinitive absolute (שם הפועל), indicative of a continuous process, explaining that Hashem is saying: "לבם הולך הלוך והשמן".</fn> Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation would refuse to heed his words and repent.&#160; At the beginning of the prophet's assignment, Hashem warned Yeshayahu that he was volunteering for a doomed mission.<fn>See Shadal who writes, "&#8206;והכוונה אם תרצה ללכת בשליחותי, על מנת כן צריך אתה ללכת, על מנת שלא ישמעו אליך".</fn></li>
 
<li><b>Description of future</b> – According to Rashi, Hashem was not commanding that Yeshayahu should actively harden the people's hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.<fn>He apparently reads the verb "הַשְׁמֵן"' as an&#160;infinitive absolute (שם הפועל), indicative of a continuous process, explaining that Hashem is saying: "לבם הולך הלוך והשמן".</fn> Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation would refuse to heed his words and repent.&#160; At the beginning of the prophet's assignment, Hashem warned Yeshayahu that he was volunteering for a doomed mission.<fn>See Shadal who writes, "&#8206;והכוונה אם תרצה ללכת בשליחותי, על מנת כן צריך אתה ללכת, על מנת שלא ישמעו אליך".</fn></li>
<li><b>Command</b> – Rid, Ibn Ezra, and Shadal,<fn>This is how Shadal explains the verses in his introduction to the chapter and in his comments to verse 1.&#160; In his discussion of verses 9-10, however, he appears to suggest that Hashem is only giving an analogy to let Yeshayahu know that the people are not going to listen to him.</fn> in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.<fn>Shadal points out that the language of "'<b>אַל</b> תָּבִינוּ" as opposed to "לא תבינו" indicates the imperative form.</fn> Due to the nation's many sins,<fn>Rid, instead, suggests that after so many warnings that went unheeded, Hashem is no longer interested in giving the people the possibility of repenting.&#160; He reads the phrase "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" as if it were written in the past tense:&#160; "I have sent so many prophet for you to listen to, yet you have refused to understand."</fn> the decree of destruction was set, and the people were to be actively prevented from repenting.<fn>For various approaches to the theological question of how Hashem can remove someone's free will and keep them from repenting, see <a href="Hardened Hearts" data-aht="page">Hardened Hearts</a>.</fn> As such, Yeshayahu's task was not be to bring the people back to Hashem, but simply to warn them of the impending destruction.<fn>Indeed, many of Yeshayahu's prophecies simply speak of the nation's sins or impending punishment, without including a call for change. Thus, for instance, Chapters 2-5 decry the people's arrogance, but mainly as a way of introducing their downfall. There are exceptions, however, and in Chapter 1, Yeshayahu clearly calls for the people to repent: "רַחֲצוּ הִזַּכּוּ הָסִירוּ רֹעַ מַעַלְלֵיכֶם מִנֶּגֶד עֵינָי חִדְלוּ הָרֵעַ."</fn></li>
+
<li><b>Command</b> – Rid, Ibn Ezra, and Shadal,<fn>This is how Shadal explains the verses in his introduction to the chapter and in his comments to verse 1.&#160; In his discussion of verses 9-10, however, he appears to suggest that Hashem is only giving an analogy to let Yeshayahu know that the people are not going to listen to him.</fn> in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.<fn>Shadal points out that the language of "'<b>אַל</b> תָּבִינוּ" as opposed to "לא תבינו" indicates the imperative form.</fn> Due to the nation's many sins,<fn>Rid, instead, suggests that after so many warnings that went unheeded, Hashem is no longer interested in giving the people the possibility of repenting.&#160; He reads the phrase "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" as if it were written in the past tense:&#160; "I have sent so many prophet for you to listen to, yet you have refused to understand."</fn> the decree of destruction was set, and the people were to be actively prevented from repenting.<fn>For various approaches to the theological question of how Hashem can remove someone's free will and keep them from repenting, see <a href="Hardened Hearts" data-aht="page">Hardened Hearts</a>.</fn> As such, Yeshayahu's task was not to bring the people back to Hashem, but simply to warn them of the impending destruction.<fn>Indeed, many of Yeshayahu's prophecies simply speak of the nation's sins or impending punishment, without including a call for change. Thus, for instance, Chapters 2-5 decry the people's arrogance, but mainly as a way of introducing their downfall. There are exceptions, however, and in Chapter 1, Yeshayahu clearly calls for the people to repent: "רַחֲצוּ הִזַּכּוּ הָסִירוּ רֹעַ מַעַלְלֵיכֶם מִנֶּגֶד עֵינָי חִדְלוּ הָרֵעַ."</fn></li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
 
<point><b>"עַד אֲשֶׁר אִם שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב... וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה"</b> – These sources disagree regarding both the context of the initial destruction and the identity of the "tenth" who will secondarily be consumed.<br/>
 
<point><b>"עַד אֲשֶׁר אִם שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב... וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה"</b> – These sources disagree regarding both the context of the initial destruction and the identity of the "tenth" who will secondarily be consumed.<br/>
Line 39: Line 38:
 
