Difference between revisions of "Yeshayahu's Mission in Chapter 6/2"
m |
m |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<p>The chapter describes Yeshayahu's appointment as prophet.</p> | <p>The chapter describes Yeshayahu's appointment as prophet.</p> | ||
<mekorot><multilink><a href="MekhiltaDeRabbiYishmaelShemot15-9" data-aht="source">Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Shemot</a><a href="MekhiltaDeRabbiYishmaelShemot15-9" data-aht="source">15:9</a><a href="Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Shemot" data-aht="parshan">About Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Shemot</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashiYeshayahu6-157-13" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiYeshayahu1-1" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 1:1</a><a href="RashiYeshayahu6-157-13" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 6:1, 5, 7-13</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraYeshayahu1-1" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 1:1</a><a href="IbnEzraYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 6</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RidYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">Rid</a><a href="RidYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 6</a><a href="R. Yeshayah of Trani (Rid)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yeshayah of Trani</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="ShadalYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 6</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink></mekorot> | <mekorot><multilink><a href="MekhiltaDeRabbiYishmaelShemot15-9" data-aht="source">Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Shemot</a><a href="MekhiltaDeRabbiYishmaelShemot15-9" data-aht="source">15:9</a><a href="Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Shemot" data-aht="parshan">About Mekhilta DeRabbi Yishmael Shemot</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RashiYeshayahu6-157-13" data-aht="source">Rashi</a><a href="RashiYeshayahu1-1" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 1:1</a><a href="RashiYeshayahu6-157-13" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 6:1, 5, 7-13</a><a href="R. Shelomo Yitzchaki (Rashi)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shelomo Yitzchaki</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="IbnEzraYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">Ibn Ezra</a><a href="IbnEzraYeshayahu1-1" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 1:1</a><a href="IbnEzraYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 6</a><a href="R. Avraham ibn Ezra" data-aht="parshan">About R. Avraham ibn Ezra</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="RidYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">Rid</a><a href="RidYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 6</a><a href="R. Yeshayah of Trani (Rid)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Yeshayah of Trani</a></multilink>, <multilink><a href="ShadalYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">Shadal</a><a href="ShadalYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 6</a><a href="R. Shemuel David Luzzatto (Shadal)" data-aht="parshan">About R. Shemuel David Luzzatto</a></multilink></mekorot> | ||
− | <point><b>"אֶת מִי אֶשְׁלַח...  וָאֹמַר הִנְנִי שְׁלָחֵנִי"</b> – Rashi and Rid point to these words as proof that the chapter speaks of Yeshayahu | + | <point><b>"אֶת מִי אֶשְׁלַח...  וָאֹמַר הִנְנִי שְׁלָחֵנִי"</b> – Rashi and Rid point to these words as proof that the chapter speaks of the commissioning of Yeshayahu into prophecy.</point> |
<point><b>Chronology of the chapters</b> – This position assumes that Sefer Yeshayahu is achronological, and must explain why Chapter 6 and the initiation to prophecy do not open the book:<fn>In contrast to Yeshayahu, both Yirmeyahu and Yechezkel open with the initiation of the prophet, as is expected.</fn><br/> | <point><b>Chronology of the chapters</b> – This position assumes that Sefer Yeshayahu is achronological, and must explain why Chapter 6 and the initiation to prophecy do not open the book:<fn>In contrast to Yeshayahu, both Yirmeyahu and Yechezkel open with the initiation of the prophet, as is expected.</fn><br/> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
