Difference between revisions of "Yitro – Religious Identity/1"
(Original Author: Ariella Novetsky, Rabbi Hillel Novetsky) |
(Original Author: Ariella Novetsky, Rabbi Hillel Novetsky) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<h2>Gentiles in Tanakh</h2> | <h2>Gentiles in Tanakh</h2> | ||
− | <p>Most Gentiles in Tanakh are portrayed in a negative light either because of their idolatry or their treatment of the | + | <p>Most Gentiles in Tanakh are portrayed in a negative light either because of their idolatry or their treatment of the Children of Israel (and in many cases, both). Yitro, though, is a member of a select group of Biblical characters who are ostensibly Gentiles, but are nonetheless favorably disposed toward the Israelites. For a number of these individuals, including Yitro, their bonding with the Children of Israel is also accompanied by a profession of belief in the God of Israel.<fn>See Malkizedek, Yitro, Rachav, Rut, Queen of Sheba, Na'aman, and <a href="Encounters with Foreign Leaders" data-aht="page">Encounters with Foreign Leaders</a> for elaboration.</fn> It is thus not surprising that some Midrashim go one step further in adopting them either as converts to Judaism,<fn>For example: Paroh's daughter (Bityah – see Divrei HaYamim I 4:18 and Bavli Sotah 12b), Rachav (Sifre Bemidbar 78, Bavli Zevachim 116b), Rut (Sifre Bemidbar 78, Bavli Yevamot 47b, Rut Rabbah 2:22), and Queen of Sheba (Shemot Rabbah 27:4), and see the list compiled in <multilink><a href="MidrashTadshe21" data-aht="source">Midrash Tadshe</a><a href="MidrashTadshe21" data-aht="source">21</a><a href="Midrash Tadshe" data-aht="parshan">About Midrash Tadshe</a></multilink> and Yalkut Shimoni Yehoshua 9. See also the image presented in <a href="YerushalmiBerakhot" data-aht="source">Yerushalmi Berakhot 2:8</a> of Hashem bringing the righteous of the world to Judaism.</fn> or in some cases even claiming that they were always Jewish or proto-Jewish.<fn>Such as Malkizedek (Bereshit Rabbah 56:10), Tamar (Bereshit Rabbah 85:10), and the midwives of Egypt (Bavli Sotah 11b).</fn> See <a href="Commentators:Midrash/Gentiles" data-aht="page">Midrash</a> for elaboration.</p> |
<h2><i>Kohen Midyan</i></h2> | <h2><i>Kohen Midyan</i></h2> | ||
− | <p>What is distinctive about Yitro, though, is that he is introduced in both Shemot 3:1 and 18:1 as a "<i>kohen Midyan</i>," seemingly indicating that he was a pagan priest – see <a href="Dictionary:כֹּהֵן" class="transliterate">kohen</a>. This causes commentators to wrestle with how to reconcile Yitro's apparent vocation with his positive character and religious declaration of faith in Hashem.</p> | + | <p>What is distinctive about Yitro, though, is that he is introduced in both Shemot 3:1 and 18:1 as a "<i>kohen Midyan</i>," seemingly indicating that he was a pagan priest – see <a href="Dictionary:כֹּהֵן" data-aht="page" class="transliterate">kohen</a>. This causes commentators to wrestle with how to reconcile Yitro's apparent vocation with his positive character and religious declaration of faith in Hashem.</p> |
<h2><i>Choten Moshe</i></h2> | <h2><i>Choten Moshe</i></h2> | ||
− | <p>The question of Yitro's religious beliefs is further complicated by the fact that he is also "<i>choten Moshe</i>" through Moshe's marriage to Zipporah.<fn>See < | + | <p>The question of Yitro's religious beliefs is further complicated by the fact that he is also "<i>choten Moshe</i>" through Moshe's marriage to Zipporah.<fn>See <a href="Dictionary:חֹתֵן – חֹתֶנֶת" data-aht="page"><i>choten</i></a> and <a href="Yitro – Names" data-aht="page">Who is Yitro</a>.</fn> Of course, this is not the only Biblical case in which Israelite leaders apparently intermarry.<fn>Some commentators attempt to address this issue by positing that all of these wives converted or came from monotheistic families – see <a href="$">here</a>. Examples are the cases of Tamar, Shaul ben HaKena'anit, Asenat, Shimshon's wives, and Shelomo's wives.</fn> However, in the case at hand, we are speaking not of any leader, but of Moshe, the giver of the Torah. Is it conceivable that Moshe, the "man of God," married into the family of an idolatrous priest?</p> |
