Difference between revisions of "Yeshayahu's Mission in Chapter 6/2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This topic has not yet undergone editorial review
m |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<li><b>Thematic order preferred</b> – Alternatively, it is possible that thematic order takes precedence over chronological order. Chapters 1-5 describe the nation's sins, while Chapter 6 (through 12) focus on their punishment. When speaking to his contemporaries, Yeshayahu could open with a prophecy of doom, since they were well aware of their misdeeds.  Yet, when ordering his prophecies for future generations, it made sense for the prophet to begin with the nation's sins, giving the reader background to understand why the decree of destruction was deserved.</li> | <li><b>Thematic order preferred</b> – Alternatively, it is possible that thematic order takes precedence over chronological order. Chapters 1-5 describe the nation's sins, while Chapter 6 (through 12) focus on their punishment. When speaking to his contemporaries, Yeshayahu could open with a prophecy of doom, since they were well aware of their misdeeds.  Yet, when ordering his prophecies for future generations, it made sense for the prophet to begin with the nation's sins, giving the reader background to understand why the decree of destruction was deserved.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>"בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ"</b> – Since Yeshayahu 1 opens by sharing that Yeshayahu prophesied | + | <point><b>"בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ"</b> – Since Yeshayahu 1 opens by sharing that Yeshayahu prophesied during the reign of Uziyahu, some question how this could be true if Yeshayahu was first initiated into prophecy with Uziyahu's death.  These commentators offer various solutions to the problem:<br/> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><b>Metaphoric death</b> – Rashi and the Rid suggest that the phrase "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the year when Uziyahu was struck with <i>tzara'at</i> and metaphorically died,<fn>They claim that "המצורע חשוב במת".  The Biur, instead, suggests that once Uziyahu was stuck with tzara'at and lost his rule to his son it was as if he died.</fn> rather than to the year of his actual death.  If so, Yeshayahu was initiated in the middle of Uziyahu's reign and prophesied for several years before his death.</li> | <li><b>Metaphoric death</b> – Rashi and the Rid suggest that the phrase "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the year when Uziyahu was struck with <i>tzara'at</i> and metaphorically died,<fn>They claim that "המצורע חשוב במת".  The Biur, instead, suggests that once Uziyahu was stuck with tzara'at and lost his rule to his son it was as if he died.</fn> rather than to the year of his actual death.  If so, Yeshayahu was initiated in the middle of Uziyahu's reign and prophesied for several years before his death.</li> | ||
− | <li><b>Initiated in the year prior to Uziyahu's death</b> – Ibn Ezra, instead, points out that the verse speaks of the <b>year </b>(not the day) of Uziyahu's death. As such, Yeshayahu could have received several months worth of prophecies during Uziyahu's reign.<fn>See, though, N. | + | <li><b>Initiated in the year prior to Uziyahu's death</b> – Ibn Ezra, instead, points out that the verse speaks of the <b>year </b>(not the day) of Uziyahu's death. As such, Yeshayahu could have received several months worth of prophecies during Uziyahu's reign.<fn>See, though, N. Meshal, who questions this reading, pointing to the similar heading in Yeshayahu 14:28, "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ אָחָז".  From context, this appears to refer to the year after Achaz' death as the following verses speak of Achaz as having already died: "אַל תִּשְׂמְחִי פְלֶשֶׁת כֻּלֵּךְ כִּי נִשְׁבַּר שֵׁבֶט מַכֵּךְ."  If so, it would seem that Yeshayahu 6:1 also speaks of the days after Uziyahu's death.</fn></li> |