<point><b>The task</b> – These sources differ in their understanding of Hashem's mission to Yeshayahu and what is meant by the statements: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" and "הַשְׁמֵן לֵב הָעָם הַזֶּה...  פֶּן יִרְאֶה בְעֵינָיו...  וָשָׁב וְרָפָא לוֹ"<br/> | <point><b>The task</b> – These sources differ in their understanding of Hashem's mission to Yeshayahu and what is meant by the statements: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" and "הַשְׁמֵן לֵב הָעָם הַזֶּה...  פֶּן יִרְאֶה בְעֵינָיו...  וָשָׁב וְרָפָא לוֹ"<br/> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Description of future</b> – According to Rashi, Hashem was not commanding that Yeshayahu should actively harden the people's hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.<fn>He apparently reads the verb "הַשְׁמֵן"' as an infinitive absolute (שם הפועל), indicative of a continuous process, explaining that Hashem is saying: "לבם הולך הלוך והשמן".</fn> Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation | + | <li><b>Description of future</b> – According to Rashi, Hashem was not commanding that Yeshayahu should actively harden the people's hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.<fn>He apparently reads the verb "הַשְׁמֵן"' as an infinitive absolute (שם הפועל), indicative of a continuous process, explaining that Hashem is saying: "לבם הולך הלוך והשמן".</fn> Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation would refuse to heed his words and repent.  At the beginning of the prophet's assignment, Hashem warned Yeshayahu that he was volunteering for a doomed mission.<fn>See Shadal who writes, "‎והכוונה אם תרצה ללכת בשליחותי, על מנת כן צריך אתה ללכת, על מנת שלא ישמעו אליך".</fn></li> |
<li><b>Command</b> – Rid, Ibn Ezra, and Shadal,<fn>This is how Shadal explains the verses in his introduction to the chapter and in his comments to verse 1.  In his discussion of verses 9-10, however, he appears to suggest that Hashem is only giving an analogy to let Yeshayahu know that the people are not going to listen to him.</fn> in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.<fn>Shadal points out that the language of "'<b>אַל</b> תָּבִינוּ" as opposed to "לא תבינו" indicates the imperative form.</fn> Due to the nation's many sins,<fn>Rid, instead, suggests that after so many warnings that went unheeded, Hashem is no longer interested in giving the people the possibility of repenting.  He reads the phrase "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" as if it were written in the past tense:  "I have sent so many prophet for you to listen to, yet you have refused to understand."</fn> the decree of destruction was set, and the people were to be actively prevented from repenting.<fn>For various approaches to the theological question of how Hashem can remove someone's free will and keep them from repenting, see <a href="Hardened Hearts" data-aht="page">Hardened Hearts</a>.</fn> As such, Yeshayahu's task was not be to bring the people back to Hashem, but simply to warn them of the impending destruction.<fn>Indeed, many of Yeshayahu's prophecies simply speak of the nation's sins or impending punishment, without including a call for change. Thus, for instance, Chapters 2-5 decry the people's arrogance, but mainly as a way of introducing their downfall. There are exceptions, however, and in Chapter 1, Yeshayahu clearly calls for the people to repent: "רַחֲצוּ הִזַּכּוּ הָסִירוּ רֹעַ מַעַלְלֵיכֶם מִנֶּגֶד עֵינָי חִדְלוּ הָרֵעַ."</fn></li> | <li><b>Command</b> – Rid, Ibn Ezra, and Shadal,<fn>This is how Shadal explains the verses in his introduction to the chapter and in his comments to verse 1.  In his discussion of verses 9-10, however, he appears to suggest that Hashem is only giving an analogy to let Yeshayahu know that the people are not going to listen to him.</fn> in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.<fn>Shadal points out that the language of "'<b>אַל</b> תָּבִינוּ" as opposed to "לא תבינו" indicates the imperative form.</fn> Due to the nation's many sins,<fn>Rid, instead, suggests that after so many warnings that went unheeded, Hashem is no longer interested in giving the people the possibility of repenting.  He reads the phrase "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" as if it were written in the past tense:  "I have sent so many prophet for you to listen to, yet you have refused to understand."</fn> the decree of destruction was set, and the people were to be actively prevented from repenting.<fn>For various approaches to the theological question of how Hashem can remove someone's free will and keep them from repenting, see <a href="Hardened Hearts" data-aht="page">Hardened Hearts</a>.</fn> As such, Yeshayahu's task was not be to bring the people back to Hashem, but simply to warn them of the impending destruction.<fn>Indeed, many of Yeshayahu's prophecies simply speak of the nation's sins or impending punishment, without including a call for change. Thus, for instance, Chapters 2-5 decry the people's arrogance, but mainly as a way of introducing their downfall. There are exceptions, however, and in Chapter 1, Yeshayahu clearly calls for the people to repent: "רַחֲצוּ הִזַּכּוּ הָסִירוּ רֹעַ מַעַלְלֵיכֶם מִנֶּגֶד עֵינָי חִדְלוּ הָרֵעַ."</fn></li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