<h2>Yitro's Descendants</h2> | <h2>Yitro's Descendants</h2> | ||
− | <p>Finally, the aftermath of the Yitro story and what ultimately happened to him and his descendants also impacts on our analysis. If Yitro were monotheistic or had converted to Judaism, it is likely that he and his descendants would have remained with the | + | <p>Finally, the aftermath of the Yitro story and what ultimately happened to him and his descendants also impacts on our analysis. If Yitro were monotheistic or had converted to Judaism, it is likely that he and his descendants would have remained with the Children of Israel. However, the Biblical record is ambiguous regarding whether this occurred. In Shemot 18, Yitro departs for his own land, but it is unclear if he ever returned – see Who is Yitro and Chronology of Shemot 18. Yitro's descendants, the Keinites, are mentioned in Shofteim 1:16 and 4:11,17, as well as Shemuel I 15:6, however, their relationships with Israel and its enemies are somewhat complex. The Reikhavites, another possibly related group, make cameo appearances in Melakhim II 10 and Yirmeyahu 35, but their connection to Yitro is disputed.</p> |
<h2>Summary</h2> | <h2>Summary</h2> |
Latest revision as of 11:51, 25 January 2015
Yitro's Religious Identity
Introduction
Gentiles in Tanakh
Most Gentiles in Tanakh are portrayed in a negative light either because of their idolatry or their treatment of the Children of Israel (and in many cases, both). Yitro, though, is a member of a select group of Biblical characters who are ostensibly Gentiles, but are nonetheless favorably disposed toward the Israelites. For a number of these individuals, including Yitro, their bonding with the Children of Israel is also accompanied by a profession of belief in the God of Israel.1 It is thus not surprising that some Midrashim go one step further in adopting them either as converts to Judaism,2 or in some cases even claiming that they were always Jewish or proto-Jewish.3 See Midrash for elaboration.
Kohen Midyan
What is distinctive about Yitro, though, is that he is introduced in both Shemot 3:1 and 18:1 as a "kohen Midyan," seemingly indicating that he was a pagan priest – see kohen. This causes commentators to wrestle with how to reconcile Yitro's apparent vocation with his positive character and religious declaration of faith in Hashem.
Choten Moshe
The question of Yitro's religious beliefs is further complicated by the fact that he is also "choten Moshe" through Moshe's marriage to Zipporah.4 Of course, this is not the only Biblical case in which Israelite leaders apparently intermarry.5 However, in the case at hand, we are speaking not of any leader, but of Moshe, the giver of the Torah. Is it conceivable that Moshe, the "man of God," married into the family of an idolatrous priest?
Yitro's Descendants
Finally, the aftermath of the Yitro story and what ultimately happened to him and his descendants also impacts on our analysis. If Yitro were monotheistic or had converted to Judaism, it is likely that he and his descendants would have remained with the Children of Israel. However, the Biblical record is ambiguous regarding whether this occurred. In Shemot 18, Yitro departs for his own land, but it is unclear if he ever returned – see Who is Yitro and Chronology of Shemot 18. Yitro's descendants, the Keinites, are mentioned in Shofteim 1:16 and 4:11,17, as well as Shemuel I 15:6, however, their relationships with Israel and its enemies are somewhat complex. The Reikhavites, another possibly related group, make cameo appearances in Melakhim II 10 and Yirmeyahu 35, but their connection to Yitro is disputed.
Summary
All of these issues cause exegetes to debate whether Yitro believed in Hashem or in pagan gods or both, either simultaneously or at different stages of his life. Those who suggest that Yitro's religious beliefs may have changed over time also need to consider when and why did this happen? In the exegetical approaches section we will examine the various positions on these issues.