<li><b>Date of transmission</b> – Finally, Shadal asserts that the opening "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the date that Yeshayhau relayed the prophecy,<fn>This, however, is somewhat difficult considering the continuation of the verse, "וָאֶרְאֶה אֶת אֲדֹנָי יֹשֵׁב עַל כִּסֵּא רָם וְנִשָּׂא" from which it sounds that the date refers to the receiving of the vision.</fn> not to the year in which he received it.<fn>He suggests that there could have been as many as twenty years between the receiving and relaying of the prophecy. Nonetheless, Shadal does not date any other prophecy in the book to Uziyahu's reign, explaining that Yeshayahu might simply not have recorded these for future generations.</fn></li> | <li><b>Date of transmission</b> – Finally, Shadal asserts that the opening "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the date that Yeshayhau relayed the prophecy,<fn>This, however, is somewhat difficult considering the continuation of the verse, "וָאֶרְאֶה אֶת אֲדֹנָי יֹשֵׁב עַל כִּסֵּא רָם וְנִשָּׂא" from which it sounds that the date refers to the receiving of the vision.</fn> not to the year in which he received it.<fn>He suggests that there could have been as many as twenty years between the receiving and relaying of the prophecy. Nonetheless, Shadal does not date any other prophecy in the book to Uziyahu's reign, explaining that Yeshayahu might simply not have recorded these for future generations.</fn></li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Vision of Hashem</b> – Since this is Yeshyahu's first prophecy it is logical why he merits a vision of Hashem.  This is comparable to the opening prophecy of Yechezkel who also sees "מַרְאוֹת אֱלֹהִים".</point> | <point><b>Vision of Hashem</b> – Since this is Yeshyahu's first prophecy it is logical why he merits a vision of Hashem.  This is comparable to the opening prophecy of Yechezkel who also sees "מַרְאוֹת אֱלֹהִים".</point> | ||
<point><b>"...אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי"</b> – Rashi, Rid and Shadal explain "נִדְמֵיתִי" to mean "‎‏‎נכרתי".‎<fn>Rashi and the Rid points to the root's usage in Tzefanya 1:11, "נדמה כל עם כנען" where it is paralleled to "נִכְרְתוּ כׇּל נְטִילֵי כָסֶף".</fn> Yeshayahu thought that he was deserving of death since he was unworthy of seeing Hashem's glory.</point> | <point><b>"...אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי"</b> – Rashi, Rid and Shadal explain "נִדְמֵיתִי" to mean "‎‏‎נכרתי".‎<fn>Rashi and the Rid points to the root's usage in Tzefanya 1:11, "נדמה כל עם כנען" where it is paralleled to "נִכְרְתוּ כׇּל נְטִילֵי כָסֶף".</fn> Yeshayahu thought that he was deserving of death since he was unworthy of seeing Hashem's glory.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>"וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ וְחַטָּאתְךָ תְּכֻפָּר"</b> – | + | <point><b>"וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ וְחַטָּאתְךָ תְּכֻפָּר"</b> – According to the Rid and Shadal, Hashem is not referring to any specific sin for which Yeshayahu needed atoning,<fn>Rashi, in contrast, explains that Yeshayahu's words "וּבְתוֹךְ עַם טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם אָנֹכִי יוֹשֵׁב" constituted slander of Israel and needed atoning. Ibn Ezra also points to a specific crime of Yeshayahu, the fact that he was an "אִישׁ טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם". He suggests that Yeshayahu bemoaned that he had learned negative speech habits from the nation, making him unworthy of being Hashem's spokesman. [As evidence, Ibn Ezra points to the prophet's words in Yeshayahu 8:11, "וְיִסְּרֵנִי מִלֶּכֶת בְּדֶרֶךְ הָעָם הַזֶּה".] Hashem thus purges his mouth, preparing him for his mission.</fn> but to a general purification process. As Yeshayahu begins his task as Hashem's messenger and spokesman, Hashem prepares him by cleansing him of all sins and purifying his mouth.<fn>Shadal points out that in Tanakh purification often takes place via fire; so too here, Hashem places a burning coal on Yeshayahu's lips. The verse states, "וַיַּגַּע עַל פִּי", the same language used when Yirmeyahu is appointed prophet.  There, however, it represents Hashem's placing His word into the prophet's mouth.</fn></point> |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<point><b>The task</b> – These sources differ in their understanding of Hashem's mission to Yeshayahu and what is meant by the statements: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" and "הַשְׁמֵן לֵב הָעָם הַזֶּה...  פֶּן יִרְאֶה בְעֵינָיו...  