<li><b>Destruction in the time of Achaz</b> – Shadal uniquely places the destruction much earlier, in the reign of Achaz, when Yehuda was attacked first by Aram and Yisrael,<fn>Since Shadal assumes that the verses do not speak of exile, he claims that the phrase "'וְרִחַק י"י אֶת הָאָדָם" refers to the fact that the massive devastation left large areas of the land uninhabited, with people being distanced from one another.&#160; He could have alternatively suggested that the phrase refers to the many people taken captive by the invading armies (see Divrei HaYamim II 28).</fn> and then also ("וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר") by the Edomites and Philistines. The holy seed that ultimately survives is Chizkiyahu, who is able to reform the country.<fn>It is this which likely motivates Shadal's reading of the verses.&#160; The other commentators must explain how Hashem can say that the people will continue to refuse to listen to the prophet until exile if there was a religious reformation already in the time of Chizkiyahu. They might respond that the reformation was short-lived, or only partially successful.</fn> [According to Shadal, Hashem's initiation message to Yeshayahu refers not to his entire tenure as prophet but only to the first part thereof. He will initially be met with resistance, but not always.]</li>
 
<li><b>Destruction in the time of Achaz</b> – Shadal uniquely places the destruction much earlier, in the reign of Achaz, when Yehuda was attacked first by Aram and Yisrael,<fn>Since Shadal assumes that the verses do not speak of exile, he claims that the phrase "'וְרִחַק י"י אֶת הָאָדָם" refers to the fact that the massive devastation left large areas of the land uninhabited, with people being distanced from one another.&#160; He could have alternatively suggested that the phrase refers to the many people taken captive by the invading armies (see Divrei HaYamim II 28).</fn> and then also ("וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר") by the Edomites and Philistines. The holy seed that ultimately survives is Chizkiyahu, who is able to reform the country.<fn>It is this which likely motivates Shadal's reading of the verses.&#160; The other commentators must explain how Hashem can say that the people will continue to refuse to listen to the prophet until exile if there was a religious reformation already in the time of Chizkiyahu. They might respond that the reformation was short-lived, or only partially successful.</fn> [According to Shadal, Hashem's initiation message to Yeshayahu refers not to his entire tenure as prophet but only to the first part thereof. He will initially be met with resistance, but not always.]</li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
<point><b>Intended audience of the prophecy</b><ul>
+
<point><b>Intended audience of the prophecy</b> According to this approach it is possible that Yeshayahu was never meant to transmit this prophecy to the nation at all, and it was aimed at him alone.<fn>If so, Hashem's words "וַיֹּאמֶר<b> לֵךְ וְאָמַרְתָּ לָעָם</b> הַזֶּה שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" are not meant to be taken literally as a command to actively relay this message to the people, but are simply Hashem's way of telling the prophet that the people will refuse to listen (or will be actively prevented from doing so).</fn>&#160; In fact, the prophecy of destruction at the end might not have been relayed even to Yeshayahu at this stage had it not been for his question "עַד מָתַי".&#8206;<fn>Shadal suggests that for many years Yeshayahu did, in fact, keep the prophecy to himself.&#160; Yet, at some point, when the people not only refused to listen but actively mocked him (<a href="Yeshayahu5-18-20" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 5:18-20</a>), Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy to show them that their refusal to listen was actually preordained, and in fact, part of their punishment.</fn></point>
<li>According to this approach it is possible that Yeshayahu was never meant to transmit this prophecy to the nation at all, and it was aimed at him alone.<fn>If so, Hashem's words "וַיֹּאמֶר<b> לֵךְ וְאָמַרְתָּ לָעָם</b> הַזֶּה שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" are not meant to be taken literally as a command to actively relay this message to the people, but are simply Hashem's way of telling the prophet that the people will refuse to listen (or will be actively prevented from doing so).</fn>&#160; In fact, the prophecy of destruction at the end might not have been relayed even to Yeshayahu at this stage had it not been for his question "עַד מָתַי".</li>
+
<point><b>Biblical Parallels</b> – Yeshayahu's initiation to prophecy shares several features with other such initiations, such as a revelation by Hashem, the giving of a sign (often via touching the lips), and the commissioning itself.&#160; Nonetheless, whereas in other similar stories the prophet or leader initially refuses the mission<fn>See Moshe, Gidon and Yirmeyahu who all point to their inadequacies.</fn> and is in need of encouragement by Hashem, here, Yeshayahu exceptionally volunteers for the task.<fn>For a&#160; detailed comparison of the appointments of Yeshayahu, Moshe, Yirmeyahu,&#160; and Yechezkel, see N. Meshel, "חזון הכסא והשרפים – נבואת ההפקדה של ישעיהו," Beit MIkra 48:4 (2003): 345-366</fn></point>
<li>Shadal agrees in principle and suggests that for many years Yeshayahu kept the prophecy to himself.&#160; Yet, at some point, when the people not only refused to listen but actively mocked him (<a href="Yeshayahu5-18-20" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 5:18-20</a>), Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy to show them that their refusal to listen was actually preordained, and in fact, part of their punishment.</li>
 
