Difference between revisions of "Yeshayahu's Mission in Chapter 6/2"
m |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
<point><b>Chronology of the chapters</b> – This position assumes that Sefer Yeshayahu is achronological, and must explain why Chapter 6 and the initiation to prophecy do not open the book:<fn>In contrast to Yeshayahu, both Yirmeyahu and Yechezkel open with the initiation of the prophet, as is expected.</fn><br/> | <point><b>Chronology of the chapters</b> – This position assumes that Sefer Yeshayahu is achronological, and must explain why Chapter 6 and the initiation to prophecy do not open the book:<fn>In contrast to Yeshayahu, both Yirmeyahu and Yechezkel open with the initiation of the prophet, as is expected.</fn><br/> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Relayed later</b> – Shadal posits that though Chapter 6 was the first prophecy that Yeshayahu received, it was only relayed later, after the prophecies of Chapters 2-5.<fn>See below that he claims that since Yeshayahu was tasked with telling the nation that Hashem was | + | <li><b>Relayed later</b> – Shadal posits that though Chapter 6 was the first prophecy that Yeshayahu received, it was only relayed later, after the prophecies of Chapters 2-5.<fn>See below that he claims that since Yeshayahu was tasked with telling the nation that Hashem was to ensure that they did not heed Yeshayahu's words, there was no point in sharing such news before rebuking them. Thus, Yeshayahu first chastised the people for twenty years, and only after they mocked his prophecies (<a href="Yeshayahu5-18-20" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 5:19</a>), proving Hashem's words correct, did he share that their refusal to listen was preordained.</fn></li> |
<li><b>Thematic order preferred</b> – Alternatively, it is possible that thematic order takes precedence over chronological order. Chapters 1-5 describe the nation's sins, while Chapter 6 (through 12) focus on their punishment. When speaking to his contemporaries, Yeshayahu could open with a prophecy of doom, since they were well aware of their misdeeds.  Yet, when ordering his prophecies for future generations, it made sense for the prophet to begin with the nation's sins, giving the reader background to understand why the decree of destruction was deserved.</li> | <li><b>Thematic order preferred</b> – Alternatively, it is possible that thematic order takes precedence over chronological order. Chapters 1-5 describe the nation's sins, while Chapter 6 (through 12) focus on their punishment. When speaking to his contemporaries, Yeshayahu could open with a prophecy of doom, since they were well aware of their misdeeds.  Yet, when ordering his prophecies for future generations, it made sense for the prophet to begin with the nation's sins, giving the reader background to understand why the decree of destruction was deserved.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>"בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ"</b> – As this prophecy is dated "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ", it seems that Yeshayahu was first initiated into prophecy with Uziyahu's death  This, however, appears to contradict <a href="Yeshayahu1-1" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 1:1</a> which states that Yeshayahu prophesied <i>during</i> the reign of Uziyahu.  These commentators offer various solutions to the problem:<br/> | <point><b>"בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ"</b> – As this prophecy is dated "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ", it seems that Yeshayahu was first initiated into prophecy with Uziyahu's death  This, however, appears to contradict <a href="Yeshayahu1-1" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 1:1</a> which states that Yeshayahu prophesied <i>during</i> the reign of Uziyahu.  These commentators offer various solutions to the problem:<br/> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Metaphoric death</b> – Rashi and Rid suggest that the phrase "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the year when Uziyahu was struck with <i>tzara'at</i> and metaphorically died,<fn>They claim that "המצורע חשוב במת".  The Biur, instead, suggests that once Uziyahu was stuck with <i>tzara'at</i> and lost his rule to his son it was as if he died.</fn> rather than to the year of his actual death.  If so, Yeshayahu was initiated in the middle of Uziyahu's reign and prophesied for several years before his death.</li> | + | <li><b>Metaphoric death</b> – Rashi and Rid suggest that the phrase "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the year when Uziyahu was struck with <i>tzara'at</i> and metaphorically died,<fn>They claim that "המצורע חשוב במת".  The Biur, instead, suggests that once Uziyahu was stuck with <i>tzara'at</i> and lost his rule to his son, it was as if he died.</fn> rather than to the year of his actual death.  If so, Yeshayahu was initiated in the middle of Uziyahu's reign and prophesied for several years before his death.</li> |