וָשָׁב וְרָפָא לוֹ"<br/> | <point><b>The task</b> – These sources differ in their understanding of Hashem's mission to Yeshayahu and what is meant by the statements: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" and "הַשְׁמֵן לֵב הָעָם הַזֶּה...  פֶּן יִרְאֶה בְעֵינָיו...  וָשָׁב וְרָפָא לוֹ"<br/> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Description of future</b> – According to Rashi, Hashem is not commanding that the people should not understand nor that Yeshayahu should actively harden their hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.<fn>He apparently reads the verbs "הַשְׁמֵן"' as an infinitive absolute (שם הפועל), indicative of a continuous process, or of certainty, explaining that Hashem is saying: "לבם הולך הלוך והשמן".</fn> Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, | + | <li><b>Description of future</b> – According to Rashi, Hashem is not commanding that the people should not understand nor that Yeshayahu should actively harden their hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.<fn>He apparently reads the verbs "הַשְׁמֵן"' as an infinitive absolute (שם הפועל), indicative of a continuous process, or of certainty, explaining that Hashem is saying: "לבם הולך הלוך והשמן".</fn> Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation will refuse to heed his words and repent.  At the beginning of his mission, Hashem warns Yeshayahu that he is volunteering for a doomed mission, for he will not be successful.<fn>See Shadal who writes, "והכוונה אם תרצה ללכת בשליחותי, על מנת כן צריך אתה ללכת, על מנת שלא ישמעו אליך".</fn></li> |
− | <li><b>Command</b> – The Rid, Ibn Ezra and Shadal,<fn>This is how Shadal explains the | + | <li><b>Command</b> – The Rid, Ibn Ezra and Shadal,<fn>This is how Shadal explains the verses in his introduction t the chapter and in his comments to verse 1.  In his discussion of verses 9-10, however, he appears to suggest that Hashem is only giving an analogy to let Yeshayahu know that the people are not going to listen to him.</fn> in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.<fn>Shadal points out that the language of "'<b>אַל</b> תָּבִינוּ" as opposed to "לא תבינו" indicates the imperative form.</fn> Due to the nation's many sins,<fn>The Rid, instead, suggests that after so many warnings that went unheeded, Hashem is no longer interested in giving the people the possibility of repenting.  He reads the phrase "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" as if it were written in the past tense:  "I have sent so many prophet for you to listen to, yet you have refused to understand".</fn> the decree of destruction was set, and the people were to be actively prevented from repenting. [For various approaches to the theological question of how Hashem can remove someone's free will and keep them from repenting, see <a href="Hardened Hearts" data-aht="page">Hardened Hearts</a>.] As such, Yeshayahu's task was not be to bring the people back to Hashem, but simply to warn them of the impending destruction.<fn>Indeed, many of Yeshayahu's prophecies simply speak of the nation's sins or impending punishment, without including a call for change. Thus, for instance, Chapters 2-5 decry the people's arrogance, but mainly as a way of introducing their downfall. There are exceptions, however, and in Chapter 1, Yeshayahu clearly calls for the people to repent: "רַחֲצוּ הִזַּכּוּ הָסִירוּ רֹעַ מַעַלְלֵיכֶם מִנֶּגֶד עֵינָי חִדְלוּ הָרֵעַ."</fn></li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>"עַד אֲשֶׁר אִם שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב"</b> – Hashem tells Yeshayahu that the | + | <point><b>"עַד אֲשֶׁר אִם שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב"</b> – Hashem tells Yeshayahu that the situation will last until "שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב," and that even those who survive will be punished afterwards. These sources disagree regarding both the context of the initial destruction and the identity of the "tenth" who will secondarily be consumed.<br/> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><b>Exile of Ten Tribes</b> – According to the Rid, the verses refer to the destruction and exile<fn>The words "וְרִחַק י"י אֶת הָאָדָם" imply not only devastation but actual exile.</fn> of the Ten Tribes. Yehuda represents the remaining tenth who is also to be burnt at the hands of Sancheriv, but will ultimately survive and thrive, "כָּאֵלָה וְכָאַלּוֹן אֲשֶׁר בְּשַׁלֶּכֶת מַצֶּבֶת בָּם זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ".</li> | <li><b>Exile of Ten Tribes</b> – According to the Rid, the verses refer to the destruction and exile<fn>The words "וְרִחַק י"י אֶת הָאָדָם" imply not only devastation but actual exile.</fn> of the Ten Tribes. Yehuda represents the remaining tenth who is also to be burnt at the hands of Sancheriv, but will ultimately survive and thrive, "כָּאֵלָה וְכָאַלּוֹן אֲשֶׁר בְּשַׁלֶּכֶת מַצֶּבֶת בָּם זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ".</li> | ||
