Difference between revisions of "Yeshayahu's Mission in Chapter 6/2"
m |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<h2>Overview</h2> | <h2>Overview</h2> | ||
<p>Commentators debate the nature of the prophecy of Yeshayahu 6 and why Yeshayahu merited specifically now to see a vision of Hashem. Many sources maintain that the chapter describes Yeshayahu's appointment as prophet, where he received his overall mission. Yet, as this necessitates positing achronology in the book, others disagree and date the prophecy to later in Yeshayahu's career.</p> | <p>Commentators debate the nature of the prophecy of Yeshayahu 6 and why Yeshayahu merited specifically now to see a vision of Hashem. Many sources maintain that the chapter describes Yeshayahu's appointment as prophet, where he received his overall mission. Yet, as this necessitates positing achronology in the book, others disagree and date the prophecy to later in Yeshayahu's career.</p> | ||
− | <p>Abarbanel suggests that the unique revelation might relate to the nature of the task that Yeshayahu received. Yeshayahu was told | + | <p>Abarbanel suggests that the unique revelation might relate to the nature of the task that Yeshayahu received. Yeshayahu was told that the fate of the Ten Tribes was sealed and that they were soon to be exiled. Such distressing news merited an awesome introductory vision. A final position posits that the prophecy constitutes a re-initiation into prophecy, either because Yeshayahu had previously attempted to resign, had sinned, or more simply, because significant time had elapsed during which no rebuke had been necessary.</p></div> |
<approaches> | <approaches> | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><b>Description of future</b> – According to Rashi, Hashem was not commanding that Yeshayahu should actively harden the people's hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.<fn>He apparently reads the verb "הַשְׁמֵן"' as an infinitive absolute (שם הפועל), indicative of a continuous process, explaining that Hashem is saying: "לבם הולך הלוך והשמן".</fn> Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation would refuse to heed his words and repent.  At the beginning of the prophet's assignment, Hashem warned Yeshayahu that he was volunteering for a doomed mission.<fn>See Shadal who writes, "‎והכוונה אם תרצה ללכת בשליחותי, על מנת כן צריך אתה ללכת, על מנת שלא ישמעו אליך".</fn></li> | <li><b>Description of future</b> – According to Rashi, Hashem was not commanding that Yeshayahu should actively harden the people's hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.<fn>He apparently reads the verb "הַשְׁמֵן"' as an infinitive absolute (שם הפועל), indicative of a continuous process, explaining that Hashem is saying: "לבם הולך הלוך והשמן".</fn> Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation would refuse to heed his words and repent.  At the beginning of the prophet's assignment, Hashem warned Yeshayahu that he was volunteering for a doomed mission.<fn>See Shadal who writes, "‎והכוונה אם תרצה ללכת בשליחותי, על מנת כן צריך אתה ללכת, על מנת שלא ישמעו אליך".</fn></li> | ||
− | <li><b>Command</b> – Rid, Ibn Ezra, and Shadal,<fn>This is how Shadal explains the verses in his introduction to the chapter and in his comments to verse 1.  In his discussion of verses 9-10, however, he appears to suggest that Hashem is only giving an analogy to let Yeshayahu know that the people are not going to listen to him.</fn> in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.<fn>Shadal points out that the language of "'<b>אַל</b> תָּבִינוּ" as opposed to "לא תבינו" indicates the imperative form.</fn> Due to the nation's many sins,<fn>Rid, instead, suggests that after so many warnings that went unheeded, Hashem is no longer interested in giving the people the possibility of repenting.  He reads the phrase "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" as if it were written in the past tense:  "I have sent so many prophet for you to listen to, yet you have refused to understand."</fn> the decree of destruction was set, and the people were to be actively prevented from repenting.<fn>For various approaches to the theological question of how Hashem can remove someone's free will and keep them from repenting, see <a href="Hardened Hearts" data-aht="page">Hardened Hearts</a>.