</ul></point>
 
<point><b>Biblical Parallels</b></point>
 
 
</category>
 
</category>
 
<category>Unique Mission
 
<category>Unique Mission
Line 81: Line 77:
 
<li><b>Moshe</b> –&#160;<a href="ShemotRabbah5-19" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah 5:19</a> posits that after Moshe's initial failed meeting with Paroh, he returned to Midyan, suggesting that Moshe, too, "resigned" after an initial failure. Unlike Yeshayahu, Moshe does not receive a second vision of Hashem, but it is possible that Shemot 6 nonetheless represents a renewed call to prophecy, where Hashem repeats the mission previously given him in Shemot 3-4.</li>
 
<li><b>Moshe</b> –&#160;<a href="ShemotRabbah5-19" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah 5:19</a> posits that after Moshe's initial failed meeting with Paroh, he returned to Midyan, suggesting that Moshe, too, "resigned" after an initial failure. Unlike Yeshayahu, Moshe does not receive a second vision of Hashem, but it is possible that Shemot 6 nonetheless represents a renewed call to prophecy, where Hashem repeats the mission previously given him in Shemot 3-4.</li>
 
</ul></point>
 
</ul></point>
 +
</opinion>
 +
<opinion>Yeshayahu Unnecessary
 +
<p>Since the people had not forsaken Hashem during the reign of Uzziyahu, there was no need for chastisement for much of his rule.</p>
 +
<mekorot>perhaps <multilink><a href="REliezerofBeaugencyYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">R. Eliezer of Beaugency</a><a href="REliezerofBeaugencyYeshayahu1-1" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 1:1</a><a href="REliezerofBeaugencyYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 6</a><a href="R. Eliezer of Beaugency" data-aht="parshan">About R. Eliezer of Beaugency</a></multilink><fn>R"E of Beaugency merely states that there was a need for Hashem to renew Yeshayahu's prophecy because a significant amount of time had passed since he had last received the Word of Hashem. He does not elaborate on the reason for the break. He does point out, however, that with Uzziyahu's death there was once again a need to rebuke the people, leading to the position presented here. [It should be noted that the development of the approach presented below is independent of R"E of Beaugency's commentary.]</fn></mekorot>
 +
<point><b>First prophecies of the book</b> – This position maintains that the book is chronological. The prophecies of chapters 1-5 were relayed during the early part of Uzziyahu's reign when the nation sinned in the interpersonal sphere<fn>See <a href="Historical Backdrop of Yeshayahu 1" data-aht="page">Historical Backdrop of Yeshayahu 1</a> for elaboration on the opinion that the chapter refers to the reign of Uzziyahu and that it might be limited to rebuke of interpersonal sins.</fn> and were overcome by arrogance.<fn>It is possible that the prosperity which marked Uzziyahu's reign gave the people a false sense of their own worth, leading to Yeshayahu's cries against "כׇּל גֵּאֶה וָרָם" in Chapters 2-5.</fn> After Uzziyahu was struck with <i>tzara'at </i>for his own conceit, however, the nation learned their lesson and there was no more need for rebuke until the next generation changed its ways.</point>
 +
<point><b>Why re-initiate Yeshayahu specifically now?</b> With the change in ruler to the sinful Achaz<fn>Yotam co-reigned with his father after Uzziyahu was struck with<i> tzara'at</i>. It is difficult to know if his entire reign overlapped with that of Uzziyahu or not.&#160; If the former, it is possible that since he, too, was a righteous king, Yeshayahu actually did not receive any prophecies during his rule at all, and was first re-initiated when Achaz took the throne.&#160; Alternatively, if Yotam continued to rule on his own after his father's death, it is possible that Yeshayahu was re-initiated at that point, since despite the king's personal righteousness, the people were corrupt. [See Divrei HaYamim II 27:2 "וַיַּעַשׂ הַיָּשָׁר בְּעֵינֵי י"י... וְעוֹד הָעָם מַשְׁחִיתִים".]</fn> the need for rebuke was renewed and Hashem re-initiated Yeshayahu into prophecy.</point>
 +
<point><b>The vision</b> – Yeshayahu receives a special vision of Hashem since after such a long break, Hashem needed to "reintroduce Himself".&#160; There might be no special significance in the choice of appearing as a king; this might simply be the closest image to Hashem that a human can understand.</point>
 +
<point><b>The punishment</b> – This approach could suggest, like Shadal above, that Hashem refers to the upcoming devastation during the reign of Achaz specifically. Yeshayahu resumed his task with a specific message for the next king.</point>
 