<li><b>Exile of Yehuda</b> – Ibn Ezra, in contrast, suggests that the verses refer only to the Southern Kingdom, and speak of the exile of Yehuda itself.  This, though, will only occur after ten kings' reigns (וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה).<fn>He points out that "עֲשִׂרִיָּה" does not mean "a tenth" but rather "ten," comparing the term to the word "שלישיה" in the phrase, "יִהְיֶה יִשְׂרָאֵל שְׁלִישִׁיָּה לְמִצְרַיִם וּלְאַשּׁוּר" (Yeshayahu 19:24). This reading of the verses, however, ignores the phrase "וְ<b>שָׁבָה</b> וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר" which implies that there are two stages of destruction.</fn> [Alternatively, one could suggest that the "tenth" refers to those who remained in the land under the rule of Gedalayah, who were then also forced to flee.] The phrase "<b></b>זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ"' refers to the returnees from Babylonia.</li> | <li><b>Exile of Yehuda</b> – Ibn Ezra, in contrast, suggests that the verses refer only to the Southern Kingdom, and speak of the exile of Yehuda itself.  This, though, will only occur after ten kings' reigns (וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה).<fn>He points out that "עֲשִׂרִיָּה" does not mean "a tenth" but rather "ten," comparing the term to the word "שלישיה" in the phrase, "יִהְיֶה יִשְׂרָאֵל שְׁלִישִׁיָּה לְמִצְרַיִם וּלְאַשּׁוּר" (Yeshayahu 19:24). This reading of the verses, however, ignores the phrase "וְ<b>שָׁבָה</b> וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר" which implies that there are two stages of destruction.</fn> [Alternatively, one could suggest that the "tenth" refers to those who remained in the land under the rule of Gedalayah, who were then also forced to flee.] The phrase "<b></b>זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ"' refers to the returnees from Babylonia.</li> | ||
− | <li><b>Destruction in time of Achaz</b> – Shadal uniquely places the destruction much earlier, in the reign of Achaz,<fn></fn> when Yehuda was attacked first by Aram and Yisrael,<fn>Since Shadal assumes that the verses do not refer to exile, he claims that the phrase "'וְרִחַק י"י אֶת הָאָדָם" refers to the fact that the massive devastation left large areas of the land uninhabited, with people being distanced from one another.  he cold have alternatively suggested that it refers to the many people taken captive by the invading armies (see Divrei HaYamim II 28).</fn> and then also ("וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר") by the Edomites and Philistines. The holy seed that ultimately survives is Chizkiyahu, who | + | <li><b>Destruction in time of Achaz</b> – Shadal uniquely places the destruction much earlier, in the reign of Achaz,<fn></fn> when Yehuda was attacked first by Aram and Yisrael,<fn>Since Shadal assumes that the verses do not refer to exile, he claims that the phrase "'וְרִחַק י"י אֶת הָאָדָם" refers to the fact that the massive devastation left large areas of the land uninhabited, with people being distanced from one another.  he cold have alternatively suggested that it refers to the many people taken captive by the invading armies (see Divrei HaYamim II 28).</fn> and then also ("וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר") by the Edomites and Philistines. The holy seed that ultimately survives is Chizkiyahu, who is able to reform the country as a whole.<fn>It is this which likely motivates Shadal's reading of the verses.  The other commentators must explain how Hashem can say that the people will continue in their crimes and refuse to listen to the prophet until exile, if their was a religious reformation in the time of Chizkiyahu.</fn> [According to Shadal, then, Hashem's initiation message to Yeshayahu refers not to his entire tenure as prophet but only to the first part thereof. He will initially be met with resistance, but not always.]</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Intended audience of the prophecy</b><ul> | <point><b>Intended audience of the prophecy</b><ul> | ||