<li><b>Exile of Ten Tribes</b> – According to Rid, the verses refer to the destruction and exile<fn>The words "וְרִחַק י"י אֶת הָאָדָם" imply not only devastation but actual exile.</fn> of the Ten Tribes. Yehuda represents the remaining tenth who is also to be burnt at the hands of Sancheriv, but who will ultimately survive and thrive, "כָּאֵלָה וְכָאַלּוֹן אֲשֶׁר בְּשַׁלֶּכֶת מַצֶּבֶת בָּם זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ".</li> | <li><b>Exile of Ten Tribes</b> – According to Rid, the verses refer to the destruction and exile<fn>The words "וְרִחַק י"י אֶת הָאָדָם" imply not only devastation but actual exile.</fn> of the Ten Tribes. Yehuda represents the remaining tenth who is also to be burnt at the hands of Sancheriv, but who will ultimately survive and thrive, "כָּאֵלָה וְכָאַלּוֹן אֲשֶׁר בְּשַׁלֶּכֶת מַצֶּבֶת בָּם זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ".</li> | ||
<li><b>Exile of Yehuda</b> – Ibn Ezra, in contrast, suggests that the verses refer only to the Southern Kingdom, and speak of the exile of Yehuda itself.  This, though, will only occur after ten kings' reigns (וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה).<fn>He points out that "עֲשִׂרִיָּה" does not mean "a tenth" but rather "ten," comparing the term to the word "שלישיה" in the phrase, "יִהְיֶה יִשְׂרָאֵל שְׁלִישִׁיָּה לְמִצְרַיִם וּלְאַשּׁוּר" (Yeshayahu 19:24). This reading of the verses, however, ignores the phrase "וְ<b>שָׁבָה</b> וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר" which implies that there are two stages of destruction. One could alternatively suggest that the "tenth" refers to those who remained in the land under the rule of Gedalayah, who were then also forced to flee.</fn>  The phrase "זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ"' refers to the returnees from Babylonia.</li> | <li><b>Exile of Yehuda</b> – Ibn Ezra, in contrast, suggests that the verses refer only to the Southern Kingdom, and speak of the exile of Yehuda itself.  This, though, will only occur after ten kings' reigns (וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה).<fn>He points out that "עֲשִׂרִיָּה" does not mean "a tenth" but rather "ten," comparing the term to the word "שלישיה" in the phrase, "יִהְיֶה יִשְׂרָאֵל שְׁלִישִׁיָּה לְמִצְרַיִם וּלְאַשּׁוּר" (Yeshayahu 19:24). This reading of the verses, however, ignores the phrase "וְ<b>שָׁבָה</b> וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר" which implies that there are two stages of destruction. One could alternatively suggest that the "tenth" refers to those who remained in the land under the rule of Gedalayah, who were then also forced to flee.</fn>  The phrase "זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ"' refers to the returnees from Babylonia.</li> | ||
− | <li><b>Destruction in the time of Achaz</b> – Shadal uniquely places the destruction much earlier, in the reign of Achaz, when Yehuda was attacked first by Aram and Yisrael,<fn>Since Shadal assumes that the verses do not speak of exile, he claims that the phrase "'וְרִחַק י"י אֶת הָאָדָם" refers to the fact that the massive devastation left large areas of the land uninhabited, with people being distanced from one another.  He could have alternatively suggested that the phrase refers to the many people taken captive by the invading armies (see Divrei HaYamim II 28).</fn> and then also ("וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר") by the Edomites and Philistines. The holy seed that ultimately survives is Chizkiyahu, who is able to reform the country.<fn>It is this which likely motivates Shadal's reading of the verses.  The other commentators must explain how Hashem can say that the people will continue to refuse to listen to the prophet until exile if there was a religious reformation already in the time of Chizkiyahu.</fn> [According to Shadal, Hashem's initiation message to Yeshayahu refers not to his entire tenure as prophet but only to the first part thereof. He will initially be met with resistance, but not always.]</li> | + | <li><b>Destruction in the time of Achaz</b> – Shadal uniquely places the destruction much earlier, in the reign of Achaz, when Yehuda was attacked first by Aram and Yisrael,<fn>Since Shadal assumes that the verses do not speak of exile, he claims that the phrase "'וְרִחַק י"י אֶת הָאָדָם" refers to the fact that the massive devastation left large areas of the land uninhabited, with people being distanced from one another.  He could have alternatively suggested that the phrase refers to the many people taken captive by the invading armies (see Divrei HaYamim II 28).