− | <li><b>Initiated in the year prior to Uziyahu's death</b> – Ibn Ezra, instead, points out that the verse speaks of the <b>year </b>(not the day) of Uziyahu's death.<fn>See, though, N. | + | <li><b>Initiated in the year prior to Uziyahu's death</b> – Ibn Ezra, instead, points out that the verse speaks of the <b>year </b>(not the day) of Uziyahu's death.<fn>See, though, N. Meshel, "חזון הכסא והשרפים – נבואת ההפקדה של ישעיהו," Beit MIkra 48:4 (2003): 345-366, who questions this reading, pointing to the similar heading in Yeshayahu 14:28, "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ אָחָז".  From context, this appears to refer to the year after Achaz' death as the following verses speak of Achaz as having already died: "אַל תִּשְׂמְחִי פְלֶשֶׁת כֻּלֵּךְ כִּי נִשְׁבַּר שֵׁבֶט מַכֵּךְ."  If so, it would seem that Yeshayahu 6:1 also speaks of the days after Uziyahu's death.</fn> As such, Yeshayahu could have received several months worth of prophecies during Uziyahu's reign.<fn>See Radak who questions this possibility from Divrei HaYamim II 26:22, "וְיֶתֶר דִּבְרֵי עֻזִּיָּהוּ <b>הָרִאשֹׁנִים</b> וְהָאַחֲרֹנִים כָּתַב יְשַׁעְיָהוּ בֶן אָמוֹץ הַנָּבִיא," which suggests that Yeshayahu prophesied not only at the end of Uziyahu's life, but also in the beginning of his reign.  Radak himself responds that the verse might simply refer to events narrated by Yeshayahu that took place before he began to prophesy.</fn></li> |
<li><b>Date of transmission</b> – Finally, Shadal asserts that the opening "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the date that Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy,<fn>This, however, is somewhat difficult considering the continuation of the verse, "וָאֶרְאֶה אֶת אֲדֹנָי יֹשֵׁב עַל כִּסֵּא רָם וְנִשָּׂא", from which it sounds that the date in the heading of the chapter refers to the receiving of the vision.</fn> not to the year in which he received it.<fn>He suggests that there could have been as many as twenty years between the receiving and relaying of the prophecy. Nonetheless, Shadal does not date any other prophecy in the book to Uziyahu's reign, explaining that Yeshayahu might simply not have recorded these for future generations.</fn></li> | <li><b>Date of transmission</b> – Finally, Shadal asserts that the opening "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the date that Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy,<fn>This, however, is somewhat difficult considering the continuation of the verse, "וָאֶרְאֶה אֶת אֲדֹנָי יֹשֵׁב עַל כִּסֵּא רָם וְנִשָּׂא", from which it sounds that the date in the heading of the chapter refers to the receiving of the vision.</fn> not to the year in which he received it.<fn>He suggests that there could have been as many as twenty years between the receiving and relaying of the prophecy. Nonetheless, Shadal does not date any other prophecy in the book to Uziyahu's reign, explaining that Yeshayahu might simply not have recorded these for future generations.</fn></li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Vision of Hashem</b> – Since this is Yeshayahu's first prophecy, it is logical why he merits a vision of Hashem.  This is comparable to the opening prophecy of Yechezkel who also sees "מַרְאוֹת אֱלֹהִים".</point> | <point><b>Vision of Hashem</b> – Since this is Yeshayahu's first prophecy, it is logical why he merits a vision of Hashem.  This is comparable to the opening prophecy of Yechezkel who also sees "מַרְאוֹת אֱלֹהִים".</point> | ||
− | <point><b>"...אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי"</b> – Rashi, Rid, and Shadal explain "נִדְמֵיתִי" to mean "‎‏‎נכרתי".‎<fn>Rashi and Rid points to the root's usage in Tzefanya 1:11, "כִּי נִדְמָה כׇּל עַם כְּנַעַן" where it is paralleled to "נִכְרְתוּ כׇּל נְטִילֵי כָסֶף".</fn> Yeshayahu thought that he was deserving of death since he was unworthy of seeing Hashem's glory.</point> | + | <point><b>"...אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי"</b> – Rashi, Rid, and Shadal explain "נִדְמֵיתִי" to mean "‎‏‎נכרתי".‎<fn>Rashi and Rid points to the root's usage in Tzefanya 1:11, "כִּי <b>נִדְמָה</b> כׇּל עַם כְּנַעַן" where it is paralleled to "<b>נִכְרְתוּ</b> כׇּל נְטִילֵי כָסֶף".</fn> Yeshayahu thought that he was deserving of death since he was unworthy of seeing Hashem's glory.</point> |