</opinion>
 
</opinion>
 
<opinion>Yeshayahu Sinned
 
<opinion>Yeshayahu Sinned
<p>When Uziyahu was struck with <i>tzara'at</i>, Yeshayahu was dismayed at the injustice of the punishment.&#160; He had thought the king a righteous individual and undeserving of such a fate. This sinful doubting of Hashem's justice precluded him from receiving further prophecy.</p>
+
<p>When Uzziyahu was struck with <i>tzara'at</i>, Yeshayahu was dismayed at the injustice of the punishment.&#160; He had thought the king a righteous individual and undeserving of such a fate. This sinful doubting of Hashem's justice precluded him from receiving further prophecy.</p>
 
<mekorot>Abarbanel</mekorot>
 
<mekorot>Abarbanel</mekorot>
<point><b>The Vision: "<b>יֹשֵׁב עַל כִּסֵּא רָם וְנִשָּׂא וְשׁוּלָיו מְלֵאִים אֶת הַהֵיכָל</b>"</b> – According to Abarbanel, Hashem's vision was meant to teach Yeshayahu why Uziyahu deserved his punishment.&#160; Uziyahu had sinned both in arrogance and in assuming that there is no individual providence.<fn>In his haughtiness, he thought that he could bring an incense offering and that Hashem would not notice. See Divrei HaYamim 26:16-20.</fn> Hashem showed Himself to Yeshayahu in all His grandeur, highlighting how lowly people are compared to God.&#160; Moreover, Hashem pointed out that despite His exalted stature, He still fills the "הֵיכָל", i.e. He is aware of what every individual in the world is doing (and there is individual providence).<fn>Abarbanel sees the same message in the angel's cry, "קָדוֹשׁ קָדוֹשׁ קָדוֹשׁ י"י צְבָאוֹת מְלֹא כׇל הָאָרֶץ כְּבוֹדוֹ".&#160; Though Hashem is unsurpassed in holiness, this does not preclude Him from filling the earth and being aware of all that goes on therein.</fn></point>
+
<point><b>The Vision:&#160; "יֹשֵׁב עַל כִּסֵּא רָם וְנִשָּׂא וְשׁוּלָיו מְלֵאִים אֶת הַהֵיכָל"</b> – According to Abarbanel, Hashem's vision was meant to teach Yeshayahu why Uzziyahu deserved his punishment.&#160; Uzziyahu had sinned both in arrogance and in assuming that there is no individual providence.<fn>In his haughtiness, he thought that he could bring an incense offering and that Hashem would not notice. See Divrei HaYamim 26:16-20.</fn> Hashem showed Himself to Yeshayahu in all His grandeur, highlighting how lowly people are compared to God.&#160; Moreover, Hashem pointed out that despite His exalted stature, He still fills the "הֵיכָל", i.e. He is aware of what every individual in the world is doing (and there is individual providence).<fn>Abarbanel sees the same message in the angel's cry, "קָדוֹשׁ קָדוֹשׁ קָדוֹשׁ י"י צְבָאוֹת מְלֹא כׇל הָאָרֶץ כְּבוֹדוֹ".&#160; Though Hashem is unsurpassed in holiness, this does not preclude Him from filling the earth and being aware of all that goes on therein.</fn></point>
<point><b>"אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי... וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ"</b> – According to Abarbanel, the word "נִדְמֵיתִי" means "I imagined". Yeshayahu realizes that he has been mistaken in thinking that Uziyahu was undeserving of punishment and cries out that he is sorry that he has imagined injustice where there was none.</point>
+
<point><b>"אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי... וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ"</b> – According to Abarbanel, the word "נִדְמֵיתִי" means "I imagined". Yeshayahu realizes that he has been mistaken in thinking that Uzziyahu was undeserving of punishment and cries out that he is sorry that he has imagined injustice where there was none.</point>
<point><b>"כִּי אִישׁ טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם אָנֹכִי"</b> – Yeshayahu is of "impure lips" because he had defended Uziyahu despite the king's guilt.</point>
+
<point><b>"כִּי אִישׁ טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם אָנֹכִי"</b> – Yeshayahu is of "impure lips" because he had defended Uzziyahu despite the king's guilt.</point>
 
<point><b>"וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ"</b> – Hashem has the angel place a burning coal on Yeshayahu's lips to both punish him and atone for his sin.</point>
 
<point><b>"וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ"</b> – Hashem has the angel place a burning coal on Yeshayahu's lips to both punish him and atone for his sin.</point>
<point><b>"אֶת מִי אֶשְׁלַח... וָאֹמַר הִנְנִי שְׁלָחֵנִי"</b> – After Yeshayahu is forgiven, he once again receives prophecy.&#160; Yeshayahu volunteers for Hashem's mission to show his willingness to rebuke the people, promising not to defend them (as he had defended Uziyahu) if unwarranted.</point>
+
<point><b>"אֶת מִי אֶשְׁלַח... וָאֹמַר הִנְנִי שְׁלָחֵנִי"</b> – After Yeshayahu is forgiven, he once again receives prophecy.&#160; Yeshayahu volunteers for Hashem's mission to show his willingness to rebuke the people, promising not to defend them (as he had defended Uzziyahu), if unwarranted.</point>
 