</fn> and then also ("וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר") by the Edomites and Philistines. The holy seed that ultimately survives is Chizkiyahu, who is able to reform the country.<fn>It is this which likely motivates Shadal's reading of the verses.  The other commentators must explain how Hashem can say that the people will continue to refuse to listen to the prophet until exile if there was a religious reformation already in the time of Chizkiyahu. They might respond that the reformation was short-lived, or only partially successful.</fn> [According to Shadal, Hashem's initiation message to Yeshayahu refers not to his entire tenure as prophet but only to the first part thereof. He will initially be met with resistance, but not always.]</li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>Intended audience of the prophecy</b><ul> | <point><b>Intended audience of the prophecy</b><ul> | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
<point><b>"שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ'</b> – Hashem's words can be understood as either encouragement or a warning to the prophet:<br/> | <point><b>"שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ'</b> – Hashem's words can be understood as either encouragement or a warning to the prophet:<br/> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><b>Encouragement</b> – Hashem explains to Yeshayahu that the reason the people had refused to heed him was because Hashem had hardened their hearts, ensuring that they would hear but not understand.  It was Hashem who was preventing them from repenting. As such, Yeshayahu should not be disappointed by perceived failure at his task.</li> | + | <li><b>Encouragement</b> – Hashem explains to Yeshayahu that the reason the people had refused to heed him was because Hashem had hardened their hearts, ensuring that they would hear but not understand.  It was Hashem who was preventing them from repenting. As such, Yeshayahu should not be disappointed by a perceived failure at his task.</li> |
<li><b>Warning</b> – Hashem warns Yeshayahu that if he re-accepts Hashem's mission, he must do so with the full knowledge that the people are going to continue to refuse to listen.</li> | <li><b>Warning</b> – Hashem warns Yeshayahu that if he re-accepts Hashem's mission, he must do so with the full knowledge that the people are going to continue to refuse to listen.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
<li><b>Moshe</b> – <a href="ShemotRabbah5-19" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah 5:19</a> posits that after Moshe's initial failed meeting with Paroh, he returned to Midyan, suggesting that Moshe, too, "resigned" after an initial failure. Unlike Yeshayahu, Moshe does not receive a second vision of Hashem, but it is possible that Shemot 6 nonetheless represents a renewed call to prophecy, where Hashem repeats the mission previously given him in Shemot 3-4.</li> | <li><b>Moshe</b> – <a href="ShemotRabbah5-19" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah 5:19</a> posits that after Moshe's initial failed meeting with Paroh, he returned to Midyan, suggesting that Moshe, too, "resigned" after an initial failure. Unlike Yeshayahu, Moshe does not receive a second vision of Hashem, but it is possible that Shemot 6 nonetheless represents a renewed call to prophecy, where Hashem repeats the mission previously given him in Shemot 3-4.</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
+ | </opinion> | ||
+ | <opinion>Yeshayahu Unnecessary | ||
+ | <p>Since the people had not forsaken Hashem during the reign of Uziyahu, there was no need for chastisement for much of his rule.</p> | ||
+ | <mekorot>perhaps <multilink><a href="REliezerofBeaugencyYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">R. Eliezer of Beaugency</a><a href="REliezerofBeaugencyYeshayahu1-1" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 1:1</a><a href="REliezerofBeaugencyYeshayahu6" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 6</a><a href="R. Eliezer of Beaugency" data-aht="parshan">About R. Eliezer of Beaugency</a></multilink><fn>R"E of Beaugency merely states that there was a need for Hashem to renew Yeshayahu's prophecy because a significant time had passed since he had last received the Word of Hashem. He does not elaborate on the reason for the break. He does point out, however, that with Uziyahu's death there was once again a need to rebuke the people, leading to the position presented here. [It should be noted that the development of the approach is independent of R"E of Beaugency's commentary.]</fn></mekorot> | ||