</fn> As such, Yeshayahu's task was not | + | <li><b>Command</b> – Rid, Ibn Ezra, and Shadal,<fn>This is how Shadal explains the verses in his introduction to the chapter and in his comments to verse 1.  In his discussion of verses 9-10, however, he appears to suggest that Hashem is only giving an analogy to let Yeshayahu know that the people are not going to listen to him.</fn> in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.<fn>Shadal points out that the language of "'<b>אַל</b> תָּבִינוּ" as opposed to "לא תבינו" indicates the imperative form.</fn> Due to the nation's many sins,<fn>Rid, instead, suggests that after so many warnings that went unheeded, Hashem is no longer interested in giving the people the possibility of repenting.  He reads the phrase "שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" as if it were written in the past tense:  "I have sent so many prophet for you to listen to, yet you have refused to understand."</fn> the decree of destruction was set, and the people were to be actively prevented from repenting.<fn>For various approaches to the theological question of how Hashem can remove someone's free will and keep them from repenting, see <a href="Hardened Hearts" data-aht="page">Hardened Hearts</a>.</fn> As such, Yeshayahu's task was not to bring the people back to Hashem, but simply to warn them of the impending destruction.<fn>Indeed, many of Yeshayahu's prophecies simply speak of the nation's sins or impending punishment, without including a call for change. Thus, for instance, Chapters 2-5 decry the people's arrogance, but mainly as a way of introducing their downfall. There are exceptions, however, and in Chapter 1, Yeshayahu clearly calls for the people to repent: "רַחֲצוּ הִזַּכּוּ הָסִירוּ רֹעַ מַעַלְלֵיכֶם מִנֶּגֶד עֵינָי חִדְלוּ הָרֵעַ."</fn></li> |
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
<point><b>"עַד אֲשֶׁר אִם שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב... וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה"</b> – These sources disagree regarding both the context of the initial destruction and the identity of the "tenth" who will secondarily be consumed.<br/> | <point><b>"עַד אֲשֶׁר אִם שָׁאוּ עָרִים מֵאֵין יוֹשֵׁב... וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה"</b> – These sources disagree regarding both the context of the initial destruction and the identity of the "tenth" who will secondarily be consumed.<br/> | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
<li><b>Destruction in the time of Achaz</b> – Shadal uniquely places the destruction much earlier, in the reign of Achaz, when Yehuda was attacked first by Aram and Yisrael,<fn>Since Shadal assumes that the verses do not speak of exile, he claims that the phrase "'וְרִחַק י"י אֶת הָאָדָם" refers to the fact that the massive devastation left large areas of the land uninhabited, with people being distanced from one another.  He could have alternatively suggested that the phrase refers to the many people taken captive by the invading armies (see Divrei HaYamim II 28).</fn> and then also ("וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר") by the Edomites and Philistines. The holy seed that ultimately survives is Chizkiyahu, who is able to reform the country.<fn>It is this which likely motivates Shadal's reading of the verses.  The other commentators must explain how Hashem can say that the people will continue to refuse to listen to the prophet until exile if there was a religious reformation already in the time of Chizkiyahu. They might respond that the reformation was short-lived, or only partially successful.</fn> [According to Shadal, Hashem's initiation message to Yeshayahu refers not to his entire tenure as prophet but only to the first part thereof. He will initially be met with resistance, but not always.]</li> | <li><b>Destruction in the time of Achaz</b> – Shadal uniquely places the destruction much earlier, in the reign of Achaz, when Yehuda was attacked first by Aram and Yisrael,<fn>Since Shadal assumes that the verses do not speak of exile, he claims that the phrase "'וְרִחַק י"י אֶת הָאָדָם" refers to the fact that the massive devastation left large areas of the land uninhabited, with people being distanced from one another.  He could have alternatively suggested that the phrase refers to the many people taken captive by the invading armies (see Divrei HaYamim II 28).