<point><b>The mission: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ"</b> – Abarbanel claims that Hashem never locks the gates of repentance, and that Hashem is simply telling Yeshayahu in advance that the people will refuse to listen and change.</point>
 
<point><b>The mission: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ"</b> – Abarbanel claims that Hashem never locks the gates of repentance, and that Hashem is simply telling Yeshayahu in advance that the people will refuse to listen and change.</point>
</opinion>
 
<opinion>Yeshayahu Unnecessary
 
<p>Since the people had not forsaken Hashem during the reign of Uziyahu, there was no need for chastisement for much of his rule.</p>
 
<mekorot>perhaps <multilink><a href="REliezerofBeaugencyYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">R. Eliezer of Beaugency</a><a href="REliezerofBeaugencyYeshayahu1-1" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 1:1</a><a href="REliezerofBeaugencyYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 6</a><a href="R. Eliezer of Beaugency" data-aht="parshan">About R. Eliezer of Beaugency</a></multilink><fn>R"E of Beaugency merely states that there was a need for Hashem to renew Yeshayahu's prophecy because a significant time had passed since he had last received the Word of Hashem. He does not elaborate on the reason for the break. He does point out, however, that with Uziyahu's death there was once again a need to rebuke the people, leading to the position presented here. [It should be noted that the development of the approach is independent of R"E of Beaugency's commentary.]</fn></mekorot>
 
<point><b>First prophecies of the book</b> – This position maintains that the book is chronological. The prophecies of chapters 1-5 were relayed during the early part of Uziyahu's reign when the nation sinned in the interpersonal sphere<fn>See <a href="Historical Backdrop of Yeshayahu 1" data-aht="page">Historical Backdrop of Yeshayahu 1</a> for elaboration on the opinion that the chapter refers to the reign of Uziyahu and that it might be limited to rebuke of interpersonal sins.</fn> and were overcome by arrogance.<fn>It is possible that the prosperity which marked Uziyahu's reign gave the people a false sense of their own worth, leading to Yeshayahu's cries against "כׇּל גֵּאֶה וָרָם" in Chapters 2-5.</fn> After Uziyahu was struck with <i>tzara'at </i>for his own conceit, however, the nation learned their lesson and there was no more need for rebuke until the next generation changed its ways.</point>
 
<point><b>Why re-initiate Yeshayahu specifically now?</b> With the change in ruler to the sinful Achaz<fn>Yotam co-reigned with his father after Uziyahu was struck with<i> tzara'at</i>. It is difficult to know if his entire reign overlapped with that of Uziyahu or not.&#160; If the former, it is possible that since he, too, was a righteous king, Yeshayahu actually did not receive any prophecies during his rule at all, and was first re-initiated when Achaz took the throne.&#160; Alternatively, if Yotam continued to rule on his own after his father's death, it is possible that Yeshayahu was re-initiated at that point, since despite the king's personal righteousness, the people were corrupt. [See Divrei HaYamamm II 27:2 "וַיַּעַשׂ הַיָּשָׁר בְּעֵינֵי י"י... וְעוֹד הָעָם מַשְׁחִיתִים".]</fn> the need for rebuke was renewed and Hashem re-initiated Yeshayahu into prophecy.</point>
 
<point><b>The vision</b> – Yeshayahu receives a special vision of Hashem since after such a long break, Hashem needed to "reintroduce Himself".&#160; There might be no special significance in the choice of appearing as a king; this might simply be the closest image to Hashem that a human can understand.</point>
 
<point><b>The punishment</b> – This approach could suggest, like Shadal above, that Hashem refers to the upcoming devastation during the reign of Achaz specifically. Yeshayahu resumed his task with a specific message for the next king.</point>
 
 
</opinion>
 
</opinion>
 
</category>
 
</category>

Latest revision as of 10:44, 11 January 2020

Yeshayahu's Mission in Chapter 6

Exegetical Approaches

This topic has not yet undergone editorial review

Overview

Commentators debate the nature of the prophecy of Yeshayahu 6 and why Yeshayahu merited specifically now to see a vision of Hashem. Many sources maintain that the chapter describes Yeshayahu's appointment as prophet, where he received his overall mission. Yet, as this necessitates positing achronology in the book, others disagree and date the prophecy to later in Yeshayahu's career. Thus, Abarbanel suggests that the revelation might relate to the nature of the task that Yeshayahu received. Yeshayahu was told that the fate of the Ten Tribes was sealed and that they were soon to be exiled. Such distressing news merited a unique introductory vision. A final position posits that the prophecy constitutes a re-initiation into prophecy, either because Yeshayahu had previously attempted to resign, had sinned, or more simply, because significant time had elapsed during which no rebuke had been necessary.

Initiation to Prophecy

The chapter describes Yeshayahu's appointment as prophet.