<point><b>"וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ וְחַטָּאתְךָ תְּכֻפָּר"</b> – According to Rid and Shadal, Hashem is not referring to any specific sin for which Yeshayahu needed atoning,<fn>Rashi, in contrast, explains that Yeshayahu's words "וּבְתוֹךְ עַם טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם אָנֹכִי יוֹשֵׁב" constituted slander of Israel and needed atoning. Ibn Ezra also points to a specific crime of Yeshayahu, the fact that he was an "אִישׁ טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם". He suggests that Yeshayahu bemoaned that he had learned negative speech habits from the nation, making him unworthy of being Hashem's spokesman. [As evidence, Ibn Ezra points to the prophet's words in Yeshayahu 8:11, "וְיִסְּרֵנִי מִלֶּכֶת בְּדֶרֶךְ הָעָם הַזֶּה".] Hashem thus purges his mouth, preparing him for his mission.</fn> but to a general purification process. As Yeshayahu begins his task as Hashem's messenger and spokesman, Hashem prepares him by cleansing him of all sins and purifying his mouth.<fn>Shadal points out that in Tanakh purification often takes place via fire. Thus, here too, Hashem places a burning coal on Yeshayahu's lips. The verse states, "וַיַּגַּע עַל פִּי", the same language used when Yirmeyahu is appointed prophet.  There, however, it represents Hashem's placing His word into the prophet's mouth.</fn></point> | <point><b>"וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ וְחַטָּאתְךָ תְּכֻפָּר"</b> – According to Rid and Shadal, Hashem is not referring to any specific sin for which Yeshayahu needed atoning,<fn>Rashi, in contrast, explains that Yeshayahu's words "וּבְתוֹךְ עַם טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם אָנֹכִי יוֹשֵׁב" constituted slander of Israel and needed atoning. Ibn Ezra also points to a specific crime of Yeshayahu, the fact that he was an "אִישׁ טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם". He suggests that Yeshayahu bemoaned that he had learned negative speech habits from the nation, making him unworthy of being Hashem's spokesman. [As evidence, Ibn Ezra points to the prophet's words in Yeshayahu 8:11, "וְיִסְּרֵנִי מִלֶּכֶת בְּדֶרֶךְ הָעָם הַזֶּה".] Hashem thus purges his mouth, preparing him for his mission.</fn> but to a general purification process. As Yeshayahu begins his task as Hashem's messenger and spokesman, Hashem prepares him by cleansing him of all sins and purifying his mouth.<fn>Shadal points out that in Tanakh purification often takes place via fire. Thus, here too, Hashem places a burning coal on Yeshayahu's lips. The verse states, "וַיַּגַּע עַל פִּי", the same language used when Yirmeyahu is appointed prophet.  There, however, it represents Hashem's placing His word into the prophet's mouth.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>The task</b> – These sources differ in their understanding of Hashem's mission to Yeshayahu and what is meant by the statements: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" and "הַשְׁמֵן לֵב הָעָם הַזֶּה...  פֶּן יִרְאֶה בְעֵינָיו...  וָשָׁב וְרָפָא לוֹ"<br/> | <point><b>The task</b> – These sources differ in their understanding of Hashem's mission to Yeshayahu and what is meant by the statements: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" and "הַשְׁמֵן לֵב הָעָם הַזֶּה...  פֶּן יִרְאֶה בְעֵינָיו...  וָשָׁב וְרָפָא לוֹ"<br/> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Description of future</b> – According to Rashi, Hashem is not commanding that Yeshayahu should actively harden the people's hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.<fn>He apparently reads the verb "הַשְׁמֵן"' as an infinitive absolute (שם הפועל), indicative of a continuous process | + | <li><b>Description of future</b> – According to Rashi, Hashem is not commanding that Yeshayahu should actively harden the people's hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.<fn>He apparently reads the verb "הַשְׁמֵן"' as an infinitive absolute (שם הפועל), indicative of a continuous process, explaining that Hashem is saying: "לבם הולך הלוך והשמן".</fn> Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation will refuse to heed his words and repent.  At the beginning of the prophet's assignment, Hashem warns Yeshayahu that he is volunteering for a doomed mission.<fn>See Shadal who writes, "‎והכוונה אם תרצה ללכת בשליחותי, על מנת כן צריך אתה ללכת, על מנת שלא ישמעו אליך".</fn></li> |
