Difference between revisions of "Yeshayahu's Mission in Chapter 6/2"
m |
m |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><b>Metaphoric death</b> – Rashi and the Rid suggest that the phrase "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the year when Uziyahu was struck with <i>tzara'at</i> and metaphorically died,<fn>They claim that "המצורע חשוב במת".  The Biur, instead, suggests that once Uziyahu was stuck with tzara'at and lost his rule to his son it was as if he died.</fn> rather than to the year of his actual death.  If so, Yeshayahu was initiated in the middle of Uziyahu's reign and prophesied for several years before his death.</li> | <li><b>Metaphoric death</b> – Rashi and the Rid suggest that the phrase "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the year when Uziyahu was struck with <i>tzara'at</i> and metaphorically died,<fn>They claim that "המצורע חשוב במת".  The Biur, instead, suggests that once Uziyahu was stuck with tzara'at and lost his rule to his son it was as if he died.</fn> rather than to the year of his actual death.  If so, Yeshayahu was initiated in the middle of Uziyahu's reign and prophesied for several years before his death.</li> | ||
− | <li><b>Initiated in the year prior to Uziyahu's death</b> – Ibn Ezra, instead, points out that the verse speaks of the <b>year </b>(not the day) of Uziyahu's death.<fn>See, though, N. Meshal, "חזון הכסא והשרפים – נבואת ההפקדה של ישעיהו," Beit MIkra 48:4 (2003): 345-366, who questions this reading, pointing to the similar heading in Yeshayahu 14:28, "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ אָחָז".  From context, this appears to refer to the year after Achaz' death as the following verses speak of Achaz as having already died: "אַל תִּשְׂמְחִי פְלֶשֶׁת כֻּלֵּךְ כִּי נִשְׁבַּר שֵׁבֶט מַכֵּךְ."  If so, it would seem that Yeshayahu 6:1 also speaks of the days after Uziyahu's death.</fn> As such, Yeshayahu could have received several months worth of prophecies during Uziyahu's reign.<fn>See Radak who questions this possibility from Divrei HaYamim II 26:22, "וְיֶתֶר דִּבְרֵי עֻזִּיָּהוּ הָרִאשֹׁנִים וְהָאַחֲרֹנִים כָּתַב יְשַׁעְיָהוּ בֶן אָמוֹץ הַנָּבִיא," which suggests that Yeshayahu prophesied not just towards the end of Uziyahu's life, but also in the beginning of his reign | + | <li><b>Initiated in the year prior to Uziyahu's death</b> – Ibn Ezra, instead, points out that the verse speaks of the <b>year </b>(not the day) of Uziyahu's death.<fn>See, though, N. Meshal, "חזון הכסא והשרפים – נבואת ההפקדה של ישעיהו," Beit MIkra 48:4 (2003): 345-366, who questions this reading, pointing to the similar heading in Yeshayahu 14:28, "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ אָחָז".  From context, this appears to refer to the year after Achaz' death as the following verses speak of Achaz as having already died: "אַל תִּשְׂמְחִי פְלֶשֶׁת כֻּלֵּךְ כִּי נִשְׁבַּר שֵׁבֶט מַכֵּךְ."  If so, it would seem that Yeshayahu 6:1 also speaks of the days after Uziyahu's death.</fn> As such, Yeshayahu could have received several months worth of prophecies during Uziyahu's reign.<fn>See Radak who questions this possibility from Divrei HaYamim II 26:22, "וְיֶתֶר דִּבְרֵי עֻזִּיָּהוּ <b>הָרִאשֹׁנִים</b> וְהָאַחֲרֹנִים כָּתַב יְשַׁעְיָהוּ בֶן אָמוֹץ הַנָּבִיא," which suggests that Yeshayahu prophesied not just towards the end of Uziyahu's life, but also in the beginning of his reign.  Radak himself responds that the verse might simply refer to events narrated by Yeshayahu that took place before he began to prophesy.</fn></li> |
− | <li><b>Date of transmission</b> – Finally, Shadal asserts that the opening "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the date that Yeshayhau relayed the prophecy,<fn>This, however, is somewhat difficult considering the continuation of the verse, "וָאֶרְאֶה אֶת אֲדֹנָי יֹשֵׁב עַל כִּסֵּא רָם וְנִשָּׂא" from which it sounds that the date refers to the receiving of the vision.</fn> not to the year in which he received it.<fn>He suggests that there could have been as many as twenty years between the receiving and relaying of the prophecy. Nonetheless, Shadal does not date any other prophecy in the book to Uziyahu's reign, explaining that Yeshayahu might simply not have recorded these for future generations.