+ | <point><b>First prophecies of the book</b> – This position maintains that the book is chronological. The prophecies of chapters 1-5 were relayed during the early part of Uziyahu's reign when the nation sinned in the interpersonal sphere<fn>See <a href="Historical Backdrop of Yeshayahu 1" data-aht="page">Historical Backdrop of Yeshayahu 1</a> for elaboration on the opinion that the chapter refers to the reign of Uziyahu and that it might be limited to rebuke of interpersonal sins.</fn> and were overcome by arrogance.<fn>It is possible that the prosperity which marked Uziyahu's reign gave the people a false sense of their own worth, leading to Yeshayahu's cries against "כׇּל גֵּאֶה וָרָם" in Chapters 2-5.</fn> After Uziyahu was struck with <i>tzara'at </i>for his own conceit, however, the nation learned their lesson and there was no more need for rebuke until the next generation changed its ways.</point> | ||
+ | <point><b>Why re-initiate Yeshayahu specifically now?</b> With the change in ruler to the sinful Achaz<fn>Yotam co-reigned with his father after Uziyahu was struck with<i> tzara'at</i>. It is difficult to know if his entire reign overlapped with that of Uziyahu or not.  If the former, it is possible that since he, too, was a righteous king, Yeshayahu actually did not receive any prophecies during his rule at all, and was first re-initiated when Achaz took the throne.  Alternatively, if Yotam continued to rule on his own after his father's death, it is possible that Yeshayahu was re-initiated at that point, since despite the king's personal righteousness, the people were corrupt. [See Divrei HaYamamm II 27:2 "וַיַּעַשׂ הַיָּשָׁר בְּעֵינֵי י"י... וְעוֹד הָעָם מַשְׁחִיתִים".]</fn> the need for rebuke was renewed and Hashem re-initiated Yeshayahu into prophecy.</point> | ||
+ | <point><b>The vision</b> – Yeshayahu receives a special vision of Hashem since after such a long break, Hashem needed to "reintroduce Himself".  There might be no special significance in the choice of appearing as a king; this might simply be the closest image to Hashem that a human can understand.</point> | ||
+ | <point><b>The punishment</b> – This approach could suggest, like Shadal above, that Hashem refers to the upcoming devastation during the reign of Achaz specifically. Yeshayahu resumed his task with a specific message for the next king.</point> | ||
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
<opinion>Yeshayahu Sinned | <opinion>Yeshayahu Sinned | ||
Line 88: | Line 96: | ||
<point><b>"אֶת מִי אֶשְׁלַח... וָאֹמַר הִנְנִי שְׁלָחֵנִי"</b> – After Yeshayahu is forgiven, he once again receives prophecy.  Yeshayahu volunteers for Hashem's mission to show his willingness to rebuke the people, promising not to defend them (as he had defended Uziyahu) if unwarranted.</point> | <point><b>"אֶת מִי אֶשְׁלַח... וָאֹמַר הִנְנִי שְׁלָחֵנִי"</b> – After Yeshayahu is forgiven, he once again receives prophecy.  Yeshayahu volunteers for Hashem's mission to show his willingness to rebuke the people, promising not to defend them (as he had defended Uziyahu) if unwarranted.</point> | ||
<point><b>The mission: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ"</b> – Abarbanel claims that Hashem never locks the gates of repentance, and that Hashem is simply telling Yeshayahu in advance that the people will refuse to listen and change.</point> | <point><b>The mission: "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ"</b> – Abarbanel claims that Hashem never locks the gates of repentance, and that Hashem is simply telling Yeshayahu in advance that the people will refuse to listen and change.</point> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</opinion> | </opinion> | ||
</category> | </category> |
Version as of 00:58, 13 August 2018
Yeshayahu's Mission in Chapter 6
Exegetical Approaches
Initiation to Prophecy
The chapter describes Yeshayahu's appointment as prophet.
- Relayed later – Shadal posits that though Chapter 6 was the first prophecy that Yeshayahu received, it was only relayed later, after the prophecies of Chapters 2-5.2
- Thematic order preferred – Alternatively, it is possible that thematic order takes precedence over chronological order. Chapters 1-5 describe the nation's sins, while Chapter 6 (through 12) focus on their punishment. When speaking to his contemporaries, Yeshayahu could open with a prophecy of doom since they were well aware of their misdeeds. Yet, when ordering his prophecies for future generations, it made sense for the prophet to begin with the nation's sins, giving the reader background to understand why the decree of destruction was deserved.
- Metaphoric death – Rashi and Rid suggest that the phrase "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the year when Uziyahu was struck with tzara'at and metaphorically died,3 rather than to the year of his actual death. If so, Yeshayahu was initiated in the middle of Uziyahu's reign and prophesied for several years before his death.
