Difference between revisions of "Yitro/0"

From AlHaTorah.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Import script)
(Import script)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
<h3>Positive</h3>
 
<h3>Positive</h3>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
<li>R. Avraham Saba in his <multilink><a href="Tzeror18" data-aht="source">Tzeror HaMor</a><a href="Tzeror18" data-aht="source">Shemot 18</a><a href="R. Avraham Saba" data-aht="parshan">About Tzeror HaMor</a></multilink> depicts Yitro as the antithesis of Amalek and a symbol of justice, truth, and peace.  He adds that Yitro came in order to convert,<fn>He follows Midrash in both this regard and in extoling the virtues of Yitro's descendants.</fn> and that his advice demonstrated great wisdom and Divine inspiration.</li>
+
<li>R. Avraham Saba in his <multilink><a href="Tzeror18" data-aht="source">Tzeror HaMor</a><a href="Tzeror18" data-aht="source">Shemot 18</a><a href="R. Avraham Saba (Tzeror HaMor)" data-aht="parshan">About Tzeror HaMor</a></multilink> depicts Yitro as the antithesis of Amalek and a symbol of justice, truth, and peace.  He adds that Yitro came in order to convert,<fn>He follows Midrash in both this regard and in extoling the virtues of Yitro's descendants.</fn> and that his advice demonstrated great wisdom and Divine inspiration.</li>
<li>R. Yitzchak Arama in his <multilink><a href="Akeidat43" data-aht="source">Akeidat Yitzchak</a><a href="Akeidat43" data-aht="source">43</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Arama (Akeidat Yitzchak)" data-aht="parshan">About Akeidat Yitzchak</a></multilink> presents a uniformly flattering portrayal of Yitro.  He praises Yitro for both the fine character reflected in his bringing Zipporah back to Moshe and the intellect displayed in his sagacious advice to Moshe.  The Akeidat Yitzchak does not address the question of whether Yitro converted, but in his commentary on Bemidbar (Chapter 72) he suggests that after Yitro departed he returned and remained with the Jewish people.</li>
+
<li>R. Yitzchak Arama in his <multilink><a href="Akeidat43" data-aht="source">Akeidat Yitzchak</a><a href="Akeidat43" data-aht="source">43</a><a href="R. Yitzchak Arama (Akeidat Yitzchak)" data-aht="parshan">About Akeidat Yitzchak</a></multilink> presents a uniformly flattering portrayal of Yitro.  He praises Yitro for both the fine character reflected in his bringing Zipporah back to Moshe and the intellect displayed in his sagacious advice to Moshe.  The Akeidat Yitzchak does not address the question of whether Yitro converted, but in his commentary on Bemidbar (Chapter 72) he suggests that after Yitro departed he returned and remained with the Children of Israel.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
<h3>Negative</h3>
 
<h3>Negative</h3>
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li><multilink><a href="Philo" data-aht="parshan">Philo</a><a href="PhiloNamesXVII" data-aht="source">On the Change of Names XVII:103</a><a href="PhiloDrunkennessX" data-aht="source">On Drunkenness X-XI:36-45</a><a href="PhiloLawsIV" data-aht="source">The Special Laws IV:XXXIII:173-175</a><a href="Philo" data-aht="parshan">About Philo</a></multilink>'s portrayal of Yitro is extremely negative.<fn>See Prof. Louis Feldman's analysis in Studies in Josephus's Rewritten Bible pp.38-54.</fn>  In <a href="PhiloNamesXVII" data-aht="source">On the Change of Names</a>, he writes how Yitro's name symbolizes superfluousness and pride.  Similarly, in <a href="PhiloDrunkennessX" data-aht="source">On Drunkenness</a> he criticizes Yitro's advice saying that Yitro in his arrogance "proposes laws contrary to those of nature."<fn>Abarbanel also views Yitro's proposal as incompatible with the Torah's system of justice and as reflecting Yitro's misunderstandings, but he is not critical of Yitro's character – see <a href="Did Moshe Need Yitro's Advice" data-aht="page">Did Moshe Need Yitro's Advice</a>.</fn>  Philo even attempts to cast even Yitro's recognition of Hashem's might in Shemot 18:12 as an offensive comparison of Hashem to other gods.<fn>On the other hand, in <a href="PhiloNamesXVII" data-aht="source">On the Change of Names</a> Philo also says that the name Reuel has a positive meaning ("shepherd of God"), and in <a href="PhiloLawsIV" data-aht="source">The Special Laws IV</a> he praises Yitro's proposal.</fn></li>
 