− | <li><b>Command</b> – Rid, Ibn Ezra, and Shadal,<fn>This is how Shadal explains the verses in his introduction to the chapter and in his comments to verse 1.  In his discussion of verses 9-10, however, he appears to suggest that Hashem is only giving an analogy to let Yeshayahu know that the people are not going to listen to him.</fn> in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.<fn>Shadal points out that the language of "'<b>אַל</b> תָּבִינוּ" as opposed to "לא תבינו" indicates the imperative form.</fn> Due to the nation's many sins,<fn>Rid, instead, suggests that after so many warnings that went unheeded, Hashem is no longer interested in giving the people the possibility of repenting.  He reads the phrase "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" as if it were written in the past tense:  "I have sent so many prophet for you to listen to, yet you have refused to understand" | + | <li><b>Command</b> – Rid, Ibn Ezra, and Shadal,<fn>This is how Shadal explains the verses in his introduction to the chapter and in his comments to verse 1.  In his discussion of verses 9-10, however, he appears to suggest that Hashem is only giving an analogy to let Yeshayahu know that the people are not going to listen to him.</fn> in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.<fn>Shadal points out that the language of "'<b>אַל</b> תָּבִינוּ" as opposed to "לא תבינו" indicates the imperative form.</fn> Due to the nation's many sins,<fn>Rid, instead, suggests that after so many warnings that went unheeded, Hashem is no longer interested in giving the people the possibility of repenting.  He reads the phrase "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" as if it were written in the past tense:  "I have sent so many prophet for you to listen to, yet you have refused to understand."</fn> the decree of destruction was set, and the people were to be actively prevented from repenting.<fn>For various approaches to the theological question of how Hashem can remove someone's free will and keep them from repenting, see <a href="Hardened Hearts" data-aht="page">Hardened Hearts</a>.</fn> As such, Yeshayahu's task was not be to bring the people back to Hashem, but simply to warn them of the impending destruction.<fn>Indeed, many of Yeshayahu's prophecies simply speak of the nation's sins or impending punishment, without including a call for change. Thus, for instance, Chapters 2-5 decry the people's arrogance, but mainly as a way of introducing their downfall. There are exceptions, however, and in Chapter 1, Yeshayahu clearly calls for the people to repent: "רַחֲצוּ הִזַּכּוּ הָסִירוּ רֹעַ מַעַלְלֵיכֶם מִנֶּגֶד עֵינָי חִדְלוּ הָרֵעַ."</fn></li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>"עַד אֲשֶׁר אִם שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב... וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה"</b> – These sources disagree regarding both the context of the initial destruction and the identity of the "tenth" who will secondarily be consumed.<br/> | <point><b>"עַד אֲשֶׁר אִם שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב... וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה"</b> – These sources disagree regarding both the context of the initial destruction and the identity of the "tenth" who will secondarily be consumed.<br/> |
Version as of 04:44, 7 August 2018
Yeshayahu's Mission in Chapter 6
Exegetical Approaches
Initiation to Prophecy
The chapter describes Yeshayahu's appointment as prophet.
- Relayed later – Shadal posits that though Chapter 6 was the first prophecy that Yeshayahu received, it was only relayed later, after the prophecies of Chapters 2-5.2
- Thematic order preferred – Alternatively, it is possible that thematic order takes precedence over chronological order. Chapters 1-5 describe the nation's sins, while Chapter 6 (through 12) focus on their punishment. When speaking to his contemporaries, Yeshayahu could open with a prophecy of doom, since they were well aware of their misdeeds. Yet, when ordering his prophecies for future generations, it made sense for the prophet to begin with the nation's sins, giving the reader background to understand why the decree of destruction was deserved.
- Metaphoric death – Rashi and Rid suggest that the phrase "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the year when Uziyahu was struck with tzara'at and metaphorically died,3 rather than to the year of his actual death. If so, Yeshayahu was initiated in the middle of Uziyahu's reign and prophesied for several years before his death.