"אֶת מִי אֶשְׁלַח...  וָאֹמַר הִנְנִי שְׁלָחֵנִי" – Rashi and Rid point to these words as proof that the chapter speaks of the commissioning of Yeshayahu into prophecy.
Chronology of the chapters – This position assumes that Sefer Yeshayahu is achronological, and must explain why Chapter 6 and the initiation to prophecy do not open the book:1
  • Thematic order preferred – It is possible that thematic order takes precedence over chronological order. Chapters 1-5 describe the nation's sins, while Chapter 6 (through 12) focus on their punishment. When speaking to his contemporaries, Yeshayahu could open with a prophecy of doom since they were well aware of their misdeeds. Yet, when ordering his prophecies for future generations, it made sense for the prophet to begin with the nation's sins, giving the reader background to understand why the decree of destruction was deserved.2
  • Relayed later – Shadal posits that though Chapter 6 was the first prophecy that Yeshayahu received, it was only relayed later, after the prophecies of Chapters 2-5.3
"בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" – As this prophecy is dated "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ", it seems that Yeshayahu was first initiated into prophecy with Uzziyahu's death  This, however, appears to contradict Yeshayahu 1:1 which states that Yeshayahu prophesied during the reign of Uzziyahu.  These commentators offer various solutions to the problem:
  • Metaphoric death – Rashi and Rid suggest that the phrase "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the year when Uzziyahu was struck with tzara'at and metaphorically died,4 rather than to the year of his actual death.  If so, Yeshayahu was initiated in the middle of Uzziyahu's reign and prophesied for several years before his death.
  • Initiated in the year prior to Uzziyahu's death – Ibn Ezra, instead, points out that the verse speaks of the year (not the day) of Uzziyahu's death.5 As such, Yeshayahu could have received several months worth of prophecies during Uzziyahu's reign.6
  • Date of transmission – Finally, Shadal asserts that the opening "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the date that Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy,7 not to the year in which he received it.8
Vision of Hashem – Since this is Yeshayahu's first prophecy, it is logical why he merits a vision of Hashem.  This is comparable to the opening prophecy of Yechezkel who also sees "מַרְאוֹת אֱ-לֹהִים".
"...אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי" – Rashi, Rid, and Shadal explain "נִדְמֵיתִי" to mean "‎‏‎נכרתי".‎9 Yeshayahu thought that he was deserving of death since he was unworthy of seeing Hashem's glory.
"וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ וְחַטָּאתְךָ תְּכֻפָּר" – According to Rid and Shadal, Hashem was not referring to any specific sin for which Yeshayahu needed atoning,10 but to a general purification process. As Yeshayahu began his task as Hashem's messenger and spokesman, Hashem prepared him by cleansing him of all sins and purifying his mouth.11
The task – These sources differ in their understanding of Hashem's mission to Yeshayahu and what is meant by the statements: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" and "הַשְׁמֵן לֵב הָעָם הַזֶּה...  פֶּן יִרְאֶה בְעֵינָיו...  וָשָׁב וְרָפָא לוֹ"
  • Description of future – According to Rashi, Hashem was not commanding that Yeshayahu should actively harden the people's hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.12 Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation would refuse to heed his words and repent.  At the beginning of the prophet's assignment, Hashem warned Yeshayahu that he was volunteering for a doomed mission.13
  • Command – Rid, Ibn Ezra, and Shadal,14 in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.15 Due to the nation's many sins,16 the decree of destruction was set, and the people were to be actively prevented from repenting.17 As such, Yeshayahu's task was not to bring the people back to Hashem, but simply to warn them of the impending destruction.18
"עַד אֲשֶׁר אִם שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב... וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה" – These sources disagree regarding both the context of the initial destruction and the identity of the "tenth" who will secondarily be consumed.
  • Exile of Ten Tribes – According to Rid, the verses refer to the destruction and exile19 of the Ten Tribes. Yehuda represents the remaining tenth who is also to be burnt at the hands of Sancheriv, but who will ultimately survive and thrive, "כָּאֵלָה וְכָאַלּוֹן אֲשֶׁר בְּשַׁלֶּכֶת מַצֶּבֶת בָּם זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ".
  • Exile of Yehuda – Ibn Ezra, in contrast, suggests that the verses refer only to the Southern Kingdom, and speak of the exile of Yehuda itself.  This, though, will only occur after ten kings' reigns (וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה).20  The phrase "זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ"' refers to the returnees from Babylonia.
  • Destruction in the time of Achaz – Shadal uniquely places the destruction much earlier, in the reign of Achaz, when Yehuda was attacked first by Aram and Yisrael,21 and then also ("וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר") by the Edomites and Philistines. The holy seed that ultimately survives is Chizkiyahu, who is able to reform the country.22 [According to Shadal, Hashem's initiation message to Yeshayahu refers not to his entire tenure as prophet but only to the first part thereof. He will initially be met with resistance, but not always.]
Intended audience of the prophecy – According to this approach it is possible that Yeshayahu was never meant to transmit this prophecy to the nation at all, and it was aimed at him alone.23  In fact, the prophecy of destruction at the end might not have been relayed even to Yeshayahu at this stage had it not been for his question "עַד מָתַי".‎24
Biblical Parallels – Yeshayahu's initiation to prophecy shares several features with other such initiations, such as a revelation by Hashem, the giving of a sign (often via touching the lips), and the commissioning itself.  Nonetheless, whereas in other similar stories the prophet or leader initially refuses the mission25 and is in need of encouragement by Hashem, here, Yeshayahu exceptionally volunteers for the task.26

Unique Mission

Since the prophecy of Chapter 6 sealed the fate of Israel and foretold their exile, it was relayed to Yeshayahu in an exalted fashion, matching the intensity of the mission.