</fn></li> | + | <li><b>Date of transmission</b> – Finally, Shadal asserts that the opening "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the date that Yeshayhau relayed the prophecy,<fn>This, however, is somewhat difficult considering the continuation of the verse, "וָאֶרְאֶה אֶת אֲדֹנָי יֹשֵׁב עַל כִּסֵּא רָם וְנִשָּׂא", from which it sounds that the date in the heading of the chapter refers to the receiving of the vision.</fn> not to the year in which he received it.<fn>He suggests that there could have been as many as twenty years between the receiving and relaying of the prophecy. Nonetheless, Shadal does not date any other prophecy in the book to Uziyahu's reign, explaining that Yeshayahu might simply not have recorded these for future generations.</fn></li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Vision of Hashem</b> – Since this is Yeshyahu's first prophecy it is logical why he merits a vision of Hashem.  This is comparable to the opening prophecy of Yechezkel who also sees "מַרְאוֹת אֱלֹהִים".</point> | <point><b>Vision of Hashem</b> – Since this is Yeshyahu's first prophecy it is logical why he merits a vision of Hashem.  This is comparable to the opening prophecy of Yechezkel who also sees "מַרְאוֹת אֱלֹהִים".</point> | ||
− | <point><b>"...אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי"</b> – Rashi, Rid and Shadal explain "נִדְמֵיתִי" to mean "‎‏‎נכרתי".‎<fn>Rashi and the Rid points to the root's usage in Tzefanya 1:11, " | + | <point><b>"...אוֹי לִי כִי נִדְמֵיתִי"</b> – Rashi, Rid and Shadal explain "נִדְמֵיתִי" to mean "‎‏‎נכרתי".‎<fn>Rashi and the Rid points to the root's usage in Tzefanya 1:11, "כִּי נִדְמָה כׇּל עַם כְּנַעַן" where it is paralleled to "נִכְרְתוּ כׇּל נְטִילֵי כָסֶף".</fn> Yeshayahu thought that he was deserving of death since he was unworthy of seeing Hashem's glory.</point> |
<point><b>"וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ וְחַטָּאתְךָ תְּכֻפָּר"</b> – According to the Rid and Shadal, Hashem is not referring to any specific sin for which Yeshayahu needed atoning,<fn>Rashi, in contrast, explains that Yeshayahu's words "וּבְתוֹךְ עַם טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם אָנֹכִי יוֹשֵׁב" constituted slander of Israel and needed atoning. Ibn Ezra also points to a specific crime of Yeshayahu, the fact that he was an "אִישׁ טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם". He suggests that Yeshayahu bemoaned that he had learned negative speech habits from the nation, making him unworthy of being Hashem's spokesman. [As evidence, Ibn Ezra points to the prophet's words in Yeshayahu 8:11, "וְיִסְּרֵנִי מִלֶּכֶת בְּדֶרֶךְ הָעָם הַזֶּה".] Hashem thus purges his mouth, preparing him for his mission.</fn> but to a general purification process. As Yeshayahu begins his task as Hashem's messenger and spokesman, Hashem prepares him by cleansing him of all sins and purifying his mouth.<fn>Shadal points out that in Tanakh purification often takes place via fire; so too here, Hashem places a burning coal on Yeshayahu's lips. The verse states, "וַיַּגַּע עַל פִּי", the same language used when Yirmeyahu is appointed prophet.  There, however, it represents Hashem's placing His word into the prophet's mouth.</fn></point> | <point><b>"וְסָר עֲוֺנֶךָ וְחַטָּאתְךָ תְּכֻפָּר"</b> – According to the Rid and Shadal, Hashem is not referring to any specific sin for which Yeshayahu needed atoning,<fn>Rashi, in contrast, explains that Yeshayahu's words "וּבְתוֹךְ עַם טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם אָנֹכִי יוֹשֵׁב" constituted slander of Israel and needed atoning. Ibn Ezra also points to a specific crime of Yeshayahu, the fact that he was an "אִישׁ טְמֵא שְׂפָתַיִם". He suggests that Yeshayahu bemoaned that he had learned negative speech habits from the nation, making him unworthy of being Hashem's spokesman. [As evidence, Ibn Ezra points to the prophet's words in Yeshayahu 8:11, "וְיִסְּרֵנִי מִלֶּכֶת בְּדֶרֶךְ הָעָם הַזֶּה".] Hashem thus purges his mouth, preparing him for his mission.</fn> but to a general purification process. As Yeshayahu begins his task as Hashem's messenger and spokesman, Hashem prepares him by cleansing him of all sins and purifying his mouth.<fn>Shadal points out that in Tanakh purification often takes place via fire; so too here, Hashem places a burning coal on Yeshayahu's lips. The verse states, "וַיַּגַּע עַל פִּי", the same language used when Yirmeyahu is appointed prophet.  