- Initiated in the year prior to Uziyahu's death – Ibn Ezra, instead, points out that the verse speaks of the year (not the day) of Uziyahu's death.4 As such, Yeshayahu could have received several months worth of prophecies during Uziyahu's reign.5
- Date of transmission – Finally, Shadal asserts that the opening "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the date that Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy,6 not to the year in which he received it.7
- Description of future – According to Rashi, Hashem is not commanding that Yeshayahu should actively harden the people's hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.11 Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation will refuse to heed his words and repent. At the beginning of the prophet's assignment, Hashem warns Yeshayahu that he is volunteering for a doomed mission.12
- Command – Rid, Ibn Ezra, and Shadal,13 in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.14 Due to the nation's many sins,15 the decree of destruction was set, and the people were to be actively prevented from repenting.16 As such, Yeshayahu's task was not be to bring the people back to Hashem, but simply to warn them of the impending destruction.17
- Exile of Ten Tribes – According to Rid, the verses refer to the destruction and exile18 of the Ten Tribes. Yehuda represents the remaining tenth who is also to be burnt at the hands of Sancheriv, but who will ultimately survive and thrive, "כָּאֵלָה וְכָאַלּוֹן אֲשֶׁר בְּשַׁלֶּכֶת מַצֶּבֶת בָּם זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ".
- Exile of Yehuda – Ibn Ezra, in contrast, suggests that the verses refer only to the Southern Kingdom, and speak of the exile of Yehuda itself. This, though, will only occur after ten kings' reigns (וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה).19 The phrase "זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ"' refers to the returnees from Babylonia.
- Destruction in the time of Achaz – Shadal uniquely places the destruction much earlier, in the reign of Achaz, when Yehuda was attacked first by Aram and Yisrael,20 and then also ("וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר") by the Edomites and Philistines. The holy seed that ultimately survives is Chizkiyahu, who is able to reform the country.21 [According to Shadal, Hashem's initiation message to Yeshayahu refers not to his entire tenure as prophet but only to the first part thereof. He will initially be met with resistance, but not always.]
- According to this approach it is possible that Yeshayahu was never meant to transmit this prophecy to the nation at all, and it was aimed at him alone.22 In fact, the prophecy of destruction at the end might not have been relayed even to Yeshayahu at this stage had it not been for his question "עַד מָתַי".
- Shadal agrees in principle and suggests that for many years Yeshayahu kept the prophecy to himself. Yet, at some point, when the people not only refused to listen but actively mocked him (Yeshayahu 5:18-20), Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy to show them that their refusal to listen was actually preordained, and in fact, part of their punishment.
Unique Mission
Since the prophecy of Chapter 6 sealed the fate of Israel and foretold their exile, it was relayed to Yeshayahu in an exalted fashion, matching the intensity of the mission.
Re-initiation to Prophecy
Yeshayahu's vision of Chapter 6 constitutes a second call to prophecy, after a hiatus in which he had not received the word of Hashem. This position divides regarding the reason for the break:
Yeshayahu Resigned
When the nation refused to heed Yeshayahu's words and mocked the punishments he forewarned, Yeshayahu gave up and stopped rebuking the people.
- Encouragement – Hashem explains to Yeshayahu that the reason the people had refused to heed him was because Hashem had hardened their hearts, ensuring that they would hear but not understand. It was Hashem who was preventing them from repenting.
- Warning – Hashem warns Yeshayahu that if he re-accepts Hashem's mission, he must do so with the full knowledge that the people are going to continue to refuse to listen.
- Eliyahu – According to some opinions, Eliyahu's flight to Chorev marked his desire to stop prophesying. In its aftermath, he, too, receives an elaborate vision of Hashem in which he is re-initiated into prophecy. For elaboration, see Eliyahu at Chorev
- Moshe – Shemot Rabbah 5:19 posits that after Moshe's initial failed meeting with Paroh, he returned to Midyan, suggesting that Moshe, too, "resigned" after an initial failure. Unlike Yeshayahu, Moshe does not receive a second vision of Hashem, but it is possible that Shemot 6 nonetheless represents a renewed call to prophecy, where Hashem repeats the mission previously given him in Shemot 3-4.
Yeshayahu Sinned
When Uziyahu was struck with tzara'at, Yeshayahu was dismayed at the injustice of the punishment. He had thought the king a righteous individual and undeserving of such a fate. This sinful doubting of Hashem's justice precluded him from receiving further prophecy.
Yeshayahu Unnecessary
Since the people had not forsaken Hashem during the reign of Uziyahu, there was no need for chastisement for much of his rule.