Chronology of the book – This position can maintain chronological order in the book, as it does not assume that this was Yeshayahu's first prophecy.
The vision – Since Hashem is sending Yeshayahu on an especially harsh mission, He reveals Himself at the beginning of the prophecy, giving proper weight to the task. He might appear specifically as a king sitting on His throne to highlight that the decree of destruction is a royal edict not to be changed.
"וְהַבַּיִת יִמָּלֵא עָשָׁן" – Radak suggests that the smoke filling the hall represents Hashem's anger at Israel.  The trembling of the doorposts might be explained similarly, further evidence of the fear instilled by Hashem's wrath.27
"אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי" – Upon seeing Hashem's anger,28 Yeshayahu cries out, "אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי," assuming that he, like the rest of Israel, will be destroyed for their sins.29
"וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ וְחַטָּאתְךָ תְּכֻפָּר" – Hashem symbolically purifies Yeshayahu, telling him that he need not fear, for any sin of his has been atoned.
"אֶת מִי אֶשְׁלַח... וָאֹמַר הִנְנִי שְׁלָחֵנִי" – Abarbanel suggests that Hashem asked for volunteers for this mission specifically since it was such a difficult one;30 the prophet was to be tasked with telling the people that there was no hope left for them and they should despair of salvation.31
"שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" – According to the fist option brought by Radak, these words are in the imperative; Hashem tells Yeshayahu to tell the nation that due to their sins He is preventing them from repenting. They will listen but not understand. Their hearts will be fattened so that they cannot repent. The decree of punishment is immutable.32
The decree: "שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב... וְרִחַק י"י אֶת הָאָדָם" – Abarbanel explains that this refers to the exile of the Ten Tribes. The people's sins finally sealed their punishment, spelling the end of the Northern Kingdom. It is this devastating news that merited the unique vision.
"וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה... כָּאֵלָה וְכָאַלּוֹן אֲשֶׁר בְּשַׁלֶּכֶת מַצֶּבֶת בָּם" – Radak explains that Hashem shares that after ten kings' reigns,33 Yehuda, too, will be punished and exiled, but in contrast to the Ten Tribes who are lost forever, they will eventually return.  Like trees who lose their leaves in the winter but rejuvenate in the spring, so, too, Yehuda will once again thrive.34
Yeshayahu's audience – According to this approach, the target audience of this prophecy is the Northern Kingdom rather than Yehuda.
Biblical parallels – It is possible that Yechezkel's vision of Hashem in the opening chapters of his book served a similar purpose.  There, too, Hashem might have revealed Himself not as part of the prophet's annunciation, but because He was transmitting a message of ultimate destruction. Yechezkel's vision, like this one, is accompanied by news of devastation: Hashem's decision to destroy the Mikdash, remove His presence, and exile Yehuda.

Re-initiation to Prophecy

Yeshayahu's vision of Chapter 6 constitutes a second call to prophecy after a hiatus in which he had not received the word of Hashem. This position divides regarding the reason for the break:

Yeshayahu Resigned

When the nation refused to heed Yeshayahu's words and mocked the punishments he forewarned, Yeshayahu gave up and stopped rebuking the people.