There, however, it represents Hashem's placing His word into the prophet's mouth.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>The task</b> – These sources differ in their understanding of Hashem's mission to Yeshayahu and what is meant by the statements: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" and "הַשְׁמֵן לֵב הָעָם הַזֶּה...  פֶּן יִרְאֶה בְעֵינָיו...  וָשָׁב וְרָפָא לוֹ"<br/> | <point><b>The task</b> – These sources differ in their understanding of Hashem's mission to Yeshayahu and what is meant by the statements: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" and "הַשְׁמֵן לֵב הָעָם הַזֶּה...  פֶּן יִרְאֶה בְעֵינָיו...  וָשָׁב וְרָפָא לוֹ"<br/> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Description of future</b> – According to Rashi, Hashem is not commanding that the people should not understand nor that Yeshayahu should actively harden their hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.<fn>He apparently reads the verbs "הַשְׁמֵן"' as an infinitive absolute (שם הפועל), indicative of a continuous process, or of certainty, explaining that Hashem is saying: "לבם הולך הלוך והשמן".</fn> Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation will refuse to heed his words and repent.  At the beginning of his assignment, Hashem warns Yeshayahu that he is volunteering for a doomed mission, | + | <li><b>Description of future</b> – According to Rashi, Hashem is not commanding that the people should not understand nor that Yeshayahu should actively harden their hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.<fn>He apparently reads the verbs "הַשְׁמֵן"' as an infinitive absolute (שם הפועל), indicative of a continuous process, or of certainty, explaining that Hashem is saying: "לבם הולך הלוך והשמן".</fn> Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation will refuse to heed his words and repent.  At the beginning of his assignment, Hashem warns Yeshayahu that he is volunteering for a doomed mission, and he will not be successful.<fn>See Shadal who writes, "והכוונה אם תרצה ללכת בשליחותי, על מנת כן צריך אתה ללכת, על מנת שלא ישמעו אליך".</fn></li> |
− | <li><b>Command</b> – The Rid, Ibn Ezra and Shadal,<fn>This is how Shadal explains the verses in his introduction | + | <li><b>Command</b> – The Rid, Ibn Ezra and Shadal,<fn>This is how Shadal explains the verses in his introduction to the chapter and in his comments to verse 1.  In his discussion of verses 9-10, however, he appears to suggest that Hashem is only giving an analogy to let Yeshayahu know that the people are not going to listen to him.</fn> in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.<fn>Shadal points out that the language of "'<b>אַל</b> תָּבִינוּ" as opposed to "לא תבינו" indicates the imperative form.</fn> Due to the nation's many sins,<fn>The Rid, instead, suggests that after so many warnings that went unheeded, Hashem is no longer interested in giving the people the possibility of repenting.  He reads the phrase "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" as if it were written in the past tense:  "I have sent so many prophet for you to listen to, yet you have refused to understand".</fn> the decree of destruction was set, and the people were to be actively prevented from repenting. [For various approaches to the theological question of how Hashem can remove someone's free will and keep them from repenting, see <a href="Hardened Hearts" data-aht="page">Hardened Hearts</a>.] As such, Yeshayahu's task was not be to bring the people back to Hashem, but simply to warn them of the impending destruction.<fn>Indeed, many of Yeshayahu's prophecies simply speak of the nation's sins or impending punishment, without including a call for change. Thus, for instance, Chapters 2-5 decry the people's arrogance, but mainly as a way of introducing their downfall. There are exceptions, however, and in Chapter 1, Yeshayahu clearly calls for the people to repent: "רַחֲצוּ הִזַּכּוּ הָסִירוּ רֹעַ מַעַלְלֵיכֶם מִנֶּגֶד עֵינָי חִדְלוּ הָרֵעַ."</fn></li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>"עַד אֲשֶׁר אִם שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב"</b> – Hashem tells Yeshayahu that the situation will last until "שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב," and that even those who survive will be punished afterwards ("וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר"). These sources disagree regarding both the context of the initial destruction and the identity of the "tenth" who will secondarily be consumed.