− | <li>According to this approach it is possible that Yeshayahu was never meant to relay this prophecy to the nation at all, and it aimed at him alone | + | <li>According to this approach it is possible that Yeshayahu was never meant to relay this prophecy to the nation at all, and it is aimed at him alone, preparing him for his task.<fn>If so, Hashem's words "וַיֹּאמֶר<b> לֵךְ וְאָמַרְתָּ לָעָם</b> הַזֶּה שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" are not meant to be taken literally as a command to actively relay this message to the people, but are simply Hashem's way of telling the prophet that the people will refuse to listen (or will be actively prevented from doing so).</fn>  In fact, the prophecy of destruction at the end might not have been relayed at this stage at all, had it not been for Yeshayahu's question "עַד מָתַי".</li> |
− | <li>Shadal agrees in principle, and suggests that | + | <li>Shadal agrees in principle, and suggests that for many years Yeshayahu kept the prophecy to himself.  Yet, at some point, when the people not only refused to listen but actively mocked him (<a href="Yeshayahu5-18-20" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 5:18-20</a>), Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy to show them that their refusal to listen was actually preordained, and in fact, part of their punishment.</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
</category> | </category> |
Version as of 21:33, 26 July 2018
Yeshayahu's Mission in Chapter 6
Exegetical Approaches
Initiation to Prophecy
The chapter describes Yeshayahu's appointment where he was prepared for and received his prophetic mission.
"אֶת מִי אֶשְׁלַח... וָאֹמַר הִנְנִי שְׁלָחֵנִי" – Rashi and the Rid point to these words as proof that the chapter speaks of Yeshayahu's appointment as prophet.
Chronology of the chapters – This position assumes that the book is achronological, and must explain why Chapter 6 and the initiation to prophecy do not open the book:1
- Relayed later – Shadal posits that though Chapter 6 was the first prophecy that Yeshayahu received, it was only relayed later, after the prophecies of Chapters 2-5.2
- Thematic order preferred – Alternatively, it is possible that thematic order takes precedence over chronological order. Chapters 1-5 describe the nation's sins, while Chapter 6 (through 12) focus on their punishment. When speaking to his contemporaries, Yeshayahu could open with a prophecy of doom, since they were well aware of their misdeeds. Yet, when ordering his prophecies for future generations, it made sense for the prophet to begin with the nation's sins, giving the reader background to understand why the decree of destruction was deserved.
"בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" – Since Yeshayahu 1 opens by sharing that Yeshayahu prophesied during the reign of Uziyahu, some question how this could be true if Yeshayahu was first initiated into prophecy with Uziyahu's death. These commentators offer various solutions to the problem:
- Metaphoric death – Rashi and the Rid suggest that the phrase "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the year when Uziyahu was struck with tzara'at and metaphorically died,3 rather than to the year of his actual death. If so, Yeshayahu was initiated in the middle of Uziyahu's reign and prophesied for several years before his death.
- Initiated in the year prior to Uziyahu's death – Ibn Ezra, instead, points out that the verse speaks of the year (not the day) of Uziyahu's death. As such, Yeshayahu could have received several months worth of prophecies during Uziyahu's reign.4
- Date of transmission – Finally, Shadal asserts that the opening "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the date that Yeshayhau relayed the prophecy,5 not to the year in which he received it.6
Vision of Hashem – Since this is Yeshyahu's first prophecy it is logical why he merits a vision of Hashem. This is comparable to the opening prophecy of Yechezkel who also sees "מַרְאוֹת אֱלֹהִים".