<li><multilink><a href="Philo" data-aht="parshan">Philo</a><a href="PhiloNamesXVII" data-aht="source">On the Change of Names XVII:103</a><a href="PhiloDrunkennessX" data-aht="source">On Drunkenness X-XI:36-45</a><a href="PhiloLawsIV" data-aht="source">The Special Laws IV:XXXIII:173-175</a><a href="Philo" data-aht="parshan">About Philo</a></multilink>'s portrayal of Yitro is extremely negative.<fn>See Prof. Louis Feldman's analysis in Studies in Josephus's Rewritten Bible pp.38-54.</fn>  In <a href="PhiloNamesXVII" data-aht="source">On the Change of Names</a>, he writes how Yitro's name symbolizes superfluousness and pride.  Similarly, in <a href="PhiloDrunkennessX" data-aht="source">On Drunkenness</a> he criticizes Yitro's advice saying that Yitro in his arrogance "proposes laws contrary to those of nature."<fn>Abarbanel also views Yitro's proposal as incompatible with the Torah's system of justice and as reflecting Yitro's misunderstandings, but he is not critical of Yitro's character – see <a href="Did Moshe Need Yitro's Advice" data-aht="page">Did Moshe Need Yitro's Advice</a>.</fn>  Philo even attempts to cast even Yitro's recognition of Hashem's might in Shemot 18:12 as an offensive comparison of Hashem to other gods.<fn>On the other hand, in <a href="PhiloNamesXVII" data-aht="source">On the Change of Names</a> Philo also says that the name Reuel has a positive meaning ("shepherd of God"), and in <a href="PhiloLawsIV" data-aht="source">The Special Laws IV</a> he praises Yitro's proposal.</fn></li>
<li>Some Midrashim – <multilink><a href="TanchumaYitro3" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaYitro3" data-aht="source">Yitro 3</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink> and Tanchuma Buber Yitro 2-4 read Yitro (with Amalek) into the verse in Mishlei 19:25 "Flog a scoffer, and the simple will become prudent," thus portraying Yitro in an unflattering light.  <multilink><a href="ShemotRabbah27-6" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah</a><a href="ShemotRabbah27-6" data-aht="source">27:6</a><a href="Shemot Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shemot Rabbah</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="MidrashShemuel12" data-aht="source">Midrash Shemuel</a><a href="MidrashShemuel12" data-aht="source">12:2</a><a href="Midrash Shemuel" data-aht="parshan">About Midrash Shemuel</a></multilink> take this even further, deepening Yitro's relationship with the enemies of the Jewish people.  See <a href="Yitro and Amalek" data-aht="page">Yitro and Amalek</a> for more.</li>
+
<li>Some Midrashim – <multilink><a href="TanchumaYitro3" data-aht="source">Tanchuma</a><a href="TanchumaYitro3" data-aht="source">Yitro 3</a><a href="Tanchuma" data-aht="parshan">About the Tanchuma</a></multilink> and Tanchuma Buber Yitro 2-4 read Yitro (with Amalek) into the verse in Mishlei 19:25 "Flog a scoffer, and the simple will become prudent," thus portraying Yitro in an unflattering light.  <multilink><a href="ShemotRabbah27-6" data-aht="source">Shemot Rabbah</a><a href="ShemotRabbah27-6" data-aht="source">27:6</a><a href="Shemot Rabbah" data-aht="parshan">About Shemot Rabbah</a></multilink> and <multilink><a href="MidrashShemuel12" data-aht="source">Midrash Shemuel</a><a href="MidrashShemuel12" data-aht="source">12:2</a><a href="Midrash Shemuel" data-aht="parshan">About Midrash Shemuel</a></multilink> take this even further, deepening Yitro's relationship with the enemies of the Children of Israel.  See <a href="Yitro and Amalek" data-aht="page">Yitro and Amalek</a> for more.</li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
  

Latest revision as of 16:49, 14 February 2015

Yitro – Overview

Contrasting Portraits

From the wide ranging body of commentary on these topics we can find exegetes who sketch two opposite composite portraits of Yitro:

Positive

  • R. Avraham Saba in his Tzeror HaMorShemot 18About Tzeror HaMor depicts Yitro as the antithesis of Amalek and a symbol of justice, truth, and peace. He adds that Yitro came in order to convert,1 and that his advice demonstrated great wisdom and Divine inspiration.
  • R. Yitzchak Arama in his Akeidat Yitzchak43About Akeidat Yitzchak presents a uniformly flattering portrayal of Yitro. He praises Yitro for both the fine character reflected in his bringing Zipporah back to Moshe and the intellect displayed in his sagacious advice to Moshe. The Akeidat Yitzchak does not address the question of whether Yitro converted, but in his commentary on Bemidbar (Chapter 72) he suggests that after Yitro departed he returned and remained with the Children of Israel.

Negative

Related Topics

An analysis of the personality of Yitro is related to the following topics:

Click here to proceed to Yitro's Religious Identity.