- Initiated in the year prior to Uziyahu's death – Ibn Ezra, instead, points out that the verse speaks of the year (not the day) of Uziyahu's death.4 As such, Yeshayahu could have received several months worth of prophecies during Uziyahu's reign.5
- Date of transmission – Finally, Shadal asserts that the opening "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the date that Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy,6 not to the year in which he received it.7
- Description of future – According to Rashi, Hashem was not commanding that Yeshayahu should actively harden the people's hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.11 Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation would refuse to heed his words and repent. At the beginning of the prophet's assignment, Hashem warned Yeshayahu that he was volunteering for a doomed mission.12
- Command – Rid, Ibn Ezra, and Shadal,13 in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.14 Due to the nation's many sins,15 the decree of destruction was set, and the people were to be actively prevented from repenting.16 As such, Yeshayahu's task was not be to bring the people back to Hashem, but simply to warn them of the impending destruction.17
- Exile of Ten Tribes – According to Rid, the verses refer to the destruction and exile18 of the Ten Tribes. Yehuda represents the remaining tenth who is also to be burnt at the hands of Sancheriv, but who will ultimately survive and thrive, "כָּאֵלָה וְכָאַלּוֹן אֲשֶׁר בְּשַׁלֶּכֶת מַצֶּבֶת בָּם זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ".
- Exile of Yehuda – Ibn Ezra, in contrast, suggests that the verses refer only to the Southern Kingdom, and speak of the exile of Yehuda itself. This, though, will only occur after ten kings' reigns (וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה).19 The phrase "זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ"' refers to the returnees from Babylonia.
- Destruction in the time of Achaz – Shadal uniquely places the destruction much earlier, in the reign of Achaz, when Yehuda was attacked first by Aram and Yisrael,20 and then also ("וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר") by the Edomites and Philistines. The holy seed that ultimately survives is Chizkiyahu, who is able to reform the country.21 [According to Shadal, Hashem's initiation message to Yeshayahu refers not to his entire tenure as prophet but only to the first part thereof. He will initially be met with resistance, but not always.]
- According to this approach it is possible that Yeshayahu was never meant to transmit this prophecy to the nation at all, and it was aimed at him alone.22 In fact, the prophecy of destruction at the end might not have been relayed even to Yeshayahu at this stage had it not been for his question "עַד מָתַי".
- Shadal agrees in principle and suggests that for many years Yeshayahu kept the prophecy to himself. Yet, at some point, when the people not only refused to listen but actively mocked him (Yeshayahu 5:18-20), Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy to show them that their refusal to listen was actually preordained, and in fact, part of their punishment.
Unique Mission
Since the prophecy of Chapter 6 sealed the fate of Israel and foretold their exile, it was relayed to Yeshayahu in an exalted fashion, matching the intensity of the mission.
Re-initiation to Prophecy
Yeshayahu's vision of Chapter 6 constitutes a second call to prophecy after a hiatus in which he had not received the word of Hashem. This position divides regarding the reason for the break:
Yeshayahu Resigned
When the nation refused to heed Yeshayahu's words and mocked the punishments he forewarned, Yeshayahu gave up and stopped rebuking the people.
- Encouragement – Hashem explains to Yeshayahu that the reason the people had refused to heed him was because Hashem had hardened their hearts, ensuring that they would hear but not understand. It was Hashem who was preventing them from repenting. As such, Yeshayahu should not be disappointed by a perceived failure at his task.
- Warning – Hashem warns Yeshayahu that if he re-accepts Hashem's mission, he must do so with the full knowledge that the people are going to continue to refuse to listen.
- Eliyahu – According to some opinions, Eliyahu's flight to Chorev marked his desire to stop prophesying. In its aftermath, he, too, receives an elaborate vision of Hashem in which he is re-initiated into prophecy. For elaboration, see Eliyahu at Chorev
- Moshe – Shemot Rabbah 5:19 posits that after Moshe's initial failed meeting with Paroh, he returned to Midyan, suggesting that Moshe, too, "resigned" after an initial failure. Unlike Yeshayahu, Moshe does not receive a second vision of Hashem, but it is possible that Shemot 6 nonetheless represents a renewed call to prophecy, where Hashem repeats the mission previously given him in Shemot 3-4.
Yeshayahu Unnecessary
Since the people had not forsaken Hashem during the reign of Uziyahu, there was no need for chastisement for much of his rule.
Yeshayahu Sinned
When Uziyahu was struck with tzara'at, Yeshayahu was dismayed at the injustice of the punishment. He had thought the king a righteous individual and undeserving of such a fate. This sinful doubting of Hashem's justice precluded him from receiving further prophecy.