"...אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי" – Rashi, Rid and Shadal explain "נִדְמֵיתִי" to mean "נכרתי".7 Yeshayahu thought that he was deserving of death since he was unworthy of seeing Hashem's glory.
"וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ וְחַטָּאתְךָ תְּכֻפָּר" – According to the Rid and Shadal, Hashem is not referring to any specific sin for which Yeshayahu needed atoning,8 but to a general purification process. As Yeshayahu begins his task as Hashem's messenger and spokesman, Hashem prepares him by cleansing him of all sins and purifying his mouth.9
The task – These sources differ in their understanding of Hashem's mission to Yeshayahu and what is meant by the statements: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" and "הַשְׁמֵן לֵב הָעָם הַזֶּה... פֶּן יִרְאֶה בְעֵינָיו... וָשָׁב וְרָפָא לוֹ"
- Description of future – According to Rashi, Hashem is not commanding that the people should not understand nor that Yeshayahu should actively harden their hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.10 Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation will refuse to heed his words and repent. At the beginning of his mission, Hashem warns Yeshayahu that he is volunteering for a doomed mission, for he will not be successful.11
- Command – The Rid, Ibn Ezra and Shadal,12 in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.13 Due to the nation's many sins,14 the decree of destruction was set, and the people were to be actively prevented from repenting. [For various approaches to the theological question of how Hashem can remove someone's free will and keep them from repenting, see Hardened Hearts.] As such, Yeshayahu's task was not be to bring the people back to Hashem, but simply to warn them of the impending destruction.15
"עַד אֲשֶׁר אִם שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב" – Hashem tells Yeshayahu that the situation will last until "שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב," and that even those who survive will be punished afterwards. These sources disagree regarding both the context of the initial destruction and the identity of the "tenth" who will secondarily be consumed.
- Exile of Ten Tribes – According to the Rid, the verses refer to the destruction and exile16 of the Ten Tribes. Yehuda represents the remaining tenth who is also to be burnt at the hands of Sancheriv, but will ultimately survive and thrive, "כָּאֵלָה וְכָאַלּוֹן אֲשֶׁר בְּשַׁלֶּכֶת מַצֶּבֶת בָּם זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ".
- Exile of Yehuda – Ibn Ezra, in contrast, suggests that the verses refer only to the Southern Kingdom, and speak of the exile of Yehuda itself. This, though, will only occur after ten kings' reigns (וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה).17 [Alternatively, one could suggest that the "tenth" refers to those who remained in the land under the rule of Gedalayah, who were then also forced to flee.] The phrase "זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ"' refers to the returnees from Babylonia.
- Destruction in time of Achaz – Shadal uniquely places the destruction much earlier, in the reign of Achaz,18 when Yehuda was attacked first by Aram and Yisrael,19 and then also ("וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר") by the Edomites and Philistines. The holy seed that ultimately survives is Chizkiyahu, who is able to reform the country as a whole.20 [According to Shadal, then, Hashem's initiation message to Yeshayahu refers not to his entire tenure as prophet but only to the first part thereof. He will initially be met with resistance, but not always.]
Intended audience of the prophecy
- According to this approach it is possible that Yeshayahu was never meant to relay this prophecy to the nation at all, and it is aimed at him alone, preparing him for his task.21 In fact, the prophecy of destruction at the end might not have been relayed at this stage at all, had it not been for Yeshayahu's question "עַד מָתַי".
- Shadal agrees in principle, and suggests that for many years Yeshayahu kept the prophecy to himself. Yet, at some point, when the people not only refused to listen but actively mocked him (Yeshayahu 5:18-20), Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy to show them that their refusal to listen was actually preordained, and in fact, part of their punishment.