<br/> | <point><b>"עַד אֲשֶׁר אִם שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב"</b> – Hashem tells Yeshayahu that the situation will last until "שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב," and that even those who survive will be punished afterwards ("וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר"). These sources disagree regarding both the context of the initial destruction and the identity of the "tenth" who will secondarily be consumed.<br/> | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
<point><b>"וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר כָּאֵלָה וְכָאַלּוֹן אֲשֶׁר בְּשַׁלֶּכֶת מַצֶּבֶת בָּם"</b> – Radak explains that Hashem shares that after ten kings' reigns,<fn>Cf. Ibn Ezra above.</fn> Yehuda, too, will be punished and exiled, but in contrast to the Ten Tribes who are lost forever, they will eventually return.  Like trees who lose their leaves in the winter and appear dried out and dead, but rejuvenate in the spring, so, too, Yehuda will once again thrive.<fn>This position could have alternatively explained (like the Rid above) that the "עֲשִׂרִיָּה" refers to the tenth of the tribes who will remain after Israel is exiled, ie. Yehuda. They will be burned by Sancheriv, but will ultimately survive.</fn></point> | <point><b>"וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר כָּאֵלָה וְכָאַלּוֹן אֲשֶׁר בְּשַׁלֶּכֶת מַצֶּבֶת בָּם"</b> – Radak explains that Hashem shares that after ten kings' reigns,<fn>Cf. Ibn Ezra above.</fn> Yehuda, too, will be punished and exiled, but in contrast to the Ten Tribes who are lost forever, they will eventually return.  Like trees who lose their leaves in the winter and appear dried out and dead, but rejuvenate in the spring, so, too, Yehuda will once again thrive.<fn>This position could have alternatively explained (like the Rid above) that the "עֲשִׂרִיָּה" refers to the tenth of the tribes who will remain after Israel is exiled, ie. Yehuda. They will be burned by Sancheriv, but will ultimately survive.</fn></point> | ||
<point><b>Yeshayahu's audience</b> – According to this approach, the target audience of this prophecy is the Northern Kingdom rather than Yehuda.</point> | <point><b>Yeshayahu's audience</b> – According to this approach, the target audience of this prophecy is the Northern Kingdom rather than Yehuda.</point> | ||
− | <point><b>Biblical | + | <point><b>Biblical parallels</b> – It is possible that Yechezkel's vision of Hashem in the opening chapters of his book served a similar purpose.  There, too, Hashem might not have revealed Himself as part of the prophet's annunciation, but because He was transmitting a message of ultimate destruction. Yechezkel's vision, like this one, is accompanied by news of devastation: Hashem's decision to destroy the Mikdash, remove His presence, and exile Yehuda.</point> |
</category> | </category> | ||
<category>Re-initiation to Prophecy | <category>Re-initiation to Prophecy |
Version as of 08:24, 31 July 2018
Yeshayahu's Mission in Chapter 6
Exegetical Approaches
Initiation to Prophecy
The chapter describes Yeshayahu's appointment, where he was prepared for and received his prophetic mission.
- Relayed later – Shadal posits that though Chapter 6 was the first prophecy that Yeshayahu received, it was only relayed later, after the prophecies of Chapters 2-5.2
- Thematic order preferred – Alternatively, it is possible that thematic order takes precedence over chronological order. Chapters 1-5 describe the nation's sins, while Chapter 6 (through 12) focus on their punishment. When speaking to his contemporaries, Yeshayahu could open with a prophecy of doom, since they were well aware of their misdeeds. Yet, when ordering his prophecies for future generations, it made sense for the prophet to begin with the nation's sins, giving the reader background to understand why the decree of destruction was deserved.
- Metaphoric death – Rashi and the Rid suggest that the phrase "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the year when Uziyahu was struck with tzara'at and metaphorically died,3 rather than to the year of his actual death. If so, Yeshayahu was initiated in the middle of Uziyahu's reign and prophesied for several years before his death.