</fn> and then also ("וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר") by the Edomites and Philistines. The holy seed that ultimately survives is Chizkiyahu, who is able to reform the country.<fn>It is this which likely motivates Shadal's reading of the verses.  The other commentators must explain how Hashem can say that the people will continue to refuse to listen to the prophet until exile if there was a religious reformation already in the time of Chizkiyahu. They might respond that the reformation was short-lived, or only partially successful.</fn> [According to Shadal, Hashem's initiation message to Yeshayahu refers not to his entire tenure as prophet but only to the first part thereof. He will initially be met with resistance, but not always.]</li> | ||
</ul></point> | </ul></point> | ||
− | <point><b>Intended audience of the prophecy</b> | + | <point><b>Intended audience of the prophecy</b> – According to this approach it is possible that Yeshayahu was never meant to transmit this prophecy to the nation at all, and it was aimed at him alone.<fn>If so, Hashem's words "וַיֹּאמֶר<b> לֵךְ וְאָמַרְתָּ לָעָם</b> הַזֶּה שִׁמְעוּ שָׁמוֹעַ וְאַל תָּבִינוּ" are not meant to be taken literally as a command to actively relay this message to the people, but are simply Hashem's way of telling the prophet that the people will refuse to listen (or will be actively prevented from doing so).</fn>  In fact, the prophecy of destruction at the end might not have been relayed even to Yeshayahu at this stage had it not been for his question "עַד מָתַי".‎<fn>Shadal suggests that for many years Yeshayahu did, in fact, keep the prophecy to himself.  Yet, at some point, when the people not only refused to listen but actively mocked him (<a href="Yeshayahu5-18-20" data-aht="source">Yeshayahu 5:18-20</a>), Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy to show them that their refusal to listen was actually preordained, and in fact, part of their punishment.</fn>   </point> |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<point><b>Biblical Parallels</b></point> | <point><b>Biblical Parallels</b></point> | ||
</category> | </category> |
Version as of 02:20, 24 August 2018
Yeshayahu's Mission in Chapter 6
Exegetical Approaches
Overview
Commentators debate the nature of the prophecy of Yeshayahu 6 and why Yeshayahu merited specifically now to see a vision of Hashem. Many sources maintain that the chapter describes Yeshayahu's appointment as prophet, where he received his overall mission. Yet, as this necessitates positing achronology in the book, others disagree and date the prophecy to later in Yeshayahu's career.
Abarbanel suggests that the unique revelation might relate to the nature of the task that Yeshayahu received. Yeshayahu was told that the fate of the Ten Tribes was sealed and that they were soon to be exiled. Such distressing news merited an awesome introductory vision. A final position posits that the prophecy constitutes a re-initiation into prophecy, either because Yeshayahu had previously attempted to resign, had sinned, or more simply, because significant time had elapsed during which no rebuke had been necessary.
Initiation to Prophecy
The chapter describes Yeshayahu's appointment as prophet.
- Relayed later – Shadal posits that though Chapter 6 was the first prophecy that Yeshayahu received, it was only relayed later, after the prophecies of Chapters 2-5.2
- Thematic order preferred – Alternatively, it is possible that thematic order takes precedence over chronological order. Chapters 1-5 describe the nation's sins, while Chapter 6 (through 12) focus on their punishment. When speaking to his contemporaries, Yeshayahu could open with a prophecy of doom since they were well aware of their misdeeds. Yet, when ordering his prophecies for future generations, it made sense for the prophet to begin with the nation's sins, giving the reader background to understand why the decree of destruction was deserved.
- Metaphoric death – Rashi and Rid suggest that the phrase "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the year when Uziyahu was struck with tzara'at and metaphorically died,3 rather than to the year of his actual death. If so, Yeshayahu was initiated in the middle of Uziyahu's reign and prophesied for several years before his death.