Mocking of Yeshayahu – This position points to Yeshayahu 5:18-20 as evidence that the nation did not believe in Yeshayahu's prophecies and assumed that they would not be punished for their deeds.35 [There is no explicit evidence in the verses, however, that Yeshayahu therefore refrained from further chastisement.]
Chronology of the book – This position can maintain chronological order in the book, as it does not view Chapter 6 as Yeshayahu's first prophecy.
The vision – Yeshayahu receives a grandiose vision of Hashem on His throne since this is a re-initiation into prophecy and not merely a new message.
"וְהַבַּיִת יִמָּלֵא עָשָׁן" – The smoke might be symbolic of Hashem's anger and disappointment in Yeshayahu for having abandoned his task.
"אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי" – This position understands "נִדְמֵיתִי" to mean "I was silent". With Hashem's renewed revelation ("כִּי אֶת הַמֶּלֶךְ י"י צְבָאוֹת רָאוּ עֵינָי"), Yeshayahu was ashamed that he had decided to remain silent and had not continued to rebuke the people despite their taunts.36
"וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ" – Hashem reassures Yeshayahu that he is forgiven and purges him of any guilt.
"אֶת מִי אֶשְׁלַח... וָאֹמַר הִנְנִי שְׁלָחֵנִי" – Hashem gives Yeshayahu the opportunity to prove that he is once again willing to prophesy by asking "אֶת מִי אֶשְׁלַח".  Yeshayahu immediately replies in the positive, volunteering to embark on Hashem's mission.
"שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ' – Hashem's words can be understood as either encouragement or a warning to the prophet:
  • Encouragement – Hashem explains to Yeshayahu that the reason the people had refused to heed him was because Hashem had hardened their hearts, ensuring that they would hear but not understand.  It was Hashem who was preventing them from repenting. As such, Yeshayahu should not be disappointed by a perceived failure at his task.
  • Warning – Hashem warns Yeshayahu that if he re-accepts Hashem's mission, he must do so with the full knowledge that the people are going to continue to refuse to listen.
The decree: "עַד אֲשֶׁר אִם שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב" – This position could understand the verses to refer either to the exile of the Ten Tribes, with Yehuda being the remaining "tenth", or to the exile of Yehuda alone, with the "tenth" referring to those who were left behind under Gedalyah.
Biblical Parallels
  • Eliyahu – According to some opinions, Eliyahu's flight to Chorev marked his desire to stop prophesying.  In its aftermath, he, too, receives an elaborate vision of Hashem in which he is re-initiated into prophecy. For elaboration, see Eliyahu at Chorev
  • Moshe – Shemot Rabbah 5:19 posits that after Moshe's initial failed meeting with Paroh, he returned to Midyan, suggesting that Moshe, too, "resigned" after an initial failure. Unlike Yeshayahu, Moshe does not receive a second vision of Hashem, but it is possible that Shemot 6 nonetheless represents a renewed call to prophecy, where Hashem repeats the mission previously given him in Shemot 3-4.

Yeshayahu Unnecessary

Since the people had not forsaken Hashem during the reign of Uzziyahu, there was no need for chastisement for much of his rule.

First prophecies of the book – This position maintains that the book is chronological. The prophecies of chapters 1-5 were relayed during the early part of Uzziyahu's reign when the nation sinned in the interpersonal sphere38 and were overcome by arrogance.39 After Uzziyahu was struck with tzara'at for his own conceit, however, the nation learned their lesson and there was no more need for rebuke until the next generation changed its ways.
Why re-initiate Yeshayahu specifically now? With the change in ruler to the sinful Achaz40 the need for rebuke was renewed and Hashem re-initiated Yeshayahu into prophecy.
The vision – Yeshayahu receives a special vision of Hashem since after such a long break, Hashem needed to "reintroduce Himself".  There might be no special significance in the choice of appearing as a king; this might simply be the closest image to Hashem that a human can understand.
The punishment – This approach could suggest, like Shadal above, that Hashem refers to the upcoming devastation during the reign of Achaz specifically. Yeshayahu resumed his task with a specific message for the next king.

Yeshayahu Sinned

When Uzziyahu was struck with tzara'at, Yeshayahu was dismayed at the injustice of the punishment.  He had thought the king a righteous individual and undeserving of such a fate. This sinful doubting of Hashem's justice precluded him from receiving further prophecy.

Sources:Abarbanel
The Vision:  "יֹשֵׁב עַל כִּסֵּא רָם וְנִשָּׂא וְשׁוּלָיו מְלֵאִים אֶת הַהֵיכָל" – According to Abarbanel, Hashem's vision was meant to teach Yeshayahu why Uzziyahu deserved his punishment.  Uzziyahu had sinned both in arrogance and in assuming that there is no individual providence.41 Hashem showed Himself to Yeshayahu in all His grandeur, highlighting how lowly people are compared to God.  Moreover, Hashem pointed out that despite His exalted stature, He still fills the "הֵיכָל", i.e. He is aware of what every individual in the world is doing (and there is individual providence).42
"אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי... וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ" – According to Abarbanel, the word "נִדְמֵיתִי" means "I imagined". Yeshayahu realizes that he has been mistaken in thinking that Uzziyahu was undeserving of punishment and cries out that he is sorry that he has imagined injustice where there was none.
"כִּי אִישׁ טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם אָנֹכִי" – Yeshayahu is of "impure lips" because he had defended Uzziyahu despite the king's guilt.
"וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ" – Hashem has the angel place a burning coal on Yeshayahu's lips to both punish him and atone for his sin.
"אֶת מִי אֶשְׁלַח... וָאֹמַר הִנְנִי שְׁלָחֵנִי" – After Yeshayahu is forgiven, he once again receives prophecy.  Yeshayahu volunteers for Hashem's mission to show his willingness to rebuke the people, promising not to defend them (as he had defended Uzziyahu), if unwarranted.
The mission: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" – Abarbanel claims that Hashem never locks the gates of repentance, and that Hashem is simply telling Yeshayahu in advance that the people will refuse to listen and change.