- Initiated in the year prior to Uziyahu's death – Ibn Ezra, instead, points out that the verse speaks of the year (not the day) of Uziyahu's death.4 As such, Yeshayahu could have received several months worth of prophecies during Uziyahu's reign.5
- Date of transmission – Finally, Shadal asserts that the opening "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the date that Yeshayhau relayed the prophecy,6 not to the year in which he received it.7
- Description of future – According to Rashi, Hashem is not commanding that the people should not understand nor that Yeshayahu should actively harden their hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.11 Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation will refuse to heed his words and repent. At the beginning of his assignment, Hashem warns Yeshayahu that he is volunteering for a doomed mission, and he will not be successful.12
- Command – The Rid, Ibn Ezra and Shadal,13 in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.14 Due to the nation's many sins,15 the decree of destruction was set, and the people were to be actively prevented from repenting. [For various approaches to the theological question of how Hashem can remove someone's free will and keep them from repenting, see Hardened Hearts.] As such, Yeshayahu's task was not be to bring the people back to Hashem, but simply to warn them of the impending destruction.16
- Exile of Ten Tribes – According to the Rid, the verses refer to the destruction and exile17 of the Ten Tribes. Yehuda represents the remaining tenth who is also to be burnt at the hands of Sancheriv, but will ultimately survive and thrive, "כָּאֵלָה וְכָאַלּוֹן אֲשֶׁר בְּשַׁלֶּכֶת מַצֶּבֶת בָּם זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ".
- Exile of Yehuda – Ibn Ezra, in contrast, suggests that the verses refer only to the Southern Kingdom, and speak of the exile of Yehuda itself. This, though, will only occur after ten kings' reigns (וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה).18 [Alternatively, one could suggest that the "tenth" refers to those who remained in the land under the rule of Gedalayah, who were then also forced to flee.] The phrase "זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ"' refers to the returnees from Babylonia.
- Destruction in time of Achaz – Shadal uniquely places the destruction much earlier, in the reign of Achaz,19 when Yehuda was attacked first by Aram and Yisrael,20 and then also ("וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר") by the Edomites and Philistines. The holy seed that ultimately survives is Chizkiyahu, who is able to reform the country as a whole.21 [According to Shadal, then, Hashem's initiation message to Yeshayahu refers not to his entire tenure as prophet but only to the first part thereof. He will initially be met with resistance, but not always.]
- According to this approach it is possible that Yeshayahu was never meant to transmit this prophecy to the nation at all, and it was aimed at him alone.22 In fact, the prophecy of destruction at the end might not have been relayed even to Yeshayahu at this stage, had it not been for his question "עַד מָתַי".
- Shadal agrees in principle, and suggests that for many years Yeshayahu kept the prophecy to himself. Yet, at some point, when the people not only refused to listen but actively mocked him (Yeshayahu 5:18-20), Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy to show them that their refusal to listen was actually preordained, and in fact, part of their punishment.
Unique Mission
Since the prophecy of Chapter 6 sealed the fate of Israel, foretelling their exile, it was relayed to Yeshayahu in an exalted fashion, matching the intensity of the mission.
Re-initiation to Prophecy
Yeshayahu's vision of Chapter 6 constitutes a second call to prophecy, after a hiatus in which he had not received the word of Hashem. This position divides regarding the reason for the break:
Yeshayahu Resigned
When the nation refused to heed Yeshayahu's words and mocked the punishments he forewarned, Yeshayahu gave up and stopped rebuking the people.
- Encouragement – Hashem explains to Yeshayahu that the reason the people had refused to heed him was because Hashem had hardened their hearts, ensuring that they would hear but not understand. It was Hashem who was preventing them from repenting.
- Warning – Hashem warns Yeshayahu that if he re-accepts Hashem's mission, he must do so with the full knowledge that the people are going to continue to refuse to listen.
- Eliyahu – According to some opinions, Eliyahu's flight to Chorev marked his desire to stop prophesying. In its aftermath, he, too, receives an elaborate vision of Hashem in which he is re-inititaed into prophecy. For elaboration, see Eliyahu at Chorev
- Moshe – Shemot Rabbah 5:19 posits that after Moshe's initial failed meeting with Paroh he returned to Midyan, suggesting that Moshe, too, "resigned" after an initial failure. Though, unlike Yeshayahu, Moshe does not receive a second vision of Hashem, but it is possible that Shemot 6 nonetheless represents a renewed call to prophecy, where Hashem repeats the mission previously given him in Shemot 3-4.
Yeshayahu Sinned
When Uziyahu was struck with tzara'at, Yeshayahu was dismayed at the injustice of the punishment. He had thought the king a righteous individual and undeserving of such a fate. This sinful doubting of Hashem's justice precluded him from receiving further prophecy.
Yeshayahu Unnecessary
Since the people had not forsaken Hashem during the reign of Uziyahu, there was no need for chastisement for much of his rule.