- Initiated in the year prior to Uziyahu's death – Ibn Ezra, instead, points out that the verse speaks of the year (not the day) of Uziyahu's death.4 As such, Yeshayahu could have received several months worth of prophecies during Uziyahu's reign.5
- Date of transmission – Finally, Shadal asserts that the opening "בִּשְׁנַת מוֹת הַמֶּלֶךְ עֻזִּיָּהוּ" refers to the date that Yeshayahu relayed the prophecy,6 not to the year in which he received it.7
- Description of future – According to Rashi, Hashem was not commanding that Yeshayahu should actively harden the people's hearts, but simply sharing what will happen in the future.11 Despite all of Yeshayahu's chastisements, the nation would refuse to heed his words and repent. At the beginning of the prophet's assignment, Hashem warned Yeshayahu that he was volunteering for a doomed mission.12
- Command – Rid, Ibn Ezra, and Shadal,13 in contrast, explain that these words constitute a command.14 Due to the nation's many sins,15 the decree of destruction was set, and the people were to be actively prevented from repenting.16 As such, Yeshayahu's task was not to bring the people back to Hashem, but simply to warn them of the impending destruction.17
- Exile of Ten Tribes – According to Rid, the verses refer to the destruction and exile18 of the Ten Tribes. Yehuda represents the remaining tenth who is also to be burnt at the hands of Sancheriv, but who will ultimately survive and thrive, "כָּאֵלָה וְכָאַלּוֹן אֲשֶׁר בְּשַׁלֶּכֶת מַצֶּבֶת בָּם זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ".
- Exile of Yehuda – Ibn Ezra, in contrast, suggests that the verses refer only to the Southern Kingdom, and speak of the exile of Yehuda itself. This, though, will only occur after ten kings' reigns (וְעוֹד בָּהּ עֲשִׂרִיָּה).19 The phrase "זֶרַע קֹדֶשׁ מַצַּבְתָּהּ"' refers to the returnees from Babylonia.
- Destruction in the time of Achaz – Shadal uniquely places the destruction much earlier, in the reign of Achaz, when Yehuda was attacked first by Aram and Yisrael,20 and then also ("וְשָׁבָה וְהָיְתָה לְבָעֵר") by the Edomites and Philistines. The holy seed that ultimately survives is Chizkiyahu, who is able to reform the country.21 [According to Shadal, Hashem's initiation message to Yeshayahu refers not to his entire tenure as prophet but only to the first part thereof. He will initially be met with resistance, but not always.]
Unique Mission
Since the prophecy of Chapter 6 sealed the fate of Israel and foretold their exile, it was relayed to Yeshayahu in an exalted fashion, matching the intensity of the mission.
Re-initiation to Prophecy
Yeshayahu's vision of Chapter 6 constitutes a second call to prophecy after a hiatus in which he had not received the word of Hashem. This position divides regarding the reason for the break:
Yeshayahu Resigned
When the nation refused to heed Yeshayahu's words and mocked the punishments he forewarned, Yeshayahu gave up and stopped rebuking the people.
- Encouragement – Hashem explains to Yeshayahu that the reason the people had refused to heed him was because Hashem had hardened their hearts, ensuring that they would hear but not understand. It was Hashem who was preventing them from repenting. As such, Yeshayahu should not be disappointed by a perceived failure at his task.
- Warning – Hashem warns Yeshayahu that if he re-accepts Hashem's mission, he must do so with the full knowledge that the people are going to continue to refuse to listen.
- Eliyahu – According to some opinions, Eliyahu's flight to Chorev marked his desire to stop prophesying. In its aftermath, he, too, receives an elaborate vision of Hashem in which he is re-initiated into prophecy. For elaboration, see Eliyahu at Chorev
- Moshe – Shemot Rabbah 5:19 posits that after Moshe's initial failed meeting with Paroh, he returned to Midyan, suggesting that Moshe, too, "resigned" after an initial failure. Unlike Yeshayahu, Moshe does not receive a second vision of Hashem, but it is possible that Shemot 6 nonetheless represents a renewed call to prophecy, where Hashem repeats the mission previously given him in Shemot 3-4.
Yeshayahu Sinned
When Uziyahu was struck with tzara'at, Yeshayahu was dismayed at the injustice of the punishment. He had thought the king a righteous individual and undeserving of such a fate. This sinful doubting of Hashem's justice precluded him from receiving further prophecy.
Yeshayahu Unnecessary
Since the people had not forsaken Hashem during the reign of Uziyahu, there was no need for chastisement for much of his rule.